Search

» » Le seigneur du temps (1996)

Short summary

The Doctor, an alien time traveller from the planet Gallifrey, is transporting the remains of his nemesis, the Master back to their homeworld. However the Master is not as dead as the Doctor thinks. The Master's essence escapes and sabotages the TARDIS, the Doctor's time machine causing it to crash land in San Franscisco on December 30th 1999. The Doctor requires a beryllium atomic clock to repair the TARDIS, but is shot as he leaves it. Taken to hospital, the Doctor's seventh regeneration is triggered by a surgeon, confused by his alien physiology, while the Master takes over a paramedic's body. He needs a Time Lord's body to survive and be able to regenerate again so he needs the Doctor's. The newly regenerated the Doctor must fight to save his own eighth body, and the world when the Master sabotages the TARDIS' power source. By midnight on December 31st 1999, the Earth will be pulled through this power-source, a mini-black hole, and only the Doctor can stop if only he can remember ...

The line "Life is wasted on the living!" is a reference to the original Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy radio series. Douglas Adams, author of the Hitchhiker's Guide series, is a former writer for Doctor Who (1963).

Christopher Eccleston, who would later play the Ninth Doctor in Doctor Who (2005), was offered the role of the Eighth Doctor but declined to audition, because at the time he felt he was not yet an established enough actor and did not want to be associated with a "brand name" so early in his career.

For 21 of the 26 season of Dr Who the key used for the TARDIS was a simple Yale lock key and was used in the normal way. The unique key used in this film was devised by Jon Pertwee and was used for his last three years in the show and was also used by Tom Baker's Dr for his first two seasons. For the first time viewers are shown exactly how this version of the key works.

When the Doctor rifles through a locker looking for clothes, we see him momentarily admiring a long scarf. This is a reference to the costume worn by the fourth Doctor, Tom Baker.

The "sonic screwdriver" seen in action at the start of the film, was first used by the second Doctor. This marks the first appearance of the sonic screwdriver since it was destroyed in Doctor Who: The Visitation: Part Three (1982). Upgraded versions of the device have become a staple in the revived series.

The UK television broadcast ended with a dedication to Jon Pertwee, the third actor to play the Doctor in the original TV series (and one of the most popular), who had died a week earlier.

The BBC originally wanted Tom Baker, who played the Fourth Doctor in the original series, to be the Doctor at the opening of the film, as this version of the Doctor is the one most familiar to American audiences. The American executive producer Philip David Segal insisted on Sylvester McCoy, as he was an avid Doctor Who fan and felt the Seventh Doctor still deserved a proper send-off. BBC One Controller Alan Yentob and executive producer Jo Wright were very resistant to the return of Sylvester McCoy, as they associated him with the decline in popularity and eventual cancellation of the original series. Wright eventually said that McCoy could appear as long as he was "in it for a very short time and didn't say anything". This was revealed on a documentary made about the film.

The Eighth Doctor is the only incarnation of the character to never encounter the Daleks on-screen.

The book that the Doctor sits down to read at the beginning and the end of the movie is "The Time Machine" by H.G. Wells. Wells is considered a legend of science-fiction and he was a huge influence on Doctor Who, hence the book's inclusion as a tribute to him.

The Eighth Doctor (Paul McGann) carries a small paper bag filled with jelly babies, which he offers to people he meets. This is a reference to the Second Doctor (Patrick Troughton) and the Fourth Doctor (Tom Baker), who did the same.

This is the first time the Doctor is shown kissing a woman. Previously the character never displayed any romantic interest in his female companions or any other women and although at the beginning of the TV series he traveled with his granddaughter, his family life is rarely mentioned. The Doctor being asexual was in part due to the family-orientated nature of the show.

Producer Philip David Segal was born in the U.S., but grew up in England, and was a fan of Doctor Who as a child. It was largely due to his determined efforts that this movie was carried to completion, and that its story stayed mostly within established Doctor Who canon.

While speaking at a Doctor Who convention in 2004, producer Philip David Segal mentioned that the TARDIS set used for this film has mysteriously disappeared from storage. The console from the set is now in the hands of long-time Doctor Who fan 'Paul Salamoff', who regularly brings the console to Los Angeles based Doctor Who convention Gallifrey One.

Peter Capaldi declined to audition for The Eighth Doctor because he felt it was unlikely that he would be given the part. He would later play The Twelfth Doctor in Doctor Who (2005).

The TARDIS set cost $1 million to build and was constructed in the hope that a series would have emerged from the film. Although it does not resemble the control rooms seen in the original series, it has long been established that The Doctor is capable of changing the interior configuration of the TARDIS anytime he chooses, as well as the TARDIS having more than one control room.

Initially, Christopher Lloyd was considered to play the part of The Master, but Universal balked at the cost. Eric Roberts was hired although, ironically, he turned out to cost more than Lloyd.

Trailers for this film used special effects footage from the 1986 television story, "The Trial of a Time Lord". The footage in question is the famous shot of the TARDIS being pulled into the Gallifreyan space station by the tractor beam.

Both Fox and Univeral Studios wanted a huge name to play The Eighth Doctor in the movie, to ensure a huge ratings success. The studios three top choices were Tom Hanks, Harrison Ford and Jim Carrey, all three of whom turned it down. Hanks, who is a fan of the classic series, turned down the role as he felt an American playing the role would not do the show's legacy any justice. Ford turned down the role as he didn't want to work in television. Carrey, who has never seen a single episode of Doctor Who, turned down the role as he felt it would cause outrage amongst Doctor Who fans if the role was played by someone who wasn't a fan of the classic series.

Although unsuccessful at relaunching the franchise, this film was adopted into the continuity of the television series. The episode "Night of the Doctor" allowed Paul McGann to play the role again, just long enough to regenerate into The War Doctor (John Hurt), who subsequently regenerates into the Ninth Doctor (Christopher Eccleston), who played the part in the first season of the new series.

Intended as a pilot for a new American-produced Doctor Who TV series, but although it was a ratings winner in the UK (achieving 9.1 million viewers, the best rating for a Doctor Who (1963) episode since Doctor Who: Time-Flight: Part One (1982)), it flopped on American TV and so no new series was purchased.

Paul McGann would continue to portray The Doctor in a long-running series of made-for-audio Doctor Who adventures by Big Finish Productions.

Sylvester McCoy (The Seventh Doctor) and Paul McGann (The Eighth Doctor) are the only British actors to appear in the film.

Alan Menken was considered to write a new Doctor Who theme tune when the producers couldn't secure the rights to the familiar theme, but before they approached him they were able to secure the rights.

In the scene where Grace is examining him, the Doctor says "I have twelve lives". This was overdubbed by Paul McGann at the last moment when executive producer Philip David Segal was informed that, in Doctor Who mythology, Time Lords in fact have thirteen lives.

