Search

» » Powrót do krainy Oz (1985)

Short summary

Dorothy Gale has recently come home to Kansas from the Land of Oz is now almost back to perfect health since the incident of the tornado, only she cannot get that wonderful place out of her head. She frequently talks about it and cannot get any sleep at night. Aunt Em worries about her health/well-being. Thinking that she is suffering delusional depression and acute insomnia, she decides to take her to see a special doctor in another town. While he tries to treat her with electro-shock treatment and take those nasty dreams away from her head, she is rescued by a mysterious girl who leads her back to Oz for a new adventure.

Fairuza Balk actually performed most of the film barefoot, as she found her black shoes uncomfortable, and the ruby slippers were very fragile and easily damaged. Thus, the actress only wore shoes when they would be visible on camera.

A gymnast, Michael Sundin, stood upside-down (with legs bent) and backwards inside Tik-Tok's body to move the legs.

Fairuza Balk's ruby slippers were specially handmade with imitation rubies and rotoscoped in post-production to give them a magical look. The rubies were actually glass beads imported from Austria and individually attached to the shoes with a special spray adhesive. This later proved problematic, as the hot stage lights melted the adhesive, and the young actress' fidgety movements would often knock the beads off. Tired of chasing after detached beads, the wardrobe staff finally ordered the shoes to be worn only when visible on camera. Balk confirmed to a fan, via Twitter in September of 2017, that she got to keep one pair of the ruby slippers she wore in the film.

In order to include the ruby slippers as part of this film, Disney had to pay royalties to MGM, the studio which had produced Der Zauberer von Oz (1939). The ruby slippers did not appear in the original novel "The Wonderful Wizard of Oz"; they were invented for the 1939 film to better take advantage of the newly developed Technicolor process. Interestingly enough, in "The Wonderful Wizard of Oz," Dorothy wore a pair of magical silver shoes which were actually destroyed when she used them to return to Kansas. In the subsequent novel "Ozma of Oz," one of the books on which this film is based, Dorothy and her friends meet the Nome King who possesses a magical belt with properties similar to those of the silver shoes. Early drafts of the script for Return to Oz reflect this, with the Nome King possessing a magical ruby belt which had been created from the ruby slippers.

The film received a mention in the Guinness Book of World Records as the sequel that was made the longest period of time after the original - it was released 46 years after Der Zauberer von Oz (1939). Bambi 2 broke that record in 2006, releasing 64 years after the original.

Director Walter Murch invited friend George Lucas to visit the set one day. During that visit Lucas wandered to different sound stages where he came across producer Rick McCallum working on a small film. The two became friends and later collaborated on the "Star Wars" prequels.

The movie is based on the second and third Oz books: "The Marvelous Land of Oz" and "Ozma of Oz". Elements from the former include the introduction of Jack Pumpkinhead, the witch Mombi and her powder of life, the conquest of the Emerald City, the escape by flying sofa, and the search for Princess Ozma. From the latter comes the return of Dorothy, the talking chicken Billina, the wheelers, the discovery of Tick-Tock, a princess with interchangeable heads, the introduction of the Nome King, and the ornament room.

Walter Murch never intended for this film to be viewed as a direct sequel to Der Zauberer von Oz (1939); rather, he intended it as a partial sequel with some direct references (the ruby slippers, actors playing characters in Oz and the "real world") but in closer similarity to the Oz novels (the appearance of the Oz characters, Oz being a real place as opposed to a dream). The misconception that the film was ever meant to emulate the MGM musical probably contributed to its failure at the box office.

Directorial debut of known editor Walter Murch. As of 2015, it remains as the only film he ever directed.

The first film to use the Walt Disney Pictures logo with the rainbow going over the blue castle.

Christopher Lloyd and Tim Curry were considered to play the Nome King, while Louise Fletcher, Teri Garr, and Mary Steenburgen were considered to play Princess Mombi. Disney regular of the 70s Don Knotts was considered to voice Billina and former Disney regular of the 60s Dick Van Dyke was considered to voice either Jack Pumpkinhead or the Scarecrow.

Emma Ridley (Ozma) was dubbed in post-production by director Walter Murch's daughter Beatrice. Ridley's natural voice was deemed too British for the character.

To create the stop-motion puppets of the nomes, Nicol Williamson and Pons Maar were photographed against a background grid. Will Vinton (of "Claymation" fame) then watched the footage frame by frame and manipulated the puppets based on the movements and expressions of the actors.

Disney actually fired director Walter Murch about a week into production due to budget concerns. The studio found dailies lacking and Murch's slow shooting pace disheartening. Murch contacted friends Francis Ford Coppola, Steven Spielberg and George Lucas for help, and all three directors lobbied Disney to rehire Murch. Lucas even offered to take over directing himself should Murch fall behind schedule. Murch finished the film on schedule, though while in post-production studio management changed. The new executives had little faith in the movie, and doomed it with limited promotion and a short theatrical run.

Originally the Scarecrow, Tin Woodsman and Cowardly Lion were to have more prominent roles in this film, however, budget cuts forced their appearances to be reduced to mere cameos.

Several additional scenes filmed for the opening Kansas sequence, including a face-painting scene between Dorothy and Aunt Em, Billina running through the farmhouse kitchen and Uncle Henry reading newspaper clippings detailing Dorothy's disappearance after the cyclone, were cut from the final film.

In the movie Mombi enchants Ozma into the mirror after the Nome king promised Mombi the heads of the dancing girls if she keeps Ozma a secret. In L. Frank Baum's original novel "The Marvelous Land of Oz," it is the wizard who brought the baby Ozma to Mombi, who hides the girl away in a transformed state.

When the desolate Emerald City is first seen, there is a close-up of a bas relief portrait of a creature with a lion's head, a monkey's body, and an eagle's wings. This is a faithful reproduction of John R. Neill's portrait of the aptly named creature Li-Mon-Eag, which appeared on the back cover of 'The Magic of Oz', an Oz tale by L. Frank Baum, first released mere weeks after the latter's death in 1919.

In the late 1950s the Disney studio did toy with the idea of making an "Oz" movie of its own using some of the Mouseketeers from The Mickey Mouse Club (1955), but they decided to make Babes in Toyland (1961) instead which (ironically) starred Ray Bolger, the Scarecrow from Der Zauberer von Oz (1939).

