Search

» » 9 1/2 Wochen (1986)

Short summary

An erotic story about a woman, the assistant of an art gallery, who gets involved in an impersonal affair with a man. She barely knows about his life, only about the sex games they play, so the relationship begins to get complicated.

Trailers "9 1/2 Wochen (1986)"

Director Adrian Lyne used emotionally manipulative tactics on Kim Basinger during the shooting to elicit the performance he wanted from the somewhat new actress, which Basinger later criticized harshly. For example, Lyne did not allow Mickey Rourke and Basinger to talk to each other off-set. The two were kept isolated from each other and Lyne would tell Basinger rumors about how Rourke intended to make her like or dislike him so that she would carry that attitude into the scene. Lyne would also offer Rourke performance notes, but Basinger none, in order to unnerve her. In a very unusual and expensive move along these lines, Lyne shot the film sequentially, so that Basinger's actual emotional breakdown over time would be effectively translated to the screen.

Body doubles were used for Elizabeth (Kim Basinger) throughout the movie.

Kim Basinger owns 14 hours of deleted scenes that MGM thought were very psychologically damaging to people. The footage has never been made available for public viewing, even in the Director's Cut DVD edition.

Mickey Rourke lost thirty pounds (at the behest of the filmmakers) before filming began.

Kim Basinger said she didn't feel like a "real actress" until she made this film.

The two leads ranked #1 on Moviefone's 'The Top 25 Sexiest Movie Couples'. [May 2008]

Jacqueline Bisset was asked to play Elizabeth but declined due to the amount of nudity the script called for. Teri Garr, Isabella Rossellini and Kathleen Turner lobbied hard for the role, losing out to Basinger.

Elizabeth wears white or colorful clothing except when she is with John, when she wears black or grey. See also Dial M for Murder (1954).

Kim Basinger has declared this as her favorite of all the movies she's done, albeit adding "I'm sorry that all of the people who've seen Nine 1/2 Weeks (1986) never saw it in its original form, because so much was cut out of it - even the European version."

Susan Faludi wrote that because Adrian Lyne insisted that "Kim had to be broken down" at one point Mickey Rourke grabbed and slapped Basinger to get her in the mood.

When John and Elizabeth are in the department store just before the scene when they're shopping for a bed, an announcement for a "Mr. Jerry Bruckheimer" over the PA system can be heard in the background.

Demi Moore tried to audition for the lead role, but Adrian Lyne didn't find her worldly enough at 21 to play a divorced art gallery operator.

First full-fledged motion picture starring role for Basinger.

In early March 1984, a press announcement was released from Hollywood that the film would go before the cameras in New York on April 16. Three days before production was scheduled to begin, the original backer, Tri-Star Pictures, pulled out. It seemed that the film was doomed, but within 48 hours it was rescued by PSO (Producers Sales Organization). Shooting began on April 30, 1984 and wrapped August 10. A year later, Hollywood was rife with rumors that the film might never be released. In fact, MGM/UA took it off its 1985 release schedule. After the film tested badly in preview screenings, Lyne said, "We're still editing. This isn't the easiest movie to make or to cut." Finally, in February 1986, almost two years after completion of principal photography, Nine 1/2 Weeks (1986) opened in wide release.

The film was initially supposed to be produced by Tri-Star Pictures. However, the studio dropped the film due to "creative differences" with Adrian Lyne and pressure by Tri-Star's co-owner at the time, Coca-Cola, to tone down some controversial material. As a result, the film was financed independently, and MGM stepped in and released the film.

Sam Shepard was the studio's original choice to play John. Basinger ended up co-starring with him in her next movie, Fool for Love (1985), which came out before this.

The male lead character shares similarities with Fifty Shades of Grey. The former is called John Gray and the latter is Christian Grey. Both are wealthy and like to play sexual games to intimidate and manipulate women.

Adrian Lyne's first version was 5 hours long

In May of 1984, Oscar-winning production designer and former studio head, Richard Sylbert was asked to come to New York for 6 weeks to oversee the production design of this film.

The film was originally supposed to have come out in August 1985.

Elizabeth's gallery contains art by Sarah Charlesworth. This was a famous New Jersey photographer who should not be confused with Canadian actress Sarah Charlesworth.

Ronnie Wood: He appears in the art gallery party scene.

Based on a true story by Elizabeth McNeill. The film stays relatively true to the book except the source material is much more explicit and disturbing. McNeill was basically a sexual prisoner; kept handcuffed to the coffee table most of the time, forbidden to do even the simplest of things for herself, such as brush her own hair or eat, and ended up hospitalized at the end of 9½ weeks. Not the stuff of great box office, so the film played down those parts and kept the eroticism.