The hospital sets used for this film were also used by the producers of the TV series Salatoimikud (1993).

The Daleks, the Doctor's most famous enemies, can be heard speaking their famous command, "EXTERMINATE," as The Master is apparently executed prior to the opening credits.

During the opening scenes in the TARDIS, a 900-year diary can be glimpsed - a reference to the 500-year diary carried by the second Doctor, Patrick Troughton.

The gold dust that the Master finds in the TARDIS and gives to Chang Lee is a reference to the Cybermen, one of the recurring enemies in the TV series (gold is lethal to them).

Sylvester McCoy was brought back as the Seventh Doctor for the regeneration into the Eighth Doctor (Paul McGann) and also to connect the TV movie with the BBC television series.

Among the various knobs and gadgets on the Tardis's control column is an old-fashioned automobile hand brake.

Mark McGann, the younger brother of Paul McGann, auditioned for the role of the Eighth Doctor.

Bruce the ambulance driver is seen waking up next to his wife Miranda, after being possessed by The Master. Miranda, who is then promptly strangled by The Master, was played by Eric Roberts (Bruce/The Master) real life bride Eliza Roberts.

Paul McGann hated the wig he had to wear.

Actors considered for the role of the Master: F. Murray Abraham, Dan Aykroyd, Richard Dean Anderson, Armand Assante, Scott Bakula, Jim Belushi, Tom Berenger, David Bowie, Steve Buscemi, Dana Carvey, Chevy Chase, Phil Collins, Tim Curry, Timothy Dalton, Matt Dillon, Michael Dorn, Richard Dreyfuss, Robert Duvall, Robert Englund, Jonathan Frakes, Matt Frewer, Jeff Goldblum, Rutger Hauer, Gregory Hines, Dennis Hopper, William Hurt, Timothy Hutton, Chris Isaak, Mick Jagger, Ben Kingsley, Christopher Lee, Ray Liotta, John Lithgow, Kyle MacLachlan, John Malkovich, Malcolm McDowell, Rick Moranis, Bill Murray, Judd Nelson, Leonard Nimoy, Oliver Platt, Jonathan Pryce, Randy Quaid, Judge Reinhold, Tom Selleck, Martin Sheen, Kevin Spacey, Brent Spiner, Patrick Stewart, Sting, Jon Voight, Tom Waits, Damon Wayans, Keenen Ivory Wayans, Peter Weller, Henry Winkler, James Woods, Michael York and Bill Pullman.

The first Doctor Who story ever to be filmed in North America.

Producer Philip David Segal was trying to make this film at the same time another company had the rights to a theatrical version of Doctor Who, but their rights were on the verge of expiring while Segal was trying to secure his version. The other company originally tried to extend their rights by having Leonard Nimoy shoot a bit of footage as the Doctor so they could claim they were starting production. However, Segal told Nimoy what they were up to, and Nimoy backed out, thus allowing the rights to expire.

Paul McGann was Jo Wright's first choice for the role of the Doctor because he was "a good actor, very good looking and had a great voice". Earlier actors to play the character had usually been selected for their eccentric or unusual looks rather than their attractiveness.

The title logo used for this film is based upon the logo used by the original TV series between 1970 and 1973. The logo is now used by BBC Worldwide as the standard Doctor Who logo for all "classic" material (all DVDs, books, etc of stories predating the Ninth Doctor and the 2005 series revival).

Steven Spielberg was originally involved in the film's development, through his company Amblin Television. When an early script featured the Doctor in World War II battling Nazis in search of an ancient artifact, Spielberg pulled his support, saying it was getting to be too much like Indiana Jones. Fearful that the production deal might fall apart, the American producers didn't tell the BBC that Spielberg's Amblin studios were no longer involved until after production was underway and it was too late to back out.

The original UK television broadcast was shown before the 9pm watershed and contained some edits for violence due to the BBFC, including the Seventh Doctor's death on the operating table was trimmed down quite a bit including his final scream, and the gunning down of Chang Lee's friends was cut out, making it appear as if they suddenly vanished. When BBC America cablecast the eighth Doctor Who 50th Anniversary special "The Doctors Revisited" on August 31, 2013, they showed this watered down version.

The Seventh Doctor (Sylvester McCoy) speaks only 11 short lines of dialogue.

Originally, the Doctor's old teacher Borusa was going to appear. Actors considered for the role included Don Ameche, Richard Attenborough, Peter Cushing, Kirk Douglas, Albert Finney, John Gielgud, Richard Griffiths, Alec Guinness, Richard Harris, Anthony Hopkins, Burt Lancaster, Christopher Lee, Jack Lemmon, Ian McKellen, Armin Mueller-Stahl, Paul Newman, Peter O'Toole, Gregory Peck, Donald Pleasence, Peter Ustinov, Max von Sydow and David Warner. The favorite was O'Toole, who declared his interest before the character was omitted.

The Master's human body was originally supposed to slowly degrade throughout the film. This plan was abandoned when Eric Roberts found the make-up prosthetics to be too uncomfortable. One scene of this plotline remains, when he peels off a fingernail in front of the ambulance dispatcher.

Michael Apted, Joe Dante, Alan Parker, Ridley Scott and Peter Weir were potential candidates for directing the film.

Fox TV announced plans to rebroadcast the movie on 31 December 1999 - the very day the film takes place - however these plans were later changed and the film was not rerun at that time.

A new theme tune was proposed for the film, replacing Ron Grainer's famous Doctor Who (1963) Theme from 1963. Ultimately, Grainer's theme was used, but the composer wasn't credited.

Michael Crawford, Tim Curry, Eric Idle, Billy Connolly, Trevor Eve, Michael Palin, Robert Lindsay and Jonathan Pryce were all considered for the role of the Eighth Doctor. Palin was a strong frontrunner, but he didn't feel that he could do the role justice. Lindsay actually auditioned for the role, together with Anthony Head, Tim McInnerny, Tony Slattery, Liam Cunningham, Nathaniel Parker and Mark McGann (Paul's brother).

The film takes place from December 30, 1999 to January 1, 2000.

The Dalek voices heard at the beginning were not from the original BBC television series, but were actually the slightly treated voice of director Geoffrey Sax.

Gordon Tipple was given an on-screen credit because he recorded the original monologue that was to have opened the movie but was discarded in favour of a monologue by Paul McGann, which was itself discarded in favour of a second monologue by Paul McGann that is now in the finished movie.

Anthony Head auditioned for the role of the Eighth Doctor.

Along with Alien Nation: Millennium (1996), this is one of two 1996 Fox television film continuations of a cancelled science fiction series to take place in California in December 1999 and January 2000.

