Search

Short summary

In a world where superheroes have been real for decades, an accountant with no superpowers comes to realize his city is owned by a super villain. As he struggles to uncover this conspiracy, he falls in league with a strange blue superhero.
In a world where superheroes have been real for decades, an accountant with no superpowers comes to realize his city is owned by a super villain. As he struggles to uncover this conspiracy, he falls in league with a strange blue superhero.

Trailers "The Tick "

Patrick Warburton is one of the producers. He played the title character in The Tick (2001).

This rendition of The Tick is written and produced in part, by Ben Edlund, the original creator of The Tick

Townsend Coleman, who provided the voice of The Tick in the animated series, makes an appearance as Midnight.

Griffin Newman (Arthur) described the character of The Tick as "a golden retriever, running toward danger or whatever shiny object is in front of him."

Peter Serafinowicz called playing The Tick "the best job I've ever had."

The Tick has maintained a cult following ever since hitting comic book stores in 1986. Patrick Warburton, who played the character in 2001, stated that fans had frequently bombarded him with questions regarding when the character would make his return.

Despite the comedic nature of the show, Peter Serafinowicz (The Tick) stated that he doesn't consider the character a parody.

Ben Edlund was initially reluctant to bring the character back to TV. A meeting with producer Barry Josephson, however, made him reconsider after bringing up the rise of streaming media and the culture's embrace of superhero movies.

Late in the first episode, Arthur tells Tick that he will not "get into bread" with him. This may be a reference to an animated episode where Arthur and the Tick face up to The Bread Master, who encases them in a massive loaf of bread.

In regards to Ben Edlund's vision of the show, visual effects supervisor Terry Windell described this version of The Tick as one that is "having fun" with superheroes as opposed to "making fun" of them.

When asked if Patrick Warburton was upset about reprising his role as The Tick, producer Barry Josephson stated that Warburton held no ill feelings and was quoted saying "If we get to the finish line and I'm not starring- that's okay."

In regards to complex design of the title character's costume, Peter Serafinowicz stated that it took a few months to go from "unbearable to wearable."

Jackie Earle Haley plays the drums in real-life, so he was thrilled when the producers mentioned that his character, The Terror, would have the same hobby.

Both Peter Serafinowicz and Griffin Newman took influence from The Naked Gun series and its star Leslie Nielsen while developing their performances and jokes for their characters.

The writers and producers of The Tick set out to make a show that was both funny but also told a compelling story with real conflict and tension.

The first episode premiered on Amazon.com's Prime subscription streaming service on August 19, 2016. It was part of the first Comedy Pilot Season, an extension of the popular and ongoing "choose your own programming" experiment known as Pilot Season. The three half-hour comedies included I Love Dick (2016), La Garrapata (2017) and Jean-Claude Van Johnson: Pilot (2016). Subscribers vote on which of the three series will be picked up based on just the first episode/pilots.

Wally Pfister, the Oscar winning cinematographer, was chosen to direct the series pilot. Pfister was a frequent collaborator with director Christopher Nolan, having worked on The Dark Knight trilogy, before making the jump to directing.

Both the Tick and Arthur say their respective "heroic " catchphrases from the cartoon. The Tick is staring at a spoon when he says "Spoon!" and Arthur is expecting to get hit by the Terror when he says " Not in the face!".

To prevent The Tick from becoming too one-dimensional, the writers decided to incorporate elements of his mysterious and unknown backstory into his character in addition to burgeoning partnership between him and Arthur.

Griffin Newman (Arthur) previously worked as a comic book store employee and was a major fan of The Tick prior to being cast in the show.

Casting director Felicia Fasano suggested British actor/comedian Peter Serafinowicz to play the title character, stating his experience as a stand-up performer and comedic actor in films such as Guardians of the Galaxy and Shaun of the Dead.

Jackie Earle Haley's makeup as The Terror took 2 and a half hours to apply. He stated that the process gave him "a Freddy flashback" as Haley played Freddy Krueger in the 2010 remake of A Nightmare on Elm Street.

This is the third television adaptation of the comic book. The Tick was first adapted into an animated series which ran from 1994-1997. The second was a live action series starring Patrick Warburton as the title character which ran for one season in 2001.

Peter hadn't watched the previous Tick TV series, but started reading The Tick comic books to develop the voice of the Tick. Peter had a call with Ben and Barry to hone the voice of the Tick which embodies the classic American hero and has a hint of 60's / 70's American radio show host tone.

Dangerboat is voiced by actor Alan Tudyk. Alan has voiced many memorable robots in cinematic history including 'Sonny' in 'I, Robot' and 'K-2SO' in 'Star Wars Rogue One.'

The producers aimed to create a more grounded aesthetic for The Tick in contrast to the more over-the-top tones from the animated and 2001 series.

Producer Barry Josephson launched efforts to bring The Tick back to TV in 2014, stating that the cultural ubiquity of superheroes inspired him to do so.