User reviews


  • comment
    • Author: Anarasida
    I find it interesting that people can get so many different feelings and experiences from one movie, but then; this is exactly the type of movie that would cause such disparity. The question really is, are you watching the movie for entertainment, or to critique it? There are wondrous scenes of erotic intimacy here (unfortunately not as fully developed as they could be) - and glimpses into just what two people "in lust" will allow themselves to be led into... The sensuousness of the relationship is the key - not the believability of the surroundings or the rest of the 'plot'. Is it believable? It certainly is conceivable... Liz (Kim Basinger) studying slides at work, so distracted by her thoughts of intimacy with a man she hardly knows that she can't keep her hands off herself... John so taken with her that he will spend exorbitantly for a gift - to give a woman he doesn't know - but feels that he must meet. The passion and need for these two lonely people that lets them open doors to their inner selves and allow another in BEFORE thinking of the consequences (there are ALWAYS consequences, in film and life; for opening "those" doors). Is it believable that they would win the fight with the street thugs? No. Is it believable that the adrenaline rush, the release of the flight impulse and fear, the closeness found in 'defeating a common enemy'; could possibly lead to the intensity of sexual closeness and climax in a semi-secluded spot (under falling water at that)? Yes. Are the other scenes believable? It's entertainment, not a psychology class... They are conceivable, certainly. Ever been really mad at your partner, and that anger leads to words then breaking dishes then apologies then hugging then closeness then sex? How about anger leading directly to sex? It can happen, and it does. It is not so much a rape as it is a purging of desire. The scene with Liz blindfolded, and the whore coming in to the room - you share the tenseness Liz feels. Will she be stimulated? Of course. Will she let John know it turns her on? He already knows it does. He wants HER to know that he knows it will.

    This movie is a glimpse of what manipulators people are. The efforts made to manipulate another person into 'making them want what you want'. So much so, that it becomes their desire, not yours. So much so that the desire is to see if you can manipulate the other becomes more consuming than the original goal. Seeing if she WILL crawl across the floor becomes more important than seeing her actually doing so. And her feeling the depth of her self in what she will do - and finding she is doing it because SHE wants to, not because he wants it. Liz takes her pleasure from John, too. What appears to be a "rape in progress" as John pushes Liz back on the table, ends with her crying because she was excited enough by it to climax. That is perhaps the 'real' rape; her discovery that even if she is initially violated, in her mind she realizes it arouses her enough to let it continue; and as it continues she finds herself clutching at her 'attacker'; and attaining orgasm. The rape as much of her mind as it is her body. It is her discovery of what she learns of herself. When she finally leaves the relationship, he finds he can't live without her. Who manipulated who?

    This movie, dated as it is, is still fresh because it is enough like life to be real. No, we may not be that rich or that attractive or that selfish or that spoiled. But we also may wish at times that we were...
  • comment
    • Author: Flas
    Two successful, but lonely yuppies embark on a sexual odessey for 9 and a 1/2 weeks. All people seem to talk about when it comes to this movie is about the sex scenes and the nudity in the film. This film is not about sex and nudity in my opinion. It is about control and power. I found this film to be intelligent and stylishly done and yes very erotic. Rourke and Basinger make a steamy couple and the ending and the events that unfolded in the film lingered with me long afterwards and left me thinking for a while. This is one film that actually seems to have gotten better with time.
  • comment
    • Author: Lbe
    I agree with the writer who mentioned that this film is too often underrated because it deals with a very dark side of sexuality that many people deny in society and in themselves. The relationship portrayed in the film is an adult one, and as such it is not a Little Mary Sunshine portrayal. It is a mature look at sex, not love, and it never pretends to be a romance. The characters find each other and they enjoy each other in a way that many people cannot accept, and therein lies the reality, the truth of this film, as well as the reason that it is consistently overlooked. For an established actress like Kim Basinger to accept this role and play it as naturally as she did speaks to her talent as well at to her willingness to explore alternate "romantic" ideas on film. Mickey Rouke has always been a maverick force in film. Look at him in "Diner" and you will see what I mean by that. He is much more talented than people give him credit for, and younger filmophiles should discover this early work and try to perceive him as an actor, not a joke.
  • comment
    • Author: cyrexoff
    I think most people don't understand this movie. This is not a love story, at least not in the conventional sense. "9 1/2 weeks" is about sexual desire and intimate sensuality run amok and becoming the monopolizing forces in a relationship, and the ultimate demise of that relationship as a result. Certainly the physical pleasures and sensuality of sex are aspects that make a relationship fulfilling and gratifying but they are not the only facets. A relationship purely based on sexual desire is doomed to failure. At first it seems like a game, but later on the intensity is too much for the relationship to withstand, largely because if love and caring are sacrificed for the sex, it will die.

    You almost couldn't find more suitable casting than Mickey Roarke and Kim Bassinger. Roarke plays John, a sexually-driven finance executive who is not satisfied with winning over the woman he wants. He craves continual heightened sexual excitement from his "lady friend". And he uses subtle coercion to achieve his goals. For Elizabeth, played by Bassinger, John is the ideal lover. He makes her breakfast, buys her clothes, brushes her hair. He takes care of her in an interesting role reversal. But nothing is free. In return, John wants Elizabeth to be in his complete control and engage in sensuous sex games. And each game is more intense than the last.

    At first the games seem innocent enough. He likes to blindfold her and play a touchy-feely game in which he introduces objects that she feels and/or tastes. But then the requests become more intense. He wants her to enact a strip-tease, to dress in a certain way without her consent, and to receive a spanking for being a "nosey parker". They have sex in the oddest of places, sometimes engaging in intimate contact in public. At first Elizabeth enjoys the attention and the excitement until she begins to lose the sense of herself as the relationship intensifies. And John eventually goes too far.

