Search

» » Fair Game (1995)

Short summary

Max Kirkpatrick is a cop who protects Kate McQuean, a civil law attorney, from a renegade KGB team out to terminate her.
Max Kirkpatrick is a cop who protects Kate McQuean, a civil law attorney, from a renegade KGB team out to terminate her.

Trailers "Fair Game (1995)"

The Paula Gosling novel the movie is based on was previously the basis for the earlier action movie Die City-Cobra (1986) with Sylvester Stallone which had been made and released around nine years earlier. As such, this makes Fair Game (1995) the second filmed adaptation's of Gosling's novel "Fair Game" (1974) which was originally published as "A Running Duck".

Actresses Julianne Moore and Geena Davis were originally considered for the role of Kate McQuean. Moreover, actresses Brooke Shields and Drew Barrymore were each offered the role of Kate McQuean, but both turned down the part. In the end, the lead female role was cast with model and actress Cindy Crawford.

Salma Hayek only took her part in the film after insisting that she rewrite it.

Mark Mancina replaced Michael Kamen as the movie's music composer. Kamen was the film's original composer along with his friend, David Sanborn, who was going to provide the saxophone solos for the score. His score was rejected after the film was delayed with re-shoots and post-production issues. The film's original posters list Kamen and Sanborn as the composers. Mancina would replace Kamen and it was the second time that he would replace him on a film in the same year, the other being on Assassins - Die Killer (1995) which also was produced by producer Joel Silver, with its release also delayed, the two pictures actually releasing within months of each other.

Keanu Reeves turned down the lead male role of Max Kirkpatrick.

The movie was originally set in San Francisco, but was changed to Miami to suit Sylvester Stallone, who subsequently left the project. Stallone had previously starred in Die City-Cobra (1986) which was also based on the same Paula Gosling novel as Fair Game (1995)

A theatrical trailer shows some deleted and alternate scenes from original cut of the movie before it was partially re-shot and re-edited. These include: An alternate interrogation scene between Kate McQuean (Cindy Crawford) and Max Kirkpatrick (William Baldwin) in the beginning of the film where he asks her some questions and she says that nobody tried to kill her; another extended part of this scene where she asks him does he has problem with lawyers and he says that he's a cop and that it's "written on the badge"; alternate dialogue between the two while they are driving in car at night where he says that they can't trust any cops and when she asks him why she should trust him he says because he hasn't shoot her yet and adds a line "Night's still young"; an additional scene where he gives her the gun and when she says that she doesn't know how to shoot he says it's just like using a camera, just point and shoot; an additional scene where Kirkpatrick asks McQuean will she hit him but she says the "Night's still young", which is same line he said to her in another deleted scene shown in the trailer.

This is Cindy Crawford's only starring role in a film.

The name of the plastic explosive was "Semtex". According to the Wikipedia website, it "is a general-purpose plastic explosive containing RDX and PETN. It is used in commercial blasting, demolition, and in certain military applications". The site also states, according to Hiltmar Schubert in "Detection of Explosives and Landmines: Methods and Field Experience", pp. 93-101, "Semtex became notoriously popular with terrorists because it was, until recently, extremely difficult to detect."

Reportedly, screenwriter Steven E. de Souza was apparently brought on board for re-writes and re shoots.

The picture's European release ran for about eight minutes longer and contained less violence but more sex and nudity.

Initally, the movie ran for 95 minutes, but after re-edits and re-shoots, the picture came in at 91 minutes. After negative test screenings, Warner Bros. cut some scenes and re-shot others. In the original version, _Rush Hour_ star Elizabeth Peña played Max Kirkpatrick (William Baldwin)'s ex-girlfriend, hence her name on the film's one-sheet poster. Lead stars 'Cindy Crawford' and William Baldwin also shot additional scenes to help boost the relationship between the two characters. Crawford also shot additional scenes on her own to help develop her character. The extra filming, re-shoots, re-writes, additional photography, and re-editing caused the movie's release to be delayed by about three months.

According to the TCMDb (Turner Classic Movies Database): "In July 1995, actor-writer Wendell Wellman filed a [US] $1.5 million lawsuit against Silver Pictures and Warner Bros. claiming the film is based on the screenplay he submitted to the studio in 1984. In addition to damages, the lawsuit also requests that the screenplay rights revert to Wellman."

The film was made and released about twenty-one years after its source novel of the same name by Paula Gosling, which is also known as "A Running Duck", had been first published in 1974.

The movie's source novel "A Running Duck" (1974) (aka "Fair Game") won The John Creasey Memorial Award (now known as the CWA New Blood Dagger Award) from the British Crime Writers' Association (CWA) for the Best First Novel of the Year in 1978.

