Search

» » Dovevi essere morta (1986)

Short summary

Paul Conway and his mother Jeannie Conway travel to a new town where Paul will join the local university invited by Dr. Johanson. They bring the robot BB that was developed by Paul, who is a genius in robotic. Paul befriends the paperboy Tom Toomey and has a crush on his next door neighbor Samantha Pringle, whose abusive alcoholic father Harry Pringle frequently hurts her. One day, Paul, Sam, Tom and BB are playing basketball and the ball fall in the field of their paranoid grumpy neighbor Elvira Parker that does not give it back to the teenagers. In Halloween, Tom convinces Paul to let BB open the padlock of the entrance to her house. However, there is an alarm system and Elvira blows up BB with her shotgun. Then Harry pushes her daughter down the stairs and the doctors let her brain-dead connected to the life support. However Paul convinces Tom to go to the hospital to rescue Sam and then he implants BB's chip into her brain resurrecting Samantha. But will she come back to life ...

Director Wes Craven and screenwriter Bruce Joel Rubin's original vision for the film was a PG-rated supernatural science fiction thriller, with the primary focus being on the macabre love story between Paul and Samantha, as well as a secondary focus on the adults around them and how they are truly monsters inside themselves. Craven filmed this version of the film and Warner Bros. decided to screen it to a test audience mostly consisting of Craven's fans. The response from fans was negative, criticizing the lack of violence and gore seen in Craven's previous films. The studio eventually discovered Craven's popularity as a horror film director. The president of Warner Bros. at the time, Mark Canton, demanded Rubin write six additional gore scenes into his script, each bloodier than the last. Rubin worked very hard with Craven to create a very deep and heartfelt movie out of it. Unfortunately, added gore scenes, re-shoots and post production re-editing of the movie heavily changed the original story. Craven and Rubin expressed strong anger at the studio and thus disowned the film.

Kristy Swanson said that she had probably thrown the basketball over a hundred times during the re-shoot filming of Elvira's death scene: Wes Craven kept at me to throw it as hard as I could to indicate great speed. I must have tossed that ball a hundred times. My arm sure felt I did." Swanson also said in an interview with Maxim magazine in May 2000 that the fake head was stuffed with actual cow brains that the production crew picked up from a butcher shop.

Kristy Swanson was 16 years old during filming, making 'Deadly Friend' her feature film debut. She thought it was very challenging to play a vibrant teenager re-animated as a zombie with a robotic brain. Today, Swanson is proud of her work in the film.

Wes Craven wasn't attracted to the story of 'Deadly Friend' because Samantha goes on a killing spree when she's revived as an undead monster. Craven was much more interested in exploring the adults around her, all of whom seem to be monsters in human skin. In his own words: "The scares don't come from her, but from the ordinary people, who are actually much more frightening - a father who beats a child is a terrifying figure. That's the one person you're afraid of in the movie...the idea is along the lines that adults can be horrible, without being outside what society says is acceptable."

In an interview with Fangoria, Kristy Swanson said that she found herself and the other actors caught up in the studio's attempts to strong-arm Wes Craven into making the film more visceral than what was originally intended. During both production and re-shoots, changes to the script were being made, title changes were being discussed (when Craven started the project, it was called 'Friend', then it was changed to 'Artificial Intelligence' and then to 'A.I.' before the producers and the studio finally settled on 'Deadly Friend'), and there were many discussions about how violent and bloody the final film would be. All these issues also caused some problems for actors.

The B.B. robot cost over $20,000 to build. Wes Craven used a company called Robotics 21. His eyes were constructed from two 1950 camera lenses, a garage remote control unit, and a radio antenna taken from a Corvette. B.B. could actually lift 750 pounds in weight.

The film was censored heavily by the MPAA and was submitted 13 times before it finally got an R rating. Samantha's nightmare about killing her father, the death scene of Samantha's father, the aftermath of his death scene, and the death scene of Elvira were all cut. An uncut version has been restored on the DVD release from the Twisted Terror Collection released by Warner Bros. on September 5th, 2007.

Promotional stills, lobby cards and many other pictures show some of the deleted scenes, all of which show more of the character and plot parts and specially more scenes between Paul and Samantha:

  • Paul and Sam having a picnic in Paul's yard with BB.
  • Paul and Sam sitting on a bench and kissing while Sam holds a toy animal that could be a gift from Paul.
  • Paul and Sam in Halloween costumes talking and/or arguing with Carl, the leader of the biker punk gang who bullied Paul, Tom, and BB earlier.
  • Paul talking with his mom Jeannie in his room after finding out that Sam is going to be unplugged from life support.
  • Paul sitting next to Sam and holding her hand while she is in hospital when some nurse shows up and probably tells him that he needs to go.
  • Paul at the hospital kneeling next to Sam soon after she is unplugged from life support.
  • The original death scene of Elvira, wherein Sam sneaks up behind her and slams her through the front door of her house. This original death scene is also shown in theatrical trailer.
  • An extended version of the scene in which Paul talks with Sam after she shows him the photo of two of them with BB.
  • Paul and Sam sitting together in the attic.
  • Paul and his mom in their living room together with re-animated Samantha (part of the different plot from original version of the movie). The back cover of the Twisted Terror DVD edition of the movie shows the picture from this deleted scene.
  • The back cover of the Twisted Terror DVD edition of Deadly Friend also shows a picture of ghostly-looking Samantha wearing a white dress. This is one of the few stills showing original ending whereafter she is killed at the end of the movie. Paul dreams that Samantha is in his room saying goodbye to him. Other stills of this original ending do exist but are very rare, although one can be seen on Kristy Swanson's website.
There were many more scenes that were deleted from the original cut during the post-production re-shoots and re-editing, some because after the forced re-shoots it ended up turning into a completely different film and some others because of the studio demands to make it shorter for more profitable theatrical release, since ninety minutes long movies or less would have more theatrical screenings. This is why there are some jump cuts and choppy editing in the final version, especially around the first half of the movie.

According to Wes Craven, the film had "seven or eight" producers and each had their own idea of what the film should be like.

In promotional interview (Fangoria #60, The Prettiest Deadly Friend), Kristy Swanson mentioned some problems she had during filming: "I felt that, at times, people on the set thought I was just this dumb teenager who had to be lend around by the hand. Nobody actually patted me on the head or anything like that, but I had a hard time getting the point across that even though I may have been young, I was a young actress." Wes Craven at first wasn't convinced that she could handle the role of Samantha: "Eventually, he changed his mind. He was always encouraging me, prodding me in subtle ways to get me to give a scene everything I could. There were days when we were behind schedule, or a particular scene was not working, where he would get a little upset, but I found Wes Craven to be a very patient man."

Wes Craven once said regarding the reasons why re-shoots and adding more graphic death scenes into the film were demanded by the studio: "We started off doing a picture that Warner Bros. indicated they wanted to do, a macabre love story with a twist. About five weeks into the shoot, they realized who I was and told me not to be inhibited by what they had told me in the past... So, in the last weeks of shooting, I made up one little nightmare scene and put it into the film. It was the big hit of the screening. So, then, they came to me and said, 'Listen, what we need is more of that stuff. What we're doing is adding to the deaths of few people, a jump for the beginning, a new closing scene and two nightmares - that sort of Wes Craven touch'." After negative reactions from preview audiences that saw Craven's first cut of the film and wanted a much more grisly film, it was re-edited and the gorier deaths and all of the other re-shot scenes were included, but these scenes only made the film look like a mash-up of two different genres: a family-friendly film and a straight-up horror film. While new scenes were added, others like more scenes between Paul and Samantha that would have made the movie more of a love story as originally intended were deleted for pacing and length because it was decided that the movie was to be released as a fast-paced horror film.