Kristian Alfonso, Maria Bello, Jodi Benson, Erika Eleniak, Stacy Haiduk, Marcia Gay Harden, Helen Hunt, Kelly Lynch, Carrie-Anne Moss, Paige O'Hara, Nia Peeples, Mia Sara, Helen Slater and Ally Walker were all considered for the role of Grace.

Fans voted this number 94 in a countdown of the 163 Doctor Who (1963) stories in Outpost Gallifrey's 40th anniversary poll in 2003.

User reviews


  • comment
    • Author: MisterMax
    I was originally captivated by the Dr. Who series while PBS was airing the Tom Baker (my favorite) and Peter Davisson episodes during the 80's. Later I caught bits and pieces of some of the earlier and later incarnations of the Doctor during PBS pledge drives. (Yes, it worked! I have a bunch of Dr. who t-shirts and coffee cups now. And of course, i supported "television worth watching".) So when i heard about the fox production i was waiting with bated breath. Silly me. I should have known that the clowns in hollywood would urinate all over a wonderful story.

    Hits:

    Paul McGann was a great doctor. Good looking in the hollywood way but not a hollywood plasticface. He actually projects some character. He gives the role a sense of childlike wonder and earnestness, very much in keeping with the interpretation of T. Baker, Davisson and Troughton. His costume works for me.(but not how he got it. see my misses)

    The regeneration scene. Awesome! The whole idea of a cocky surgeon suddenly unable to perform a routine procedure and because of her frustration and conviction of the way things are she kills him is wonderful. The fact she has to deal with the reality that if she had just stepped back, questioned her assumptions, given the x-ray techs and radiologist credit for knowing what they were doing, etc, she would not have "killed" him, works for me. My only gripe is that she doesn't really agonize over it enough. She doesn't even apologize for killing him!

    Sylvester McCoy making his appearance. I think this regeneration was approached as well or better than any of the others. It's too bad Fox assumed that americans couldn't deal with the quirky McCoy as the Doctor. I guess he was just not "beautiful" enough. (last time i checked i was an american and i liked his doctor a bunch. I'd put him in a close tie with peter Davisson as second best)

    Some very typical doctor behavior. I particularly like where he holds the gun to HIS OWN head in order to steal the motorcycle. I could easily have pictured Tom Baker's or Patrick Troughton's Doctor doing that.

    The kiss - I don't mind the kiss at all. Actually it was kind of cool. I was always disappointed he never kissed Romana. There seemed good chemistry there. (since Tom Baker and the actress did end up marrying i guess that makes sense.) And come on people! it's just a kiss. It's not like they went totally hollywood and had them strip down, jump in bed and have her teach him the "human way" to ecstasy. And it's not like she shacks up with him in the Tardis. They each go their own way, friends. As it should be.

    Special effects, nothing outstanding for an american show but not bad. Wouldn't it be cool to have seen some of the classic who stories shot with effects this good?

    The new tardis. Not bad. A little hollywood i guess but no worse than the claustrophobic, antiseptic control room in the series. Wasn't there a point where one of the doctors (i think it was t. baker) used a nice mahogany and brass "old control room" for awhile? As for the spaciousness, not too hard to deal with. I remember an episode of the tv series where the doctor seems to be running endlessly down corridors in the tardis that look strangely like they might be corridors in a studio basement.

    Misses:

    Doctor is Half human and renaming the chameleon to the cloaking device... These are the result of the brainless hollywood assumption that americans will better consume a product only if it is made according to formula. In this world all sci-fi fans are by definition star trek fans, therefore these two "tips of the hat" to Star Trek are necessary. To me they are just way too jarring - they don't belong in the story at all. Tell me, what does it add to the story for him to be half human? What? Why does hollywood always assume that americans are all brainless boobs.... Still, (am i speaking heresy here?) if they are going to mix worldlines why pussyfoot around? Why not have the tardis appear on the bridge of the enterprise? I think the tension and interaction between Tom Baker's irreverent Doctor and Spock would be priceless. Still, it wouldn't be a Dr. Who story.

    Reinventing the master as a cheap terminator/krychek knock-off. Yuch. I accept the the incarnation of the master portrayed by anthony ainly was already a stolen body for the master trying to live beyond his final incarnation but still... this just doesn't work for me. I think i saw a villain like this on Power Rangers.

    Chang Lee does not leave with the doctor to become his first companion in the new Fox series. Why not? It's not like he's got much of a life to look forward to as a gang member. It would have been great.

    Procuring his costume -- I pondered that a long time after i saw the movie. How does a guy who's just left the morgue and is wandering around in a hospital basement find a room with all the windows smashed out and filled with lockers containing stage costumes? huh? I worked maintenance in a hospital when i was a teenager and EVERYTHING in the building was kept clean, painted and in perfect working order, even in the sub-basement. A derelict room like that? Not in any hospital i've ever seen!

    All the senseless incorrect references to the Dr. Who pantheon. Ok, him having jelly babies is marginally acceptable, i guess, but the Eye of Harmony? Just let the story develop naturally for pete's sake....

    the chase scene and other hollywood pap. I admit that Pertwee and the U.N.I.T. people end up doing that a lot but ya know, I always thought of pertwee's doctor as pretty lame compared to most of the others. The whole thing about the doctor being sentenced to remain on earth seemed a cheap budgeting ploy by bbc to cut down the cost of sets and special effects. Why put any of this in except to make a nod to the pertwee incarnation. Again, why does hollywood always assume we're morons? And the countdown scene for the bomb or whatever (it's been awhile since i've seen it). What's up with that? They only thing they didn't have was the scene where he has to cut the red wire or the blue wire. Or the scene where he walks into the darkened room where the monster is and inexplicably doesn't turn on the light. Or the scene where his boss takes away his badge and tells him he's on his own... I mean if we're going to tell a story by formula what's up? You missed a few, hollywood guys!!

    Why wasn't K-9 in the movie? It's amazing the hollywood guys missed the potential r2-d2 tie-ins.

    I guess to sum up, i'd say that this Doctor is better than no doctor at all. I just wish they'd have given us a script that was even a little better than an episode of (70's) battlestar galactica or the six million dollar man. Maybe if they would have made the series it would have. Maybe. I'd like to see the people that made the new Dune movies for the Sci Fi channel take a crack at the doctor. Now that would be cool!
  • comment
    • Author: spacebreeze
    It was in January 1996 that I first heard that my all time favourite TV hero was returning to our screens as a joint BBC / American network TVM . Whoever you are reading this review never EVER give up on your hopes and dreams because for DOCTOR WHO fans in the early 1990s not one of us ever believed we`d be seeing our favourite show return , never mind seeing a big budget American production or that this version was gong to have BAFTA award winning actor Paul McGann in the title role . Words fail to describe the anticipation me and every single other Who fan in the cosmos had in waiting till the TVM was broadcast in May . The only comparison I can think of is LOTR diehards waiting to see FELLOWSHIP , THE TWO TOWERS and RETURN OF THE KING . When the day of the broadcast came one Bank holiday Monday I`d almost bitten my fingers off in unbearable anticipation . I`d read every article I could find about the production in telefantasy magaziness , Paul McGann`s Doctor had appeared on the front cover of every British TV guide and the trailers led me to believe the Daleks were going to be heavily featured alongside the Master . So in mid evening the TVM began and for 90 minutes all the world`s problems disappeared . When the end titles rolled I was torn between being totally amazed by the good and bitterly disappointed by the bad .