Second of three major theatrical feature films entitled with a "Fair Game" title in twenty-five years. The first was the outback Australian thriller Hunting Season (1986) and the third was the American spy drama thriller Fair Game - Nichts ist gefährlicher als die Wahrheit (2010) starring Naomi Watts and Sean Penn. During this quarter century period, there has also been Fair Game (2005), Mamba (1988) (aka "Mamba" / "Fair Game"), as well as the tele-movie Fair Game (1994).

Salma Hayek only took on the role of Max Kirkpatrick's girlfriend after getting the part completely rewritten from the role that Elizabeth Pena was originally signed for. In the end, Hayek only appeared in one scene.

The name of the sea vessel featured in the action sequence at the end of the film was "TORTUGA".

This is the only film directed by Andrew Sipes.

Actor Dan Hedaya had a bigger part which was cut out of the picture.

The nick-name of Leonid Volkov (Paul Dillon) was "The Hacker" whilst the nick-name of Kathryn McQuean (Cindy Crawford) was "Kate".

The meaning of the Russian phrase "Zapadny Zavod" spoken in the film was "Death to the West".

Kate McQuean (Cindy Crawford), according to computer screen information about the character's identity in the film, states her full name to be Kathryn A. McQuean, and her address to be 3401 E Mt Vernon [East Mount Vernon], Miami Shores, Florida, 33136, USA.

The age and date of birth of Kate McQuean (Cindy Crawford, according to computer screen information about the character's identity in the film, gives her character's date of birth as 15th March 1969, making her character about twenty-six years old around the time of the release year of the movie. Similarly, the age and date of birth of Max Kirkpatrick (William Baldwin), according to computer screen information about the character's identity in the film, is 23rd June 1965, making his character about thirty years old around the time of the release year of the movie.

Intelligence agencies referenced and/or featured in the film include the FBI, the KGB, and Interpol.

The famous news anchor from Mobile Alabama, Bob Grip, makes a one second appearance in the film

User reviews


  • comment
    • Author: Coron
    Can Cindy Crawford act? Not really, but well enough to scream and run from one overblown action scene to another, taking the odd breather for showers (plural) and changes of clothes.

    I kind of enjoyed this brainless tosh. Cinders looks great, adequately playing an uncompromising, smarty-pants attorney. Baldwin is the cop determined to guard her body when people start trying to kill her. He just about pulls off the hardass cop routine, but never really musters the enthusiasm to look like he's enjoying it.

    The bad guys glower and plot, hunting the fleeing pair down with ruthless skill (and some rather suspect computer trickery), then cocking things up each time allowing them to escape. It's hugely violent, fast moving, loud, full of swearing etc., all the things you associate with nineties action fodder, and finishes off with a big enough bang. Don't expect much, and you shouldn't be disappointed.

    Oh, and if you're wondering about nudity, Cindy does indeed ‘get them out for the lads', and Baldwin shows his butt.
  • comment
    • Author: Arabella V.
    In my opinion most blockbusters are watchable movies. Some are good, some are not so good. Some are even quite bad, but they try so hard to offer something for everyone that there usually are at least some things in the movie you like. But because they do offer something for everyone, they usually also have some things you don't like. However, once in a while a film comes along which focuses solely on it's own target audience. Sometimes the critics and fans of so-called 'quality cinema' are the target audience. In those cases we have films like "American Beauty". Sometimes fans of sex-related teen-comedies are the target audience and we have a film like "American Pie". And sometimes fans of pure action-entertainment are the target audience and we have a film like "Fair Game".

    This is a film which most people have a strong opinion of. Others love it while others hate it. What's interesting is that the reasons for the opinion of the film are the same for both people. Others hate it because it's unbelievably dumb, excessively violent, has an unoriginal plot, stupid dialogue and has no good actors. However, others love it for the same reasons. And I'm one of those people.

    The film is based on Paula Gosling's novel of the same name. It's interesting to notice that Sylvester Stallone's actioner "Cobra" was also based on the same novel but the films have very little in common. About the only thing they share is the hate of the critics and the love of action-fans. What's even more interesting is that Stallone was originally attached to this film as well.

    Anyway, about this film.. While it's true that no-one has been able to make a good macho-actioner since the 80s (except Steven Seagal and even he is now making films like "The Patriot"), this is a quality effort if there ever was one. This has everything I want (a macho cop as the hero, a sexy woman as his sidekick, lots of action and gratuitous violence) and nothing I don't (a deep and original plot, Academy Award-winning actors, emotional scenes between mom and daughter...). Actually many scenes here are so stupid that they could be considered campy and even if you aren't a fan of the genre, you might enjoy laughing at the movie's unintentional humor.

    One of the things which always means a lot to me in films is the score and "Fair Game" has one of the best scores I've ever heard. I liked Mark Mancina's score to "Speed" and "Bad Boys" but they're nothing compared to this. A brilliant main theme combined with excellent underscore. Full marks.

    There is also the traditional "You killed my partner. Big mistake, you hear me? Wanna know why? Because I'm gonna come and get every last one of you!"-threat from Baldwin. I love those lines, I really do. "Cobra" was filled with them and the mid-80s was a good time for macho-actioners.

