Civilisation watch online HD

There have been many fine video lecture series by prominent cultural figures, from Joseph Campbell to Robert Hughes, but for me, the finest is still the first, Kenneth Clark's landmark, "Civilization, A Personal View". The sub-title is important, for Clark's survey of western civilization through its art and architecture is certainly opinionated. And this gives the series a wonderful intimacy that previous televised surveys never approached.

Not only is there a wealth of information and insight in this beautiful production, but there is Kenneth Clark himself. A scholar of culture and art, admirer of Ruskin and student of Bernard Berenson, he was director of the Ashmolean Museum in Oxford and the National Galley in London, as well as pioneering arts commentator for radio and television in the UK. Kenneth, Lord Clark, raised to the peerage for his achievements, is perhaps the greatest impresario of art of the 20th century.

"Civilization, a Personal View" has been criticized by some art critics as being a bit "facile". I disagree. Clark's argumentation is always reasoned, never arbitrary. It certainly is facile for pop commentators to repeat the old tourist-pleasing but phony assertion that Michelangelo designed and built St. Peter's dome. It is Clark who points out that St. Peter's dome is the work of Giacomo della Porta, not Michelangelo. Is it facile for Clark to confess that when he was young he scorned Frans Hals out of snobbery, but later, "as I grew older," began to appreciate Hals's "convivial" figures? Facile indeed. Everything Clark says carries weight.

Aside from questions about Clark's personal views - he ends Civilization at the beginning of the modern era, not because he ran out of film but because he didn't care for modernism - it cannot be denied that he delivers them in such a lucid, congenial and engaging manner, that only the pedantic and churlish could fail to be delighted with a dapper, eloquent, beautifully spoken gentleman's tour through western history. Where else do pronunciations like caPITalism and usages such as "lie of the land" sound so wonderful than from the lips of this erudite Scotsman?

"And please allow me two minute's digression on the subject of tulips." I love it!

Clark's series is by far the best televised course in Western Civilization ever created. I doubt if it will ever be surpassed. There are two men I dearly miss having met before they died - Joseph Campbell and Kenneth Clark. Upon meeting Clark in "Civilization, a Personal View," I think you'll understand why.

I was a young man in my impressionable early-20s, when Kenneth Clark's "Civilisation" made its appearance on American television. I recall, at the time, thinking what ambition to entitle a program so. Public Broadcasting had not been around for many years, and I expected a stodgy, pompous, supercilious approach to the subject of art and civilization, especially as it was coming from Britain. Surely, this was a program for the elite, the snobs of the art world, the aristocrats of Europe who had access to such treasures. Kenneth Clark truly changed those first impressions, presenting in a gentle, understandable way some of the great treasures of the human species. These pieces were no longer remote, mysterious objects stuffed away in some dusty museum or moldering palace. He clearly taught about each of his choices, seeming to enjoy the opportunity to pass on to the viewer his love and admiration for these works and their meaning, as they related to the modern world and to the world long past in which they were created. He was humorous and wise, and the photography was stunning. I immediately changed my major in college to art history and, although I never became wealthy from the education, I have always appreciated what I did learn, beginning with the inspiration provided by Kenneth Clark and "Civilisation." Mr. Clark became one of those people with whom I wish I could have spent an afternoon, just listening. I haven't seen the program in many years, though it was re-run often after its first showing. I would like to see this back on television, or on DVD. I do believe it was the inspiration for many similar, and more famous programs to follow and was part of that exceptional time in television when the UK sent us its best - "Civilisation", "The First Churchills", "The Six Wives of Henry VIII", "Elizabeth R", and "I, Claudius."

If "Civilisation" ever reappears, do yourself a favor. Sit back in an easy chair, tone down the distractions, have a good hot coffee, and enjoy the story of your past. It's shared by all of us, and Kenneth Clark will introduce you to yourself.

First broadcast in 1969,Civilization was produced not only to showcase the new medium of color television but also to reassure a then turbulent society of its established roots.

Before viewing Civilization I had never heard of Kenneth Clark, or K Clark as he was known to his contemporaries. At first glance he appears to be the product of a stodgy old order, a stereotypical brown flannel suit poised very uneasily in the Age of Aquarius. However his soft demeanor, articulate observations and frank but reasonable opinions quickly become very endearing qualities. I soon found myself very disappointed I had never met the man, or at least lived through his era.

I can say with confidence that if you seriously enjoy history, particularly the European variety, you will enjoy Civilization. Even if you don't, the stunning and intimate portrayal of 1500 years of art may still be captivating enough to hold your attention. This program is unlike anything broadcast in the post-MTV era, and it sets a standard of culture and erudition that puts networks which should know better, like the History Channel, to shame.

I know very little of Art or its history, or compete with the wonderful commentaries above, but know this; I just can't return Kenneth Clark's "Civilisation" to my garage to moulder! Every year it returns to my DVD player for a full replay as I sit back to enjoy Clark's enthralling journey through time, his insights, his sweet lines, especially of Episode Two; "like a Russian spring!", "the inflated scale of modern materialism!", "these great orderly mountains of stone!", "And so she was martyred!" And I come out of it refreshed and satisfied, and more thoughtful too. "Civilisation", so different from the common historical gruel. Where's the quality now I ask? "History Channel"? I don't think so! Not for depth anyway. Give me Clark any day!

