Search

» » Making Love (1982)

Short summary

A successful young L.A. doctor and his equally successful television-producer wife find their happily-ever-after life torn assunder when he suddenly confronts his long-repressed attraction for other men. Zach and Claire live a comfortable life secure in their love for one another when Bart, a swinging L.A. novelist, walks into Zach's office and awakens unfamiliar feelings in him. In a move which leaves him wracked with guilt, Zach cancels dinner with his wife in order to go out with Bart. He is inexplicably drawn to this man who seems intent on keeping him at arms distance. Why can't Bart allow their relationship to grow? he wonders. Exasperated, he asks Bart, "Do you snore? Does anybody ever get a chance to find out?" As Zach's absences become more and more frequent, Claire's concern manifests itself in the suspicion that he is having an affair with another woman. Jilted by Bart and feeling alone for the first time in his married life, Zach resolves to tell Claire the truth about ...

Trailers "Making Love (1982)"

One of the film's movie posters/press ads featured a long descriptive preamble that told the public in a subtle way that the film was about a homosexual love affair between two men. It read: "After eight years of marriage, Claire had everything, a loving husband and an exciting career. Suddenly, Claire's whole world is threatened when she learns that her husband is involved in a love affair, but not with another woman. MAKING LOVE is the sensitive story of a courageous husband and wife who deal honestly with their problem. There's more to love than... MAKING LOVE".

This film's producer Daniel Melnick said of this movie in the documentary Gefangen in der Traumfabrik (1995) that he had "had the unpleasant task of running the rough cut of the film" for a person who was not of "the film world, nor the intellectual world, nor the world of letters and arts". Visibly uncomfortable during the screening, at the scene in the film when the two men kiss, the man "jumped up and said 'you made a goddamn faggot movie'! and stormed out".

At least fifteen leading male Hollywood actors turned down the lead role of Zack in this movie. These included Harrison Ford, Michael Douglas, Richard Gere, Tom Berenger, Peter Strauss, and William Hurt, the latter of whom would within three years play a gay role in Kuß der Spinnenfrau (1985) and win a Best Actor Oscar for it. They all expressed reservations about the subject matter.

In-joke: Cast as a TV network executive fighting to bring quality to television, former Charlie's Angels star Kate Jackson looks disdainfully at a script titled Callahan's Dolls.

When Roberta Flack was asked by Hotspots Magazine if she was nervous about recording the title song knowing the movie's content, Flack responded, "Afraid of singing a song about love? Never. I was so glad when that song charted. People who did not know that the song was about love between two men loved that song. I would talk about it in my shows, and about how love is love. Between a man and a woman, between two men, between two women. Love is universal, like music."

This picture was considered one of the most controversial films within the Hollywood film industry in 1982. This movie has also been considered the first Hollywood studio movie that openly and directly marketed a feature film about homosexuality to the general public. The film was part of a breakthrough cycle of mainstream Hollywood studio movies featuring gay partnerships and drag characters. Others included Zwei irre Typen auf heißer Spur (1982), Cruising (1980), Victor/Victoria (1982), Tootsie (1982) and Personal Best (1982).

Goldie Hawn turned down the role of Claire, fearing that too much of the dramatic subject matter would have to be altered to fit her comic talents and fan base.

Marvin Davis, the then new owner of the 20th Century Fox studio, unusually issued a special statement about this movie. It read: "I believe it to be a very fine motion picture and I admire its boldness. It is well acted, beautifully directed, and it is my hope that it will receive a favorable public response. I congratulate the producers for taking a controversial subject and bringing it to the screen in an honest and sensitive manner".

Screenwriter Barry Sandler attended a packed opening night screening of the film in 1982, and was confused by makeup of the audience in line. His idea that the studio sold them without telling them it was a gay-themed film came true when screams and walkouts occurred after the first kiss 45 minutes in.

Writer Barry Sandler has confirmed that much of this film is autobiographical; however he refuses to discuss the issue in any detail.

Harry Hamlin was eager to work with Hiller, and consulted his industry friends who advised against taking the role. However, his agents told him he'd be fine due to his then-relationship with actress Ursula Andress.

The film's editor William Reynolds excitedly called Harry Hamlin after his first cut of the film and told him he's be getting an Academy Award nomination for his performance.

First leading role in a Hollywood theatrical feature film for actress Kate Jackson after she had become famous in the TV series Drei Engel für Charlie (1976).

The film featured a warning at the start of the picture advising of the film's sensitive subject matter that "may be too strong for some people".

The movie reunited actors Michael Ontkean and Kate Jackson who both had previously appeared together in the TV series Die Rookies (1972) about a decade earlier.

Harry Hamlin's film career stalled due to the film's reception, but he later found success on TV and resumed his film career afterwards. He is still proud of the film and would make the same decision in a second.

This movie is cultural critic Camille Paglia favorite film about gay men.