    In fact, "Fair Game" is like a throwback to the 80s, when Joel Silver still made good actioners (Commando, Action Jackson, Die Hard, Road House - all brilliant). Of course it's not intelligent. Of course it's not original. Of course it's not a film which makes people think about their lives. It is pure action-entertainment, nothing more and nothing less. This will definitely appeal to fans of "Cobra", "Action Jackson" and the early Steven Seagal-films. However, if you don't like action, pure action and nothing but the action - skip it. Even if you liked films like "Speed" and "Face/Off", you might not like this.

    Gunfights, explosions, gratuitous violence, gratuitous nudity (from Cindy Crawford, no less!), a brilliant score..what more could a guy who loves action ask? Definitely a 10.
  • comment
    • Author: Ral
    Really bad and tedious with it. The mystery here was not who was trying to kill Cindy Crawford, but how her hair was magically dry and sexily tousled after a series of dunkings.

    Cindy has exhibited better acting in lipstick commercials. And that scene where she uses her charms to persuade the geek in the computer shop to help her was reminiscent of Ginger trying to coax a coconut from Gilligan.

    Silly from start to finish.
  • comment
    • Author: Mitars Riders
    I like Cindy Crawford. I really do. I respect the class she has maintained in an often classless fashion and modeling industry. But some people should stick to what they know.

    Cindy, my God! In this movie, you were just in your lovely apartment overlooking the water. Your apartment is then blown up, you are blown off the balcony into the water, your cat is toast and all your possessions are gone. Oh, and by the way, a bunch of very bad people are now trying to shoot you dead. You get out of the cold water, run for your life and get taken to a safe house where the 2nd rate Baldwin asks you `How do you feel?' And Cindy says with the intensity of a heroin addict, `Like my life just exploded. What is this place, Motel Hell?' She said it like she was reading the phone book! A real actress would have been looking at the cop like he was nuts! And she would have delivered the lines accordingly. It got worse.

    Did you see at the very first scene in the movie where Cindy's character is jogging and gets shot? Did you notice her slowing down to hit her mark and wait for the shot? I've never heard or seen anyone more stilted and lifeless except for a really bored telemarketer.

    The writing was just BAD, and the movie was just about look how good Cindy looks after being dumped in water and having no shower. Notice her lips still had color? Did they have the long-lasting stuff back then?

    Luckily it wasn't the kind of bad where you can't sit and laugh at it. You can sit and laugh at this one. In fact, you don't have a choice.
  • comment
    • Author: Stonewing
    Fair Game is one of those films that teaches you things you never realised were true until it happened on screen. Things like this:

    • Explosions that blow up a mansion, and send someone flying into the water never leave a mark on that person. But they will have blood on their clothes, irregardless.


    • Teams of expert assassins can be beaten by one cop.


    • It's not humanly possible for a bad guy to kill someone without using a one-liner first. This may explain why they don't feel any remorse.


    • Cars blow up on impact, regardless of where the impact is and what the impact is with. Unless of course our hero is in the car, in which case, it just catches fire.


    • Perfect looking fake IDs aren't necessarily done with the use of any computers.


    • Letters that look like 3s, but aren't, are found by typing in '3' into the computer.


    • Employees of small stores swear freely and loudly while on the phone in the store.


    • Continuity is not important. It can easily flow from late afternoon, before the sun starts to set at all, to well after the sun has set, in a matter of seconds.


    • Choppers can't be heard over bad sex scene music and Cindy Crawford's disinterested moaning.


    • Cops leave the safety off when they put their gun away.


    • Trained assassins watch their target do a random Baldwin brother instead of actually doing their job.


    • A bomb counts down from 2 minutes 57 seconds to 1 minute 47 seconds in just under 15 seconds. That bomb then proceeds to blow up everything except the room the bomb is located in.
  • comment
    • Author: Burilar
    Definitely not Oscar material, but a good late night watch. Lots of action and stunts. Cindy Crawford can't act, but who cares!? The plot involves some high tech Ruskies who are after Cindy, as F.B.I. Agent Billy Baldwin comes to the rescue. There is ensuing sexual tension.
  • comment
    • Author: tamada
    Okay, so it's got hardly any plot and what there is doesn't make much sense. So it was doomed to be slated by critics the second Cindy Crawford said yes. So the film may have the world record for the number of scenes in the trailer that aren't in the finished film. It's still far from the worst film ever made, and certainly far from the worst in the year it came out (1995 was the year of "Showgirls," "Waterworld," "Species," and "Congo" for openers).