Several characters from the Oz books make cameos in the final parade scene including Braided Man, Button-Bright, Cap'n Bill holding the Magic Flower, Frogman, Glinda, some Munchkins, Notta Bit More, Patchwork Girl, Polychrome, Shaggy Man, and Tommy Kwikstep.

Fairuza Balk did all her own stunts.

Emma Ridley, who plays Ozma, also auditioned for the role of Dorothy. Other actresses who auditioned for the role included Drew Barrymore, Alanis Morissette, Toni Ann Gisondi, Elizabeth Berkley, and Juliette Lewis.

Pons Maar who plays the Lead Wheeler, one of the asylum orderlies, and provides the voice of the Nome Messenger also served as a movement coach on the film, working to develop the postures and movements of the Scarecrow and Jack Pumpkinhead.

This was Fairuza Balk's first feature film debut. She did appear in a TV movie before this but this is her first featured movie.

The scene where Dorothy (Fairuza Balk) falls onto the couch with a thud and onto the Nome King's mountain was done in 11 takes

The Scarecrow was originally supposed to have a fully articulated animatronic face, akin to that of the Gump, however budget cuts forced the puppeteers to reduce his face to a series of masks with fixed expressions.

The character of the movie's version of Princess Mombi is based on that of Princess Langwidere in "Ozma of Oz", who ruled the Land of Ev, across the Deadly Desert from Oz. As in the movie, Langwidere had interchangeable heads and locked Dorothy in the tower room of the palace.

Judy Garland was 17 when filming Wizard of Oz, Fairuza was only 11 even though Return to Oz is a sequel.

In the movie Mombi enchants Ozma into the mirror after the Nome king promised Mombi the heads of the dancing girls if she keeps Ozma a secret. In L. Frank Baum's original novel "The marvelous land of Oz," it is the wizard who brought the baby Ozma to Mombi requesting that she be concealed from Queen Jinjur; Mombi disguises the girl's identity by turning her into a boy called Tip.

Leo McKern, who bore a strong resemblance to the character in the original Oz illustrations, was the first choice for the role of the Nome King. McKern turned down the role due to scheduling conflicts.

Walter Murch had scouted a number of filming locations to double as Oz in the film. Last-minute budget cuts forced the production to shoot almost entirely on soundstages and backlots.

Vince Cross composed a tie-in song "Return to Oz" which was released as a single on the Cherry Lane label, sung by Victoria Wood. It was not used on the soundtrack and is not on the official soundtrack album.

This film has some throwbacks from the 1939 Wizard of Oz film. Examples include Dr Worley and Nurse Wilson having evil Oz counter parts where the Nome King and Mombi represent Dr Worley and Nurse Wilson respectively. Like Tin Man Tick Tock keeps freezing on the spot and at one point cries as well. Like how the Witch of the West has flying monkeys and Winkie Guards as her minions, Mombi similarly has the Wheelers who are original characters in the film as her minions. Belina like Toto serves as Dorothy's pet. And more famously the Nome King says the ironic line 'There's no place like home'.

In the movie, the interior of the Nome King's Mountain looks like Fingals Cave, (near Scotland) as it is made of hexagonal basalt columns (even the floor of the cave). This kind of Basalt columns are also found on the Giant's Causeway located off of Northern Ireland.

Dr. Worley seems to be preparing Dorothy for electroconvulsive therapy.

The film has considered to be a dark horror movie by Minty Comedic Arts on the YouTube website.

In the Nome Kings's lair Dorothy says to a teary Tick Tock 'Don't cry'. Dorothy also said this line to Tin Man in the 1939 Wizard of Oz before she returned to Kansas.

While filming the sequence near the end of film where Dorothy rides atop the Cowardly Lion, actress Fairuza Balk became so overwhelmed by the temperature (in excess of 110 degrees Fahrenheit) that she passed out on the sound stage.

When Dorothy is in the hospital in Kansas, she is kept in room 31 by Nurse Wilson (Mombi). Later, when Dorothy is in Oz, Mombi's "original" head is kept in cabinet 31.

During the scene in Dr. Worley's office, Dorothy is telling the story of how the Tin Woodsman came to lose his legs. Dorothy starts to say the word 'hacked' ... but this was hastily dubbed to 'cut' as the original line was deemed too strong for younger viewers.

When Gump, Jack Pumpkinhead and Tick-Tock were turned into ornaments, the rock-like Nome King changed in appearance to a more organic looking being.

User reviews


  • comment
    • Author: Nenayally
    To truly understand and appreciate "Return to OZ", you've got to know two things.

    First off, this is NOT a follow-up to the classic MGM movie. This can't be emphasized enough. It is actually a synthesis of the first five or so sequels to the BOOK. (This isn't a dig at the movie, mind you. If you don't like it on some level or other, you can't be human. It's just that the movie was based on the book in the respect that the characters in the movie had the same names as the characters in the book.)

    Secondly, L. Frank Baum's original, printed-page OZ is, quite possibly, the most messed up imaginary universe ever created. There's a land of beings who throw their own heads at you as weapons. There's a land of sentient vegetables who raise *people* in their gardens (think "Motel Hell" and you've got the idea). To top it all off, it turns out that Dorothy's buddies are really good at killing things; in particular the dear, heartless Tin Man who bloodies up his hatchet with unsettling apathy.

    What I'm trying to get at here is that "Return to OZ" is an OZ movie that is much more faithful to the books. Much more "THIS is how long you have to be alive!" than "We represent the Lullaby League". I think it goes without saying that you'd be legally insane to show it to little kids, but fantasy fans, OZ enthusiasts, and fans of cult movies should hunt it down as soon as possible.

    By the way, please note that the old-school herky-jerky puppets and claymation monsters in this movie are scary as all get out. Compare this to the awful remake of "the Haunting" with it's stupid cartoonish CGI creatures (and this isn't a dig at computer animation, but since the technique is inheritely realist, it's not scary). There is a lesson here.
  • comment
    • Author: Nnulam
    As a young kid, The Wizard Of Oz was one of my favourite-est movies in the world. The movie was bright, colourful, cheerful, happy and undoubtedly saccharine. And while it was a Box-Office smash and collected millions of Oz fans worldwide, it displayed nearly none of the points that made the book series so successful. So when after viewing Return To Oz, I was extremely happy.