The film was meant to be an antidote to William Friedkin's "Cruising," which was released two years before, in order to portray gay men in a more positive light.

Marketed to gay audiences with "Making Love" matchbooks distributed in gay bars.

One of two movies released in 1982 by the 20th Century Fox studio that were directed by Arthur Hiller. The other picture was Daddy! Daddy! Fünf Nervensägen und ein Vater (1982).

Director Arthur Hiller was scheduled to direct "The Verdict" but changed his mind after reading the script for "Making Love."

Production designer James Vance originally included a huge portrait of Judy Garland on the mantelpiece in Bart's house, but screenwriter Barry Sandler vetoed it saying it wouldn't be realistic to have it.

For the "make love" scene, actors Michael Ontkean and Harry Hamlin only agreed to kiss and be in bed together but refused to do the simulated sex sequence, which was a last minute addition by director Arthur Hiller. Therefore, screenwriter and a location manager went to West Hollywood and picked up two similarly-built extras for the scene.

Infamous New Yorker film critic Pauline Kael never reviewed the movie properly, but eluded to having seen it in a 1984 review of director Arthur Hiller's film "The Lonely Guy". She called "Making Love" 'ineffable' (not able to describe adequately with words) which was probably a put-down.

When the film was released in theaters in 1982, it caused some audiences to boo and walkout.

Nearly all of Leonard Roseman's musical score was recycled from motifs he had initially composed two years earlier for Hide in Plain Sight (1980).

User reviews


  • comment
    • Author: Zeueli
    I remember hearing about this film long before it came out. Living in a small eastern Ontario town in Canada in 1982 (a town with an army base no less) I thought that as much as I wanted to, my chances of seeing this film were pretty slim unless I could somehow make it to a big city. Finally, I lucked out and the film did come to our town as part of a double-bill along with Neil Simon's "I Ought To Be In Pictures". I remember watching as this movie (the second feature) started, and silence descended upon the entire theatre. You could have heard a pin drop. As the movie progressed and we got to the scene where Zack and Bart lovingly kiss for the first time there was pandemonium in the theatre. It seemed like half the audience got up. People were yelling abusive epithets at the screen and storming out of the theatre in droves. As a young man on the brink of committing suicide because of feelings I didn't understand and had no relation to -- this movie saved my life. For the first time in my life, after watching this film, I could identify with someone else, and I knew there were other people like me in this world. I thought then, and I think now, twenty-two years later, that all the people involved with this film took tremendous chances and showed great courage in seeing to it this movie was made.

    Say what you will about the soap opera type plot, and making the movie more palatable for mainstream tastes, the fact remains that this was in its time a ground-breaking film. I know many other people who have been profoundly touched by this film. Several years ago I ran a group for gay men in various stages of coming out. One night I showed them my own personal copy of this film. Nearly all who were viewing it for the first time were still totally mesmerized and awed by the courage shown by all involved with this film, particularly Harry Hamlin and Michael Ontkean. Both of these actors were already popular established actors at the time this film was made, and both of them took tremendous risks with their careers by taking these parts. For a movie to actually show two men in a loving relationship, and to actually show two men kiss each other on the lips was amazingly brave. As was pointed out elsewhere on this board Tom Hanks and Antonio Banderas would not even kiss in the 'critically acclaimed' "Philadelphia", and that was many years later. Kate Jackson was fresh off "Charlie's Angels" when she took the part of Claire. Kate did a wonderful job in this film, and held her own against two powerful actors. Her powerful speech to her husband after he comes out to her gave many women the words to say to their husbands.

    All of these years later I don't think there is a finer 'coming out' film than "Making Love"!
  • comment
    • Author: Lli
    This is a beautiful story that was years ahead of its time. It deals with a young doctor who realizes that he is gay and the consequences it has on his marriage and his life. As the lead character begins to explore his new sexual identity, he gets involved with a commitment phobic writer and the movie explores issues of commitment, love, infidelity, rejection. But most importantly the movie shows the importance of being true to oneself. It is an extremely gay positive film and the filmmakers are not afraid to explore the depths of the characters struggle. All characters are portrayed honestly and realistically and the viewer is never given the feeling that the filmmakers are trying so hard to get the approval of the straight audience as in "Philadelphia". It is simply an honest and accurate portrayal of one man coming to terms with being gay. All performances are top notch and the ending so bittersweet that one cannot help but shed tears. A wonderful coming out story that i know had a profound impact on many gay men.
  • comment
    • Author: Simple
    A happily married doctor (Michael Ontkean) realizes he has sexual feelings about men. One day he meets openly gay Bart (Harry Hamlin) and falls in love. Meanwhile his wife Claire (Kate Jackson) can't understand why her husband is suddenly so cold and distant.

    I saw this twice in a theatre back in 1982. I was a 20 year old closeted gay man seriously considering suicide. Basically this film saved my life. It portrayed gay men as sympathetic people--not victims or psychopaths or comic relief as other films did before this.