    At one poignant moment in the film, Elizabeth speaks with an artist-recluse. Because her job is at an art gallery, she helps coordinate artists for exhibitions. When she finds him in a rural area, she asks him if he remembered that his exhibition is coming up. He replies that when he is hungry he remembers to eat and when he is tired he remembers to sleep. She has lost the simpler pleasures of life, and this old man reminds her of that.

    Late in the film there is an interesting scene where Elizabeth's former boyfriend comes to the place she works--not to see her but he is now dating one of her co-workers. He's a plain man who does not have nearly the sexual allure of Roarke. But he seems kind and honest. Liz watches her co-worker and her former boyfriend leave and there is an expression on her face that speaks volumes: maybe she misjudged him after-all. For a moment, the two stare at each other from a distance, and you get the feeling that she was the one who left him. He is not the Mr Exciting that John is, but maybe he has other qualities that John could never have.

    This is quite a stunning film, certainly not for all tastes, and some of the steamy sex scenes could be misinterpreted as being only for pornographic sake. What saves it are the incredible and absolutely believable performances by the two leads, Roarke and Bassinger which strangely complement one another. Roarke plays his character right on the money, always enigmatic, never raising his voice, but always mysterious. His character is always just outside of reach. He constantly smiles, even when he is noticeable disappointed. Basinger is a perfect complement as one of the few actresses left who can be vulnerable and elicit a willingness to be under control that you don't see in many female performances anymore. Despite what may appear to be pornography, there is a point to the film I think, and that is that constant sexual control and nurturing relationships mix like oil and water. In the end you wonder if it was all a game.
  • comment
    • Author: BORZOTA
    Except perhaps in Paris where, until recently, it played in a cinema just off the Champs Elysee. This film has been condemned from just about every possible, so I will not try and defend it blow by blow. There is much to appreciate here, particularly when the film is looked at in the context of it being the '80's "Last Tango In Paris" - perhaps even self consciously so. The opening shot of "Nine 1/2 Weeks" echoes the famous opening of "Last Tango In Paris" and there are many parallels, but never to the point of it becoming overt.

    If one accepts that form is to mirror content and apply that here it becomes clear that efforts were made to do so. The visual 'look' of both films not only mirror their content (for 'Tango': a muted color pallette, yet somehow lush, there is a layer over everything) but also their era. Both films deal with similar subject matter, in the context of the time in which they were made.

    "Nine 1/2 Weeks" IS the '80's in much the way that "Last Tango..." is the '70's - the obsessions of an era are embodied in the struggle of two human bodies. Motions, touches are imbued with something beyond what is happening in the here and now. Very much in question here is the internal landscape of the characters involved - something one, as a filmmaker, would rather expose in a visual way as opposed to having characters pontificate about it (though Brando TALKS in "Last Tango..." it is very often what he doesn't say, the silence between two lines of dialogue, that SAY more) - in "Nine 1/2 Weeks" there are many visual cues/pointers as to the characters' states of mind, i.e. their apartments, the manner in which they are decorated stark, all straight lines (John) vs. cluttered and dusty (Liz). Elements like that make a film work.

    The only moments of relief that Liz experiences in the film are when she is away from the city, away from John, amidst nature with the painter - in fact, one almost never sees John outside, just like Paul in "Last Tango..." - all these little cues about character should raise the questions in the viewer's mind - what sort of person would?...
  • comment
    • Author: GoodBuyMyFriends
    I have seen this movie many times. I find it to be, not a sexual movie. It does have depth and symbolism if you are able to get passed the simple sex scenes. My favorite part is when Elizabeth goes to visit Fransworth, the artist.If you really think about it just as he is at the gallery opening of his show, so is she "a fish out of water".It can't survive and in the end neither can she.I love the way this film was shot.This movie is more about stepping out side your comfort zone. You know about her family and life, but you don't learn about his until it is to late.People need to get passed the sex scenes and realize this movie is about human limits.All of us feel this inside, but are afraid, like Elizabeth to try it.
  • comment
    • Author: Skunk Black
    Don't know why I didn't see this movie until recently, as I am a big Adrian Lyne fan. Maybe because Mickey Rourke has become so repulsive in recent years. However, I found this to be a thoroughly entertaining film, with fascinating performances and all the 80's accoutrements - music, fashion, set decoration, etc. I don't know how anyone could call it boring, but we all see different things when we watch a movie.

    I thought the much-vaunted "sex" scenes were pretty tame, actually, but really, really fun to watch! Kim Basinger never looked more beautiful, and Rourke looked great, too. I disagree that there was no character development. I think there were depths to both characters that didn't come out until the end of the movie, which I found very poignant. Yes, I think it was more about power than sex, and when the moment of truth came for the balance of power to shift - as the Rourke character had planned for it to do - he had scared off his true love. Sad, and a true sequel could have been fun.

    I give it 8/10 and plan to add it to my video collection ASAP.
  • comment
    • Author: Jay
    Probably one of the most misunderstood movies ever made, Nine and 1/2 Weeks to me is, in one word, amazing.