    While thousands blasted the film calling it 'dark' and even 'scary', I thoroughly enjoyed it. New characters, magic powders, creepier witches, talking chickens and flying couches - what more could an imaginative youngster want?!

    Faruiza Balk portayed Dorothy Gale exceptionally well, and at times, takes on Judy Garland's version so similair, it's scary! Return To Oz was, I mean, is, better than the original, because it was more based on the books, whereas The Wizard Of Oz was a cross between the original book, bittersweet sets and a symphony orchestra.

    While some disagree, I believe that 'Return' was not all a weak sequel, but more of a non-sequel sequel, which had little to do with the original, and had an exciting, haunting, script, which worked really well.

    Well it's been about 10 years since I first saw Return To Oz, and I still think that it's one of the best children's movies ever made (however scary) and it's in everyone's best interests to rent it out - even if you hated it's predacessor.
  • comment
    • Author: xander
    After reading about 40 of the other comments here, all of whom say RETURN TO OZ is dark and disturbing, I will make a different comment. In the early 80s Disney certainly were off the cash trail with a range of films, each expertly produced, that were box office disasters. One may recall SOMETHING WICKED THIS WAY COMES, TRON, THE BLACK CAULDRON, ONE MAGIC Christmas and a few others that had much to offer any thinking crowd,and each had special effects that were quite astonishing. Disney were in a very bleak period and the films, attempting to reflect perhaps a more mature or even grown up perspective chose, oh dear I have to say it: a dark and disturbing theme. At the time of release every critic bleated at the grim and melancholy tone of RETURN TO OZ, and sadly themselves neglected to celebrate the original book look, a choice Disney execs applauded themselves for. One Exec infamously said to us theatre owners: "We're going for the Frank L Baum book illustrations and nothing like that 1939 vaudeville thing". Oh dear, I thought at the time. You mean the world's most popular kids film? Well. $27 million dollars later in production costs returned maybe a quarter in theatre film rentals and RETURN TO OZ for all its merit and lavish production care and superb scary special effects....was consigned to the Disney dud bin. At the time I was irritated by the fixed goony expressions on Jack Pumpkinhead and the Scarecrow (loved Tik-tok, though, a fascinating and completely compelling design and movement piece) This time around I didn't mind it and actually appreciated the fact that they were 'book' expressions. Viewed 20 years later on a Disney DVD of dubious quality, I have to say it is a film more suited to these dark and disturbing times and if released today would certainly get a better reception and better crits...and possibly make a lot of money. I think the world is tuned into this type of family film more now than in the Flashdance 80s. The production values of RETURN TO OZ are simply breathtaking. Scene after scene perfectly realised: the green walled horror of the psychiatric asylum in reel one, the amazing claymation of the Gnome King, and especially the glittering halls of Mombi's castle. One genuinely screamworthy scene in the hall of Heads with a headless Queen rushing about in a nightmarish vision is almost only for adults, so intense is it's genuine horror. The glittering climax of a restored Emerald City is a triumph of green and silver/gold set design, I defy any viewer not to rewind it several times just to see each and every part. Yes nominated for 5 Oscars, it won none and vanished for 20 years. The no-marquee name Fairuza Balk didn't help the public embrace, no matter how exquisite she is. At least she wasn't named Soleil Moon Fry. In the same class as The Dark Crystal and Labyrinth, RETURN TO OZ now deserves its place there as part of a trilogy of superbly crafted fantasy for smart kids and astonished adults. That 'vaudeville thing' it certainly isn't. But not a failure either. The DVD is lacking trailers and production material that should and could be included. Bad Disney! Good film! I also defy any viewer not to shriek with laughter at the Gnome King revealing he is wearing the ruby slippers, a sly joke well presented.
  • comment
    • Author: Walan
    Cherubic Dorothy Gale is catapulted back to the magical world of Oz in this enchanting, but very atypical Disney Production that got released 46 years after Victor Fleming's original (none of the original cast-members lived long enough to ever see this sequel!). In the story, however, only six months have passed since Dorothy was brought to Oz by a tornado. During some medical tests, performed because she keeps talking about her unbelievable journey, a mysterious girl helps Dorothy escape from the hospital and back to Oz for a new adventure! The screenplay, based on two L. Frank Baum novels at once, introduces a large amount of imaginative new characters that are either Dorothy's loyal friends…or malicious new enemies. It soon becomes clear that she was called back to Oz for a reason, as the evil Nome King has turned everyone to stone and the mad Princess Mombi is after more human heads for her collection. Despite the presence of a talking chicken, this is a frighteningly grim and obscure fantasy tale, perhaps not even suitable for the typical Disney-target groups. The events and characters in "Return to Oz" are often quite macabre (decapitation for a hobby, eerie guys on wheels…) and the tone of the film is heavier since there isn't any singing and dancing going on. Perhaps a little too scary for the smallest children but "Return to Oz" nonetheless is a compelling and spontaneous adventure, highly recommended to those who like their fairy-tales sinister. The special effects are really terrific, with stunning stop-motion animations and some very engaging mechanical machinery (Tic-Tok!). The young Fairuza Balk is an unbelievably convincing follow-up to Judy Garland! The talented Piper Laurie ("Carrie") is regretfully underused, though. This film, along with "The Dark Crystal" and "The Neverending Story", was a huge favorite of mine when I was young and they seemly only got better with years. Good stuff.
  • comment
    • Author: Kelezel
    The first time I saw this movie I was about 6 or 7. It really scared me, I remember having nightmares of Mombie for weeks... I also remember rewatching it week after week. Now 10 years later I've rediscovered it and it's still chilling. Not because it was meant to be a horror, but because the imagery and plot is so vivid and captivating I can't help but feel like I'm really drawn into another world. Very few movies have done that for me... this is right up there with movies like Willow, Labrynth, and The Neverending Story. If you like musicals, bright colors and munchkin's dancing around, then stay away from this one, but if you want to go on a journey of pure imagination that will leave you breathless on the edge of your seat, rediscover Oz for yourself!
  • comment
    • Author: breakingthesystem
    There have been many people since this film came out who have tried to compare it to The Wizard of Oz. I don't think you can compare the two films and neither film is better than the other. They're both fantastic.