The voice of B.B. the robot was provided by Charles Fleischer, who had previously appeared in Wes Craven's earlier film Nightmare - Dal profondo della notte (1984), and who would go on to voice Roger Rabbit in Chi ha incastrato Roger Rabbit (1988).

Although a critical and financial failure at the time it was released, over the years 'Deadly Friend' has become a cult movie and garnered a fan following.

While filming the movie and having problems with the studio-forced re-shoots, Wes Craven and his ex-wife Mimi were going through a messy divorce, and he even faced a $30 million lawsuit in court with a person who claimed not only to have written Nightmare - Dal profondo della notte (1984), but that Craven stole the story. On top of all that, he was removed from two major projects: Beetlejuice - Spiritello porcello (1988), and Superman IV (1987), both of which were also distributed by Warner Bros.

Matthew Labyorteaux said, in interview for Starlog, that Wes Craven didn't want to turn 'Deadly Friend' into a horror film: "Wes said that one thing he didn't want to do was make this a horror movie, because it's one of his first large budget movies which isn't from New Line Cinema or Joe Blow Pictures. That gave me a little sense of security knowing that he wanted to do a nice picture."

Earlier in production, when the movie was originally going to be a PG-rated sci-fi thriller, Wes Craven wanted to make something that was similar to Starman (1984), in which Jeff Bridges played an alien who, after crashing on Earth, transforms into a human, falls in love with a woman who helps him out, and, throughout the film, reacts to the certain things around him in similar way that Kristy Swanson's character does in 'Deadly Friend' after she gets the microchip implanted into her brain. According to Swanson in 1987 interview with Fangoria: "Craven suggested that I take a look at the movie 'Starman' because what he wanted to do with 'Deadly Friend' was similar in tone to that film." Interestingly, John Carpenter directed 'Starman' because he wanted to get away from his reputation as director of violent horror movies, just as Craven wanted to make 'Deadly Friend' into PG-rated movie in order to show that he could make a movie that wasn't "blood and guts" horror.

The theatrical trailer of the movie that Warner Bros. made represented it as a straight-up horror film, with not one frame of B.B. the robot anywhere. The mixture of teens and terror as seen in the trailer implied that 'Deadly Friend' would be vastly derivative of Wes Craven's previous film, Nightmare - Dal profondo della notte (1984).

Wes Craven had a hand in selecting Bruce Joel Rubin to write the screenplay for 'Deadly Friend'. Rubin agreed that the film should have a gentler tone than Craven's other features. Craven couldn't write the script himself because he was preoccupied with directing episodes of Ai confini della realtà (1985) at the time. Craven and producer Robert M. Sherman hired Rubin as screenwriter after reading and being impressed with his (at that time) unproduced script for _Jacob's Ladder (1990)_.

In an interview for Fangoria, Wes Craven said that the deadline for delivering the first cut of 'Deadly Friend' with re-shoots included, and delivering a script for Nightmare 3 - I guerrieri del sogno (1987), which he was working on with 'Bruce Wagner', was virtually the same, making it very difficult for him to do both projects at once.

Although the movie has much of Wes Craven's trademark iconography, including nightmare sequences, Craven himself originally didn't want to film them. During the re-shoots, he was told by the producers to include few of them. As Craven said, "They were mine but they came very late. It was after the film was shot and the producers said, 'Let's put dream sequences in'."

According to Wes Craven, 'Deadly Friend' came about as a direct consequence of his agent saying to him, "You should do a studio film, because otherwise you'll be stuck doing small films for the rest of your life."

The suburban setting of the film echoed Wes Craven's previous film, Nightmare - Dal profondo della notte (1984), and was a deliberate choice by Craven himself.

Much like 'Deadly Friend', another movie written by Bruce Joel Rubin, _Jacob's Ladder (1990)_, had similar problems with script and negative test screenings. Rubin's original script for 'Jacob's Ladder' was re-written prior to filming, and around 20 minutes of horror scenes were deleted from the original cut of the movie because preview audience thought that they were too disturbing.

Screenwriter Bruce Joel Rubin went on to write two more afterlife-themed movies; Ghost - Fantasma (1990) and _Jacob's Ladder (1990)_. Unlike 'Deadly Friend', both films were critically and financially successful.

The theatrical trailer shows parts of the original death scene of Elvira. Also, Samantha is shown in Paul's room saying, "You're so cute", but this scene is not in the actual movie. Since scenes from both the original and the re-shoot version are shown in it, the trailer was probably edited by combining footage from both versions of the movie.

For the scene chronicling the transplant of B.B.'s microchip into Samantha's brain, Wes Craven called on the advice of retired neurosurgeon William H. Faeth, who has a cameo in the film as a coroner in Sam's hospital room. Craven said that "he was very helpful on all the anatomical details." Craven himself studied anatomy a great deal before filming started.

While critics, audiences, and horror fans praised the film's script, plot and actors, most of the bad criticism was centered on scenes that were added or changed because of the demands made by Warner Bros. and the producers. These include all gore and dream scenes, as well as the post-mortem "transformation" of Sam in the revised ending.

In an 1996 interview Kristy Swanson said about 'Deadly Friend': "It was my first starring role in a feature. I was 16. I committed myself completely to it. I just went full out with it. I wanted to do the best job I could possibly do. I was having the time of my life. As for the movie itself, some people love it, some people hate it. It is what it is. I really enjoyed making 'Deadly Friend'. At that point in my life, it was spectacular."

Because of all the studio interference and re-shoots, when it was released, 'Deadly Friend' was considered to be "a schizophrenic jumble of genres", and even Wes Craven himself admitted that he didn't know "what the Hell kind of film it was."

In an interview, writer Bruce Joel Rubin told a story of how the $36,000 he got paid for writing the script for 'Deadly Friend' saved him from bankruptcy due to the four-month Writer's Guild strike and also helped him prepare his son's Bar Mitzvah and to buy a house. In the same interview, Rubin said that at first, he didn't want to write the script, but after changing his mind, he called producer Robert M. Sherman and got the job. He also said how working on the film was one of the most extraordinary experiences of his life: "It was a horror film with a lot of elements that are not things I wanted on my resume. And it didn't do very good business, but it was total fun. My kids were on the set every night. My five-year-old Ari was totally in love with Kristy Swanson, who was the lead. She later became Buffy the Vampire Slayer in the movie. She was really sweet to him and even took him on a date."

During filming of one of the re-shoot scenes where Sam has a nightmare in which her father attacks her in her room and she stabs him with glass vase, there were difficulties on set with effects. Kristy Swanson said in interview: "The scene was set up so that I would hit a protective device inside his shirt. But, during one take, I missed the device and glass actually shattered on his chest. I freaked out because I thought I had really stuck this glass into his chest. Everybody else just laughed." In another accident, the great amount of fake blood turned out to be a problem: "We had been working on that scene a long time. Finally, it was time for blood to spray out, but something leaked and we had blood spraying all over the set and myself. I was so tired that I started yelling, 'More blood!' and the effects people really pumped it out."

Just like 'Deadly Friend', another Warner Bros. movie from the same year, the cult action film Cobra (1986) was also a victim of studio forced cuts and re-edits. Much like he did with 'Deadly Friend', Warner Bros.' head demanded for some drastic changes to be done on the film, which included shortening the running time from two hours down down to 84 minutes, removing many of the plot and character scenes and heavily cutting down the action sequences and all the gore and violence.

'Deadly Friend' was released in cinemas in October because Warner Bros. were hoping the Halloween crowd would boost its box office performance. It bombed.

According to the book 'Wes Craven: Art of Horror', Wes Craven's original cut of the film was "a teenage film filled with charm, wit, and solid performances by likeable teens Kristy Swanson and Matthew Labyorteaux. It was definitely a mainstream, PG film all the way, but the point was made that Craven could direct something other than double-barreled horror".