    This was a groundbreaker for Hollywood and, at first, did very well at the box office. And, unlike other posters, I never had any audience walk-outs when I saw it. I saw it at a theatre in Boston and there was dead silence throughout--and applause at the end. Then business fell off when word got out that this was boring. In some way it is--they go out of their way to please everybody--gays and straights. The film lacks an edge that could have made it stronger BUT (in 1982) Hollywood was very timid about this subject--this probably went as far as studio executives would allow it.

    Credit goes to Hamlin and Ontkean for playing gay characters (very rare in those days) and sharing a long passionate kiss together. Also they both gave good performances--especially Hamlin. The real surprise was Kate Jackson--she was INCREDIBLE in her role. When her husband comes out to her, her reaction is utterly believable and actually had me crying (the first time I saw it).

    It's kind of sad that people still think this is gay propaganda (as one poster here does). It's just a compelling drama about a man coming to grips with his sexual orientation.

    Seen today the movie may seem dated and WAY too timid, but this was the first major Hollywood film to deal realistically with gay men. That makes it a gay classic. I give it a 10.
  • comment
    • Author: JoJogar
    The picture frequently gets a bad rap for being soap-opera-ish, timid, too white, too pat, etc. It remains a groundbreaker, for up to that time (1982), gays were either comedic relief, self-pitying ("Boys In the Band" - 1970), psycho-killers, or victims (includes "Philadelphia" - 1993). Released by a major studio (Fox), the film features characters who have some inner turmoil (the married doctor yearns for male affection in a carefree writer), but are NOT any of the above, which is refreshing and unheard of in 1982. Director Arthur Hiller (the supporting cast includes Arthur HILL and Wendy HILLER), elicits superb performances from Michael Ontkean, Kate Jackson, and Harry Hamlin, backed by Leonard Rosenman's pretty score, including the title track, this is a captivating, touching drama with no violent, tragic, degrading ending. How many times has one see that depicted in a gay-themed motion picture?
  • comment
    • Author: Atineda
    Saw this movie in 1982, and remember the gasps of the audience before half the theater left.

    Saw it again 4/24/2001 on Fox Movie, and was amazed at how relevent this movie still is, and how it anticpated the sensitivity which we now take for granted in the portrayal of homoerotic themes.

    My hats off to Barry Sandler and Arthur Hill for doing this way before it's time, and to Michael Otkean and Harry Hamlin for a willingness to take on the roles of two gay men way before the American public was ready to see it.
  • comment
    • Author: Kulalbine
    MAKING LOVE was dismissed as a rather routine melodrama despite its "controversial" subject. This is a pity, for this film is years ahead of its time in the frank and non-judgmental approach it takes to same-sex love. The on-screen kiss between Michael Ontkean and Harry Hamlin was in some ways the "shot heard round the world;" although not sexually explicit, this movie has clear and frank lovemaking scenes between the two men. This has yet to be duplicated in a mainstream Hollywood film; eleven years after MAKING LOVE, Hollywood gave us PHILADELPHIA, a "groundbreaking" film in which the lovers don't even kiss! This is progress?

    Unappreciated in its time, MAKING LOVE has held up surprisingly well. Yes, it is a rather routine romance; except for the gender-switch, there isn't much here that is new or unusual. Yet, oddly, this is exactly what makes this film so appealing. Homosexuality is not seen as a problem except where it coincidentally creates one; the love triangle is handled in almost exactly the same way it would be if the husband had an affair with a woman. The stars are attractive and sympathetic and all give extremely appealing and deeply felt performances. If you saw it in 1982, it's worth a second (even third) look. If you've never seen it, it's a treat.
  • comment
    • Author: ℓo√ﻉ
    I believe that given this film was made in 1982, in the early stages of the AIDS epidemic, it IS groundbreaking.

    For me, it was the film that helped a struggling 10 grader come to terms with his sexuality. Therefore, I recommend this film to anyone who wants to know what it is like to admit to yourself that you are in denial and being self-deceiving. It follows a man's journey through self-discovery and the unfortunate damage that this type of discovery can bring to a family, friends, and other loved ones, when the reality is finally admitted. Anyone who cannot see this for what it is may need to do some self-discovery work of his or her own to ascertain what is living just below the surface that is presented to the public.

    Although the plot and story are a bit simplistic by today's standards, in its day it was revolutionary: a former TV star (Kate Jackson), up-and-coming hunkies star (Harry Hamlin), and the gorgeous guy next door type (Michael Ontkean). Even the sex scene between the men was too much for many in that time.

    Al in all, I would say that it is not as bad as many have commented and it is not a tour-de-force of acting either. Just good, old-fashioned melodrama, American-style.
  • comment
    • Author: Skrimpak
    The one good thing you can say about this film is that it has a good heart. It's honest and well intentioned. It was groundbreaking in 1981 in that it was released from a major movie studio, 20th Century Fox, and portrayed gay characters and homosexuality in a positive light, something that had not been done up to that point. I don't believe it did very well at the box office then, and off the top of my head I can't recall if another major movie studio backed another film with a gay central character in a positive light.