    The good bits were Geoffry Sax`s direction . Every single cent was up there on screen for the audience to gasp at . This is one Who story that can`t be accused of having crap FX . Sax also does an excellent editing job with intercutting between scenes , and it really was fascinating watching a Who story take place in an American setting . But the best aspect to the production is Eric Roberts camp scene stealing performance as the Master . My own memories of Roger Delgado`s original Master soon faded as Roberts bad-ass TERMINATOR inspired American arch enemy of the Doctor stole the entire show .

    But unfortunately much of the bad outweighed the good and most of this was entirely down to Matthew Jacobs script which involved far too much continuity and extremely bad continiuty at that which not only displeases diehard fans but will alienate casual viewers at the same time . Regeneration ? temporal orbit ? the eye of harmony ? I know of these concepts because I`m a fan but here they`re presented entirely different from what I know them as . Likewise when did the Doctor become half human ? But the most disappointing thing were the Daleks who seem to be intergalatic hangmen and not the Nazis of the universe as shown on TV for three decades . Also bitterly disappointing to see them relegated to an off screen cameo when according to the trailers they might have been making a physical presence . Oh BTW can anyone really understand the plot ? At times it felt more like a Bond movie as the Doctor races around on a motor bike trying to save the world from a super villain . With the exception of Roberts no one really turns in a good performance least of all McGann who is surely one of Britain`s most underrated actors . I really expected more from him , though to be fair he didn`t have a lot to go on due to the script.

    Oh well I suppose it was good while it lasted and I suppose my life has been slightly enriched after seeing an American version of DOCTOR WHO , and let me just repeat if someone had told me in 1992 I`d one day be watching an American version of the show I would have laughed in their face . It`s not the worst DOCTOR WHO story I`ve seen but it`s not a story I`ll watch over and over again unlike The Silurians , Inferno , Genesis Of The Daleks , Seeds Of Doom or Kinda . These really were classic pieces of not only Who but of British television
  • comment
    • Author: Voodoogore
    At last people can stop taking the proverbial out of the special effects in Dr Who! Instead they can take the proverbial out of the limp plot (if you can call it that). Eric Roberts isn't a patch on either of the previous incarnations of the Master. Paul McGann, however, makes an original Doctor and it's a shame a potentially interesting incarnation of the great Time Lord wasn't allowed to develop. There was a lot of complaining about the kissing scene, but I personally didn't see what was wrong with it as long as the Doctor doesn't turn into James Bond or Captain Kirk. Anyway, since the Doctor has a grand-daughter (Susan) then he must have done more than kiss a woman at some point in his life! But I did see what was wrong with the 'half-human' business. Can't people accept somebody who is an alien?

    This film certainly has its moments and shows great potential for a new series, but it's just a shame Fox couldn't get their act together and make that series instead of allowing it to fall back into the clutches of the money-minded BBC where it'll probably never be seen again.

    Not an example of Dr Who at its best by any means, but if you're a fan of the program like me then it's worth watching just to see the Doctor back in action, if only for one adventure.
  • comment
    • Author: Morlunn
    In 1996, seven years after the original Doctor Who series was canceled, the American network Fox thought a USA reboot of the show might be a good way to bring everybody's favorite Time Lord back to the small screen. The resulting TV movie was notoriously lambasted by critics and fans alike, who responded with more warmth to the BBC's revival of the character in 2005. Perhaps the biggest problem lies in the very fact that the Yanks tried to do their own version of a quintessential British creation: you don't see the Brits try and remake Star Trek, do you? Nevertheless, as messy as it is, this 1996 version of Doctor Who (which is part of the official mythology) has a few valid selling points that make it worth tracking down on a boring Saturday afternoon.

    The original show ended with the Doctor being played by Sylvester McCoy, the seventh incarnation of the character, and it is still McCoy, albeit credited as a guest star, who controls the TARDIS at the beginning of the story. The year is 1999 (as a matter of fact, the specific date is December 31st), and the renegade Time Lord is transporting the ashes of his archenemy, the Master, back to their home planet Gallifrey. However, due to a series of mishaps, the machine crash-lands in America, with the Doctor presumably dead and the Master's spirit free to take over the body of a paramedic (Eric Roberts). His plan is to use some temporal anomaly to steal the Doctor's remaining lives (each Time Lord has thirteen of them; the Master's used them up). As for the Doctor, once he's regenerated into a half-human eighth embodiment (Paul McGann), he has to stop his nemesis once and for all.

    The plot is a classic good vs. evil confrontation, and that's one of the TV movie's main flaws: instead of reintroducing the Doctor, like Russell T. Davies did in the new series, the narrative proceeds as if no time had passed between the original show's finale and this Americanized version. This can prove particularly alienating to US audiences, for whom Doctor Who isn't an essential part of popular culture, and McGann's clumsy voice-over doesn't do much to sort things out in that department. And that's without mentioning the holes in logic: why introduce two new (American) sidekicks, one of whom a potential love interest for the protagonist, and then suggest they would have no major role in other episodes, had the US show been picked up by Fox? And since when do Daleks and Time Lords cooperate, as shown prior to the opening credits?

    That said, McGann and Roberts are good enough to compensate most of the other rubbish, one giving that undeniably English quality to the quirky time traveler, the other adding a bit of OTT menace to one of the show's seminal villains. In addition, the special effects are state-of-the-art, as is the new rendition of Ron Grainer's immortal theme music.

    Overall, a one-off experiment that is best remembered as a guilty pleasure for die-hard fans. Fortunately, the Yanks were wise enough to let the BBC handle everything Who-related from this point on.

    6,5/10
  • comment
    • Author: Mataxe
    This is one of the most over-analyzed pieces of television ever produced. "Doctor Who" fans are such a dedicated bunch that they'll buy camcorders and film their own episodes when the show is not in production; it stands to reason that they'd pick apart the only "official" new episode produced for TV in the 1990s, but the chorus of their dissenting voices sometimes really grates on me. Thanks to all the controversy, I still can't honestly say what I think of this movie, even all these years later; every time I see it, I have a different opinion.

