Whipsaw (1935) watch online HD

MGM Studio execs. may have have wondered whether Director Sam Wood wasn't taking something of a risk when he hired Spencer Tracy (recently released by Fox, and known primarily for his action-packed B films) to play a tough-guy romantic lead in "Whipsaw" opposite Myrna Loy (fresh off a big success the previous year in "The Thin Man") but Wood knew what he was doing. The result is excellent. Tracy and Loy have terrific screen chemistry together in this 1935 cops-and-robbers movie. It doesn't even matter that the plot isn't particularly fresh, or that the dialogue doesn't always sparkle; the pleasure to be had in "Whipsaw" lies in watching these two screen pros slowly build a portrait of completely disparate characters who overcome their prejudices and their "better" judgments and fall in love. Since Spencer Tracy always played Spencer Tracy (no matter who the character he was portraying may have been) Myrna Loy had the more difficult transformation to accomplish here, and she comes up aces. Her performance is nuanced and understated and she's an elegant, intelligent foil to Tracy's more down-to-earth, beefy, good-guy persona. There's fine supporting work, too, from the secondary characters with John Qualen taking standout honors as a mild-mannered Midwestern farmer; and appropriately "noirish" cinematography from James Wong Howe. But the real story here is the performance by Loy and Tracy. In the flood of terrific movies that the '30's gave to us, "Whipsaw" is often overlooked. It shouldn't be.

Judging by the small handful of comments posted by other reviewers for this film, I guess I wasn't supposed to like it as much as I did. I'm not even a Spencer Tracy fan, so I'll have to credit Myrna Loy for doing her part in keeping my interest going. For a film out of the mid-Thirties, I thought the story writing was a lot more intricate than expected, with enough clever twists to keep one guessing. My favorite was when Palmer (Loy) tried to ditch Ackerman (Tracy) at the hotel, and the detective turns the tables by apologizing for trying to ditch her! That kind of quick thinking on his feet got my notice throughout the picture, just like that improvised scenario at the Dabson house when Ackerman invents the marriage story to confound the rival hoods holding Dexter.

I didn't want to go for the whole romantic angle thing between Ackerman and Palmer, but there again, you have to blame Myrna Loy for the chemistry. It took the whole picture to get there, and even if a little contrived, it has a way of working to close out the picture. You know, I think I just decided that Loy is my second favorite actress of the era. My top honors go to Ann Sheridan on that score, but with a few more Loy films under my belt, I'll be glad to reconsider.

Now Dexter (Harvey Stephens), there was a real heel. He spilled to Doc Evans (William Harrigan) and Steve Arnold (Robert Gleckler) about the pearls right out of the gate. If he was half as creative as Spencer Tracy the story might have kept right on going.

Anyway, I had a reasonably good time with this little flick, and can offer a modest recommendation. Yes, both Tracy and Loy did better work in better films, but this one has enough interesting stuff going on to keep it moving. If you pay close enough attention, you can even have some fun with period details, like that little scene at the Dabson's, when the farmer knows who's calling on the phone because it was their ring!

This 1935 movie starred Spencer Tracy and Myrna Loy as a detective who follows a woman linked to jewel thieves who stole a group of valuable pearls. After the thieves make their getaway, another group of thieves try to muscle in on the loot. Spencer is tasked with tailing Myrna in an attempt to find the pearls. For most of the beginning of the film, the pair try to throw off the other of group of thieves who are also trying to find the pearls. Spencer pretends to be a hood in front of Myrna in order to gain her confidence. However, she figures out that he is a cop early in their first encounter. Myrna tries a few times to get away from Spencer to no avail as he is one step faster than she is. The latter part of the film has the pair having to stop at a home with an expectant wife and nervous husband during a big rainstorm. Myrna assists in the childbirth and has a change of heart with how she has lived her life. The original thieves and the other group of thieves eventually track her down. She wants to give up the stealing way of life, but her cohorts complicate the matter by hiding the stolen pearls with her and not telling her. When the thieves all come to the home where the pair have been staying, Spencer makes up the story that they are married and that the pearls were left in another city. They stop off at a diner where Spencer makes his move and a shootout occurs. Spencer gets Myrna out of harm's way by intentionally smudging dirt on her face so she would go to the restroom to clean it off. Spencer is wounded, but state troopers hear the shooting and arrest the entire bunch of thieves. At the end, Spencer asks for a deposition from Myrna regarding her role in the jewel heist. It involves yes or no answers. She turns the table on him after he finishes his line of questions.