    Michael Ontkean gives a sincere and effective performance as a young doctor coming to terms with his conflicting reality. He loves his wife deeply but is no longer able to deny that he is gay. He is believable and sympathetic even as he navigates his way through what is unfortunately a horrible script. Harry Hamlin and Kate Jackson meet with considerably less success. Hamlin seemed to be calculating every dramatic point with a wink to the 1980's audience that telegraphed, "I don't really like playing this part but I need some career visibility". There was a lot of speculation at the time about how doing these roles might affect the leading men's careers. I took this as hedging, by Hamlin, against jeopardizing future roles because playing gay was not the crown jewel then that it is today. So it was a little frustrating to see Michael Ontkean giving his heart and soul to his character when his co-star was essentially a piece of wood. I think Ontkean's career did suffer from doing this role. He is an excellent actor and it's a shame we didn't see his career launched from this role. Instead it was sort of stunted.

    The script is very bad and some of the dialog is wince worthy. The score was lifted straight from an elevator. It really is sappy. But somehow, because of it's genuinely good heart, and a fine performance from Michael Ontkean, by the close of the movie your eyes are misty. As the movie ends there is a tinge of sadness, but also a sense that all is OK. Roberta Flak singing "Making Love" over the credits is the perfect final touch. In spite it's many flaws "Making Love" is worth seeing. I can revisit this movie and not be at all sorry because the story (not the script), and Michael Ontkean, pull me through with their honesty and sincerity.
  • comment
    • Author: Frei
    I don't understand the number of reviews that refer to this movie as being "ahead of its time." The time was clearly right for this movie. By 1980 the gay and lesbian community had finally become fed up with movies portrayal of homosexuals as either the predatory lesbian or the flamboyant faggot who best case ended up alone and bitter at the end of the movie or worst case ended up dead. When scripts for "Cruising" and "Windows" were leaked to the gay and lesbian community (with their depiction of gay men and lesbians as the underbelly of society, stalkers, and murders) there were attempts to disrupt location shoots and when the movies opened there were protests and boycotts (with posters saying "Stop Cruising" and "Close Windows"). I have to believe that this sent some sort of message to the studios, because two years later, 1982, "Making Love" was released (along with "Personal Best").

    Though I don't believe this movie was ahead of its time, I do believe it to be groundbreaking. Prior to 1982 positive depictions of gay men and lesbians in film were either rare, covert, or nonexistent. 1980's "Happy Birthday, Gemini" was a positive (though not really well done) coming out comedy, but completely devoid of any even remotely sexual physical contact. What made "Making Love" (and "Personal Best") unique was not just that that they dealt with gay/lesbian subject matter in a more positive way, but that the characters actually had sex. After decades of heterosexual sex being portrayed as everything from curtains blowing in the wind to anal sex with butter in "Last Tango in Paris," this was the first time homosexuality in mainstream film was anything more than theoretical (though sex between Ontkean and Hamlin was portrayed more as a rolling around wrestling match than as the title "making love").

    This film is flawed, it is soap opera like and melodramatic, and the documentary style talking to the camera scenes don't really work. But, there is no denying that it is a big step forward from the films of just two years before. It is a step that got us to the point where there now are characters in film who just happen to be gay and lesbian, because in society there are people who happen to be gay and lesbian. Even though it might not be a great film, it is an important film.

    A few final comments about the actors. First, I never understood the common wisdom that "playing gay" would kill a career. If "Clash of the Titans" didn't kill Harry Hamlin's career nothing could. Second, I've always been disappointed in Kate Jackson's career. She became a TV star in an era where the crossover from TV to movies was difficult. Then she was unable to do "Kramer" because of "Charlie's Angles" obligations. Then she did this movie and her performance was ignored because it's not the sort of film that the Academy is going to recognize (and ironically she would have been up against Streep had she been nominated). I wish her better things than another "Satan's School for Girls" sequel.
  • comment
    • Author: Envias
    I love how people so eagerly show their prejudice by calling movies like this "gay propaganda." If anything, these folks do us a favor by exposing themselves so that those of us with brains in our heads can steer clear of them.

    If the purpose of this movie was to send a message, then that message was obviously this: Trust what's in your heart, and be true to yourself and the ones you love.

    Would love to see this little gem released onto DVD, maybe with some commentary. Playing a gay role in a motion picture required much more bravery from an actor in 1982 than it does today. It would be interesting to hear Michael Ontkean and Harry Hamlin give their perspective on this.
  • comment
    • Author: Survivors
    I saw this in its first limited release, in New York City with a group of gay friends, in February of 1982, on a Saturday night. The picture had been out for about a week, and everyone, I thought, knew what it was about. We saw it in a major East Side theater, the only one where it was being shown as I remember.