    I'm not on board with some of the usual criticisms. I don't care about the romance (it barely features), and I don't really mind that the Doctor is half-human (it's a side issue that doesn't alter the plot, hardly worth complaining about). What I do dislike is the fast-paced, action-oriented nature of the story, which prevents character development (Chang Lee is the chief offender here) and doesn't allow any room for the Doctor to act like a detective (which is his usual schtick).

    Still, good effects, a rockin' music score and some nice arty camera work elevate this far above the average TV production. Perhaps the only thing that really matters is that it's entertaining; why analyze it beyond that? The only real problem here is that the original series is, generally speaking, even more entertaining, but that's one tough act to follow!

    An ex-roommate and good buddy of mine perhaps summed it up best: "That was fun, but could you put on a cheesy one now? They're more interesting." I bet her opinion of it wouldn't change on a second viewing; I, alas, am afflicted with the curse of fandom!
  • comment
    • Author: Wohald
    This attempted pilot for a new Doctor Who series may have faults but I think some of the criticism is off-base. The original Doctor Who series was never a slave to realism or it's own continuity the way shows like Star Trek or The X-Files were. It was more like a long-running comic strip with it's light "who cares about obsessive fan-boys and fan-girls" approach. This show always played fast and loose with it's own continuity and often contradicted what had gone before for the sake of the present story being aired. So many fans went bananas over things like the Doctor being half-human and the Eye of Harmony being on board the Tardis and the Master being able to slither around in that black snake form to find a new host body or why he was put on trial by the Daleks. For a show that always pretty much made it up as it went along that's a waste of time. I've got some random thoughts to throw out about this attempt to revive the series.

    As for the Doctor being half-human I'll repeat my remark about this show making it up as it went along. From what I recall the show was on the air for years before it even established that he was a Time Lord so a sudden revelation about a half-human heritage isn't as way out as it first seems.

    My view on the Master being able to slither around in snake form is also to repeat that this show was never a slave to it's own continuity. I'd like every Dr Who fan who can't sleep at night fretting over this bit to explain to me what the White Form in the story where Tom Baker regenerated into Peter Davison was and why the other regeneration scenes took place without such a White Form "merging" with the Doctor.

    As for why the Eye of Harmony was on board the Tardis I'll say that if a new Doctor Who series had resulted from this pilot movie they could have done a flashback story at some point featuring Sylvester McCoy's Doctor and explained all that.

    I thought the Master being put on trial by the Daleks was kind of cool - sort of like they were saying "This guy is so evil even the Daleks are outraged!" If a new series had resulted they could have done another Sylvester McCoy flashback story at some point to explain what led up to the Master being put on trial by the Daleks. Maybe he tried to take over Skaro and turn all the Daleks into his own personal hit-squad or some other nonsense.

    Sylvester McCoy was pretty cool for agreeing to appear in this movie to give the potential new Doctor Who series a legitimate link to the original British show. The poor guy had to come in with a lame regeneration scene and went out the same way and the effort was for nothing since the show's own fans turned up their noses at this film and the new series was never given a chance. A new Doctor Who series that didn't live up to the continuity geeks' vision of the show would have been better than no Doctor Who series at all. Just another example of the down-side to cult shows.
  • comment
    • Author: Saberblade
    Whenever anyone talked about the possibility of America doing "Dr. Who" (especially after BBC cancelled the show), people would joke, "Oh, right! They'd add car chases and gun fights and the Doctor would fool around with his companions!" Then they'd have a hearty laugh at these stereotypes of Hollywood, confident that they were being sarcastic and, if it ever DID happen, certainly people involved with the show would try to preserve the sensibilities of the series. That'll show 'em for over-estimating the intelligence of our media! I think America should revive the Lend-Lease Act, providing funding for any future movies but letting the Brits actually make them. In turn, the BBC should file for a gun law exemption so they can shoot any Fox producer trying to visit the set.
  • comment
    • Author: Kerry
    The summary says it all: Oh, dear.

    I don't particularly like it when Hollywood attempts to "glamourize" an existing phenomenon in order to rope in lots and lots of new viewers (to make money, of course, what other reason can there be?) but I've grown to accept the fact that it's an established part of the entertainment business. I approached this movie with what I hoped was an open mind, and I was even slightly intrigued by the first five minutes or so of the movie...

    This changed, of course, when suddenly stuff started blowing up, pointless FX started popping up all over the place, and the scriptwriters apparently forgot that they were writing for DOCTOR WHO and seemed to think that they were employed by Chris Carter and the X-FILES, as they started a direct rip-off of the black oil creature, which is suddenly all that's left of the Master. (That this flies in the face of all previous background established by a show that had run for over twenty-five years is only to be expected; after all, it was only a cheesy little British sci-fi show and everyone KNOWS that Hollywood knows best, after all!) I was left with my mouth hanging open, aghast at the mess to which I was being subjected.

    Paul McGann tried. God, how he tried. I can almost see him as the Doctor if I squint. This has nothing to do with the man's acting ability, which is superb, nor does it have to do with his comparatively young age--he was about the same age as Peter Davison was when he took over the role, after all. I just could not believe in a Doctor who was playing second fiddle to a completely new and fictitious TARDIS--say, last time I looked, wasn't the Eye of Harmony something to do with Rassilon back on Gallifrey?

    Let us mercifully pass over the spectacle of the Doctor's first on-screen kiss--except to say that if he was never tempted by some of the companions in his past (particularly Romana, who at least was of the same species!) then why the heck would he be tempted by some jittery Earth woman who didn't particularly like him?

    Please, o scriptwriter, if you're going to use characters and equipment that have been established over a quarter of a century, does it not make sense to have some passing familiarity with what you are writing? Or am I being ridiculous?