    This is an enjoyable movie which can be enjoyed time and time again. Dorothy returns to Oz and teams up with Tik-Tok (a robot), Jack Pumpkinhead (a pumpkin man obviously) and the Gump (don't ask)to battle the evil Nome King and Princess Mombi. There's plenty of fun throughout as Dorothy and friends battle the likes of the wheelies and all manner of creatures.

    The finale is perhaps one of the best ever for a fantasy film. Yes, it really is that good as Dorothy and friends meet up with the Scarecrow and battle the evil Nome King and Princess Mombi.

    The original Wizard Of Oz was a timeless classic still talked about today. It is no exaggeration to call Return To Oz a classic movie either.
  • comment
    • Author: Conjuril
    Honestly I do not know how I am this sane because when I think of my childhood, one of my favorite movies was Return to Oz. I absolutely adored this movie, but it scared the heck out of me. I was shopping and found Return to Oz on DVD and without hesitation bought it, it's always nice to go down nostalgia lane and I was thinking maybe since I was a kid I was just easily scared by silly things, nope, I was so wrong. This is a major mind screw of a movie. However, I cannot believe that I still adore this movie, I love the risks it took and that it didn't insult children's intelligence like most movies do. Don Bluth, one of the greatest animators and story tellers of our time, said that kids are more resilient than you would think. That's so true and Return to Oz is a wonderful magical movie that leaves you breathless.

    Dorothy Gale has become a melancholic child who cannot stop dreaming of the people she met in the magical world of Oz, concerning Aunt Em and Uncle Henry. The two decide to take her to see Doctor Worley, known for his shock therapy treatments. Before going, Dorothy finds a key she believes her friends from Oz sent to her on a shooting star. Aunt Em leaves Dorothy at Dr. Worley's laboratory under the care of Nurse Wilson. As she is taken to have treatment, the lab has a blackout, and Dorothy is saved by a mysterious girl who reveals that some patients have been driven insane by Worley's treatment. The two escape but fall into a river. The blonde girl vanishes underwater and Dorothy returns to Oz. Upon awakening, Dorothy finds her chicken who can now talk named Billina for company. The two discover the ruined Yellow Brick Road, which leads them to the Emerald City, now in ruins, missing its emeralds, and all of its citizens including the Tin Woodman and Cowardly Lion turned to stone. She swears that she will restore Oz with the help of some new friends while being chased by some disturbing new villains.

    I remember as a kid being terrified by Princess Mumbi, she has this room full of heads that she can change as she pleases and when Dorothy has to go to retrieve a potion from her cabinet with the "main head" she accidentally knocks over a jar and the head screams "Dorothy Gail!!!" and all the other heads start screaming! God, that scene is still horrifying to watch! But there is an extremely touching scene that always gets me in tears, Jack Pumpkinhead who Dorothy meets asks her if he could call her mom until he finds his real mother, she agrees with a kind heart and as they are laying on their flying couch called The Gump, he puts a scarf on her and says "good night, mom". I loved their relationship, it was beautiful. Also she has a great relationship with Tik Tok, a robot who was part of the Army of Oz and has to be wound up in order to work, his personality fits so extremely well with the group since you have the silliness, you need the intelligence too. The effects are still outstanding to this day in my opinion, the acting is very good, the sets, the lighting, the costumes, the characters, I just love Return to Oz. It's a great movie. Parents today are so afraid of showing their children movies like Return to Oz because it might give them nightmares, take advice from me and Mr. Bluth, your kids are a lot stronger than you think, and I'm perfectly fine and I'm so glad I have this movie in my collection. It's a wonderful film not to be missed.

    10/10
  • comment
    • Author: CopamHuk
    Return To Oz was the first horror film i ever saw, and i love it today just as much as i did when i was 5. yes, i do believe Return To Oz is a horror, but one that children should see. it is horror just as the brothers Grim are horror. it is horror because everything in the eyes of a child can be very frightening. and yes, i do believe this horror is better than The Wizard of Oz, despite what all my contempories might believe. as a kid, i could not get over the fact the Judy Garland was too old, that they would not stop singing and dancing. come on, this was my childhood, i needed a good rush, not a bunch of eye-candy and disturbing munchkin voices. little dorothy walking down a corridor of decapitated head in ornate display cases, afraid that she might wake them, that the decapitated body would come in search of her in her terrifying gothic splendor-this moment has stayed with me, has always frightened me, but i'm glad that i experienced it, it is healthy for a child to be afraid, humility is something everyone needs to embrace, and this film with its lush terror and build up to a phenomenal climax as apocolyptic as anything today still inspires me toward something the silly set pieces and hammy emotion of Wizard of Oz, cannot do. Return to Oz is a lost masterpiece, terrifying, energetic, creative, and wonderful.
  • comment
    • Author: Goldenfang
    Be warned: this film may be found a little too frightening for the young ones. It's a shattered vision of the Land of Oz with the jovial munchkins conspicuously absent, and it opens with Dorothy in an insane asylum (!). What's surprising to me is I rented this film with the mindset that it was going to be complete trash, that a sequel to "The Wizard of Oz" was blashphemy. I stand corrected. This adaption is an effectively satisfying interpretation of the popular children's story. Child actress Fairuza Balk (now in such crap like "The Waterboy") is a very convincing Dorothy Gail, more so than Academy Award winner Judy Garland in the original. But it's the little things that keep you entertained: a severed trophy head, brought to life, quips, "If I had a stomach, I know I'd be sick!" when free-falling through the air; the evil Princess Mambi has an interesting collection on display in her palace; and the realization that the cause of Oz's decline into this dismal state may be directly attributed to Dorothy's departure in the prequel. One disappointment: Toto is left behind in favor of a talking chicken. I know, I know . . .