The movie the neighbor is watching is "The Bad Seed," about a homicidal little girl.

Editor Michael Eliot, who also re-edited the original and longer cuts of two other Warner Bros. movies Giustizia a tutti i costi (1991) and _Showdown in Little Tokyo (1988)_, re-edited the original cut of 'Deadly Friend'.

As of 2015, 'Deadly Friend' remains Matthew Labyorteaux's last appearance in a theatrical film. Most of his later projects were voice work in films, animations, games and minor roles in two TV movies.

Based on the archive site of Variety and Joseph Maddery's 2014 article from Deadly Magazine about the film, principal photography of 'Deadly Friend' began on January 6, 1986, in California and ended sometime in February. That's not counting the later re-shoots.

One of the many original titles this movie had while in development was 'Artifficial Intelligence', later shortened to 'A.I.', until the studio settled on 'Deadly Friend'. Many years later, a movie combining both initial original titles would be released, A.I. - Intelligenza artificiale (2001). Both films were produced by Warner Bros.

In some countries a film title for TV broadcasting was changed to simply: BB, which are actually the initials and the name of a deadly robot.

What has probably became the most confusing and hated scene of the film since its release, the ending where Samantha turns into a robot and kills Paul, was indeed considered to be a very bad idea for the ending by people involved in filming, but it was included as a nonsensical last-minute idea of Mark Canton, who was the head of the studio at the time. In an 1990 interview with Fangoria magazine, screenwriter Bruce Joel Rubin commented on the forced ending: "The robot coming out of girl's head belongs solely to Mark Canton, and you don't tell the president of Warner Bros. that his idea stinks!" Rubin also said how, at least at that time, people were still blaming him for the ending where Samantha turns into the robot, even though Canton was the one who conceived it. He also mentioned that despite the fact that studio destroyed the love story of the movie that he and Craven enjoyed, he still liked working with Craven, confirming that he wasn't the one who wanted to change the film and that he should not be blamed for what happened to it. Rubin even said that production was one of the happiest experiences he ever had.

Professional mime artist Richmond Shepard taught Kristy Swanson all of the robotic movements that her character has in the movie. In an interview, Swanson said about learning to walk in that specific way: "Getting those moves down was difficult at first. You don't think walking that way is hard until you actually try doing it. But Richmond was a good teacher and I picked up on most of the moves pretty quickly."

When the new ending with Samantha turning into a robot and attacking Paul was to be filmed, an extra actress was hired and trained three weeks for the scene, but she panicked when she realized that oxygen was to be put through two different masks so that she could breathe. Production coordinator Nancy E. Barr was then asked to do the scene with full make-up on; she complied.

In an earlier rough cut of the movie, Elvira's death was filmed to be less gorier than in the final cut. Instead of shattering her head with a basketball, Sam smashes Elvira through her front door, leaving the upper half of her body hanging outside the door and the lower half still inside. In the scene where Elvira's body is carried out on a gurney, a big hole in her door was still visible. Dialogue said by Dr. Johanson that her head was smashed all over the room is heard off-screen, meaning that it was probably added later when the scene was changed.

In a 2006 interview, Wes Craven mentioned a few problems that one of the re-shot gore scenes from 'Deadly Friend', the infamous basketball-to-the-head death scene, had with MPAA; "On 'Deadly Friend', we had a scene where a nasty old lady gets her head knocked off with a basketball. The actual scene as it was originally cut was fabulous; she was running around the room like a chicken with its head cut off for ten, fifteen seconds. It was bizarre and wonderful and they cut the shit out of it. So I compiled what we called our 'Decapitation Compilation', all the films that I knew of that had decapitations in them that had an R, and sent it to them. They immediately sent it back saying they just base it on what they feel in the room at the time. And we had like 8 or 10 films in there, like Il presagio (1976) where the guy gets his head cut off by a sheet of glass, and it didn't matter to them."

Kristy Swanson actually didn't throw the basketball at Anne Ramsey's prosthetic head when filming the infamous head explosion sequence. Samantha throws the ball during one shot, but when it cuts to Elvira being decapitated by the ball, the ball in that shot was actually thrown by the special effects team. This was done for insurance and safety reasons as they didn't want to risk damaging an expensive prop for the scene. Director Wes Craven actually really wanted to throw the ball, but the effects crew had to do it instead.

The original cut of the movie did not include the gory dream sequences, the infamous basketball decapitation sequence, the opening jump scare scene where the thief tries to steal from Jeannie's minivan, and the ending where Samantha turns into a robot and kills Paul. All of these scenes were added because of script re-write demands and re-shoots forced by Warner Bros. executives and the producers.

Body count: 5.

Some of the differences between the original book and the film are; - Paul and Tom's nicknames in the book, Piggy and Slime, are never mentioned in the film. - In the book, the robot's name is spelled Bee Bee. In the film, Bee Bee is shortened to BB. - Elvira's last name in the film is Parker. Her last name in the book is Williams. - In the film, Samantha and Paul are in their mid-teens. In the book, Sam is around twelve years old and Paul is only thirteen. - In the film, Paul is slim teenager while in the book he is fat. He is also teased in school. - In the book there is a ghost character called Lennard that haunts Paul because he was the one that burned him alive in his old school in Boston because Lennard was going to hurt BB. - The persona of Dr. Johanson differs greatly between the book and the film. In the film, he is a friendly man who welcomes Paul to the university. In the book, he is old, stubborn, ignorant, and grouchy, clashing with Paul on several occasions and doesn't really cares about him and BB. - Character of Sgt. Volchek (one that accidentally shoots and kills Sam by accident in ending of the movie) is talked about more in the book. - In the film, Harry's abusing of Sam is given little to no explanation. In the book, Harry's wife and Sam's mother, Grace, left Harry for another man because of his violent ways, thus whenever he abuses Sam, he sees it as him beating Grace because she and Sam look so similar to one another. Samantha's character is also fleshed out more in the book. - In the film, Tom recruits Paul, Sam, and BB to help him prank on Elvira. In the book, Tom scares Paul with a haunted house. - In the book Paul and Tom steal Sam's body from morgue instead of hospital like in the film because she was already dead. - While in the film Sam is revived by Paul who puts BB's microchip into her brain, in the book Sam is resurrected by bolt of lightning. - In the film, BB is killed when Elvira blows him apart with a shotgun. In the book, the shotgun is still the instrument of BB's destruction, but it is Samantha's father who wields the weapon, and he beats BB to death with it. - In the book, the re-animated Samantha becomes more and more corpse-like as the story progresses. Also her feet are full of rat bites. - The infamous basketball decapitation scene is not present in the book. In the book, Sam murders Elvira by drowning her in her bathtub. - Sam also kills Tom by stabbing him (he lives in the movie). The ending of the book is totally different from the ending in the film, in which Sam turns into a robot that closely resembles BB before snapping Paul's neck off-screen. In the ending of the book Paul follows Sam into the snow towards the bridge while police is chasing them. While they're on the bridge Sam and Paul are fighting in the rain. Sam is on top of Paul and hugs him and Paul, thinking that Sam is trying to kill him, kicks her so hard that she goes over the railing and crashes through the ice below. Paul then realizes that Sam wasn't trying to kill him and that she was holding him because she still felt love for him and was actually trying to take him with her when she would have jumped anyway, because, "...she did not want to go into the darkness alone. She wanted him with her." Then when Sam yells "Come with me" Paul swan dives off the bridge into the icy water, with the final line of the book being Paul's final thought: "So this is what love comes to".