    Way too much senseless violence, confusing scripting (from Charlie Fletcher and an uncredited Steven E. deSouza), and frenzied editing for sure, and Cindy's Oscar is unlikely to be coming any time soon - but she's no worse than the rest of the cast (and unlike Steven Berkoff, at least SHE hasn't sunk to doing a Jean Claude Van Damme film since). She's actually pretty good more often than not, and her punches are more convincing than some male actors (though hitting the smuggest of the smug Baldwin brothers provides motivation). Let's just say that the man credited as her acting coach clearly didn't see all his efforts go unrewarded.

    And you have to give her and the rest of the cast and crew credit; no one ever pretends that "Fair Game" is anything other than an unpretentious action film, which can't be a bad thing. (But then even Cindy's biggest detractors have never claimed she was pretentious.) While it is mainly for fans of the moled one, it's still short enough not to hurt, and it certainly improves on the last time the Paula Gosling novel it's based on was turned into a film (the truly awful "Cobra" with Sylvester Stallone), and you don't often see films starring lawyer characters doing something other than criminal law. And before you point out that no lawyer ever looked as good as Cindy Crawford, remember that that never stopped Steven Bochco - or David E. Kelley with "Ally McBeal." Now who would you rather be represented in court by, Cindy or Ally?
  • comment
    • Author: Jediathain
    Is Cindy Crawford really supposed to be staggeringly beautiful? I mean, she's okay, with her pointy chin and beauty spot, but is she any more attractive than, say, Madeleine Stowe, Sean Young, or Jennifer Connolly? Crawford is taller than the others, true. She could be on an all-girl's Olympic basketball team. But it would be hard to rank order the beauty parade that's been on screen lately. When you get so close to the top it becomes a matter of stylistic choice, almost arbitrary.

    There's another woman in this movie, a homely middle-aged KGB agent who demolishes men with a single kick to the head. It could be argued that a woman with such a talent for meting out punishment might be a more exciting date than some marshmallow ex-model.

    Anyway, Crawford, the ex-model at hand, isn't bad. She has legs the length of a giraffe's and she takes two showers at the beginning of the movie and changes her T shirt in front of the camera once. I don't mean to be too critical of her appearance.

    It's no wonder that her bare midriff prompts the goggle-eyed Baldwin to put a cigar in his mouth and try to light it. I take this to be symbolism although, to be sure, "sometimes a cigar is just a cigar." But then she cozzens some computer nerd so much that he winds up "fiddling with my joystick." Can a joystick sometimes just be a joystick too? Of course she can't act but we can't count that as a demerit because nobody else in the movie can act either, so the absence of skill on her part is hardly noticeable. Her performance though does put on display at least one of her attractive features, in addition to the other two, and that is an endearing lisp. "Pizza" comes out "PEET-tha." Kind of nice. Gives her a vulnerable quality, you know? Speaking of her vulnerability brings up the question of the plot, alas. See -- these ex-KGB agents try to murder her in every way possible -- shooting, blowing up her house, shooting yet again, and again. Then, towards the end, they decide she can't be killed but rather she must be interrogated. End of discussion of plot.

    I found myself wishing the heavies weren't all ex-Russian KGB agents because the movie was shot, after all, in 1994, five years after the collapse of the USSR, which either makes the villains out of date or the screenwriters unimaginative in their search for heavies. Maybe both.

    It doesn't matter really, except that there are some people of an impressionable age who might be tempted to take this cartoon as a serious reflection of reality. Their minds might be warped enough by exposure to these stereotypes that they grow up imagining all Russians have faces with the general contours and texture of potatoes. The heavies all scowl and sneer and speak with one or another foreign accent. Was it Oliver Cromwell who said, "Take me for what I am, warts and all"? Makeup has given the chief heavy a prominent wart right in the middle of his forehead, like a third eye, I suppose so we don't mix him up with the others.

    These ex-Soviet Seals are something special. They are "experts in electronics," the film tells us, but that doesn't do them justice. Their equipment has positively supernatural attributes. For instance, they use an infra-red heat sensor that can not only penetrate walls but can detect that the leading lady is wearing high heels as well. And their radio direction finder can "triangulate" a transmitter's position all by itself.

    Essentially the whole movie is one long chase. None of it makes too much sense. After Baldwin saves Crawford's life a dozen times over she suddenly turns on him angrily then runs away. Shortly afterward, aboard a freight train, they have a physical fight and then she immediately falls into his arms and they make love. Unfortunately it's one of those love-making scenes in which such arty effects as dappled spots of blue light move across patches of undifferentiated limbs, and it's interrupted by one of the agents who has a laser-sight-equipped weapon that plants a red circle on Baldwin's butt. At least Crawford notices this. I can understand why Baldwin might not have.

    There are some gags and would-be jokes and sassy lines sprinkled through this melange of explosions and shootings and slow-motion fireballs. It doesn't add up to much but it's so slam bang that I found it kind of fun. I really do wish we had some generic villain for these types of movies though. Those impressionable minds -- the ones that can't remember the difference between Russia and the Soviet Union -- worry me at times.
  • comment
    • Author: Wnex
    This is bad, very bad. It must have sounded like a good idea at the time: "Die Hard With Legal Mumbo-Jumbo" with a twist: we'll have a sexy model as the star.