    Grade: B
  • comment
    • Author: Rarranere
    I saw this for the first time when I was under ten and wasn't scared at all. In fact I loved it, but because it was on television I forgot about it for a long time. I recently rediscovered the movie and even as an adult I still love it. Yes, the movie is considerably darker the Wizard, but in my opinion it is a better and more interesting story. In light of the violence in movies today I do not think it is out of the question to allow a ten year old to see it and if you are a teenager or older I would certainly recommend this film. If you found Wizard of Oz too cutesy for your taste you may be pleasantly surprised by this underrated film.
  • comment
    • Author: Irostamore
    Most of the comments on this film seem to be from people who saw this when they were little, and haven't been able to forget it. The imagery of this film lingers long after first view, and its marked stylistic and thematic differences to Wizard Of Oz have a hypnotic effect on a certain type of viewer.

    In Return, the central theme is one of deep unhappiness with reality and a wish to return to fantasy, where as Wizard focuses more on the concept of "there's no place like home". I admire and am still deeply effected by this film because, in some ways, it is braver than Wizard. It isn't afraid to deal with the conflict - that the misery of a grey Kansas is very real.

    It expresses a rippling dissatisfaction that seems more in keeping with Baum's original works, and is all the more satisfying for it. In particular, I enjoyed the parrallels between the real world and Oz- for what it suggests about our world- and the Nome King's conversation with Dorothy. For a children's film, there is great depth in both, and most of the film can be interpreted on several different levels. The implications of the corridor of heads alone is enough to send any first year pysch/lit student into a whole mess of garbage.

    But don't be fooled. This also an excellent children's film, that deserves more attention than it got.
  • comment
    • Author: Kajikus
    Along with "Hook" (1991) this has got to be the best continuation / sequelesque adaptation of a classic fairy tale for kids . (although this one is slightly better than Hook because it has a more reliable plot and a tighter pace) . There are no words to describe how well constructed this movie is . Every part of it really shines . From the imaginative direction to the impressive sets and costumes and from the professionally constructed script and dialogue to the effectively subtle performances from all the actors (live and animatronic) .

    I will have to tell you that I am fanatically against the screenplay changes film-makers usually conduct to a story / novel / myth / comic book / TV show when they turn it into a movie . They omit important plot elements , they mistreat important characters by underusing them , they often fail to shoot chilling scenes from the book (et al) due to lame direction and untalented SFX crew members hence not doing them justice (like the freezing super power of Sub-Zero in "Mortal Kombat") and generally they bastardize crucial thematic parts because of many changes in the atmosphere of the original . The "Return to Oz" script mixes elements from 2 books by L. Frank Baum and puts them in the blender with multiple variations and vital declinations from their roots . God forgive me but it is probably the best bastardization I have ever witnessed . If these words are coming out of my mouth then it is definitely a very successful film . I will brief you a little (slight spoilers coming) : characters from the first book which is the direct continuation of Dorothy 's adventures where Dorothy manages to find the ruby slippers and returns to see her friends , are Jack the pumpkinhead , the reindeer-headed flying sofa and Mombie the witch (and NOT an aristocratic princess) . Jack and the reindeer were precisely the same as in the movie , animated by the powder of life . (there was also a cute wooden pony which was probably omitted because it was a silent role) . Mombie however was a rather old grey haired wannabe witch who resembled remarkably Mim ! ( for the uninitiated Mim is Magica De Spell 's partner in the crusade of stealing the lucky dime of uncle Scrooge) . Ozma was indeed Mombie 's prisoner although she thought she was a boy in a young Jodie Foster way with dirty clothes under the name Chip ! The second book introduces us to Tic Toc who managed to drag Dorothy into the land of Oz once again . Tic Toc was indeed a golden metal robot but a bit shorter and quite thinner so he wasn 't as macho as in the film . He had more childish voice and manners , something like a juvenile version of C3PO from Star Wars . The greatest change was of course the Gnome King . Although his kingdom was under the ground of a desert he was not the ruler of stones but the king of Dwarfs (he was a nasty little Oumba Looba-like himself) . Nevertheless he had a powerful army and weapons and he tried to take over Oz. The Dwarves ' only weakness was the eggs . Oh , and Bileena was not Dorothy 's chicken but a native habitant chicken in Oz . The rescue mission was not for the Schiactro but for an unrelated prince (the Prince of Eb under the request of his beloved Princess) . Also the jewelry museum was true with the difference that the contestants had only one chance (not 3). The rest of the plot 's surprises such as the wheelers & the decapitated dancers were completely the brainchildren of Walter Murch and Gill Dennis.

    All in all the combination of these thematic factors was wonderful . I believe that this slightly tense adaptation is a much more successful depiction of Frank Baum 's vision of the Land of Oz . Enchanting and beautiful for the eye but with hidden dangers lurking around . Who can forget the beginning sequence where Dorothy finds Oz literally wrecked ? Everybody has been transformed into a stone statue and the roads and buildings are torn apart . The direction is flawless in giving us this absolutely successful threatening but interestingly suspenseful scene . I really cannot realize why so many libels like "much dark" "too scary" etc. This has exactly the same level of violence with classic Disney cartoons where the evil step mother curses Snow White with diabolical spells in the middle of storm with frightening thunders or where Sleeping Beauty 's charming prince struggles to save her by fighting her wicked witch godmother who is transformed into a giant dragon who spits up disastrous and dreadful fireballs . A much more twisted and snicky kids film is " Willy Wonka " , especially the boat scene .

    Anyway I don 't think Mombie 's heads or the giggling deranged wheelers can be frightening . They are graphic figures like the wicked witch of the West or the gremlins . As a matter of fact how hasn 't anyone found unsuitable and politically uncorrect the reoccurring quote of the Queen of hearts " Off with his / her / their head ! " in Alice in Wonderland (which keep in mind that was written by a priest) . Not only Return to Oz is the near perfect follow-up to a well known legend , but it is also one of the best fairy tale adaptations cinema industry has ever given us . Adequate SFX (like the petrified Emerald city or the flying sofa or the earthquake scene) , impressive sets (Mombie 's palace or the desert) and of course the unforgettable jewels museum (I have seen the film several times but this scene always thrills me) . As a stand alone fairy tale it is also great . Two scenes at the end standout as perfect examples *******Spoiler alert******** The celebration scene at the palace and the mirror-through communication between Dorothy and Ozma******** On top of that the glossy ruby slippers are still enchanting . What else can be said ? Mere cameos from the Tin man and the coward lion for the fans of the old cast combine with fine direction and script for a spectacular show . If only *****spoiler**** they didn 't spoil it with the doubts that it was all a dream ****** A classic masterpiece