User reviews


  • comment
    • Author: Adoranin
    Deadly Friend should probably be good for fans of cult horror films, and this is nothing like some of Wes Craven's past and present films such as "Nightmare on Elm Street" or "Scream", but it does have a good combination of both the horror classics "Frankenstein" and "Bride of Frankenstein". However, the script is rather weak and seemed poorly adapted from Diana Henstall's more effect short novel "Friend". Deadly Friend does have some good scares and above all gore and a good solid cast from teen stars Matthew Laborteaux, Michael Sharrett and a young beautiful Kristy Swanson in the title role. Both Russ Marin and Anne Twomey provide a warm feeling to the younger cast and the audiences, while Richard Marcus and Anne Ramsey both, as usual, looking wickedly evil in their roles. Above all, Ramsey's classic decapitation by basketball scene is the highlight of the film. One year before she was seen in Steven Spielberg's "The Goonies", and a year after this she got an Oscar nomination for "Throw Momma from the Train", before dying in 1988. I whould say Deadly Friend gets 8/10, for a classic cult horror favorite.
  • comment
    • Author: Direbringer
    A super intelligent teenage whiz revives the love of his life with a chip that used to belong to his robot pal BB. But things don't go all that smoothly as his creation proves to have homicidal tendencies.

    Is the film weird? You bet. Is it silly? Yeah, kind of. Is it hokey? Definitely. Is it entertaining? Surprisingly Yes.

    The film is probably as close as you can get to family oriented graphic horror. The characters are not only well acted but extremely likable and that takes the film a long way. Matthew L something brings warmth and charm to his role and his relationship with his mom is cute and wholly believable. Kristy Swanson is pure delight as his "girl next door love" and her robotic moves are surprisingly well executed. Like in A Nightmare on Elm Street, Wes Craven is able to create characters who you actually give a damn about and that's what makes this silly premise actually work.

    The film is pretty funny at times and the graphic horror is sure to delight gore hounds. The basketball scene alone is outstanding. For the most part Deadly Friend is more actual fun than suspenseful, although it does have a few well timed shocks.

    All in all; A nice effort from Craven. Pretty inventive and overcomes it's weaknesses by being just a plain old fun flick.
  • comment
    • Author: Tojahn
    I had heard very mixed things about Deadly Friend so I was a little worried but I think this film is a little misunderstood. Much like Shocker(1989), this film gets a bad rep and I don't get it. We all know that Wes Craven is very hit or miss but I think is one of his hits. At least he's trying something different.

    The acting is mediocre but I really like the story as a modern day Frankenstein. The direction and scares, I thought, were fantastic and the basketball scene was awesome.

    I challenge all you horror fans to give Deadly Friend a chance. You might just find that you've made a good decision.
  • comment
    • Author: Yndanol
    "Deadly Friend" is one of those horror films that came and went without a trace; but for a die hard horror fanatic like myself, it certainly had it's share of scares, humor, and yes, a surprising human touch.

    Matthew Laborteaux (a "Little House on the Prairie" alum) plays Paul; an egghead teen with a robot pal named BB. In the course of the plot, he meets Samantha or "Sam" (Kristy Swanson), an abused, lonely girl who catches the eye of young Paul. Needlessly killed, by her drunk father, Paul vows to make wrongs right, by implanting BB's superchip into Sam's brain....and that my friends, is where the fun (or nightmares) begin.

    Sam is confused about her new identity, and is naturally seen as a freak. She proceeds to take it out on the locals (including Anne Ramsey, of "Goonies" fame, with above all things; a basketball!!), who want this abomination to cease from existing. Wes Craven didn't quite score with this outing, even after the phenomenal success of "A Nightmare on Elm Street", but even a flop has it's own merits. Find this little gem, and be sure the lights aren't off!!

    Grade: C+
  • comment
    • Author: Syleazahad
    My girlfriend told me of a movie she saw when she was little, about a robot who starts killing people. She couldn't remember much of it, but as I searched for it, she kept telling me how much it impressed her... Obviously this is, as with a lot of child's movie memories, a film which is over-romanticized but in actuality less good then you remember... Though after seeing it I was not really impressed, it left me with some mixed feelings..

    GOOD FEELINGS: Positive aspects of the film are in my opinion the idea behind it, Kristy Swanson, Wes Craven and the sometimes eerie music score by Charles Bernstein. Not really knowing what to expect, the film's opening of a car thief being stopped by BB (the robot) made me laugh immediately. The movie made me sad in a way, especially when BB gets blown to bits and the scenes with Kristy Swanson in her zombie form, desperately longing for Matthew Laborteaux' love. Wes Craven's signature is all over the film. With some scary dream sequences (I WAS scared when the father squirted blood all over the place while laughing like a madman) and some sets which looked extremely familiar to me (the cellar in which the father dies for instance, did anyone else got flashbacks of A Nightmare on Elmstreet?)

    BAD FEELINGS: On the other hand, there were numerous things which I found annoying. A at times very laughable plot, a basketball as a murder weapon and most of all an extremely lousy ending... I've read that Wes Craven wasn't particularly happy with this, wanting another ending and less mindless gore for gore, but the President of Warner Bros. thought differently. Too bad, as it doesn't do ANY good to the movie, which could have been so much more...

    CONCLUDING: Mixed feelings... Deadly Friend could have been a real cult classic, but doesn't reach for it in my opinion. Though there are some memorable moments (though the basketball-murder is absolutely ridiculous, I'll probably remember it for the rest of my life) and some good emotional moments (how did I feel for poor Kristy Swanson.) The BB robot is cute and you really feel sorry for Matthew Laborteaux when it gets destroyed, but all this barely saves the movie. Though I do not blame Wes Craven, who probably did everything he could to make the best of it, Deadly Friend is JUST good enough... The ending is a real downer, as it left me with disbelief and almost made me forget all the positive aspects of the film and I think the added gore doesn't add much to it as well... 5,5/10!
  • comment
    • Author: Nikobar
    ***SPOILERS***

    Deadly Friend has received a lot of bad press over the years. It's far from accomplished I agree, but then so are a lot of todays contemporary offerings, which have budgets the size of Mars.

    Much was expected from Craven after the success of A Nightmare On Elm Street, it was by no means an easy time for Craven. When you're faced with a $30,000,000 law suit and a marriage on the verge of total disintegration I would imagine it's quite a task to commit yourself 100% to a film which had also adopted a dozen or so wannabe producers, all with their own 'unique' ideas of where Craven should take his next 'blockbuster'. *Sighs heavily*

    Despite these interferences Craven, and screenplay writer Bruce Joel Rubin, manage to inject a certain amount of genuine heart and humour in to an otherwise troubled project. Casting was spot on in my opinion, particularly Kristy Swanson, my first ever movie crush!!. Anne (Throw Momma From The Train) Ramsay makes an appearance doing what she does best, looking mean and evil! And Matthew Laborteaux is absolutely perfect as the boy genius. Michael Sharrat lends support as Tom, Pauls friend and partner in crime. Richard Marcus plays the part of Samanthas abusive alcoholic father.

    I won't go too much in to the plot but suffice to say DEADLY FRIEND is quite an emotional journey, particularly when Samantha appears as herself for a brief moment, we take her POV during the final moments of the film, where her vision returns to normal and the old Samantha appears to be alive and well, of course BB overrides her, and the final act was a bit of a tear jerker for me, well when I was a kid !!!!

    Bottom line; DEADLY FRIEND had it's moments good and bad, it just goes to show what happens when studio bosses think they're film makers, if you can get past these minor discrepancies you'll find a half decent tale of love trying to survive beyond the grave.....

    (Whatever happened to Matthew Laborteaux?, highly underrated actor!)

    6/10
  • comment
    • Author: Era
    DEADLY FRIEND

    This Wes Craven effort may seem a little dated in these post-Scream days, but watching it for the first time in years I realised it may have been an overlooked slice of mid-eighties teen-horror cinema. It's stylistically similar with the lesser cherished of Craven's films, such as Summer of Fear, Deadly Blessing and Chiller, but, like these mentioned titles is worth revisiting.