    Erm, it sounds good on paper, and perhaps it would have been a good idea if they hadn't screwed the damn thing up by giving us a weak script, even weaker plot, weaker villians and then give up on the sexy model as John McClane and turn her into a damsel in distress.

    It almost feels like Producer, Joel Silver is satirizing or parodying himself in the constant need for set-piece action after set-piece action strung together on the weakest thing to ever grace the screen.

    Everything that hits something explodes, cars hit telegraph poles and explode violently, tree's that are in the way explode even more violently...its almost too much to take in. I know action is what was driving hollywood around the early 90s - but this is just TOO much.

    Anyway, the film pretty much nose-dives when Crawford - who looks stunning - turns into a damsel in distress with Baldwin acting like he's painting by numbers - just doing the thing because either Stallone dropped out or because of the money.

    Not even the "sex-scenes" can save this terrible affair. Not even Berkov, now type-cast as Russian bad guys, can save it. Everything hurts...everything. The end explosion looks kinda cool, but it can't mask the fact that this film is flimsy at best - and at worst? Well, I just don't wanna think about that.

    They could have made it a lot better than this trash. A die-hard with a woman as the hero could have been done a lot better. Its a shame with the buckloads of money they wasted on this trash seems to have gone onto Crawford's make-up.

    My Rating: 0/10
  • comment
    • Author: Hirah
    I was fueling at the truck stop in Florida,chatting with the hog hauler fueling at the pump next to me. He was telling me about the time he had pulled off the road to take his 8 hour break,when a bunch of Russians pulled him out of his truck at gun point. Made him open his trailer,all the time yelling "Where are they". One had a g.p.s. locater device. He makes his way thru the hogs and stops about half way through the trailer. Stops ,reaches down through the hop crap, and picks up a cell phone. Im thinking,"Some truck drivers have nothing better to do but think up wild stories to tell his fellow truckers." Cindy Crawford,Selma Hayek,Johann Carlo, and Jenette Goldstein are hot!! ---One Truck Drivers Opinion--- erldwgstruckermovies.com
  • comment
    • Author: Kanek
    ****SPOILERS***** Action packed police movie set in Florida about a group of mobsters consisting of ex-KGB agents led by former KBG agent Kazak, Steven Berkoff. The mobsters use an off-shore freighter, The Tortugo, to tap into underwater bank cables and steal millions of dollars in bank transactions. That plan falls apart when the feisty and pretty civil lawyer Kate McQueen, Cindy Crawford, got in their way and had to be eliminated in order for them to keep up their illegal activities.

    Attempting to assassinate Kate at the beginning of the movie as she was jogging down swanky Ocean Drive she has Homicide Detective Max Kirpatrick, William Baldwin, assigned to be with her around the clock to watch protect and defend her, it's a real hard job but somebody's got to do it, against other attempts on her life. This gang of ex-KGB thugs really mean business as they blow up half of South Florida to get the pair, Max & Kate. As usual, in the movies, Max & Kate are always one step ahead of them and the mobsters no matter how much men and firepower as well as electronic equipment that they have are no match against the two who have almost nothing but the clothes on their back, and some times not even that, to fight them with. Far more violent then most action police movies with almost the entire cast wiped out, with the exception of Max & Kate of course, by the ending credits.

    The action scenes of "Fair Game" are a lot like the old Saturday afternoon cliff-hangers with Max & Kate looking like they've had it and then just getting away from the bad guys every fifteen or so minutes in the movie. The bad guys are as bad as they can get in what they do and try to do, you can just imagine anyone trying to hurt or kill Cindy Crawford has to be the biggest enemy against hu-MAN-ity in history.

    The last half-hour of the movie is non-stop action on the roads and highways as well as railroad trains and ships in the South Florida area with the most graphic boat sinking since, even though movie was made in 1995 but I haven't seen it until 2004, the movie "Titanic" in 1997.