    Well, I was mistaken about the "informed" audience! This mixed, supposedly knowledgeable New York audience nearly rioted at the first on-screen kiss, discreetly photographed, in a darkened, shadowy corner of a room, in a long shot! The gays (including my group) were cheering and applauding, the older, presumably straight folks were screaming things like "How revolting!" and "Oh, my God!" as they bolted from the theater. This only increased at the second kiss, in close-up, a few moments later. I was never more astonished in my life!

    I just saw this again, after a long time. Dated though it is, I still felt the message was clear: be true to yourself. The final ironic shot says it all.
  • comment
    • Author: Kanal
    I saw this when it first came out. I was 20. I had never seen a film about gay men before - except Boys in the Band - on late nite TV. That film scared me. This one made me feel good and positive about myself. It is warm and sad and happy and realistic. (well if we were all successful LA tyes, anyway) Credit goes to Ontkean and Hamlin for taking on these roles at the time. Jackson is terrific. She has a scene in the phone with her estranged father that makes you realize why she was first choice for Joanna Kramer in Kramer vs Kramer. Wish this would come out on dvd.
  • comment
    • Author: Flarik
    I saw this movie for the first time last night and have been reading the comments here with some interest. Having read in the past that it was nothing more than a soap opera, to my great surprise I found the movie to be subtle and very stylish with fine performances and production values. It seems to me that the recent movie it is most like is Far From Heaven in that the writer and director of Making Love uses the same narrative strategy - recreating the Hollywood romance - but adds twists that illuminate what was not spoken of in the genre before. In Making Love (the title speaking to the difference between sex and love) we see the characters watch An Affair to Remember and there are other movie quotes of that genre. Claire and Zack share a somewhat improbable passion for Gilbert and Sullivan and have been befriended by an elderly woman (the great Wendy Hiller) who had loved a poet killed in WW1 who was a friend of Rupert Brooks, another poet killed in that war. So the theme of physical love being separate from emotional love and devotion is set up. This is the life that Zack refuses to accept either for Claire or himself in the scene in which he renounces their marriage, declaring that she must have a marriage in all senses of the word just as he must. Although they break up, in the final scene we see that Claire has settled for a good marriage, but one which lacks the heady excitement of her time with Zack. By naming her child 'Rupert' she, in effect, makes him be Zack's, the child they always wanted together. And Zack, too, has to settle for a good man, although not the man he first loved.

    So it's an elegant and nuanced structure, given the sleek gloss that declares it to be quite frankly 'a movie'. It's an intelligent strategy in that it shields what might be a less than sympathetic audience from having to deal with anything too threatening. We've all read comments by those self-consciously straight posters who must insist on sharing how 'grossed out' they were. Stories of soldiers all but rioting at screenings of the movie. Such babyish acting out is still sadly very much with us. Indeed, it almost seems to be a sport for straight men - competing to see who can be most grossed out.

    Other points of interest seeing this movie now: The gay bar. The men are quite ordinary looking. Compare this to the relentless 'hotness' of all the men seen in movie representations of gay bars now.

    Of course the big difference is that AIDS is nowhere in sight. Though the epidemic may have been under way it's nowhere visible in the movie.

    Michael Ontkean is very believable and his dilemma is treated seriously. And more sympathetically than the same dilemma in Far From Heaven.

    Of course, having straight men play the parts distances the actors from the sex but again, the director deals with this by abstracting the sex into movie terms. It's no more or less real than watching Cary Grant and Deborah Kerr.

    How grown-up it seems. In some respects it is a more adult take than the current movie romance, Brokeback Mountain. It may be less frank about the mechanics of sex but it allows the characters to grow and achieve a realistic, adult life. Not perhaps having it all (though they do get have great apartments and clothes. but that's part of the style) but having something worthwhile and treating their regrets as an inevitable part of life. The final shot - very Douglas Sirk - of Claire returning to her domestic life while Zack takes a different fork in the road, sums up the movie's point of view with great elegance and wit.

    So watch it. It's fascinating to see how far we've come and how much we've retreated. Compared to the dishonest posturings of Philadelphia this movie really has something to say and says it very well. Directed with enormous skill the performances are first-rate and Kate Jackson is more than that. It's a performance that should have led to a big movie career.
  • comment
    • Author: Unereel
    When released 24 years ago, critics dismissed this as a "mawkish soaper" and it was shunned at the box office due to its "controversial" subject matter. In reality, it is a well scripted, well acted, and more than competently directed film. Quite the opposite of a melodrama, Jackson, Ontkean, and Hamlin turn in subtle and richly textured performances. The screenplay is equally satisfying: tugging at your heartstrings without being overly sentimental or maudlin.