    It has the usual Craven touches – kids in jeopardy, nightmares within-the-film that throw you off balance and dysfunctional relationships, but the film is basically about an intellectual who reanimates his girlfriend by placing the microchip brain of his home made android into her dead body leading murderous results. No one can deny the greatness, if extremely absurd, of that exploding head via basketball scene remains.

    Bride of Frankenstein and Short Circuit combined may not suite a lot of pallets, but as Wes Craven films go Deadly Friend is definitely not half as bad as the critics claimed at the time of it's initial release.
  • comment
    • Author: Andromathris
    Deadly Friend is a largely unknown film from acclaimed director Wes Craven, who became famous for movies like The Hills Have Eyes and The Last House on the Left. But if you give a chance to this thriller you will find something very original and scary...very scary!Deadly Friend is a genuinely frightening experience, it has such a great story that catches you from the beginning to the end. First of all, the plot is original and interesting - Deadly Friend isn't just another horror film, it's in parts a love story and in others it works as an old-fashioned gripping thriller that would make Hitchcock or De Palma proud of. Paul is a new kid in town, and he is a genius in computers and robots. He falls in love with the kind, sweet and vulnerable girl next door, Samantha, but everything ends up bad when Samantha's abusive father kills her. The guy freaks out and steals Samantha's body. He uses all his knowledge in machines and computer chips, and achieves to bring her back...as a killer robot!he takes her to his attic but she soon starts to kill the persons who used to humiliate her.

    The Cast: the cast is great, terrific performances are delivered by the main actors. Kirsty Swanson is outstanding as Samantha, in the first hour of the film she is so sweet you may fall in love with her, in the last hour she is scary as hell. She is an excellent young star, and in certain ways, she reminds a lot another great young actress, Reese Witherspoon, she has that quality of delivering true-to-life, real performances, and like Reese she has an innocent beauty.Mathew Laborteaux makes a believable character, Paul is a guy who isn't a bad kid, he just is desperate to help the girl he loves but doesn't know how to deal with the consequences of his acts.

    The Director: Wes Craven once again hits big time!this is one of his greatest films, but it will be a surprise for his fans because, instead of what they saw in The Hills Have Eyes and in most of Craven's films, Deadly Friend isn't so violent. Of course, you get some blood and guts here, but the deaths are relative low. If you want to see a body count, go rent Hellbound Hellraiser 2. Craven's goal here is that he sustains some kind of genuine suspense during the whole film with mastery, something that just Alfred Hitchcok used to do well.

    The Story: in just one word - OUTSTANDING!this is a different, compelling story, it's a gripping tale that mixes such elements like love and horror, it's an appealing and charming material.

    If you want to watch something really good, rent this great movie!here you will find suspense, humor, horror and love. It's a great job from great professionals!
  • comment
    • Author: Rageseeker
    DEADLY FRIEND is written by Bruce Joel Rubin who has also written films like Deep Impact (Mimi Leder, 1998) and Ghost (Jerry Zucker, 1990). DEADLY FRIEND is directed by Wes Craven, the horror maestro behind films like A Nightmare on Elm Street (1984), The Serpent and the Rainbow (1988) and the 90's boxoffice hit Scream (1996). Craven has done many mediocre or even bad films and especially in the 1980's. Fortunately DEADLY FRIEND isn't among the worst ones.

    The film stars Matthew Laborteaux as teenager Paul, who moves to a new town with his mother. Paul has a self made artificial intelligence robot called BB and he spends a lot of time with BB and even talks about its structure and other elements in the school for students. Soon he meets the neighbor Samantha played by Kristy Swanson. Samantha is abused by his father and BB is abused by their angry old lady neighbor who indeed looks like a nightmare on your street. Soon something happens to BB and something happens to Samantha and what our teen genius develops is something we've seen at least in Frank Henenlotter's trash classic Frankenhooker (1990) among many other more or less serious "Frankenstein themed" horror films.

    DEADLY FRIEND is little like Craven's other late 80's film, Shocker (1989). Both films try to be teen drama, horror and comedy at the same time, and it is of course pretty difficult to achieve a totally satisfying result with so many ingredients. DEADLY FRIEND is surprisingly restrained and drama oriented and Samantha really becomes pretty sympathetic girl and the two central boys as well. They're not over-the-top smiling and beautiful adolescents one can find from any of those disgusting Hollywood produced teen horrors/slashers that spawned after the success of Scream. In DEADLY FRIEND, the teenagers are pretty natural and realistic and so they're easy to feel sympathy for.

    Craven has the talent to keep his tongue in cheek while directing these films (just remember the outrageous finale in Shocker!) and that helps a lot. He doesn't take himself too seriously and if he does, it happens very rarely. DEADLY FRIEND makes me smile a lot, but it's all intentional and I don't smile because I feel ashamed or sorry for the makers, which is the case when a film really takes itself too seriously and becomes laughable. The outrageousness in DEADLY FRIEND is taken as far as possible in a Warner production like this when the infamous and often heard among horror fans "basketball murder" comes and I must say it feels quite gruesome in an otherwise "lame" and harmless film like this. The gore in that brief but memorable scene is close to that of Tom Savini's in films like Maniac (William Lustig, 1980) and The Prowler aka Rosemary's Killer (Joseph Zito, 1982). I kind of doubt would this film get an R rating nowadays.

    The main problem in DEADLY FRIEND is that it is too straightforward and has huge holes and easy solutions in its plot and screenplay. When writer Rubin decides they're going to do something, it just happens and there are no problems at all, as if they were completely alone in the city, the hospital and so on. Also the Samantha's father is totally unnecessary as a character. He is there completely in vain, and the violence he commits towards his daughter without any motive or explanation feels quite tasteless and unnecessary in a film like this. Samantha's fate could have been arranged without the character of her father and definitely ten times more satisfyingly and with a more noteworthy result and final film.

    The "shock epilogue" we could expect from Craven is this time very effective and really has to be seen to be believed. It is as shocking and surprising as the ending in Elm Street, but I would say it is even more gruesome and even surreal this time. The effects required for that ending are handled fine as well as throughout the whole film. The BB robot is quite nice and never irritating. The result which comes after Paul's operation on BB and Samantha is very close to that of Henenlotter's Frankenhooker and they both are equally demented!