    Outlandish but at the same time ironic ending with the head gangster Kazak instead of trying to escape the sinking and exploding ship tries to punch into the ships computer the information that he needs to complete his illegal bank transaction of almost one billion dollars! All this with him knowing very well that he won't make it out alive by taking so much time doing it! It's as if Kazak just wanted to die rich.
  • comment
    • Author: Kashicage
    The plot was stupid and the acting was so bad. Cindy Crawford can absolutely not act. And the movie didn't even have any decent nude scenes. If the people responsible for this movie are going to subject us to such garbage they can at least throw in some decent nudity so that the movie won't be a total loss.
  • comment
    • Author: asAS
    This was by far one of the worst films ever made. Money definitely should have been spent on some acting lessons. The plot was needing of well ANYTHING and there was no chemistry between the actors. There was a lot of things being blown up… unfortunately none of them was the film itself. Cindy Crawford is of course a beautiful center piece but her acting is so strained there is no emotional connection with her acting partners or with the audience. Baldwin also bombed in having any kind of real or believable connection with his scene partners. I actually walked out of this movie because it was so painful. Some really good films would be Pierce Brosnan and Rene Russo in the "Thomas Crown Affair" or a more comical film like "True Lies"
  • comment
    • Author: Ironfire
    This review contains extra bits of the plot! The heroine, played by Cindy Crawford as Miss Mcqueen is shot on Orlando Drive, while jogging. A cop, played by William Baldwin who is supposed to be Sergeant Kirkpatrick, is publicly humiliated by his girlfriend (played by Salmek Hayek), in a police station, before he has to interview Cindy Crawford. She goes home after a quick trip back to the office and just when Kirkpatrick shows up to get something signed, her house gets blown up by the Russians. This is when Steven Berkoff steps in to attack Baldwin and Crawford. A chase ensues because through a computer, they can track the couple's every movement. The baddies kill two police cops at a safehouse, several f.b.i. agents, bash two computer salesmen, and generally create mayhem. In the end, Crawford gets captured, and Baldwin comes to the save the day. The ship explodes with the remainder of the baddies, including Berkoff and that wraps up the film. It is quite a short film, with the British version lasting nearly an hour and a half. It also plays in widescreen and looks like a good but dud film of that era. If you like action, you will like this.
  • comment
    • Author: Arcanescar
    Leggy lawyer Cindy Crawford is attempting to get sleazy lawyer Dan Hedaya to admit that his client owns a certain boat.

    Crawford shows Hedaya a picture of a boat. "Never heard of the *Tortuga*," he says.

    "I didn't say the name," says Crawford.

    Ha! Gotcha! Isn't she clever? Even though there was no reason--NONE--for Hedaya to say the name of the boat, he said it anyway. I mean, it doesn't even make any *sense* for him to say the name of the boat at this point. In the situation, it's virtually a *non sequitur*.

    But he said it anyway! That's just how brilliant Ms. Crawford's character is.

    And you know what? That's only a minor idiocy, like having Billy Baldwin claim that he's been on hold for 20 minutes when we can clearly hear that he's at the very beginning ("press 1, press 2") of one of those automated phone systems.

    It gets worse...oh, so much worse. I mean, Cindy Crawford plays a brilliant lawyer, for God's sake!

    Then there's the "infrared scope" scene, the stupidity of which is beyond my descriptive powers.

    And am I wrong, or was "They did it on computers!" a really lame explanation for all this, even back in 1995?

    And I have given up trying to understand how the bad guy's plan is supposed to work--I mean, what is killing one lawyer supposed to accomplish? Is the idea that she's the only lawyer in Florida who could get a judge to enforce an outstanding court order? Or is she supposed not to have put any of this information in her law firm's files? Or mentioned it to anyone else? Or filed any court papers? Or employed a single clerk or investigator on the case? You know, I really don't think these guys understand how the world works.

    And since their plan is going to be completed in a very short time anyway, does it even matter? Wouldn't it have been smarter just to have sleazy lawyer Hedaya stall for a couple of days if necessary? It just doesn't make any sense!

    And I absolutely refuse, for the sake of my own mental health, to even go into this "federal maritime court" nonsense.

    It comes as no surprise to learn that idiot screenwriter Charlie Fletcher has only one other credit. Whether this is because he's too stupid even to gain employment in Hollywood, or smart enough to have changed his name, I don't know.

    Idiot director Andrew Sipes (whose cinema career seems to have come to an abrupt and deserved end after he helmed this, his one and only movie) tries to add "excitement" to the first couple of "action" scenes by doing flash pans accompanied by "SHOOM!" noises, although he abandons this after the first couple of scenes and moves on to the even more clichéd slow-motion.

    If anyone had been stupid enough to give Ed Wood a $50-million-dollar budget (and if anyone had been, it would have been idiot producer Joel Silver), this is the movie he would have made. If you enjoy repeatedly shouting "Oh, come ON!" at the screen, then you'll like this movie. If you want intelligent scripting, competent acting, exciting action, and skillful direction, look elsewhere.
  • comment
    • Author: furious ox
    Even though I haven't read the book, if you ask me, FAIR GAME is an excellent film that is sure to keep you on the edge of your seat from start to finish and blow you away. I said that because Kirkpatrick (William Baldwin) and Kate (Cindy Crawford) were always on the run from danger. Also, I loved Rita (Salma Hayek). I just wish her role in the movie had been bigger. In my opinion, the performances were top grade, the direction was superior, the costumes were perfectly designed, and the cast was perfectly chosen. Also, the soundtrack is really good, too. Before I wrap this up, I must warn you that this movie is very violent if you're going to see it, so viewer discretion is strongly advised. Now, in conclusion, if you like Andrew Sipes films or enjoyed Paula Gosling's title novel, I highly recommend this movie. It's sure to keep you guessing from start to finish.
  • comment
    • Author: Levaq
    This movie basically blows. But, it's fascinating to watch just because it's so bad. I find myself not able to turn the station when I stumble across it.