    Never mind. At least I still have access to all of the videos of the classic episodes. Be sure that this travesty is one that I have zero interest in acquiring. If you're a fan of the television series, avoid this movie or spend the duration of it weeping for the mess they've made of DOCTOR WHO. If you've never seen the series and are a big fan of on-screen stuff that is really special effects in search of a movie, well, this will be right up your alley. Just don't subject a true fan to this nightmare, please.
  • comment
    • Author: Balhala
    I love doctor who. I was introduced to it when the 2005 series came out. That's when I started loving the show. Now I have every series on box set and some Peter Davison. And lots of collectibles. Recently I went to the video library and I saw the doctor who movie. So I thought I would take a look at it. I'm glad I did it was a very good film. The car chase scene was full on and so was the gun fight scene. The TARDIS interior was massive, but I think it was a little scary it was always dark and gloomy. I liked it how the doctor just regenerates in the fridge. His mouth all twisting a deformed. And how he is copying all the moves from the Frankenstein movie. And then how he gets up and his eyes are exposed to the light. Paul McGann is excellent as the doctor and his insane attitude is just hilarious. But how does the Paul McGann doctor regenerate, I want to know that. Because in the 2005 series Christopher Ecclestons doctor is just there. I think they should have brought Paul McGann back and then have him regenerate into Christopher Ecclestons doctor. I think that would have been more real. Anyway I hope you found this a little bit interesting. Cheers, The Doctor.
  • comment
    • Author: MrDog
    The American TV movie was great. There, I said it. Yes, it was flawed in places, and can actually be considered as a wasted opportunity. But I can still recall the thrill of seeing the first new Doctor Who in years – the wonderfully redesigned console room, the brief return of Sylvester McCoy, Paul McGann's performance as the Doctor. Throw in the Master, the kiss, the Doctor's revelation that he was half-human (which I really didn't buy because it was too much like Star Trek), and, apparently, the Master's final death. It was so much to take in all at once. And then it was all taken away. The TV movie was actually a pilot for a new series that would have been produced in America. So, in order to appeal to a broader television audience, it couldn't be your traditional Doctor Who story, so it was inevitable that most fans were going to be disappointed. Perhaps, if the series had been picked up, we would have seen more traditional stories, but I'm straying off the point…

    I've only got two major gripes. I was disappointed that Sylvester McCoy got such a lame send-off. After facing off Daleks, Cybermen, and Fenric, the Seventh Doctor blithely walks out of the TARDIS and is casually shot down by a street gang. To add insult to injury, he actually survives this attack, only to be accidentally killed on the operating table. Ah well, the Seventh Doctor may not have entered this Universe kicking and screaming, but he certainly left it that way. Producer Philip Segal could very well have ignored most of the series past and started the movie off with a completely new Doctor. I'm thankful that we saw some sort of transition. My other gripe has to be the setting. This is supposed to be a show about time travel. It doesn't seem that setting the story exclusively in the twentieth century would grab that many casual viewers' attention. Perhaps if they'd added a 15 minute stretch at the beginning where the Seventh Doctor retrieved the Master's remains on Skaro, and then had to escape a trap laid by the Daleks…Not only would the story have had a slightly bigger scope, but it would've highlighted the differences between the McCoy and McGann Doctors. If wishes were fishes… (I have 2 minor gripes as well - Pete the intern and Professor Wagg. I would've loved to see the Master kill these idiotic characters off...)

    On the plus side, I really like the Eight Doctor. He seems a wonderful mix of the Troughton and Davison Doctors, full of child-like wonder at the world around him and crazy impulses. The constant motif of clocks and ticking was nice. I thought Eric Roberts' portrayal of the Master was fine up until the end where he started to camp it up and wear that ridiculous costume. And I had no problems with the kiss.

    Some Doctor Who fans consider the TV movie to be a footnote to the legacy of the series. I don't think so. As the Doctor, himself once said: `Time will tell…'
  • comment
    • Author: Kelerana
    growing up as a child in the 90's i along with many others were deprived from there own doctor unlike our parents and grand parents my only contact with WHO was watching old video tapes of Pertwee and Baker, thought i loved and appreciate them i felt i was missing out. and then along came Paul Mcgann and his doctor. sure he only did one TV movie, but to me as a 8 year old child i was gripped.

    lets not fool ourselves here, it wasn't no where near perfect,looking back on it now, but to me Mcgann was everything i thought the doctor should be, funny, charismatic, intelligent, demeaning and to me it was an awful shame a series for his doctor did not come along, but since 1997 i brought all his doctors audio tapes, graphic novels and even a poster.

    Eric Roberts was passable as the master, sure he wasn't Robert Dalgado or Anthoney Ainley but he was passable as a one off. Grace wasn't actually a bad assistant and i didn't find her irritating, she kept the doctor on his toes which i did like.

    The Tardis interior i found outstanding, it was very Victorian which went spot on with Mcgann and Mccoy to some extent who along with Mcgann is a very under rated doctor.

    overall i must say that even thought its not the best story ever told i really enjoyed it, Paul Mcgann will always be my doctor no matter who plays the character in the future(Tennant has nothing on Mcgann)
  • comment
    • Author: Anicasalar
    A fun, action filled return for Doctor Who. I think this should have made the big screen. Paul McGann gives a teriffic performance as Doctor Who, one that seems to draw energy from the Tom Baker regeneration, and emotion from Peter Davison's Doctor. A lot of people think that the motorcycle chase was cheesy, and the kiss un-like the Doctor, but I think that it fit well. Hopefully Doctor Who will return again!
  • comment
    • Author: Zinnthi
    This 1996 BBC/Fox-Universal co-production TV movie gets the short end of the stick on too many counts. 'Doctor Who' is a science fiction classic, a staple if you will in SF and the longest run show of its kind in history. After 26 seasons it ended in 1989. Thanks to the diligence of a mainly British crew (working in the states/Canada), the show was at least briefly, canonically, and finally revived, and even if it was only one TV movie it re-surged the merchandising for the show immensely. The Movie itself starred Paul McGann in the best ever first 'New Doctor' performance since the Original episode starring William Hartnell. The effects were great, if the story was lacking, but the cast was superb (barring perhaps Eric Roberts) and the cinematography very cool and interesting throughout. I loved Doctor Who in its original form, and I think that while this movie did not catch on to the true greatness of SF storytelling that made the show in the first place, it DID capture the spirit of the series and continued it well.
  • comment
    • Author: Xanzay
    "It was a request they should never have granted" The time the American's made Doctor Who. But was it worth it? Yes. Although it took SEVEN YEARS to make, it turned out to be one of the most pivotal stories in the history of the series: Time Lords, action chases, love scenes and death, destruction and disaster facing the universe on New Year's Eve 1999. With two Doctors, an old enemy and another now-alone Doctor (this one's from San Fransisco), this 90-minute TV Movie is possibly, to fans or casual viewers, either excellent or rubbish. However, with the graphic CGI and first-time orchestration of the historical theme tune, and stunning performances by Sylvester McCoy, Paul McGann (the Doctors), Daphne Ashbrook (Dr. Grace Holloway), and particularly Eric Roberts's portrayal as the Master, this TV Movie, although seen by only 9 Million people in the UK (despite there being no new WHO for seven years!)on original broadcast on Monday 23 May, 1996. With this year commemorating 50 Years of the series, and the 16th Annversary of the TV Movie, this 90 minute special surely is a testament to the greatest show in the galaxy: DOCTOR WHO!
  • comment
    • Author: Mr_Mole
    I really enjoyed this movie although it scared my 7-year old... she didn't like the part about the evil looking snake. lol... I really want to buy this movie on dvd in the correct format but can't find it anywhere. Is it even available yet?? You would think that it would be since it was made in the usa. Jen
  • comment
    • Author: Sardleem
    As I said- you know, my love of British actors? Well, this time, Paul McGan, or Paul Mgann, or whatever his name is, can be referred to as one of my favorites- even though, I found out, his origin is American. I have more taste for full-bred English actors. Any way, if you want a great movie, and if you prefer corny lover-boy endings, this is the movie of your dreams. Any way, it gets sort of muddled in the end, so whats the point? Grace falls in love, the doctor has a date with Grace at Payless shoe source, grace and Chang lee, or Bruce lee, or Lee Bruce- I could never get it right- die, and the eye of harmony- well, to put it shortly, it has quite a few sub-plots. But you know what? It is the most entertaining of the 1995 year- well, British at least.
  • comment
    • Author: Asher
    'Dr.Who' ended in 1989, but as we know too well Time Lords are notoriously difficult to get rid of. The absence of a new series did not result in the character being forgotten. But when a proposed 1993 Anniversary Special - 'The Dark Dimension' - fell through, many fans were disappointed. Then, three years later, it was announced that a T.V. movie co-produced by the B.B.C. with Universal would be made, starring Paul McGann as 'The Doctor'. Since 2005, fans have downgraded the movie from 'disappointment' to 'disaster'. Certainly it didn't lead to the expected follow-up series, but that was down to bad scheduling in the U.S.A. rather than the quality of the film itself. In Britain it got nine million viewers. Its biggest mistake was to start a new era with an old Doctor ( Sylvester McCoy ) who then regenerates. Good for the hardcore fans perhaps, but baffling to the new audience the film was hoping to attract. The throwaway mentions of the Daleks and the Time Lords did not help either. Geoffrey Sax, the director, does a fine job ( ironically, in 1979 he did a spoof for L.W.T.'s 'End Of Part One' entitled 'Doctor Eyes'! ).