    DEADLY FRIEND isn't as great and noteworthy horror comedy as it very well could have been in the hands of this director, but still I prefer this over Shocker, for instance, but this is far away from the masterpieces (Elm Street, Serpent etc.) of the director. I give DEADLY FRIEND 4/10 and will watch out those basketballs for sure.
  • comment
    • Author: Mallador
    Okay, one of my fellow reviewers here on this site described this film in one marvelous – rather sarcastic – sentence. In fact, it's so well stated that I'm going to steal it for my own review. The premise of Deadly Friend, ladies and gentlemen: `Boy meets girl, boy loses girl, boy creates lethal cyber-Barbie...'. Deadly Friend introduces Paul, an ultra-intelligent adolescent who build a robot that thinks and handles completely for itself. The robot – B.B – is the purest, most advanced piece of technology ever yet it talks with a peppy, blurry voice. Along with his mother, Paul moves to a new town where he continues his Pointdexter studies and falls in love with his sweet neighbor girl (the yummy Kristy Swanson). The girl is terrorized and eventually killed by her monstrous father, a crazy old woman blows B.B to pieces and Paul snaps. He steals her corpse from the hospital and implants her with B.B's artificial brain. Right from the start, this goes wrong as Kristy avenges her death (and how!). Although the undertone of Deadly Friend is downright comic, there are quite a lot gruesome moments and bloody sequences. The plot is highly unoriginal (actually, some sort of lame Frankenstein-variant), the characters are far from believable and the entire production is perfect to claim Wes Craven is an overrated director. Below average, silly film but with – it has to be said – one of the coolest killings ever! The basketball-decapitation alone is worth at least one viewing of this film.
  • comment
    • Author: Rias
    Deadly Friend is not a bad movie. Looks like alot of critics did not like this movie. But why like a movie like scream? Those movies did not make any sense. Deadly friend had some great scenes. The best I would say is when Sam jumps out the window to attack Paul's friend. This movie had some scary moments. I feel it was overlooked by alot of people. Wes Craven makes good horror movies. He did a great job with this movie. It's really worth watching.
  • comment
    • Author: Naril
    i really liked this movie.i though it was very creepy.it isn't original,borrowing from other movies,some quite heavily.more than anything,this is an 80 take on the Frankenstein tale.and like Frankenstein,this movie is filled with sorrow and tragedy,in the deepest sense.most horror movies are not deep at all,but this one has more depth than most.Wes craven also borrows liberally from his own Nightmare on Elm Street.the acting is pretty good,but Kristy Swanson is brilliant,in my opinion.she steals the show,in all her scenes.even though this movie is not original,i do like the direction they took with it.i think it's well made and compelling,with a main character you really care about and feel great sadness for.this movie is part of the Twisted Terror Collection,and is also contained in the box set of the same name,with five other suspense/horror movies.for me,Deadly friend is an 8/10
  • comment
    • Author: Sha
    Paul Conway is an intelligent 15-year-old teen that has moved into a new town with his mother and artificial creation called BB, to study and teach at the local university. Although after settling in, tragedy hits hard when during a Halloween prank his paranoid neighbour across the street shoots BB to pieces and his good friend / neighbour Samantha falls victim to her father's alcoholic rage, which leaves her in a coma. Deciding there's nothing they can do they decide to turn off the life support, but Paul plans to steal her body and place BeeBee's computer chip in her brain. Sure thing it worked, but she isn't who she uses to be.

    Oh Wes, what were you thinking? Now, what to make of it. Yep, it's feebly dumb, but slightly diverting with a few memorable scenes and not much else. Well, I guess I would be lying if I didn't add Kristy Swanson to being one of the draw cards. Her robotic turn where she's brought back to life was facetiously done.

    Taken from the novel "Friend" by Diana Henstall, this starts off like a "Short Circuit" rip-off than transforms into a modern day Frankenstein retelling. Craven really overplays his hand in over-plotting the film with elements of a family drama with moralistic babble, which then suddenly skyrockets into cheesy daftness and steers it into horror territory with mostly minor results. The simple story feels sparse with many redundant avenues that dig many more holes in the unbelievable developments and flawed material. Circulating through the flick is an easy-going sense of humour that fits in naturally well. It never really takes itself far too seriously, and oh the infamous basketball decapitation is a real scene-stealer and purely a riot. What else is a scene-stealer has got to be the film's enticing gimmick, BB the robot. Although, at times I didn't know what the heck it was mumbling about, but it was a likable inclusion nonetheless. You should listen to the catchy (or maybe drawn out) tune that plays over the credits for a chuckle.

    Mechanically dicey direction by Craven lends the film to have quite a languid pace and junky set pieces with wilted suspense. Despite some effectively unpleasant jolts and the use of splatter, it just feels like they have thrown a spanner the mix in hoping it would take off. Instead it's pretty much a hasty and fumbled attempt. This goes for the daftly incompetent climax, which leads to a hopelessly idiotic (if unpredictable) conclusion. The soaring music score in the film strangely has energy and roughly tugs on the emotional chords. The performances were handled in a tolerable manner. The young cast; Kristy Swanson, Matthew Laborteaux and Michael Sharrett are sound in their roles and never let the overall silliness affect their performances. Anne Twomey was pleasantly engaging as Paul's mother and Anne Ramsey is superb as the stingy neighbour, Elvira.

    This was a lean period for Craven and it shows up here in this pretty middling offbeat failure. Not his worst, but it's not too far from the bottom. But better was to come with the voodoo horror piece, "The Serpent and the Rainbow".
  • comment
    • Author: Yramede
    A few people have said that it's an undiscovered treasure, more people have stated that it's possibly Wes Craven's worst movie (haven't they seen "Shocker"?); I simply found it to be an OK, average horror offering that merely helps you kill two hours. The first half plays almost like a well-observed drama, but after Swanson has been "resurrected" the film becomes just too silly to work. The "infamous" basketball scene, however, is undeniably great; you'll have to rewind the tape multiple times to get the full effect of it! (**1/2)
  • comment
    • Author: Hellmaster
    Now we know where Johnathan Davis, of Korn, gets his inspiration for the strange animal-like sounds he makes -- from B.B. the robot!

    I caught this movie on TV in the late 80's. It's a pretty nightmarish disturbing movie because of the different emotions involved, but it's not so annoying as some movies where the "dream" sequences just tick you off. You feel for boy genius and understand the lines he crosses.

    Things are pretty happy throughout the beginning of the film. Then, boy genius (Paul) gets his first kiss from Samantha one fateful night, which happens to be the same night Samantha is killed by her abusive, alcoholic father. You know this has to be traumatizing for Paul (who will probably never have such a grand opportunity to have a girlfriend in his nerdy life-time). So Paul devises a plan to bring Samantha back to life by putting B.B. the robot's computer chip in her brain (it's a movie, go with it). The plan works, but there's a catch. Samantha is a pale-faced vegetable who moves like a robot. This is pretty disturbing to me, since you know Paul wants her like she was before, but things sure aren't the same. In a sense, this movie is very much like Stephen King's "Pet Sematary" and sometimes dead IS better...

    While resurrected, Samantha goes on a killing spree; avenging her death, as well as B.B. the robot's, via the "basketball" scene! Paul tries to hide Samantha's wicked ways. It's emotionally tugging. Can you imagine if you were trying to hide that you know something about the deaths of people around you? It's gotta be stressful for Paul.

    Finally, things get too far out of hand. Samantha is shot by the police and laid to rest during a dramatic scene when it appears she is finally turning into her normal self. I would have thought they'd lock Paul up after all of this -- nope. Paul goes back for more! I think the ending is great! Though, unrealistic, the ending is a good emotionally sucker punch to cap it all off. It's a good movie to watch by yourself when you can't sleep (hehe).
  • comment
    • Author: Manona
    Everyone who knows anything about horror movies knows that Wes Craven is a horror legend because of films like The Last House on the Left, The Hills Have Eyes, A Nightmare on Elm Street, and Scream. But I personally feel this is one of Wes Craven's best films and is very underrated. To start with, it has interesting characters that are easy to relate to which I feel is a very important thing for any film to have because if you don't care about the characters, you won't care what happens to them and if the viewers don't care what happens in a film then it is a total failure. Matthew Laborteaux (who people may know as Albert from The Little House on the Prairie) is perfectly cast as Paul Conway, the main character of the film who is a genius and is even friends with an adorable robot named BB. His convincing performance makes the character likable and easy to care about. Kristy Swanson plays the character of Samantha who I personally felt very sorry for because she had to live with an abusive alcoholic of a father. Her character's life is very sad and she doesn't deserve to go through what she has to on a daily basis. Another performance that stood out was Anne Ramsey as Elvira, the grouchy old next door neighbor the audience loves to hate. Her performance was hilarious because she was so mean and her crotchety attitude made for some great and memorable moments.