    The acting is terrible, the plot is terrible. There are too many goofs to count. It just goes to show you it does not require a great script or even a great idea to make a movie.
  • comment
    • Author: virus
    I don't why "Fair Game" got such a harsh critique. I thought the cast choices were great. Billy Baldwin playing a tough cop, and Cindy Crawford as a lawyer. This movie was action-packed, and a thrill-seeker as well. I liked the train scene when the cop and lawyer got on, and the Caddy sacrificed itself at the pole. Going after the KGB is an extreme task, especially when these agents are extreme themselves. Killing everyone in their path, targeting anyone they first lay eyes on. At first, both Kate(Crawford) and Max(Baldwin) don't get along too well. But when the rogue KGB starts targeting people, and killing Kate's sister, that's when the two began to trust one another. Some scenes remind me of "The Gauntlet" and "The Joshua Tree". The action of the movie is just right, I don't see what the big deal was. Perhaps when a model decides to go into acting, expect a lot of typecasting in the making. I don't see it that way, Cindy Crawford did fine there. I don't care what the critics say, this movie was fine, not in the theaters, but at home, it's a hit! 3 out of 5 stars!
  • comment
    • Author: Manazar
    No, a teenager couldn't have written the script for this, because a child in preschool could have done a better job! Quite possibly the worst movie I've seen this year with the exception of "1941", I was shocked by the stupidity of "Fair Game". I really think the author of the book this was based on must have just decided to make up a pointless story on a Sunday morning with only ridiculous gadgets, pointless violence, and a sexy woman to hold up this lemon.
  • comment
    • Author: Faebei
    Supermodel Cindy Crawford launches her star movie career,and promptly crashes it in FAIR GAME.The premise to begin with is heavily far-fetched as we're supposed to accept La Crawford as a high-flying lawyer in trouble with ex-KGB baddies intending to exterminate her at all cost over some nonsense concerning a boat belonging to an associate,while would-be macho cop Billy Baldwin is on hand to protect our Cindy when the ensuing mayhem starts.And what mayhem!

    The above is the basic plot line,thin even for a routine one-hour TV episode.Perhaps unconsciously realising this,the film's makers decide to pad it out with as much absurd,ludicrous and hilariously over-the-top action as possible,with barely the slightest concern for intelligence,wit,or logical plot development.Crawford herself looks predictably lovely in various states of skimpy dress or undress,but this is the only positive aspect of her performance;when it comes to delivering the admittedly hackneyed dialogue,she struggles terribly and embarrasses herself,as mostly does her leading man Baldwin.Steven Berkoff is mildly enjoyable in yet another variation on his innumerable mad Soviet-style villains,but his hammy,bellowing visage becomes tiresome.The film's only assured performance comes in a cameo from Salma Hayek,as a former beau of Baldwin's.Ms Hayek would've been a better choice than Crawford as the leading lady;she is criminally wasted in this tiny role.

    Cindy C as a lawyer broke credulity barely as the film started;if anything,it goes even more downhill from there as Berkoff and Co.(thanks to sophisticated computer tracking devices) are remarkably clever at tracking the exact point and time wherever Cindy and Billy happen to be,but despite the couple being armed with little more than a token gun and their fists (though in Cindy's case,her breasts,which are teasingly present underneath tight-fitting t-shirts),they are hopelessly inept at bumping off their prey,despite seemingly having the equivalent of the entire world's military hardware to hurl at them! Aside from the odd scratch here and there and mussed-up hair,the hero and heroine amazingly survive their ordeal unscathed.

    With such dumbness present,FAIR GAME could've been enjoyed as a no-brain action thriller had there been any sort of chemistry with the two leads and better dialogue.Since it fails dismally on most of these and other points,it is barely watchable,and Cindy Crawford has not starred in any film since.She has however,performed adequately in supporting roles (her appearance on US sitcom THIRD ROCK FROM THE SUN received unexpected praise in some quarters) in other films and TV programmes.Cindy Crawford is a great supermodel,an acceptable small-part actress,but not a leading actress.Perhaps even Cindy realises that now.

    Rating:2 and a half out of 10.
  • comment
    • Author: Balladolbine
    Okay, so the screenplay wasn't really Sidney Lumet, and the two leads were in bad need of an acting class, but you can't say this movie wasn't entertaining. It was campy! Everyone in the cast talked like they were reading off a chalkboard somewhere, making it hilarious. What's more (or to add good expectations for the male side) you get a full glimpse of Cindy Crawford's bare breasts and the millionth Baldwin brother to take a shot at acting. (And without a surprise, this shot proved blank.) Don't take this as something serious; look at it as the "Plan 9 Of Outer Space" for Hollywood action movies. If you have to poke fun an it, you could, but take the whole thing like a grain of salt.