    Ontkean is "Zack" Elliott, a handsome young physician who has spent his life thus far as a compassionate and dedicated doctor, husband, and son. In all of his commitment to "do the right thing" he has been suppressing the fact that he is indeed gay. Because of his stalwart ethics, he comes to the realization that he can no longer deceive his devoted wife. Ontkean shines as a man who is overcome with internal turmoil, yet through the love for his wife, is determined to do what is best for her (more so than even himself).

    The precepts of self-sacrifice, honesty, and integrity in the Ontkean and Jackson characters is much of the appeal of the story. Jackson is convincing as Claire Elliott, the wife who, despite her initial feelings of anger and betrayal, experiences acceptance, understanding, and ultimately, unconditional love. An especially touching moment comes in the final scene when, despite her best efforts to be super human, she subtly reveals her sense of loss after a brief reunion with Zack.

    Hamlin is Bart, the openly gay, randy, self-involved West Hollywood habitué and Zack's first same-sex encounter. Through narration and in his intimate dialog with Zack, he, too, exposes his humanity, need for acceptance, and sense of loss at the foregone opportunity of a serious relationship with Zack. This is a surprisingly underrated landmark film in that it serves as a rare bridge between the pre-80's depiction of gay men as mincing, self-loathing social misfits and the heavy-handed political correctness of the marginalized "queer cinema" to follow. In contrast to today's movies, there is a near absence of trendy fashions, catch-phrases, soundtrack, and banal preachy social conceits of the moment. That's what sets this apart as an enduring film.
  • comment
    • Author: Qudanilyr
    This movie was the first "gay themed" movie I had ever seen back in the 80's. I couldn't quit watching it. Being raised in a small conservative town, I was relieved to see a movie that struck a chord with me.

    In response to another reviewer, just because a movie has a gay theme that makes it propaganda? So does that mean every other movie I had seen up to that point was hetero propaganda? Jeez, right-wingers never cease to amaze me.

    Anyway, it was a very good movie. The fact that the main character was married and announced that he was "gay" seems to have confused the straight community that watched this. It does not mean that he had a bad relationship with a woman so he "turned gay" as a result. That is ludicrous. He had buried his true feelings to fit into a prejudiced and discriminating society. He could just no longer deny who he really was and decided that hiding was not worth it to be accepted by society. That is the message of this movie.

    I love this movie and return to it often. I hope it will be released on DVD sometime in the future.
  • comment
    • Author: Ynap
    Although the film "Making Love"(1982) was done over 20 years ago, I felt than and still feel today that it delivers one of the best and strongest messages about gays and lesbians in our society; a message that unfortunately more people need to 'get', even today. The film explores not only the idea of an individual coming to grips with his true sexuality, but provides the viewer with reasons why. It does an excellent job of depicting not only Zack's 'coming out', but the emotional stages both he and Claire go through before,during and afterwards.

    There were a few weak mini-scenes, segue ways into bigger more important scenes that would of, or rather could of been done better; but when one sees this film today, one must take into account that this was still a rather taboo subject and not many people, including gays and lesbians were talking about. I strongly suggest seeing this film on video; it has an excellent message, not only about 'homosexual love', but about 'loving another person',period!
  • comment
    • Author: SARAND
    "Making Love" is an engrossing and well acted romantic drama on a mature subject. Its characters and situations are easily understood, and one feels for their marital problems and their steps toward solutions. An unusually good looking cast has been assembled, and all play their parts convincingly. The musical score and photography give the film a somewhat slick and glossy look, but the production is a very good one, thanks to a quite mature script and subject matter. For all its slickness, "Making Love" is a film one tends to remember.
  • comment
    • Author: Maridor
    This was the most impressive movie I had ever seen in my lifetime. As a young teenager, I fell in love with a gay man. I did not know he was gay until later (4yrs) into our 'fun' relationship. After all was said and done, I will still love him till I die. I eventually married a straight man. When I was divorced, we still hung around together all the time. He would tell me time and time again that he loved me and that I will always be his best friend, but it wouldn't be fair to marry me. Of course, still being naive' I couldn't really understand. When I was in my twenties, this movie came out. He called and said, "get your pants on, we're going to the movies!" I agreed. We got into the theater and he said, "You need to really pay attention to this movie. This is why I did not, will never and can not every marry you. I love you way too much to hurt you in this way. It wouldn't be fair to either of us. Well, I swallowed every word and every action in that movie and when it was over, I cried. I cried like a baby. I now knew all of it. I knew what he was struggling with in front of me (and his parents, siblings and classmates) all the time. I figured out he wasn't teasing me when he'd tell me that some guy had a nice backside. He was for real. I am so happy he took me to see Making Love. Well, he has since passed away and there is not a day that goes by that I don't think of him. I still love him for who he was and I always will. Excellent movie!
  • comment
    • Author: Мох
    1982 was my coming out year.I was 19...I had just embarked on my first gay relationship and it was a voyage of discovery living in London at that time. I used to frequent the Black Cap in Camden town..still a gay pub..and I remember it was abuzz with anticipation when this film came out. EVERYBODY talked about going to see it. Things are more mainstream and things just don't have that same 'buzz' any more. But 'Making Love' was OUR Brokeback mountain. The 80's were a great era in many ways..they were just the beginning and I am sure 'Making Love' went a long way to making gay people feel good about themselves. I did remember feeling sorry for Kate Jackson's character though..I think I even cried for her. But was pleased also for the guys to be so open. The film was an underrated one and deserved more recognition.
  • comment
    • Author: Zan
    "Making Love" may not be the greatest film about Homosexuality but it may be the most important. Before Ennis and Jack went camping, Zach met Bart. This is 1982; the beginning of the Reagan Era and was before the AIDS epidemic exploded. For a film about a Gay man who is not a victim or victimizer it is remarkable. This was the first mainstream film that dealt with the feelings of coming out. There had been no film before then or since from a Hollywood Studio that honestly depicted a man coming to accept his Homosexuality. For this reason "Making Love" may be more potent than the brilliant "Brokeback Mountain". The sad part is that it took 23 years between the 2 films for Hollywood to really take a chance with a Gay Love Story. Granted, Tom Hanks played a Gay man in a 'public friendly' "Philadelphia" and let us not forget the 'jolly queens' of "The Birdcage." Those 2 films are travesties of the first order because they trivialized what being a Gay man in America is all about; and made them socially acceptable for a generally Homophobic Public.