    This film starts out as your typical, cheerful '80s movie about the new kid in town and has a light, comedic atmosphere to begin with. But when the film becomes serious, there are very emotional moments that will definitely leave an impact on the viewer's psyche. It touches on issues such as alcoholism, domestic abuse, love, and death. The story is very creative. It is a love story as well as a horror film and to me it doesn't feel like any other film I've ever seen. There is one death scene that most audiences remember this film for. If you haven't seen it, I won't spoil it for you, but if you have, you know exactly what scene I'm referring to. The death sequence came out of nowhere and was immensely shocking. Overall, this was a well written, well acted film with interesting characters. The only flaw I noticed with the film is the ending. Again, I don't want to give too much away for those who haven't seen the film but it is not the way I would've ended the film whatsoever. But other than that, the film is perfect and one of my absolute favorites of all time. If you haven't seen this film yet, you absolutely should because it is a true, underrated classic.
  • comment
    • Author: Zainian
    It sure has been a while since I last watched Wes Craven's "Deadly Friend", but I had forgotten just how much fun it was. The plot is so absurd and has murder sequences so surreal, I was completely won over. A bright teenager who can create artificially intelligent robots and understands complex matters concerning the human brain, responds to a crisis rather extraordinarily..his girlfriend is killed by her lousy, cruel, drunk of a father(..he knocks her down the stairs causing a head trauma/cerebral hemorrhage)and the kid, Paul(Matthew Laborteaux)resurrects the girl, Samantha(Kristy Swanson)by implanting his robot's computer chip intelligence in her brain! This Frankensteinian maneuver unleashes a cavalcade of problems he attempts to juggle with little success.

    First, Paul's friend, newspaper boy Tom(Michael Sharrett), who helped him kidnap Sam's body from the hospital, is having a hard time accepting what they had done. Second, the computer chip that Paul inserted in Sam's brain, is controlling her..this is a major setback because robot BB was starting to evolve into an entity which made it's own decisions without his master's approval, and it seems Sam is following orders directed by BB. Third, certain targets are being systematically murdered such as a paranoid neighbor who doesn't like people, Elvira Parker(Anne Ramsey; Throw Mama from the Train/The Goonies), always pointing her double-barrel shotgun at folks, who was responsible for destroying BB and Harry Pringle(Richard Marcus), the louse who sent his daughter crashing down the stairs to her demise. Fourth, Paul is having a difficult time keeping Sam stashed away, and getting her to follow instructions is not an easy task. With Tom about to crack, his mom(Anne Tworney) always close to discovering Sam, and a body count, Paul's life spirals out of control and it will only be a matter of time before the secret's out.

    I like how Craven creates what looks like a television movie, only for the outbursts of violence to shock the viewer into silence such as the celebrated head explosion gag by the use of a basketball(..this is followed by a body hopping about without the head as blood squirts out)..how Samantha is all of a sudden equipped with superhuman strength, allowed to lift a grown man in the air after snapping his wrist back, crushing his throat while having him extended high off the ground. Or, when Samantha lifts a biker bully, picking on Paul, over her head, hurling him into a cop car's windshield. Craven includes an amusing nightmare sequence many might consider a homage to "A Nightmare on Elm Street" where Paul finds someone slithering underneath his bed sheets, only to find the charred visage of a victim whose head had been eviscerated in an incinerator. We also spend time with Paul's cute robot before it's blown to smithereens by mean old hag Elvira, and it's established here that it's got some malevolence in it's evolving programming(..right at the start, BB nearly chokes the life out of a thief planning to lift money from Paul's mother's purse), how it could cause harm if needed. The plot itself is laughable, no doubt, and it's hard not to giggle at the ending where Paul hasn't learned his lesson, reaping unpleasantly for his interference in the process of life and death, having created a monster he will not be able to contain.
  • comment
    • Author: Tall
    I consume everything that has the words slashers from the 80's so I decide do to finally give a chance to "Deadly Friend". Well, I think about it as Craven's high school horror flick with a slasher vibe and cheesy elements.

    The whole B.B. sub-plot kinda got onto my nerves but hey, I accept the 80's cheesiness. When things get ugly for B.B. (shotgun thing), I really liked how the sweet, super tender and sexy Kristy Swanson came on board as the main villain.

    The movie follows the typical over the top slasher formula that deals with inventive death scenes (much in the likes of "A Nightmare On Elm Street") and a graveyard love story.

    Still, the movie lacked of a dark tone or any mystery. This should be considered as a "Ferris Bueller's Day Off" horror flick for teens.

    Kristy Swanson is absolutely adorable, sexy, tender. The perfect girlfriend to take home and introducer her to your parents.

    The most brilliant moment comes with the infamous basketball death. Nice! A must see for a PG-13 audience and for any lovers for the 80's slasher craziness.
  • comment
    • Author: Kerry
    Paul Conway (Matthew Labyorteaux) and his mother Jeannie Conway (Anne Twomey) travel to a new town where Paul will join the local university invited by Dr. Johanson (Russ Marin). They bring the robot BB that was developed by Paul, who is a genius in robotic. Paul befriends the paperboy Tom Toomey (Michael Sharrett) and has a crush on his next door neighbor Samantha Pringle (Kristy Swanson), whose abusive alcoholic father Harry Pringle (Richard Marcus) frequently hurts her. One day, Paul, Sam, Tom and BB are playing basketball and the ball fall in the field of their paranoid grumpy neighbor Elvira Parker (Anne Ramsey) that does not give it back to the teenagers. In Halloween, Tom convinces Paul to let BB open the padlock of the entrance to her house. However, there is an alarm system and Elvira blows up BB with her shotgun. Then Harry pushes her daughter down the stairs and the doctors let her brain-dead connected to the life support. However Paul convinces Tom to go to the hospital to rescue Sam and then he implants BB's chip into her brain resurrecting Samantha. But will she come back to life normal?

    "Deadly Friend" is an underrated cult movie from the 80's directed by Wes Craven in the beginning of his successful career. The story of friendship begins as a drama, with Samantha receiving bad treatment from he abusive father, and sci-fi with BB, maybe with one of the first artificial intelligence of the cinema. When Samantha becomes a zombie- robot, the plot becomes terror, but without gore, in the style of Franklenstein. Kristy Swanson is gorgeous and has a great chemistry with Matthew Labyorteaux. My vote is eight.

    Title (Brazil): "A Maldição de Samantha" ("The Samantha's Course")

    Note: On 28 Nov 2016, I saw this film again.
  • comment
    • Author: Arabella V.
    I remember watching this movie as a kid (quite a bit after it came out, I am 19) and I loved the storyline. The good characters were love-able, the bad characters were hate-able. I freaked out at Scary parts, cried at Sad parts, and sometimes I had to reassure myself "Hey, this is just a movie". This, and Chopping Mall, are two movies I have loved since I was a kid. Watch it, you won't regret it.
  • comment
    • Author: Mullador
    You're probably not expecting to hear "goofy" and "sweet" in the description of a horror film, especially a Wes Craven horror film, but I don't know how else to describe Deadly Friend. It's a coming of age story mixed with elements of Frankenstein and it really does, for one reason or another, work surprisingly well.

    A young boy moves to a new town with his mother and falls head over heels for the girl next door. Unfortunately, this girl has an abusive father right out of an after school special and things turn tragic when he accidentally kills her. Not being able to let her rest in peace, the young boy uses his brilliant mind to replace her brain with a robot brain and things, of course, don't go as planned.

    One can feel that Craven was forced to bloody things up a bit for Deadly Friend. After all, this was his next big film after A Nightmare on Elm Street and I'm sure the studio wanted a hard R film to capitalize on that film's success. This makes some of the bigger, gorier set pieces feel a bit out of place in what is, otherwise, a charming and sweet family horror film. I could imagine it being PG with a few small trims here and there, which I feel, must have been Craven's original intention.

    Besides these small nitpicks, Deadly Friend is a charming slice of 80's horror that's worth checking out.
  • comment
    • Author: Whitescar
    Yes, it has very over the top plot and some scenes are both crazy and funny, but it's still one of my fave movies ever. For very long time now i am huge fan of it, and i don't care about all the crap i might get, i'm not gonna change my opinion.