Some thought that the plot was not well developed and didn't provide enough of good material for the stars. While it probably did not rate as well as later movie roles for Spencer and Myrna, I felt the storyline was still acted very well by the stars. Some of the plot twists probably was on the implausible side, but I still enjoyed this movie as a crime melodrama. A touch of romance was added to lighten what could have been a much darker movie. The movie did highlight something that would be much more common later in the telephone industry, that is tracking phone calls and their origin. The movie also has a few unique plot twists that show how "clever" the screenwriter was.

Always nice to see Myrna and Spencer in one of their early talking movie roles.

This film is extremely underrated. While it is not "The Thin Man", "Manhattan Melodrama" or "Liabled Lady", it is worth watching for Myrna Loy fans. What this film really amounts to is a gangster film, coupled with a "Battle of the sexes", with Good Guy FBI Agent Spencer Tracy vs Bad Girl Jewel Thief Myrna Loy. Throughout the film, Myrna always has the advantage because she is one step ahead, because she knows he is an FBI Agent, and he is unaware that she knows. In the end, Myrna apparently wins, because Tracy has to quit being an FBI Agent in order to be with her......Of course, if you are a Myrna Loy fan, you know that is a small price to pay. So Tracy really wins.

Whipsaw (1935)

** 1/2 (out of 4)

Myrna Loy is in with jewel thieves when she runs into another mug (Spencer Tracy) who's actually an undercover cop. Loy, knowing his real identity, plays along and the two hit the road with Tracy hoping she'll lead him to her gang. Considering the talent involve you have to put this one down as a minor disappointment even though there's still a lot of stuff to enjoy. The biggest problem with the film is that it's rather flat and doesn't contain too much energy outside of the performances. It seems the film never knew if it wanted to be a drama, a romantic comedy or perhaps just a romantic melodrama. It doesn't really do any of them things very well as there aren't too many laughs and the drama isn't really there as the story is pretty predictable. What does work is the romantic angle thanks in large part to the wonderful performances by Loy and Tracy. Loy makes for a terrific leading lady and comes off quite sensitive to the point where you have no problem seeing why the agent Tracy would fall for her. Tracy plays it pretty tough and believable but has no trouble sinking into his wonderful charm. The two of them together makes for a great couple and they certainly keep the rather standard screenplay going. John Qualen plays a farmer who the leads meet half way through the film and he delivers nice work as well. While there's no question a stronger screenplay would have done wonders with the film there's also no doubt that Loy and Tracy really shine here. Fans of the stars will probably find themselves enjoying this a lot more due to them.

Whipsaw is the picture that answers that burning question in the title.

This was Spencer Tracy's second film under his new MGM contract when he switched studios from Fox in 1935. With few exceptions Tracy starred in routine action films while at Fox and working in Whipsaw must have made Spence feel he was still at Fox. Other than the fact Louis B. Mayer instead of Darryl Zanuck was signing his paycheck, he wouldn't have known the difference from the quality of material he was being asked to do.

Myrna Loy however had already found her screen persona in The Thin Man a year earlier at MGM. So why she was asked to do Whipsaw is beyond me.

Basically the plot is Myrna is the confederate of jewel thief Harvey Stephens who's just made a big score. Stephens has a problem though, he's got to watch out for the law and for another gang who wanted in on the robbery.

The FBI has decided that the best way to Stephens is through Myrna and they've sent ace G-Man Spencer Tracy to work undercover and gain her confidence. Of course Spence gains more than her confidence.

So how will it work out for our intrepid duo? See the film if you are big fan of both of the stars, but only if that. Myrna and Spence both did much better work.

But big things were breaking for Tracy soon. He got cast as Father Timothy Mullin in San Francisco, got the first of his Oscar nominations, changed his screen image, and the rest as he later said in one of his better films is cherce.

As for Loy, I'm sure she was grateful to get back to working with William Powell in another Thin Man film. In fact she got to work with Powell and Tracy in Libelled Lady one of the best screen comedies from MGM ever. See that film by all means.

Spencer Tracy is an FBI man who pretends he's a con man to capture Myrna Loy and her fellow criminals in "Whipsaw," a 1935 film. When Loy's confederates steal valuable pearls, Tracy attaches himself to her so she will lead him to the robbers and the pearls. The only problem is, Loy is onto him.

This is a meandering story and not up the level of either actor. Loy is very beautiful and Tracy is appealing, but they're burdened by a silly plot that has them driving, riding in an airplane, and staying in hotels without much else going on. There is a nice sequence when a horrible rainstorm traps them at a farmhouse where they help an expectant mother give birth to twins. That whole section is the best part of the film.