    I truly love "Brokeback Mountain" but do hold a high regard for "Making Love" and what it represents.
  • comment
    • Author: WinDImmortaL
    "Making Love" was released to the theaters when I was in the 12th grade. Growing up in the south in a very fundamental Christian church was not easy. This movie not only confirmed my homosexuality but showed me that real, normal people were gay and that I too could have a wonderful life as a gay man and not have to resort to substance abuse or suicide; what the church said would happen to me. The movie, with all of it's flaws is still one of my favorites. I have to give credit to Hollywood for stepping out and taking a chance, along with the actors. For the time period it was perfect and still holds up to high standards of film making but is never-the-less still pushed to the background. Many of my young gay friends have never seen or heard of the movie which I consider a travesty of gay history not told. This is a must see movie for gay and straight alike.
  • comment
    • Author: Arar
    I first saw this movie when I was 17. Back then I didn't know why I liked it so much. I watched it again recently and now I know, but the reason is different. I liked it back then because it was the only gay movie I knew about. When I think about the many gay movies I've seen since then, Making Love still holds its own after all these years. It is a very realistic depiction of what, no doubt, many couples have gone through. It doesn't sugar coat anything, and still it manages a happy ending. Rare for gay films of its time.
  • comment
    • Author: Realistic
    Before Ennis and Jack discovered their true sexual selves on Brokeback Mountain, Making Love opened up a lot of eyes in presenting the gay male culture right before the beginning of the AIDs plague. We learned that gay males indeed come in all shapes and sizes and libidos.

    I have to say I really identified with Michael Ontkean's character here, more than with the two in Brokeback Mountain. Stripped of the cowboy mythology, Ennis and Jack are a pair of blue collar working stiffs who live in that part of society. It's just that a film about a pair of gay plumbers wouldn't have really done all that well.

    Ontkean's character had my middle class upbringing. He's a doctor, happily married to the beautiful Kate Jackson and they are happy. But Mike's got those feelings that society has told him are wrong. If you're suppressing them, I'm here to tell you that just like in the film, sooner or later they surface and explode under any kind of stress.

    He strikes up an acquaintance with one of his new patients, writer Harry Hamlin, after making a few false starts into the gay world. That was roughly paralleling my experience, I wanted the first to be special, especially since my best youthful years were behind me. It was as special to me as Harry Hamlin was to Michael Ontkean.

    One of the things I liked best about Making Love is that it made no judgments about either of these guys. Ontkean wants a relationship and I'm betting if he were alive today, he'd be breaking down the doors of his legislature in California and working real hard to overturn Proposition 8.

    That's not what Hamlin wants and he had a good chance of ending up with AIDs. But even as the plague was on the horizon and not a factor in gay life yet, Making Love makes no condemnation of Hamlin at all. It's just the randy way he is, like so many straight men looking to score with all kinds of women.

    Kate Jackson is the tragic figure here as well. But tragic in the sense that she's a victim of Ontkean's internalized homophobia which caused him to marry and seek society's approval rather than follow his own nature. So many marriages went south because of that, but Making Love affixes the blame on our attitudes, not on either of the men. It is fortunate that no kids were yet involved.

    Making Love was a reunion film of sorts as both Ontkean and Jackson were regulars on the Seventies police drama, The Rookies. They weren't paired together however, Ontkean was one of the three rookie cops the series concentrated on and Jackson was married to Sam Melville who was another one. Ontkean left the series midway in its run to pursue a film career.