    RETURN TO OZ 9.5 / 10
  • comment
    • Author: great ant
    In this minor dark fantasy classic, we return to Oz with Dorothy Gale who has not been able to adjust to normality since her primary adventures. Her Auntie and Uncle do not know what do to with her, and no-one believes her amazing stories. Eventually she is sent to a psychiatric hospital, and unknown to her family it is run by near-masochists who supposedly perform terrifying experiments on children. As this is above all a kids' movie, none of this is shown, but the suggestion is pretty heavy, and there are 'implements' all over the hospital. Jean Marsh plays Nurse Wilson who is relentlessly horrifying, and pursues Dorothy through the stormy night in which Dorothy escapes. Dorothy jumps into a river, and when she wakes she is in Oz with a chicken called Billina. However, after some exploring it appears that Oz has been infected with some kind of evil, and it is no longer the enchanting place it was, but is now the place of nightmares. The Emerald city and all inhabitants including the Cowardly Lion and the Tin-Man have been turned to stone. After a chase by the brilliantly memorable and scary Wheelers, Dorothy meets Tik-Tok, a mechanical man, and they try to find the Scarecrow and work out what has happened. Soon Dorothy is taken prisoner by the wicked Princess Mombi, Jean Marsh again, who is obsessed with her appearance, stealing the heads of beautiful young women. It seems that the Nome King has become immensely powerful, turning all to stone as his personal statues. The struggle to return Oz to its glory is one which will take all of Dorothy's skill and love.

    This film is a definite classic for kids, but beware, it is dark and has many moments which will be scary. I saw this recently, having not seen it in a few years, and although the impact has dwindled, and the faults are clear, it is still a good film although should definitely be seen at a young age. There are many things to recommend it, although fans of The Wizard of Oz my be disappointed by the lack of music and light-hearted fun. The acting is all top notch;Jean Marsh is excellent in her roles, an extremely talented actress, and Fairuza Balk is outstanding in her first role, seeming both timid and strong and giving a good account of what may be a disturbed child. The new characters are all just as good as those in the 1939 film, particularly Pumpkinhead and Tik-Tok. The effects here are also extremely good for their time, and they are still pretty good to see today. Scary moments include the Wheeler chase, the final encounter with the Nome King, and of course the infamous screaming heads scene which will likely stay in the memory of all who see it. If you have children with strong imaginations, or with an interest in reading or fantasy, then this is a film they should be shown, but if they are scared easily it may not be such a good idea.

    7.5
  • comment
    • Author: Kirizan
    Though this movie never picked up where Dorothy(Fairuza Balk) left off, this movie seemingly tries to be the update version of the original. Far scarier than the original movie in 1939, the new characters in Oz like Tik-Tok, Jack Pumkinhead, Mombi(Jean Marsh), and the Wheelers. They didn't show the Munchkins, and Dorothy's original friends The Tin Woodsman, and The Cowardly Lion have turned to stone. And to me, The Wheelers replaced the Flying Monkeys which makes this movie a classic of its own. The funny parts in the movie is when Tik-Tok took out the Wheelers, and Jack Pumkinhead's head lands upside down, and he asks, "Why are you standing on your heads?" And that character Mombi, she has more heads than Albert Eistein. That's what makes her a dangerous character. I enjoyed every bit of this movie, it was different, original, and definitely not a sequel to the first. Otherwise, it would be a no-brainer. Hard to rent, easy to buy, it's a neo-classic for all ages. Rating 4 out of 5 stars.
  • comment
    • Author: Amhirishes
    I fully recommend this film. My father bought it in a second hand video shop for £1! That was when I was 9. I am now 18, and it still plays on my television. Having been brought up on the original movie, as a child, I never really made the link between the two. I think Disney introduced this movie not just as a sequel, but an original story in its own right. You don't need to see the first, to see the second. As I child, I used to get spine tingling nightmares when watching this movie. Even though it frightened me, it also excited me. It should not have been certified a PG, more like a 12, but having said that, I'm glad I watched when I was young.

    You cannot compare it to the likes of Lord of the Rings or Harry Potter because these films were made in a new era. The powerful combination of the music, visual effects of the characters and the intricate plotline gives this film a 5* rating in a separate film poll.

    Although Return To Oz is not as colourful and positive as the original Julie Garland movie, it contains sinister undertones, like the psychiatric hospital and the doctor attempting to give Dorothy electric shock treatment, to destroy her dreams of the magical world of Oz.

    The original film was timeless, as there was no indication of the decade or even century the film was set. In comparison, the opening scenes of Return to Oz reminds the viewer that this film was set at the turn of the century (1899), "at the dawn of a new era," as the doctor points out to both the viewer and Dorothy Gale. This realistic theme of the film is touched upon, but not elaborated. It seems all sense of time and place is lost when Dorothy enters Oz.

    From an adults perspective, Dorothy's adventures in Oz are merely a dream. To a child, they are very much a real life happening. We would all like to believe we could escape to a secret, colourful, bright, timeless place like Oz, but as we get older, that secret place seems even more farther to reach.

    I think Walter Murch was very clever with the linkages made between the first and the second film. He has managed to make his own mark on the film as an original piece of movie-making. However, we know it is a sequel from the title. Other reminders include Dorothy's connection made between the people that enter her life in Kansas, and the characters that she encounters in Oz. For example, the male nurse who 'wheels' her to the operating table does not speak a word. All Dorothy can hear is the squeaking of the wheels of her moving bed. In Oz, the face of the male nurse is repeated over a dozen times, and reintroduced as the fast-moving, squeaky mobile creatures known as the "wheelers." The creature is shown as an evil one, working for Mombie. This shows Dorothy was frightened of the male nurse in Kansas. Her dreams takeover, and recreate this man as an evil, impatient, large character.

    Mombie (another villain who challenges Dorothy) was also Nurse Wilson who kept a close eye on Dorothy, in the hospital. When Dorothy attempted to escape, along with Ozma, Wilson finds the girls and shrieks "you!" This is where the dreamworld and our world of reality overlaps, as we discover Wilson already recognises Ozma (unnamed until we enter Oz). We are also reminded, towards the end of the film, that Mombie was not only imprisoned for the use of her evil powers in Oz, but also in the real world.