    Some call it soft-core porn while others call it meaningless. I call it a movie that shows the viewer what other movies do not show. The other side of relationships. The darker side, the side of people that most movies don't go to because they believe the average person would be turned off due to the fact that it is not the average love story.

    Yes, parts of the movie to some might seem slow, but if you let yourself get involved in the character, then you might just understand what this amazing movie is all about.
  • comment
    • Author: DEAD-SHOT
    After all these many years I finally watched "Nine 1/2 Weeks" and clearly it is a dated piece that captured the times of the 1980's well. Also many may find the film a bit overstated for the way it tries to prove it messages of love and feeling. Still this is a film that is fun and very enjoyable to watch as it proves just how complex and tense that love making can be really this film showcased it as a dangerous and mysterious game of obsession.

    Set in New York City, with the hustle and rush of big city life you see Elizabeth(Kim Basinger) a young single and attractive woman who works at an art gallery showcase. Then one day while strolling the city by chance and fate she meets a handsome and strange man his name is John(Mickey Rourke). John is the perfect man who has a successful job as a wall street broker, he dresses nice has a nice place. Yet the big thing missing is love. He's just so emotionally empty that it hurts inside.

    When the relationship progresses the love making leads to extremes as their ways of pleasure are strange. The scenes where food were used as support were interesting! John had clearly showed a side of being a risk taker and that is seen as even being more evident when his erotic love making ways with Elizabeth push her limits and boundaries. You name it from blindfolds to whip creme to another woman for hot turn ons for John! This film really proved just how fun love making can be true it pushed the limits, but it showed just how far someone will go like the John character who was so emotionally and physically empty for so long. Yet in the end as with most cases the passion wears off as it couldn't last proving that love hurts and it must be a special kind for it to last. Overall good film that may be a little to dated, still it's a nice treat for it's take of pushing love making to new erotic and obsessive heights. As it proved love can be so complex and which passion feeds from one's emotions. And the on screen chemistry between Basinger and Rourke made it a watch.
  • comment
    • Author: Duzshura
    I am very surprised reading several negative reviews about this movie. Probably this is not a movie made for the American audience, which many times react in a bad way when a movie push a little bit too much the envelope. This movies was a very big hit in Europe when first came out. It was the most talk about movie of the year because of his extremely unique and modern approach to sexuality in a film. I was very young when this movie came out, but i still remember the big fuss about it. The director is one of the best director, he challenged himself constantly, his movies are never boring or dull and he like to take chances which many directors are very afraid to do it. Nine and 1/2 weeks is a very interesting movie to watch, because it is about what is going on between this 2 people, in an emotional level. Which can be pretty scary for the intensity of that. It is not about sex, it goes beyond that. It is a very innovative movie that it would always be remembered for changing the rules about making movies that are considered erotic. Too bad that not everybody is Adrian Lyne, and the majority of the films of this genre are horribly bad.
  • comment
    • Author: Saberdragon
    I just saw this film again after 18 years since it release and although I was in my twenties back then and now I appreciate this film so much for what it is. I guess one could say this is kind of a "Last Tango in Paris" of my generation; maybe not as deep and bleak but Lynn packaged this film like one long music video or long commercial; there is so much eye candy shots and that is just to get your attention so he can draw into this relationship that develops slow into a kind of dark and sad area. The first time John and Liz meet each other; John takes her back to a boat house and while there he kind of gives a her subtle glimpse of his sadistic nature; and all the other scenes that follow are all like a building blocks of John's dark character who according to Liz "She can't figure what he is about".

    There is a scene where John takes Liz to buy her the outfit that he likes and while paying the cashier Liz asks John, "don't want to know what I think about it?"and John smiles and says "No". At his apartment he has her crawl to pick up the money because it pleases him and doesn't care what Liz feels about it; and yet Liz continues to let him push her into doing it. Each time she gives into his demands he goes further to manipulate her into something that he likes and that last request in the hotel room with the Hooker was the breaking point for Liz where she runs into a porn store and kisses a complete stranger to get a kind of even with John and yet deep in turmoil on the inside of what is happening to her.

    I think to me the last scene its still the very best part of this whole film; when Liz gets out of bed while John still sleeping and she is in tears. She begins to pack up her stuff and when John wakes up he tries to again in his subtle and manipulative way to stop her. He says he has never felt like the way he feels with her and some how he calls his feelings "Love". I think what I like the best is what Liz says: "we both knew it will be over if one of us said stop, but you wouldn't say it, and I waited too long"; she has had enough; as much as she is in love I guess there is a part of her that can still find reason and see the damage this relationship can do to her; I don't think the audience didn't expect this to happen or how it will end so fast in just 9 1/2 weeks, for most of us takes so much longer to realize how unhealthy a relationship is because we are too busy having fun and focusing on sex as love; this is where this film truly becomes of a substance and takes a huge turn by Liz ending it not John; this time she took control and left John hoping she will return as all others did when he counted to 50, this is how self absorbed his character was. When Liz leaves the apartment while walking and crying in the street there is one last shot of her turning back one more time maybe hoping John had followed her and then she turns because its over; this part still holds up today as it did 18 years ago when I first saw it and I still get the same feeling.