When diving into the character of The Terror, Jackie Earle Haley made a mental concoction of famous movie stars, astronauts, quarterbacks, and other famous people to try to comprehend what it would be like to play The Terror who has been alive and famed for hundreds of years.

The Tick is based on the comic book series from creator Ben Edlund which first hit shelves in 1986.

When Peter Serafinowicz is doing the voice of the nightlight speaking to Arthur, he recorded his audio when he was on set, just off camera. This is unusual because actors typically record this type of dialogue in an ADR session after initial production has wrapped.

Jackie Earle Haley (The Terror) previously played Rorschach in Watchmen (2009), which is also based on a comic series that mocks common comic superhero tropes.

Townsend Coleman, the voice of Midnight, was the voice of the Tick in the 90's animated series. Coleman is also credited as doing voices in Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles and numerous other series.

Jackie Earle Haley, who plays The Terror, has made a career playing villainous or deeply troubled characters. Such roles include Rorschach in 2009's Watchmen, Freddy Krueger in the 2010 reboot of A Nightmare on Elm Street, and a recently paroled sex offender in 2006's Little Children (for which he received an Oscar nomination).

When Griffin Newman started reading the script for The Tick, he felt like his character. Arthur's psychological map was so well written that he didn't have to do a lot of homework for his role.

Creator Ben Edlund has served as both a writer and producer on multiple shows by Joss Whedon including Buffy the Vampire Slayer, Firefly, and Angel.

Ms. Lint is often referred to by her first name, Janet, usually by the Terror. In "The Tick" (2001), Captain Liberty is also referred to by her first name, Janet, on numerous occasions, usually by her former lover, Batmanuel.

Playing Overkill was cathartic for Scott Speiser as he was able to get some frustrations out through his character.

The name Superian is likely an amalgamation of DC Comics character Superman and the similar Marvel character Hyperion.

The scenes of doubt in the show start when the Tick begins to realize that he doesn't have a past, or at least remember it.

User reviews


  • comment
    • Author: Anayalore
    My new favorite show.

    Parody of super heroes Satire of Super heroes While also, still, somehow, a superhero show in it's own right. Filled with complex characters, heart string plucking hero's journey...

    While also being the funniest thing on tv.

    I'd say this is something new, except Edlund has being doing this for almost 30 years. He just keeps getting better and better at it.

    Can't recommend any higher.

    Amazing.

    Please please please Amazon, keep on making this.
  • comment
    • Author: Fearlessdweller
    Ok maybe the storyline isn't quite the same as the comics/animated series but that's a good thing actually. It adds a lot more fun by not being too predictable! Griffin Newman is a great Arthur and Serafinowicz had done a great job, he's a warm, funny big ol' Tick! But my favorite character is the Terror; goddamn Jackie Earle Haley NAILED IT
  • comment
    • Author: Hulis
    First let me give a disclaimer, I have been a HUGE Tick fan since they day I saw the first cartoon back in the 90s. People have to remember that the Tick has always a mixed bag, you either love him or hate him. It's a parody of all things super hero, even though this time there is a bit a seriousness. When there is a serious explosion, afterwards you look for the bad guy dangling from rooftop begging for help.

    I think the last live action attempt was better in some ways, in other ways I think this one will be better. I won't deny that Patrick Warburton was perfect in the last one. But Peter Serafinowicz is also pretty good. He really doesn't have a lot of screen time to judge by. But when he does he does a good job. His monologue at the end was great and I could really see him as the Tick. As for Arthur, Griffin Newman does a perfect job. The writing is of course spot on, because it's written by the original writer and creator. This new darker story line was a nice twist. And doing an origin story on Arthur was a bold choice for a pilot episode, because it doesn't give much screen time to the Tick.

    The jokes are there, but only really when the Tick is around. So I think some people will miss what I think is the writer's intention. Where as before it was non-stop jokes and puns. This show is serious, then bam a joke/pun. I think over all it makes for a better ride.
  • comment
    • Author: Risa
    I've watched this episode 3 times now. I really like it. I liked the comics and the animated series, but I didn't love the last live action version. This is by far, the best character development of any iteration of The Tick. Arthur's back store is excellent, and Griffin Newman plays it brilliantly. Peter Serafinowicz's acting as The Tick is a little rough, but he's a good actor and I have no doubt he'll pull it off. Plus with Patrick Warburton as a producer (as opposed to playing The Tick like he did the last time) I'm sure he'll coach Peter along.

    To me, this is more representative of the comics, which could be darker than the animated series. Arthur's back story is definitely darker and it seems that Arthur's story line is going to carry the series forward while The Tick may be "the sidekick" to the story. I really hope Amazon picks this up, I can't wait to see where Ben Edlund takes it from here.
  • comment
    • Author: Barinirm
    Overall, I enjoyed the pilot episode, and would vote for it to be continued. There, that's said.