    During Dorothy's adventures in Oz, Aunt Emily explains the hospital was destroyed in a fire. Dr. Worley (who appears as the Nome King in Oz) was burned to death, "he tried to save his machines." Ironically, the Nome King was also destroyed, with the help of Billina's "poisonous" egg. As Aunt Em talks about it, she hugs Dorothy, holding her in a blanket, but Dorothy's eyes tell all. It's like she already knows. She is not shocked by the burning of the hospital, nor is she shocked to see a coach man driving Nurse Wilson away, within a coach made like a prison cell.

    Not once in the film does Fairuza Balk falter in her performance. Although she is a child, Dorothy is required to make responsible, mature adult decisions, in her quest to save the land of Oz. Even Pumpkinhead calls her "Mum." She feels a responsibility to look after all her friends, as she is the decision-maker, the oracle. Tik-Tok is also a good decision-maker, but his thinking falters when it runs down.

    Dorothy's eyes are not unlike an adults; large, tired, aged and all-knowing.

    All in all, I rate this film 10 out of 10. The cabinets which display Mombie's different heads still haunts me to this day. As does the vision of Mombie sleeping in her bed, headless, but still breathing. I can remember screaming with my friends as Mombie gets up from her bed, headless, bellowing "D-O-R-O-T-H-Y G-A-L-E?.....Where's my powder of life?"
  • comment
    • Author: Damand
    I still think about this movie...often in fact...The imagery is wild....so dark and wicked...This movie haunts me and I give it mucho credit for that...not much can penetrate my own odd imagination...Check out the 'wheelers'...wicked!! I find some points that I would change but hey it was great for what it was...the whole point of movie-making is to take you beyond reality .and explore it further.....Fariuza Balk is adorable...tick-tock too...have fun!
  • comment
    • Author: Lli
    While "Return to Oz" is an interesting curio, it pales in comparison to "The Wizard of Oz." The difference is simple: "Wizard" connected with audiences on an emotional level, and for the most part, "Return" did not. The sequel had more than a fair chance to become a hit; audiences simply rejected it. I can understand that fans of "Return to Oz" want to make a case for the movie, especially in light of its total commercial failure, but trashing "The Wizard of Oz" is no way to begin. Neither is disparaging Judy Garland. Garland's performance as Dorothy will linger in our collective memory long after the world has forgotten Fairuza Balk. That's an irrefutable truth. The best "Return to Oz" can hope for is a small cult following... and, frankly, that's all it deserves.
  • comment
    • Author: Alsath
    I dug this movie out because I've just met someone who has a child and I thought my step son may like to watch it as I did when I was a child and had my milk snatched from me. I never got to watch it with my step Son but I am sat watching it at home, on my own, with the lights out. This film immerses you in a world of dark emotion control and dare I say it, insanity. So real it's like looking out the window, so fantastic it's like reading strewlpeter for the first time. Do not be expecting this to be a continuation of the song and dance that was the wizard of oz, this is much closer to the books and far away from the rose tinted world of Judy Garland.

    If you don't like heads this film may be for you.
  • comment
    • Author: Mojar
    I've read all the other comments regarding Return to Oz, and would like to add my own. I to love Return to Oz, but do not think that it is any better then The Wizard of Oz, and you shouldn't compare the two, since they are two totally different films (and Return to Oz is NOT the sequel to the Judy Garland classic as many people wrongly assume) made in toally different times. I find both Judy and Farzua pleasing and believable Dorothys-so what if poor Judy was made to have her chest taped flat during filming? Does that make her any less believable? I don't think so. Despite the fact Judy was 16 at time of filming, she still made a beautifully sweet Dorothy and her performance in the film is no less believable than that of Fazura Balks. These two films are both classics in they're own rights and the two Dorothys both brilliant.
  • comment
    • Author: generation of new
    Normally I can't really fault disney movies as they are of such good quality but I honestly have no idea what they were thinking when they did return to Oz. To me it seemed more like a spinoff than a sequel and not a very good one at that. It contained an almost completely new set of character and hardly had anything to do with the original wizard of Oz. I give 4 out of 10
  • comment
    • Author: Onnell
    OZ is a magical place. It is where I always wanted to live as a kid. Some people here were impressed by the fact that they made an OZ movie dark and scary, but by making scary, they miss the whole point of the OZ books. I don't even care as much about the stupid mistakes like making Mombi and Princess Langwidere one person. They were both villains and I don't love that, but okay I accept it. I thought that the Judy Garland version butchered the OZ series as much as humanly possible until this movie came along. At least they got the mood of OZ correct. The plot is that Dorothy's aunt and uncle put her in an institution and she escapes with the help of a mysterious blonde girl. Uncle Henry and Auntie Em would never do that. Even in th Emerald City of OZ, when they are going broke and extremely worried that their niece is going insane, they try to shield her from all the hardship in their lives and tell her to go in the attic and dream and say that she should go to OZ while there is so much trouble. It is nuts to think that they would put her through that. They also messed up my favorite character of all time. Princess Langwidere is vain and silly, but not a malicious, evil character like the one portrayed. At one point, she wants to swap heads with Dorothy, but it is only because she forgot and is wearing her head that is impulsive and has a bad temper. Mombi was a evil, but she wasn't nearly as bad as the woman portrayed. She also had absolutely no connection to the Nome King. He was also silly. He was a villain, but in the books, he is a fat, rolly-polly, little man with a huge belt that turned the entire Royal Family of Ev into ornaments. Not exactly the evilest man in the world. Also, one of the best parts of the series was the second book, where you find out that Mombi turned Ozma into a boy and hid her that way. The mirror thing was just so silly and they took away one of the best twists ever. These books were written during the Depression as a form of escapism. It wasn't dark; it was happy. You don't mess with perfection. Why did they have to butcher the series?
  • comment
    • Author: Tejar
    I hate to be the spoiler of all these wonderful comments of "Return to Oz", but I have to say that this movie didn't really do anything for me but scare me. Don't get me wrong, I LOVE Jim Henson and I LOVE Disney, I own both The Dark Crystal and Labyrinth, and yet this movie pales in comparison and fails badly. Faruiza Balk was good I'll admit, but she was the only thing. And while this may be a better adaptation of Baum's book, if that is the case, then I'm NEVER reading his books. The villians were just disturbing, and the whole film gives the feeling of being in some psycological delirium, which is not something I enjoy watching. It did have it's bright moments too, and the ending was very touching. Jack Pumpkinhead and TicTok helped the movie alot, but overall it is not something I would recommend watching.
  • comment
    • Author: Maximilianishe
    This film shows more of what OZ really was, or is, if you believe an alternate universes. It's a mirror of our own world. And we can exist there and here at the same time, all we need is a pair of ruby slippers and a counterpart who lives in a mirror.