    This film really should have been longer and from what I read here it was originally about 3 hours and I like others would Mr. Lynn does someday release it as a director's cut. I never saw the sequel to this film "Another 9 1/2 weeks" which I hear was a disaster. Its sad really because this could have been like "Before Sunrise" and "Before Sunset" sequels; although Mickey Rourke may not as appealing or as popular he once was back in the 80's after his acting career took a dive to his boxing career but I still think he is a great actor and I personally would like to see another sequel with both Bassinger and Rourke to this dark romantic masterpiece...you never know it may still happen?
  • comment
    • Author: Kemath
    "9 1/2 Weeks", while containing a few sequences of sex and nudity, is nowhere near as shocking as it might once have been considered. Kim Basinger plays Liz, an art gallery employee who meets Wall Street trader John, played by Mickey Rourke. While their romance is at first sweet and romantic, things begin to quickly change. John initiate a series of kinky sexual trysts involving food, a hooker, and an enticing striptease performed by Liz. But the time comes for Liz to question the nature of the relationship and ask herself, Is this really healthy? The movie is very, very slow, and in parts, very boring. If your watching this for the much hyped sex and nudity, don't bother, besides the occasional glimpse of Basinger's breasts and butt, there isn't much here to see. See it, just don't expect too much.

    "9 1/2 Weeks" is Unrated for strong sensuality and nudity, and for some adult language.

    NOTE: "9 1/2 Weeks" is available R-Rated or Unrated, which is one minute longer than the R version. But the Unrated version is no more graphic than a regular R-Rated movie.
  • comment
    • Author: Mr_Mix
    May contain some spoilers:

    What I find incredibly ironic about our society ( North American that is ) is how hypocritical we are when it comes to sex. I mean let's face it, many people over the age of 18 have had it at least once and many people are consumed by it. And as long as it is consentual, protected sex and intentions are never misleading, then what is wrong with sex, even if it is with someone that you are not in love with. Sex can be a powerful thing. Because if you think about all the feelings that you can experience during the act, they really range perhaps more than any single act that you can think of. Everything from pure lust to passionate love can be felt at one time or another during sex. And I find it funny that certain institutions or groups try to deny or at least restrict people from fulfilling one of the most basic needs they have as an animal. Nine 1/2 Weeks explores the power of sex. It examines it and doesn't shy away from what it wants to say. And for a film that is almost 14 years old, I have to applaud it for pushing the envelope of what is acceptable and what is loathed.

    Kim Basinger is a successful but lonely woman living in New York City. She meets a stranger who buys her an expensive item that she could never afford. But he buys it because he can. This starts the intrigue between the two. He is the tall dark mysterious man that doesn't really reveal much of himself. He is obviously incredibly wealthy, but it is not really revealed what it is that he does. And that feeling of subserviance is paralleled when the blindfold scene is presented to us later in the film. He controls his life by controlling others. He has his world under his control and that includes his sexuality towards her.

    Some say that this film doesn't really have a point or that it has no plot but to show a lot of soft core sex scenes. But look at it a little more carefully and you will see that it does have much to say. It just has to say it about sex, and many people can't handle that. Sex is topic that is taboo. It is something that shuold stay in Pandora's box buried in some ancient Egyptian catacomb, never to be unleashed on mankind. But Adrienne Lynne is a bit of a renegade, that, or he grew up in Europe where sex is like eating. They are both necessary to live.

    This film also has a perfect mood setting soundtrack. Songs like Slave to Love and Eurasian Eyes are just as important to the film as the lighting and the set design. Then there is Joe Cocker's famous " You Can Leave Your Hat On" melody that is the perfect song for Basinger's strip tease. These songs heighten the mood and make you feel a part of the world that you are voyeuristically watching.

    I'm not going to comment on the plot and the acting and the direction or tell you what this film is about. It is a film about a relationship that is doomed because of it's sexuality, that is all you need to know. Judge for yourself how good or how bad it is. I personally liked this film very much and I do recommend it. It has a lot to show and a lot to say about our psyche when it comes to "doing it". But don't take my word, make up your own mind.
  • comment
    • Author: Nettale
    Although generally rubbished by critics because of the two lead actors, among other things, this was an interesting film in that it attempted to be artistic, something of a rarity for Hollywood. Much of what is presented was designed to look sexy, even if it was unlikely to be if you tried it yourself. And to give it its due, those responsible for art direction and cinematography did a pretty good job and it stands repeated viewings to pick up on nuances missed first time around. It is tantalizing but not especially erotic; a lot more is suggested than actually happens. Anyone who can remember working in an office in the 80s will relate to the telex machines, phones with bell-rings, and no desktop computer for the manger, and no mobile phones. The 80s apartment decor and fashions will also jog memories.
  • comment
    • Author: Nekora
    What one realizes while watching this is how limited and ultimately unsatisfactory is a relationship based purely on sex.