    I know, this movie has lot of problems with mixed direction and forced horror scenes, but i don't think that it's as bad as some of the Craven's other work like Hills Have Eyes 2. And it's important to know that most of the problems that Deadly Friend has is not because of the director, but because of the Warner Bros studio. But getting back to the movie;

    Screenwriter Bruce Joel Rubin did a good job with script, even though it's somewhat obvious that some of it was changed and added because of studio requests. Rubin also wrote scripts for two great movies from 1990; Jacob's Ladder which i am a huge fan of, and Ghost.

    As for movie, i think that actors did a good job with their roles, script works for about 90% of the movie (hey,i have to be honest, right?), horror atmosphere is quite good, jump scares are sometimes predictable but they work, gore scenes were not really needed (more on that later), but even though some are laughable, i think that they are actually well done with solid makeup effects and infamous "basketball kill" is definitely one of the funniest kills ever and one of the best head explosions i ever saw in movie, along with the ones in Scanners, Maniac and Prowler. Nightmare scenes from movie are often called stupid, but i think that they were quite creepy to be honest, specially one where Sam dreams about killing her dad. Hey, if Wes Craven is directing a nightmare scene, then you know it's a good one.

    Some people would probably disagree with me, but i think that ending, at least first part of it, is quite sad. But that second part with ultra stupid and idiotic "she's a robot!" ending is one thing that i absolutely hate.

    After doing some research i found out that movie was originally very different then what was released. It was originally meant to be more of a love story then horror, but producers from Warner Bros had different ideas and Craven was told to make the movie bloodier. I think that it's damn shame. If all gore was taken out, movie would still be solid horror and with, like they originally wanted, interesting and dark love story.

    You can actually see that there was more to this film with the romance subplot, and few of those scenes between Paul and Sam after she's been brought back to life are very well done both by director and actors. And i'm not talking about scenes when he tries to hide her or when he runs into the murder scene, i'm talking about scenes like when Sam is looking at photos of her and Paul and when she shows him one of those photos. Movie would probably benefit more from those scenes, and original cut probably did have more of that.

    Instead, what we got is movie that jumps from "kids" horror to usual over the top 80's horror. More serious subjects that it touches, like child abuse are almost overshadowed with gore scenes that really don't feel like they fit anywhere.

    I can see why Craven and Rubin disowned the movie, which is too bad cause i would really like to see how different original version was before they had to changed it. I'm a sucker for movies that have been tempered with in post production from one reason or another, so maybe that's one of the reasons why i appreciate this movie for what it could have been or for what it originally was.

    I know that i'm probably one of the few fans that this movie has, but either way, i still love it and i would recommend it to everyone who are interested in entertaining, fun horror movie.
  • comment
    • Author: Painbrand
    I have not seen this one in quite some time, but it is about a new kid in town and his pet robot. A robot designed to grab people by the crotch and squeeze. Already, you see the flaws; he apparently designed this robot to have a bit of a violent streak in him. Young new boy makes a new friend a girl who has an abusive father. You can see where this is going. The old lady from "The Goonies" and "Throw Momma from the Train" blows the heck out of the robot and the girl is killed by her abusive father. Young boy somehow deduces that if you put the robot's computer chip in the young girl she will come back and she does. Unfortunately, she now seemingly has the robot's personality and that isn't too good. All the deaths you see coming, though the one with the basketball is rather good, in fact the highlight of this overly predictable movie. The only thing that is not predictable is the end which makes no sense. Well you know what happens, I am just saying by that time the kid should have left well enough alone. It is also a rather impossible phenomenon, but hey it is a horror movie.
  • comment
    • Author: Oveley
    Oh where do I start? I remember catching this on television at some ungodly hour a few years ago. From the beginning it screamed "crappy 80s horror film", but the plot was so strange I couldn't turn it off.

    Here's the basic idea (it's been a while, remember...). Paul and his family have just moved to town and he has no friends. That's because he just moved in, but also because he's a child prodigy that spends his time performing brain surgery and building robots.

    Paul's only friend is a robot he created named B.B.. By today's standards B.B. is laughably primitive and at the same time impossibly advanced. See, Paul's so intelligent that he bases the brains of his robots on the human mind, so even though B.B. looks like a clunky, cheap, barely-mobile toy from the deepest, darkest part of the 80s, it's highly intelligent.

    Anyway, Paul gets picked on at school and is pitied only by a pretty girl named Samantha, who decides to be nice to him, just like in real life. Everything looks good until some bullies try to break B.B. and instead short-circuit him. Paul gets B.B. to run, but something is not quite right with our school bus-yellow, rotund mechanical friend. And then the movie gets REALLY ridiculous.

    Paul is forced to dismantle B.B. because of angry neighbors or something. Later, Samantha's abusive father kills her and Paul, devastated by the loss of his young crush, decides that he can reanimate her BY PUTTING B.B.'S MAIN CHIP IN HER HEAD. No power source is required, nothing like theat. Just a trip to the morgue, a little surgery, and Samantha is as good as new. Except for her complete lack of emotion and her odd, mechanical movements. Paul keeps her in his garage because, you know, Samantha's supposed to be dead and everything, but she starts committing acts of revenge against anyone who mistreated Paul, Sam, or the robot itself.

    Like the other reviews mention, there are only three good things about this movie:

    * The scene in which robo-Samantha decapitates a mean old woman with a basketball (I'm not a big horror fan, but that was too cool and odd to ignore)

    *The fact that the role of the mean old woman is played by that mean old woman from Goonies

    *Keeping in mind the material she had to work with, Kristy Swanson does a good job

    I realize I've summarized most of the plot, but I'm not going to give away the ending... it's too hilariously out there. You just have to see it.

    So yeah, Deadly Friend is a silly movie from a decade that gave us a lot of silly movies, but it's a decent way to kill some time, if only for a few scenes (and laughs).

    I said there was something horrifying about Deadly Friend, and I wasn't lying, just saving the best for last: the screenplay was written by the same guy who penned the screenplay to JACOB'S LADDER, one of the finest films I have ever seen!
  • comment
    • Author: Vrion
    With the Wes Craven/ Kristy Swanson combination, we should have the makings of a cult favorite here, but this film somehow lacks the under-the-bed, behind-the-door, in-your-face terror of the usual Craven offerings. Somehow, Freddy K.--who dwells in the realm of dreams that we don't really understand--is a little more terrifying than Samantha/BB the deadly neighborhood cyborg. Actually, one of the more disturbing things in the film is having BB's (Charles Fleischer) voice coming out of Kristy Swanson's face screaming "BB!". Brrrrr.
  • Cast overview, first billed only:
    Matthew Labyorteaux Matthew Labyorteaux - Paul Conway (as Matthew Laborteaux)
    Kristy Swanson Kristy Swanson - Samantha Pringle
    Michael Sharrett Michael Sharrett - Tom 'Slime' Toomey
    Anne Twomey Anne Twomey - Jeannie Conway
    Anne Ramsey Anne Ramsey - Elvira Parker
    Richard Marcus Richard Marcus - Harry Pringle
    Russ Marin Russ Marin - Dr. Johanson
    Lee Paul Lee Paul - Sergeant Volchek
    Andrew Roperto Andrew Roperto - Carl
    Charles Fleischer Charles Fleischer - BB (voice)
    Robin Nuyen Robin Nuyen - Thief
    Frank Cavestani Frank Cavestani - Angry Resident
    Merritt Olsen Merritt Olsen - CAT Scan Technician
    William H. Faeth William H. Faeth - Doctor in Sam's Room (as William H. Faeth M.D.)
    Joel Hile Joel Hile - Deputy
    All rights reserved © 2017-2024 hd.thomson-multimedia.com