Watching the series in China, it makes me all the more proud of my heritage. The last comment is a good one; let Clark introduce himself to you, just as one reads a Herodotus or Suetonius- to be in the presence of a knowledgeable and engaging friend. having visited many of the places shown, it's also a marked benefit that the series was filmed in 1969, when travel was truly the domain of those seeking enlightenment before our days of package tours. And how clear and lucid are his discussions of culture and history! Often I found myself anticipating his next sentence from my own classes I teach, but am left feeling pedantic and plebeian by comparison. Although the BBC continues to be a source of wonderment through its historical live-action recreation series such as Auschwitz, Pompeii and the Attenboroughs, this is truly of its time when there was no need for gimmicks or embellishment. www.tracesofevil.blogspot.com

The greatest problem with this 1969 BBC documentary series is its name. It really doesn't cover civilization, but only some parts of culture, mostly music, painting, sculpture and architecture with some literature. But science, for example, is only dealt with tangentially. And it really doesn't cover the whole world but only European culture. And West European culture at that, since the important cultural contribution of Eastern European countries like Russia is almost unmentioned. Even the art of places like Scandinavia and the Iberian Peninsula, which most people would include in Western Europe, are barely mentioned. And it only covers the world from the Middle Ages on, with scant mention of the ancient Greco Roman world. So basically, this series is about high culture in a relatively small geographical area, mostly England, France, the Low Countries, Italy and the German speaking world, between the late middle ages up to the beginning of the 20th century. Yet what incredible art was created in those places during that period. In our politically correct age, we would like to believe that every country and every people has contributed equally to world culture. Unfortunately, this is not true. European culture, especially the high culture of the period between the renaissance and around 1900 achieved a depth, a craft, a complexity, a moral seriousness unparalleled in human history. So if you are willing to accept that this TV program is not really about global civilization but about a qualitatively important subset of it, then this is a magnificent TV program.

With his upper class accent, politically conservative views and erudite art knowledge, anchor Kenneth Clark (an art historian of repute) seems almost the stereotype of the English gentlemanly aristocratic scholar. As he visits historical locations in several countries, the stunning color photography, vividly showing us how Western Europe looked during the late 1960s, becomes another considerable plus of this series.

There have been many TV series on history and art, but this was one of the first and most impressive. I saw it on PBS on its release and here is the scene. I'm sprawled on the floor of my apartment with half a dozen graduate students from a nearby university, in my Philadelphia living room, some of us having lightly indulged in psychedelic substances, and the camera follows Sir Kenneth Clark as he guides us through an ornate doorway into the Sistine Chapel. But the camera doesn't stay on Clark's back. As it passes through the door it bend backwards, looking upward, as a human might do, at the gaudy splotches that adorn the ceiling. And there comes a low growl of astonishment from someone seated behind me -- "Wowww!"

I won't summarize the contents of the series here, but I guess I'll mention that the subtitle, "A Personal View," should be taken literally. At one point Sir Kenneth suggests that the residents of a Medieval village that had been passed by barbarians might have preferred being conquered because it would relieve their boredom.

But I've recently watched it a second time and it lacks the impact of its first viewing. There have been many similar series, less languorous, more quickly paced. Sir Kenneth is gentlemanly and doesn't condescend to an audience raised on commercials for hair dye, remedies for impotence, and corn flakes.

He strolls along a wall whose figures have been painted by Giotto. "Giotto's work needs no words from me," he remarks, and there follows a period of nothing but plainsong and a very slow and deliberate camera roaming over the figures. It's more than a minute long, and Clark is absent. The good part of this kind of approach is that you get to recognize Giotto's work by heart. (All of Giotto's eyes looked the same, sort of too-close-together and squinty.) The bad part is you might fall asleep for a few seconds.

I kind of wish, too, that he'd anchored us a bit more firmly in the historical time line. What was the social and political context of the work? Or, even more elementary, who followed whom? Simon Schama's series, though much less ambitious, tells us a lot more about the individuals who wielded the brushes and mallets.

Yes opiniated, yes patrician, but also an enlightening, exceptional documentary series. Nothing else I've seen on the BBC can match it (though I enjoyed The Ascent of Man very much). A profoundly intelligent look at Western 'Art' History covering music, painting, architecture, sculpture, writing (poetry, drama, prose, philosophy) and celebrating the astonishing achievements of individuals. "There they are, you can't dismiss them". Quite.

Actually, this is an old tired, imperial, colonial, Europocentric view of history and culture, unpleasantly presented and conveying nothing but the contents of British imperial trashbin, starting with the thesis that "humanity invented harmony." Even more amazing to see this lack of taste and common sense from the BBC of "the golden period." I grieve that it had not ended as a highway filler, as some truly great British TV programs had.