    I imagine that the familiar dominance/submissive psychology at the heart of this visually stunning movie--and it really is beautifully shot--comes from the novel by Elizabeth MacNeil. I say that, not having read the novel, because the seduction of Manhattan art dealer Elizabeth (Kim Basinger) by the smooth and supremely confident financier John (Mickey Rourke) is so very well done with the expensive presents, the well-timed flower deliveries, little endearments, etc., that it amounts to a woman's fantasy. The partial debasement of Elizabeth and her eventual triumph over her darker instincts and her realization that there is a difference between love and submission is also something that one might expect to find in a woman's point-of-view novel.

    However when we get to the actual sexuality and how it is acted out, it is unclear who dreamed up the scenes, MacNeil or director Adrian Lyne or the scriptwriters. I say this because the scenes were so predictable and so ordinary, and when not ordinary and predictable, were bordering on the just plain dumb. Making love in the rain, at the top of a tall building (inside the clock tower), blindfolding the woman, making her crawl, feeding her strawberries, etc., bring nothing new to eroticism. And the scene requiring some imagination--baiting the gay bashers--was not realistically done. Why directors insist on allowing a man holding onto the hand of woman to outrun the men chasing them never ceases to amaze me. And then to have Elizabeth and John stop in the middle of the street to allow the bashers they have outrun to catch up was just plain stupid, not to mention the phony fight that followed.

    Not only were the sexual scenes predictable but clearly Lyne was in harness (and I am glad of that) since he stops well short of what might happen if this sort of theme were fully played out.

    Putting all that aside what makes this movie worth seeing is Kim Basinger. She is absolutely stunning, and it is clear that Lyne and his camera adored her. More than that Basinger does a fine job of acting in a demanding role.

    I was impressed. Before seeing this film I thought she was a rather ordinary actress, but her ability to combine grown-up New York chic with little-girl vulnerability and to make absolutely clear the psychological dilemma her character's heart faced really held the movie together.

    Lyne's insistence on whispered dialogue difficult to hear was consistent with the theme of the movie but not kind to these ears. But that was okay because much of the dialogue was secondary to the visual exploration of the woman's sexuality. The peek-a-boo and off center and shadowed shots of Basinger's face and her silhouette, and the studied smile from Rourke combined with the stark black and whites of their clothes and the furnishings served to highlight and emphasis the flesh tones of Basinger's skin while lending an appropriate artistic and fashionable atmosphere to the movie, which after all has an art dealer at its center. The many scenes that were began and suggested, and then cut away from, allowed a richer texture of experience for the viewer than would have been possible had the scenes been played out. And that was doubly good because again it is the visuals that make this movie worth seeing, not the originality of the story and its development.

    To those viewers who thought that this was some sort of high class pornography, I can only say you missed the point entirely, and indeed, you may be projecting your own sorry mentality. For those others who were not, shall we say, sufficiently stimulated, I can point you to a graphic novel with a similar theme (written by a man) entitled The Story of O which will NOT be coming to a theater near you anytime soon.

    See this for Kim Basinger whose sensitive and robust beauty dominated the screen.

    (Note: Over 500 of my movie reviews are now available in my book "Cut to the Chaise Lounge or I Can't Believe I Swallowed the Remote!" Get it at Amazon!)
  • comment
    • Author: Lilegha
    This movie still rates high in my Top 10 Favorites. Basinger and Rourke have the right chemistry it takes to make this movie a success. I can't see anyone else playing either role. In this day and age of accepted nudity, 9 1/2 Weeks leaves enough to the imagination to make this movie highly-erotic by most standards. It leaves the imagination wide open to explore our own inner-workings and desires. Everyone of legal age should watch this movie, more than once. I've watched it at least a dozen times since 1992 and have gotten something 'different' out of it each time. Everyone will get something different from this movie, but it must be watched with an open mind. The movie had to end the way it did or it wouldn't have made sense otherwise. It's incredibly thought-provoking, and left me with various emotions throughout every scene. For anyone who hasn't seen it, it's worth every highly-charged minute.
  • comment
    • Author: Humin
    this film caught so much flack. This is not so much a movie about sex (although that's definitely the major theme of the story) but more about power and control and the ramifications of giving up that control. This is a movie that's definitely controversial and there are some pretty hard to watch scenes but this is by no means your typical "sex and that's it" movie, it makes a powerful statement.

    Anyone who's ever been in love-passionately in love-and had the feeling they'd do anything for that person even if that meant giving up their very self-even if that feeling was fleeting and only lasted 5 minutes-should watch this film. I believe it is based on a true story, though I'm not absolutely sure of that-but the question that this movie will have you asking is:could this ever happen to me?