    Landing in San Francisco in 1999, the Doctor is shot by a drug gang and taken to a hospital where he dies - or seems to. In the mortuary, the 'corpse' assumes a completely new form. Elsewhere, the Doctor's old enemy 'The Master' ( Eric Roberts ) has cheated death by taking over the body of an ambulance driver, and plans to steal the Doctor's remaining regenerations.

    As McGann asserts his personality, the film becomes fun. He's a terrific Doctor, and had the potential to be the best since Tom Baker, but it was not to be. This would be his one and only television outing, though he has reprised the role since in audio adventures. As the 'Master', Eric Roberts is more 'Terminator' than Roger Delgado and Anthony Ainley ever were, but makes a decent fist of it. The beautiful Daphne Ashbrook is delightful as 'Dr.Grace Holloway', a character in the 'Liz Shaw' mold. Yee Jee Tso's 'Chang Lee' is great too.

    Sadly, the British premiere was overshadowed for many by the sad death of Jon Pertwee one week earlier. As a mark of respect, a special dedication was added to the closing credits.

    Some edits took place for the V.H.S. and B.B.C.-1 versions - the Doctor getting shot was toned down, and the Master puking slime reduced. Fan reaction was mostly positive, although some complained about continuity errors, such as the Tardis' chameleon circuit being renamed a 'cloaking device', and the 'Eye Of Harmony' relocated to the Tardis when it is actually on Gallifrey. The Doctor is said to be half-human, a plot element that has never been picked up by books, comics, audios or the new B.B.C. series. There is a curious lack of monsters, though some off-screen Daleks make their presence known at the start ( who did the voices? The Smurfs? ). Matthew Jacobs' script never makes it clear why the Master has been placed on trial, nor how the Doctor is able to recover his remains without endangering his own life.

    The interior of the TARDIS is a stunning piece of design, the S.F.X. are the best the show has ever seen, and by and large the positives outweigh the negatives. Alas 'Dr.Who' didn't impress the Americans, and back he went into limbo until 2005, when Russell T.Davies and his team successfully reinvented the concept for a new generation.
  • comment
    • Author: Vit
    I was very excited when I heard that FOX would be doing a version of Doctor Who. I have been a fan of the programme for a very long time and was somewhat skeptical of a version that would fit to be a FOX Tv Movie. The story actually does very well. It is somewhat let down by a few inferior actors and some rather annoying stock footage disguised as special effects but then again - this *IS* Doctor Who. Paul McGann was an excellent choice for the title role and the main supporting cast holds up their own as well. I have personally never been against the Doctor having a sexual relationship, which upset many fans, but I felt it was poorly executed in this production. Grace, the love interest, has totally unbelievable and horribly timed dialogue that seems to have no basis whatsoever.

    Other than that one truly glaring annoyance it's very good and rather interesting with repeated viewings I've discovered.
  • comment
    • Author: Sorryyy
    The Doctor Who T.V Movie was excellent!!

    Paul McGann was a great Doctor (even though he only played it once!!)

    The acting was superb and the direction/script was good.

    I say the BBC should stop earning a penny for the Doctor Who franchise, if they're not going to make new episodes....don't you think??

    Bring back The Doctor......no new Doctor Who is driving me crazy!!

    I hope this has helped the BBC decide.

    Kind Regards,

    The Doctor ^?
  • comment
    • Author: Jan
    A lot of people, especially the fans, say that the Doctor Who tv movie is terrible. I don't agree.

    My friends don't like Dr Who the original TV series. In fact, you could safely say they hate it. But I persuaded them to watch the tv movie and guess what? They loved it!

    It isn't the best Dr Who story ever, because it isn't Dr Who as Dr Who was. But to make a new series commercially viable then people have to watch it, and if people will watch this - which wasn't too far off - then this is what we'll get.

    If we want Dr Who back then its going to have to be more like this than the original series - except with less kissing. And that isn't such a bad thing.
  • comment
    • Author: elegant stranger
    For fans of Doctor Who, Doctor Who The Movie was one of the greatest experiences in 33 years. This is a show that is LOVED in England, It is a ratings winner, It needs to be made, It has made more money for the BBC than any programme in their history, and the BBC still frustrate fans and refuse to make it.

    Thank god for Philip Segal. He is the Genius [not that one is needed] who had the bright idea that more episodes of Doctor Who could be made. It doesn't matter that the programme was going to be an American flavoured take on the beloved characters. The important thing is that the good Doctor would be back on the box. Mr Segal in my opinion was right.

    The casting of Paul McGann as The Doctor was the most inspired thing about this TV Movie. McGann brings a sense of the Mysterious to the role without ever really trying too hard. Sylvester McCoy tried REALLY hard during his time as the Doctor without much success. One look at Tom Baker and you believed he WAS an Alien. The same is true for Paul McGann. He is the most worthy successor to Baker since Sir Tom relinquished the Tardis Keys in 1981. The interesting thing is that both Baker/McGann rein from the great city of Liverpool.