    Director Arthur Hiller includes a stylish cast to support Ontkean, Hamlin, and Jackson. Arthur Hiller and Nancy Olson are Ontkean's parents and Dame Wendy Hiller plays Ontkean and Jackson's lovable, but slightly dotty neighbor. Look fast and you'll see Eighties action star Michael Dudikoff as one of the delightful items to be found in the cruising bar.

    In its time Making Love was as groundbreaking a drama as Brokeback Mountain is in the new century. And this review is dedicated to my personal Harry Hamlin, USMC private Donald Buchecker of Consohocken, Pennsylvania. I hope you made it through the plague.
  • comment
    • Author: Alister
    Although Zach is a doctor and Claire is a television-programming executive, the young, attractive, and successful couple are prepared to budget so they can afford their sprawling dream house. The McMansion is spectacular, their careers are going up hill, and they are evidently in love, both physically and emotionally. The Elliotts are the perfect upper-middle class American couple, typical of daytime soap operas and cinematic melodramas. However, a cloud peeps over the horizon when Zach spots two handsome young men together on a motorcycle, and, before the audience can catch its collective breath, Zach drives down a cruising alley, invites a guy into his car, and frequents a gay bar. A few heartbeats later, Zach is locking lips and rolling in the hay with Bart, a sexy young writer. Evidently, Zach's sexual repression has been stretched to the breaking point, and, although his path to that crucial point is not clearly delineated, he is ready to make up for lost time.

    Arthur Hiller's oh-so-tasteful "Making Love" was daring and bold in 1982. Twenty-seven years have wrought many social changes, not to mention "Brokeback Mountain." Contemporary audiences may be impatient with the film's pacing, and the scenes where the three main characters talk directly to the camera arguably destroy credibility. The audience will wonder if the three principals are undergoing joint therapy and talking to a psychoanalyst or if they are in a filmed play and addressing the audience. Either way, the effect is jarring. However, the cast is quite good, although Wendy Hiller as a retired actress friend of the Elliotts is so skilled and effortless that she upstages the younger actors in her few scenes. Kate Jackson of the wonderfully distinctive voice is effective as the wife, who feels betrayed and initially tries to ignore her husband's revelation. Michael Ontkean is good as Zach, although the part does not make any demands on his talent. Harry Hamlin also does well as Bart, the writer who wants to be alone with his collection of old movies.

    Fortunately, neither Ontkean nor Hamlin plays "gay," and the audience is spared any lisping or effeminate gestures. The film actually bends in the other direction and shows the two men engaged in sports, arcade games, and other non-stereotypical activities. The script demands that the audience accept mature intellectual discussions and informed decisions from obviously well educated characters. Despite any credibility gaps that modern viewers may spot, "Making Love" remains entertaining in a glossy melodramatic style that is just a cut above TV fare. Unfortunately, Lana Turner could have wrung more tears and emotion out of Claire's character; Montgomery Clift could have soul searched with more depth as Zach; and Troy Donahue could have epitomized the unattainable male sexual ideal. The film has the makings of an over-the-top melodrama in the grand style of "Imitation of Life" or "Portrait in Black," which only a Ross Hunter could have realized. Rather than pull out all the stops, Arthur Hiller has directed the film with a sturdy hand and a tasteful eye. "Making Love" is a melancholy tale that leaves viewers with a wisp of sadness for all involved. Perhaps that undercurrent was a cautionary moral for the early 1980's, just before the scourge of AIDS would add a darker tone to this fable.
  • comment
    • Author: Brariel
    First saw the movie in 1982 or 1983 here in Hong Kong with a friend who committed suicide in 1990. Deeply impressed by Zack because I felt I was bit like him, having identity crisis and did not know how to handle myself at that time. I loved the movie since then. Keep thinking about it and trying to watch again in the past 20 years but could hardly found the video tape or DVD in Hong Kong. So happy to accidentally find the movie on the internet, and bought it right away because I long to watch it after all these years. The feeling came again when watching the movie again as long as getting it, it was really so fresh feeling. I love it, just like a long lost friend, so nice to see Zack again, and will never forget him.
  • Cast overview, first billed only:
    Michael Ontkean Michael Ontkean - Zach
    Kate Jackson Kate Jackson - Claire
    Harry Hamlin Harry Hamlin - Bart
    Wendy Hiller Wendy Hiller - Winnie
    Arthur Hill Arthur Hill - Henry
    Nancy Olson Nancy Olson - Christine
    John Dukakis John Dukakis - Tim
    Terry Kiser Terry Kiser - Harrington
    Dennis Howard Dennis Howard - Larry
    Asher Brauner Asher Brauner - Ted
    John Calvin John Calvin - David
    Gwen Arner Gwen Arner - Alrene
    Gary Swanson Gary Swanson - Ken
    Anne Haney Anne Haney - Lila (as Ann Harvey)
    Stanley Kamel Stanley Kamel - Charlie
    All rights reserved © 2017-2024 hd.thomson-multimedia.com