    I saw this a long time ago and found it very tough to watch but fascinating too. There's a lot more depth to this film then people give it credit for. Not by far the best film ever made but definitely worth seeing.
  • comment
    • Author: zmejka
    S and M even suggested at is still powerful to people. This movie was a sexual control being erotic. Well we've all been there in some way at one time or another. The acting was amazing. The eating scene remains very sexy indeed. Rourke was hot, better than his "just been hit by a truck look" in Wrestler. This is in my top 25 best. I am sure this could have been made today and it would be more graphic. Some things are sexier when some mystery remains intact. I hope they never remake this. Would love to see more of Basinger. a woman ages and they toss her aside for these anorexic babies who still need acting lessons. They were both at the height of their physical prowess and beautiful and still remain in our memory as hot hot hot. Indeed
  • comment
    • Author: from earth
    Divorced art gallery worker in New York City meets a handsome, enigmatic financier with a kink: he's into role-playing games, emotional and sexual manipulation...also, he's a bit of a jerk. There isn't much about "9 1/2 Weeks" that is warm or inviting; the central relationship between Kim Basinger and Mickey Rourke is there to be busted up, and director Adrian Lyne doesn't appear to be concerned with the characters anyway--his thing seems to be chilly atmospherics and stylish furniture. The first sex with the blindfold and ice cubes is tantalizing, but the scene seems chopped short (presumably so as not to offend us prudish Americans!). In fact, all the sexual scenes are edited the same way: the clinch, the brief flash of nudity, some heavy breathing, end of scene. Interest wanes after the viewer becomes satisfied with Basinger's milky beauty and Rourke's sometimes-devilish panache, but their surroundings are sterile. There are two or three playful moments (such as a food frenzy in front of the refrigerator), but mostly it's all talk and little action, and unintentionally funny bits like Rourke attempting to get Basinger in the mood by playing Billie Holiday's "Strange Fruit" (!) **1/2 from ****
  • comment
    • Author: Beranyle
    "9/2 Weeks" based on an erotic drama that stars Kim Basinger and Mickey Rourke as Elizabeth and John who embark on a steamy and seductive romantic escapade that breaks the barriers of how far she will go. In sync to the title, the relationship is not long lasting, but the experience was unforgettable and utterly fulfilling. John has been smitten with Elizabeth the moment he has set his eyes on her while his flawless charisma is hard for Elizabeth to resist.

    As a no brainer, she naturally falls in love with John and while his behavior becomes more domineering and controlling, his seductive mannerisms are just so unbearable for her to let go. He continually pampers her with gifts even though that barely phases her romantically. It appears that what gets her juices flowing is his manipulative charm and his physical good looks. The most intimate moments came from a scene where Elizabeth is blindfolded in the kitchen and John starts rubbing her with ice cubes and feeds her while her eyes are blocked and they have sex in places we would have never imagined like a back alley or at a clock tower. Sure the eroticism is quite frequent, the scenes are overly done in terms of vulgarity as one might anticipate. It all comes down on its audience to draw their own interpretations.

    The actions of John is quite unpredictable as you just anxiously await to see if his raw emotions change this movies will try keep you at the edge of your seat. But throughout the movie, John succeeds to keep his calmness in tact even when he was controlling her, which makes this man a hostile individual with a subtle demeanor. In the case of Elizabeth her vulnerable desire is just to be loved no matter how much of a jerk, John can be. And sure she didn't like the games he played, she still went along and enjoyed what was given to her. The interaction of Basinger and Rourke's characters is so engaging you will want to applaud them one their names appear when the final credit roll.
  • comment
    • Author: Coiron
    I remember this film from the great and exciting cinema of the 80's, it quietly invigorates one, tethers the soul, and makes you ask the question, "Where have all the thoughtful and powerful movies gone?" 9 1/2 Weeks stars Mickey Rourke as John, and Kim Bassinger as Elizabeth, as a post-modern couple smitten with each other in New York City. Through a series of erotic adventures, the young and stunning Rourke manages to estrange Elizabeth, pushing her to the edge of her sanity and her emotional boundaries.

    What makes this film so great is the simple dramatic story, the fact that it is so visual, and that it is shot so well. It constantly uses close ups without seeming intrusive, the casting is superb, the montages are to die for, and the camera work is excellent, as is the cinematography. It is, I believe, everything one could ever want from a film; thoughtful, smart, visual, sophisticated, and very entertaining still. What 9 1/2 Weeks is also, is a thoughtful indictment of post-modern and consumer culture, not that it did any good. From a paper thin pocket-book, Lyne takes a clumsy first draft script and makes an impressionistic masterpiece.

    Through many modern abstractions, what constitutes modern living, the people in this film loose the connection to their core being. This is constantly being played with in the film, from the fish motif started in the very first scenes, to the art gallery showing toward the end of the film, which spreads out post-modern decadence and its foibles for us like a buffet.

    This film, by the way, anchors beautifully in the subplot of Elizabeth's friend, Molly, who, with her average looks, average intellect, and lack of sophistication, by the end of the film winds up in a better place than our protagonist. By contrasting the main theme in the subplot and paying off the script resonates more completely, adding another dimension to the theme.
  • comment
    • Author: Dolid
    Look past the soft-core porn aspect. I respect Adrian Lynne, his shots are beautiful, many stills from his movies could stand alone as paintings. But aside from that, the main character of this movie has stepped outside of society. He answers to no beta boss, he sees a woman he wants to pursue and does not hesitate. He is sexual, he is alive. Have you ever felt like this- before 3 kids, a mortgage, yuppie friends you despise, answering to a beta boss every day of your life, sitting in a steel cage in traffic for half an hour twice daily. (the recent popularity of such movies as matrix, fight club, american beauty all cater this feeling in us that there is something more to life than going to the mall and drinking lattes)