The stars are very good together and probably in 1935 this went over a lot better. But now we know what Tracy and Loy were capable of, so "Whipsaw" is disappointing.

There are some good scenes but in general there's a forced contrivance to the playing, and the action scenes are amateurish. The plot of jewel thieves is preposterous and annoyingly depicted. Tracy and Loy are good as always but not enough to overcome a general feeling of lifelessness. However, John Qualen appears about 2/3 through and adds a spark by breathing life into the country-farmer cliche.

Spencer Tracy and Cary Grant are my 2 favorite actors. And, when I started to watch this film I thought I had finally found a Spencer Tracy movie that I didn't like. For one thing -- although I don't know why -- I almost always dislike stories about jewel thievery (in this case, pearls); they seem to 30-ish, rather than being an enduring theme. And I don't like films where stars, like Tracy, play villains. And here, Spencer Tracy plays a villain. Or does he? Well, you can guess now that he doesn't, and it's when we learn that he is a federal agent that the film begins to get a bit better. The trouble is that while he is faking being a criminal, his acting seems fake. Once he's unveiled as a good guy, it's more the Spencer Tracy that audiences enjoyed. However, that's not the only problem. Yes, in films we almost always have to suspend belief to some extent, but I just think this film doesn't seem very logical at all. The action seems very contrived to me, particularly the cross-country chase that is taking place. And the acting of the thugs seems rather stereotypical to me. By the way, although this is not the film's fault, the print I was watching on TCM was not particularly good.

That's not to say there weren't some good things here. Spencer Tracy's acting...once he stopped faking being a bad guy...was that good, steady acting that I admire him for. I also liked Myrna Loy's performance here after she began to reconsider her status as a thief. I don't don't just say that because I want her to be a "good guy", but because at that point there is some depth to her portrayal.

I'd just as soon dismiss all the acting by the supporting cast, although it was interesting to see veteran character actor John Qualen...and for once not playing his Scandinavian self.

If you want to see a Spencer Tracy or Myrna Loy film, this isn't the one I'd suggest. Both have done so much better work.

This is a movie to watch twice. It is first and for most a relationship movie between criminal Vivian Palmer ( Myrna Loy) and FBI Agent Ross McBride ( Spencer Tracy), The best scenes are the ones where you see what they are really about ( especially Vivian). 1: Where she helps deliver twins and they are named after Vivian and Ross. 2: Where she does not want Rose to see her because she does not like looking at herself.spoilers ahead: 3: Where he chooses Vivian over his job. And she does not want him to. It is interesting how they have to pretend to be married throughout the movie( especially important because it saved McBride's life. The ending is a classic where they ask each other questions and they have to say yes or no. The last line is where Vivian tells McBride you do not have to ask a question the answer is yes. They are getting married after he gets out of the hospital ( he got injured in a gun fight against Ed Dexter ( a very nasty bad guy and other gangsters. Although McBride turned in his badge, gut feeling is he can keep it because of the smile on his boss's face when Vivian tried to stop him, and it was Vivian who ended up with his badge. 10/10 stars a must for Myrna Loy fans.

Myrna Loy plays against type in this film, as she's a high-class thief working with a gang of jewel thieves. However, the law knows who these folks are and decide to infiltrate them with one of their agents (Spencer Tracy). To do this, Tracy poses as a crook himself and they stage a fight between him and a detective--right in front of Loy. When Tracy makes his getaway, Loy joins him and helps. However, she is NOT taken in by this ruse--and she soon lets her gang know about this staged event.

If you have seen many westerns, you have undoubtedly seen this plot before---many times. I have seen films with Tim McCoy, Roy Rogers, Gary Cooper, Randolph Scott and others--all with the same basic plot! It's all the same down deep--with the hero staging a jailbreak or supposedly committing a crime right in front of gang members. There also is the angle about having the pair stay with a nice country family that leads to the crook vowing to change her ways (copied right from "Hide-Out" which MGM made the year before). It's all very, very familiar AND quite contrived. It's a shame they reused this old plot, as Tracy and Loy were wonderful actors and deserved something better--something FRESHER. Now this is not to say it's a terrible film--with Loy and Tracy, it really couldn't be all that bad and the ending was great--very tense. But you can clearly see why this is not among their more famous films. A decent time-passer and unfortunately nothing more--and it should have been.

By the way, I agree with one of the reviewers that John Qualen's performance as a simple farmer. Unlike many of his films where he puts on a THICK Scandinavian accent, here he underplays the role more--and it worked well.