    The designs of the TARDIS, Plus the costumes and Special effects, all hit the mark and help make this look like a $40million movie. The man who very nearly steals the show is Eric Roberts as The Master.After years of the droll and predictable Anthony Ainley in the role, Segal found an Actor worthy of Roger Delgado. Yee Jee tso is quite good as Chang Lee. He resembles the same portrayal that Mathew Waterhouse gave as Adric [1980-82]. And then there is Daphne Asbrook as Grace. She is clumsy and Daphy as her name sounds. She is also surprisingly strong as the female lead. And she kisses the Doctor. Who cares [no pun]? There is absolutely no sexual tension in The Doctor/Grace relationship. If there was i could understand the controversy.

    What really lets the TVMovie down is Mathew Jacobs script. It evokes the best memories of Doctor Who from childhood whilst simultaneously adding some awful plot holes. The main loop of course is the atrocious climax in wich the Doctor goes back in time [Superman The Movie style] to stop The Master. If it was that simple why didn't he do that in 500 odd episodes of the television series?

    Overall though, excellent Theme Music [John Debney, Brilliant Hartnell style costumes for the Doctor, a Good TARDIS set, nEAT sfx and up to the standard acting. Add to that teriffic bike chases and invisible snakes and the problems are ironed out. All in all this would have acted as a very enjoyable Pilot movie to a smilarly enjoyable series. Its a pity. Lets hope that the TARDIS materialises in Hollywood or back on the BBC some time soon.
  • comment
    • Author: Agagamand
    Not that bad really. Or at least the plus points outnumber the bad points. The major factor in favour of the movie was the inspired casting of Paul McGann as the Doctor. Paul McGann is probably the best actor to play Doctor Who (apologies to fans of William Hartnell and Peter Cushing), and his Doctor has more depth of character than the others. If only he would agree to do reprise the role (or the BBC if it comes to that). The dialogue was not to great, but better than the series frequently had. The same could be said of the plot, however the series also turned out some of the best stories and ideas to grace science fiction in any form, so the film loses out on that point. A popular criticism is the Americanisation and emphasis on high-speed action. Such thins are out of place in Doctor Who, but I believe they are misplaced in this case. The best two examples are the kiss and the car chases. I thought the kiss really added to this Doctor's character, but only because he then left her behind on Earth. Anyone who thought there was too much action obviously cannot remember the Jon Pertwee era when Doctor Who could hardly go an episode without high speed antics of some sort. Who thinks Jon Pertwee was a bad Doctor? No one, and quite rightly too.

    The only real disappointment was the way Sylvester McCoy was killed. Doctor Who has got out of more unwinable situations than expendable extras on Star Trek, and needs a special end to each of his lives. This one just didn't pass mustard, although I wish whoever wrote it in does.

    All in all the film is not bad, but hardly classic Doctor Who.

    6/10

    P.S. The new Tardis interior design is stunning.
  • comment
    • Author: Мох
    I was SOOOO excited for this telefilm and (for the most part) I was not disappointed. I pretty much enjoyed everything about it with a handful of exceptions (which I'll get to later). Paul McGann is excellent in his brief stint as the Doctor and the new TARDIS interior is amazing. Overall, all the acting was good to excellent and the story good. There were a few annoyances however: the change from "chameleon circuit" to "cloaking device", the half-human revelation (as a biologist, I find that hard to swallow, despite the frequency of hybridization in the 'natural world'-- but it does explain things like the Doctor's traditional difficult regenerations), and a few weaknesses in the plot and continuity from the series. I for one do not mind the (infamous) kiss. In any case, I was very glad for one last televised chapter to be added to the Doctor's saga.
  • comment
    • Author: Haal
    I'm absolutely bonkers about Dr. Who. When it's at its best there is no finer Sci-Fi. It manages to mix the supernatural, science fiction, horror, comedy, and history seamlessly at times. This was the failed attempt at reviving Dr Who, with a stronger focus on getting him to break America. This was probably the biggest mistake of all. It reminds me of when pop stars/comedians try and crack the ever important (in terms of money and fame) market. It seems like a lot of the Dr's identity is lost along the way.However, being able to view this after 6 seasons of the most recent incarnations, this isn't so bad. In fact, it is a damn sight better than some of the nonsense Russell T. Davies subjected the audience to (I love a lot of his stuff, but he was hit and miss). Paul McGann is fantastic. Maybe I have a soft spot for The Doctors that didn't last long, but I can't wait to read the novels based on his character. McCoy gets a decent send off and unlike the more recent Doctors it's also fairly subtle and underplayed. Eric Roberts is menacing, but also confusing at times. He starts almost off robotic, and is later camp. A mix between the terminator, a lizard alien thing, and a gay pop star. There are some awful performances, mostly because the American cast members don't seem to understand the tone they should be going for. This is most likely down to bad direction. Overall most of the plot holes that boil fans' blood can be ignored. The half human thing kind of makes sense in a way, as a planet hopping time traveller should really spend some more time away from Earth otherwise. Daleks holding a trial is confusing though. Certainly one to check out, and actually a pleasant surprise after all the negativity.
  • comment
    • Author: Thozius
    Though this very successful 1996 TV Movie, separately listed by

    the IMDb from the previous 30-plus-year TV series, proved that

    there was much life in the concept, it inexplicably failed to launch a

    new series.

    Or did it?

    I cannot recommend enough the BBC-licensed CD audio adventures that have followed this film. Paul McGann has now

    starred in a further 19 adventures of generally exceptional quality

    (produced by a company called Big Finish; and no, I don't work for

    them).
  • Cast overview, first billed only:
    Paul McGann Paul McGann - The Doctor
    Eric Roberts Eric Roberts - The Master / Bruce
    Daphne Ashbrook Daphne Ashbrook - Dr. Grace Holloway
    Sylvester McCoy Sylvester McCoy - The Doctor
    Yee Jee Tso Yee Jee Tso - Chang Lee
    John Novak John Novak - Salinger
    Michael David Simms Michael David Simms - Swift
    Catherine Lough Haggquist Catherine Lough Haggquist - Wheeler (as Catherine Lough)
    Dolores Drake Dolores Drake - Curtis
    Will Sasso Will Sasso - Pete (as William Sasso)
    Jeremy Radick Jeremy Radick - Gareth
    Eliza Roberts Eliza Roberts - Miranda
    Bill Croft Bill Croft - Motorcycle Policeman
    David Hurtubise David Hurtubise - Professor Wagg (as Dave Hurtubise)
    Joel Wirkkunen Joel Wirkkunen - Ted
    All rights reserved © 2017-2024 hd.thomson-multimedia.com