    I guess this movie starts on this positive note, this connection and infatuation between the two people, but than the fetishes dominate as the excitement of the relationship must sustain it's "high", the relationship comes to an end as the two were not intertwined in society in a "normal" fashion. Left to their own devices and primary character's revelation of his true self he comes to learn that primal sexuality alone cannot sustain a relationship.
  • comment
    • Author: JoJolar
    This is another of Hollywood's many excursions into obsessive sex. It is not a great motion picture, but too many critics attack it because some shrink they read in best selling books, or listen to on radio tells them love is the answer to everything. Also there are the PC critics who can hail a movie showing a disgruntled woman trying to kill her former sex partner because that is supposed to show empowerment - but think a woman giving power to a male is degrading and criminal. Actually both type movies can be entertaining, and this one is.
  • comment
    • Author: Uaoteowi
    Liz is a graceful beauty who deals in modern art. John is a guy with money, which he makes from some vague financial dealing. They are both lonely New Yorkers, and both ready for an affair.

    The central idea of the film (if 'idea' is the correct word) is that a woman is best wooed by engaging her senses. The movie purports to show how John 'educates' Liz into enjoying sex through sensuality. There is an edge of danger in everything that John does (stopping the ferris wheel at its highest point, feeding the blindfolded Liz a chilli pepper) and the nervous, insecure Liz has to learn to embrace the risks in order to augment the thrills.

    That's the theory. What we get is Basploitation, with Kim Basinger having her nipples and bikini line rubbed with ice cubes. Lacking the imagination to treat its subject seriously, the flim shows us scene after scene of Mickey Rourke shovelling food into Basinger's mouth. Rourke's character is meant to be mysterious and alluring, but he is mostly just plain irritating. Basinger's Liz is supposedly being titillated, but the titillation is aimed at the viewer, not the girl (molasses poured on a thigh LOOKS sexy, but actually FEELS yucky). John, the guru of sensuality, can think of nothing more original than continually blindfolding Liz.

    The film desperately wants to be a badass New York movie-with-attitude. We are shown traffic and garbage trucks, and smart alec art critics at dinner parties. Puddles compete with smoky, dark restaurants in Chinatown in a bid to convince us that this is all gritty and real. John takes Liz to an eathouse where hoodlums were once killed. Molly is a funny-and-sassy-but-vulnerable-jewish-New-Yorker who bashes the trunks of taxis which displease her. The flower delivery boy bops to the rhythm of his walkman because this is New York and he's a crazy dude. The more the film strives after image, the more it descends into cliche. This isn't New York, it's a stereotype of New York concocted by West Coast film-makers.

    Details which are intended to persuade us that this affair is a wild, romantic fling simply don't work, for the simple reason that they are grindingly mundane (throwing Liz's hat into the air, a 'quickie' in the clock tower). Rourke lacks the gravitas of a Don Juan. He is supposed to be a wonderful cook, but all we ever see him doing is cracking raw eggs.

    Aspects of the film which tax our credulity include the fight with the street thugs, which John and Liz win so easily, the copulation under a downspout of freezing New York rainwater and the leg-spreading game on the department store bed.

    Is it fair that pretty blonde actresses are expected to get their kit off in this way? Well, one imagines that there are plenty more pretty blonde actresses in work than plain ones, and the pretty ones don't seem to be complaining. Basinger may rail against it all now, but she took the chance of stardom when it came her way. In one scene, Liz crawls reluctantly across the floor, picking up money. Maybe that is a metaphor.
  • comment
    • Author: Darksinger
    I saw this movie over 15 years ago, and was impressed with the way it handled the complex human emotions that permeate all romantic relationships. I was curious if I'd like it as much now as I did back then. And the answer is: yes, I did. Maybe even more so.

    For some reason this movie is loathed by many critics and viewers. I honestly do not know why. The interplay between the Type-A, controlling, cold power player John, and the lost, insecure divorcée Liz is palpable. Slowly, sensually, John begins to probe past Liz's defenses as he opens her up to things she'd never experienced before. The movie highlights how passion, while not always pretty, is an integral part of human emotions. And how once a person enters that dimension, it's necessary to keep upping the ante in order to keep experiencing the thrill that was so welcome at the start. If anything, 9 1/2 Weeks paints one of the most accurate pictures I've ever seen of just how dangerous that path really is.
  • Cast overview, first billed only:
    Mickey Rourke Mickey Rourke - John
    Kim Basinger Kim Basinger - Elizabeth
    Margaret Whitton Margaret Whitton - Molly
    David Margulies David Margulies - Harvey
    Christine Baranski Christine Baranski - Thea
    Karen Young Karen Young - Sue
    William De Acutis William De Acutis - Ted
    Dwight Weist Dwight Weist - Farnsworth
    Roderick Cook Roderick Cook - Sinclair - the Critic
    Victor Truro Victor Truro - Gallery Client
    Justine Johnston Justine Johnston - Bedding Saleswoman
    Cintia Cruz Cintia Cruz - Whore
    Kim Chan Kim Chan - Chinatown Butcher
    Lee Lai Sing Lee Lai Sing - Angry Chinese Customer
    Rudolph Willrich Rudolph Willrich - Chinatown Shopper
    All rights reserved © 2017-2024 hd.thomson-multimedia.com