    Invite some friends over, leave your brain at the door, get a few beers and Chinese take-out and prepare yourself for a blast!
  • comment
    • Author: Bu
    Before it careens into total silliness, `Fair Game' is a lot of fun. After the rather absurd attempted shooting of Crawford in the opening scene, `Fair Game' begins rather effectively examining the loss of privacy in the digital world, a fresh idea in 1995 (`Enemy of the State' didn't arrive till three years later). Crawford plays a lawyer specializing in civil cases. While helping one of his divorce clients she inadvertently falls under the scrutiny of a group of former KGB assassins. William Baldwin (`Backdraft')is the cop assigned to protect her. Baldwin looks like a cross between his brother Alec and Nicholas Cage; in other words, kind of goofy. Cindy Crawford looks like …well, Cindy Crawford, one of the world's most beautiful women. Crawford received some pretty bad raps for this movie. That's really unfair, but not surprising, considering Hollywood's experience with supermodels. In the 50s, they used to dub supermodel Suzy Parker. Crawford's considerably better than that. Her voice and line readings remind me of early Farrah Fawcett.

    The big problem here is neither Crawford nor Baldwin. It's a script that would have us believe former KGB operatives would miss Crawford with a machine gun as she stands by a storefront with no cover. It's a script that would have us believe KGB agents would blow up Crawford's house with C4 to cover a COVERT operation. It's the script that would give Baldwin endless supplies of 9mm ammunition, while he leaves behind machine guns and `street sweepers'. It's a script that has the intelligent, sensible Crawford running from Baldwin, her only ally. It's a script that would have us believe the feisty Crawford would surrender without a fight, etc., etc.

    Production values for `Fair Game' are top notch, great color photography, sound, music, editing and stunts. Had producer Joel Silver substituted Jackie Chan for Billy Baldwin, `Fair Game' would have made a first rate martial arts movie, even with its other shortcomings. ‘Course, I'm not sure Cindy Crawford would've `gotten naked' for Jackie Chan. Well, topless, anyway.

    `Fair Game' is a `dumb blonde' of a movie, but Crawford is anything but dumb. She deserved better and deserves another opportunity to prove her mettle as an actress. If she made another movie, I'd go see it, even if she become closer to an "8" than a "10".

    Nonetheless, `Fair Game' is, at worst, a `fair' movie. I give it a `5'.
  • comment
    • Author: Connorise
    My moron friend John says that this movie is tripe but in reality this is one of the finest accomplishments of modern cinema. Fair Game incorporates elements from every terrible action/suspense/thriller movie and creates the ultimate viewing experience in that you get the best of everything and the worst of nothing. Also, Cindy looks really great. After all, the only reason for watching movies is to see lead actresses, right? Okay, this is not a GOOD movie so much as it is an enjoyable one. Seriously, watch it at least twice for the full experience.
  • comment
    • Author: Mayno
    The story line is OK if entertainment is what you are after. There are a lot of holes in continuity and in the graphics. With a small leap of imagination and remembering entertainment is what we are pursuing. this is an enjoyable film........... and deserves Kudos for the pyrotechnics.
  • comment
    • Author: Xal
    This movie was perhaps not the most accurate when it comes to effects, cars don't explode when they make contact with stationary objects, but isn't movies some entertainment? The movie caught on quite quickly, no slogging with getting to know characters just some prime action directly.

    Cindy isn't perhaps the most capable actress but she is fair to look at. I liked the movie, it tickled some laughs and gave my some entertaining moments. I rate this much higher than a lot of drama that seems to be the only thing people like these days. I might have things go another way if I where to shoot this movie, but the action was good, even though it was predictable sometimes.
  • Cast overview, first billed only:
    William Baldwin William Baldwin - Det. Max Kirkpatrick
    Cindy Crawford Cindy Crawford - Kate McQuean
    Steven Berkoff Steven Berkoff - Colonel Ilya Pavel Kazak
    Christopher McDonald Christopher McDonald - Lieutenant Meyerson
    Miguel Sandoval Miguel Sandoval - Emilio Juantorena
    Johann Carlo Johann Carlo - Jodi Kirkpatrick
    Salma Hayek Salma Hayek - Rita
    John Bedford Lloyd John Bedford Lloyd - Det. Louis Aragon
    Olek Krupa Olek Krupa - Zhukov
    Jenette Goldstein Jenette Goldstein - Rosa
    Marc Macaulay Marc Macaulay - Navigator
    Sonny Carl Davis Sonny Carl Davis - Baker
    Frank Medrano Frank Medrano - Graybera
    Don Yesso Don Yesso - Beanpole
    Paul Dillon Paul Dillon - Hacker
    All rights reserved © 2017-2024 hd.thomson-multimedia.com