    I rented this on a beta tape and watched it with my mom after it had finished its original theatrical run. We both liked it, but without the widescreen format and a theatrical sound system, it lost some of its ability to overwhelm us. But we still enjoyed it, quite a bit.

    I wish my mother were here now that I have a 50" HDTV and a halfway decent DVD copy, and a Kenwood surround sound system. I can sit in the middle and it is just as if I am sitting in a seat in a theater because that's where this needs to be watched. Because when I watched it last night, I was completely overwhelmed by this amazing movie.

    The "Kansas" scenes are very dismal, not sure where they were filmed actually although I know some of this was filmed in London. But the landscapes looked very much like a dismal Kansas late fall prior to the turn of the 20th century.

    Nicol Williamson represents a type of "doctor"/quack that dangerously fiddled around with electronic devices before people really understood how electricity worked, and his Oz mirror alternate is none other but the Gnome King himself . Joan Marsh was his nasty looking nurse (and Mombi). Piper Laurie is Auntie M and Matt Clark is Uncle Henry. But the breakaway performance in this film is Fairuza Balk who really captures the spirit of Dorothy as laid down by Judy Garland. The DVD which I found has a very good interview with Fairuza where she talks about being one of 1000 girls that they interviewed for this part, of all the kids that they looked at she was the most perfect for this.

    Although this film does not have musical numbers, it does have animatronics by Brian Henson and I didn't know it at the time but claymation by none other than Will Vinton, who put life into the Gnome King in such a frightening way.

    Some other reviewer said this, but this is actually a horror movie, the last we saw Oz before Dorothy went home it was not like this Oz. This is apparently six months after that and something very bad has happened and it is up to Dorothy, her chicken, and the Royal army of Oz "Tic Toc" to find out what is going on. And there is also a mysterious girl who shows up in mirrors, that gives Dorothy a helping hand now and then: Who is this?

    This movie could have and should have been made long ago, shortly after the original had been made. But if it had been, there's a high probability it could not have been done as well as this.

    And somebody else also said this is not a sequel to the original, but it is a continuation of that same story. Most importantly, it reveals characters that were part of the Oz stories that were not mentioned in the first film. Bellini, Tic-Toc, Ozma, Mombi.

    Maybe in another 20 years they can continue the story. It could happen, and it should happen.
  • comment
    • Author: Mala
    My family loved the 1939 movie The Wizard of Oz and we didn't know about this later one until as a kid I found a book in the local library based on it, with pictures from the movie. The book itself scared me, I definitely found it darker than the Oz I knew. This movie might have scared me more had I seen it then. I finally saw it on the Internet just now, and found it underwhelming. This can serve as a sequel to the 1939 film but it's really a separate adaptation of a public domain story.

    The story gets darker starting with the opening in Kansas, where we have scary science and Dorothy needing to break free. When she gets to Oz (how, I'm not sure) she finds the place in ruins, which may not be pleasant to those who remember the pretty place we saw in the 1939 classic, but it is interesting. The creepiest part may be a woman who keeps many heads, and threatens to take Dorothy's head.

    Still, any gripping atmosphere this movie could have had is sunk by poor special effects. This may be surprising since it came 45 years after Judy Garland's movie and the Great Depression was long gone this time, but the older movie looks better than this one. The most obvious comparison would be the Scarecrow, who looks terribly cheap here. It goes deeper than that, however. The talking rocks and "Wheelers" are poor effects as well. For this reason, Return to Oz won't draw you into Oz in the same way The Wizard of Oz does.
  • comment
    • Author: Llbery
    Director Walter Murch claims he never intended for this to be a direct sequel to The Wizard of Oz, which sounds to me like a weak excuse for an underachieving film. If I were to release Return to Casablanca, set in an east African nightspot, with Rick Blaine pining over the girl he chased away, I can claim it's unrelated all I like but the comparisons will still be made. Dorothy's return to the world of her imagination is similar in subject matter, with constant references to the MGM classic and cameos by all of the original characters, but feels much more twisted and sinister in tone. Not that the first Oz was lacking in terrifying material - the flying monkeys alone must have fueled millions of nightmares - but those moments were balanced by an optimistic, sing-songy spirit and bright outlook on life. This is more like something from the depths of Tim Burton's catalog, minus the off-kilter conscience. Strange, dark and eerie, it compensates for the lack of a clear purpose by overloading the audience with weirdness. A real head-scratcher.
  • Cast overview, first billed only:
    Fairuza Balk Fairuza Balk - Dorothy
    Nicol Williamson Nicol Williamson - Dr. Worley / Nome King
    Jean Marsh Jean Marsh - Nurse Wilson / Mombi
    Piper Laurie Piper Laurie - Aunt Em
    Matt Clark Matt Clark - Uncle Henry
    Michael Sundin Michael Sundin - Tik-Tok
    Tim Rose Tim Rose - Tik-Tok
    Sean Barrett Sean Barrett - Tik-Tok (voice)
    Mak Wilson Mak Wilson - Billina
    Denise Bryer Denise Bryer - Billina (voice)
    Brian Henson Brian Henson - Jack Pumpkinhead (voice)
    Stewart Harvey-Wilson Stewart Harvey-Wilson - Jack Pumpkinhead (as Stewart Larange)
    Lyle Conway Lyle Conway - Gump (voice)
    Stephen Norrington Stephen Norrington - Gump (as Steve Norrington)
    Justin Case Justin Case - Scarecrow
    All rights reserved © 2017-2024 hd.thomson-multimedia.com