    There are a few things that jar me the wrong way. Serafinowicz doesn't quite have the physical and vocal presence I'd want in the Big Blue Guy. And the suit looks a bit too rubberized. But, as pointed out in other reviews, Serafinowicz is a good actor and voice actor, and, with a commitment as a producer, too, he'll find his way with the character.

    But, that aside, we have Ben Edlund back writing the Tick, and for the continuity that he'll bring to this, I'm okay with the changes that he's been making to some of the story elements (The Terror, Arthur's back story, the lack of a spoon).

    And who but Edlund could give us a line like "blinded by weaponized syphilis"?

    And, as a bonus, Patrick Warburton is producing.

    It's fun. Is it as much fun for someone coming cold to the series, without the history that we've grown up with? That's to be seen.

    Disclaimer: I've been a Tick fan since the comic first came out
  • comment
    • Author: LadyShlak
    I loved this. Yes it was darker than the original but I loved the slant they have taken.

    It still has all the classic fun you would expect but there is a slightly darker undertone running through the episode. Silly little comments bring back the old shows famous one liners. Also how the villain manages to deal with some of the superheroes is just hilarious.

    It would develop if the show was ever picked up into a fantastic storyline that I think would do justice to the show.

    Very clever and the right blend of drama and comedy. If the pilot is this good a full season of this could be brilliant. Lets hope we get to see more of the The tick and Arthur.

    Please pick this show up amazon!
  • comment
    • Author: Arar
    OK I was a 90s kid but never was really interested in the tick growing up however when I saw the trailer for this I had to give it a chance and I am rather happy I did this was exciting hilarious and action filled you really cant go to wrong here the tick himself is hilarious and is like the poster boy for dorky sidekicks however it works they are both great together I say give the tick a chance he may save your day from bordom if nothing else lol
  • comment
    • Author: Raniconne
    I was very much looking forward to this, but rather disappointed of it being limited exposure on amazon. I have only a basic account, so will end up paying for future episodes if any. While not perfect, it shows promise. I did like the delivery of lines by Peter Serafinowicz as the title character, but he lacks the threatening presence of Patrick Warburton. I was OK with the Arthur backstory, but don't think it really added anything. Griffin Newman very nearly nailed Arthur, I think.

    I did not like The Tick's costume. It looked cheap and cheesy. Was this intentional or were there budget constraints? Significant muscle padding may have been an improvement, since Serafinowicz's frame is not particularly imposing as I note previously. Another criticism I had was that the show is not over-the-top enough. It's like an awkward merging of life as we know it with the absurd, and they just don't "fit". I cannot imagine the plethora of ridiculous Tick characters in this universe, and I would miss that. I don't expect Chairface Chippendale or even The Human Ton & Handy to make appearances due to the apparent effort to make this series more "realistic."

    That said, I think the program has considerable potential. I laughed many times, and that's what counts when you're watching a show called The Tick. If there were more episodes available at time of this review, I would have watched them. Perhaps they'll find their balance between playing it straight and embracing ludicrous.
  • comment
    • Author: Cetnan
    I'm a big fan of The Tick. I've seen both the animated series and the live-action series. So I was pretty pumped when I heard it was getting rebooted again. But when I watched the pilot, I was disappointed. I have no problem with darker humor (and yes, I'm aware that the comics were darker), but it still has to be funny. I didn't laugh once except for a few uncomfortable chuckles. The casting was a huge problem. Patrick Warburton is tough to top, but Peter Serafinowicz is really forcing it. I'm not sure if he's trying to play the character as dumb, arrogant, or both. The whole thing felt like a really empty affair. No laughs, no heart, no character, no substance. It got no reaction out of me.
  • comment
    • Author: Buridora
    Anyone who has enjoyed episodes of "The Tick" in years bygone will not be disappointed in this series. While I am only six episodes in - the voice characterization of The Tick and his comedic quotes are enough to carry a sublime story line.

    This character adaptation paints The Tick as the consummate hero - albeit strangely cast in this role. It has the feel of a "good" Deadpool. Some of the other character choices seem a bit wonky - but it adds to the mystique of what is to come.
  • comment
    • Author: fabscf
    This is only my second review on this site, and I hesitated to even write it. But the more I watched of this show, the more I felt an obligation to. The title really says it all, the special effects are lacking at times (pretty obvious green screen in one scene, cheap- ish looking costume in the next), and it doesn't matter in the slightest. I haven't read the comics, at least not yet, so I can't speak to whether or not this is a faithful adaptation. But it's more than just entertaining. In every moment of it, you can see and feel that someone put their heart and soul into this show. It's leagues ahead of any Marvel/Netflix series, solely because it's not just about superheroes running around being invincible and fighting evil. It refuses to take itself too seriously, while still somehow being an effective human drama, and a good comedy to boot.

    There are no huge action setpieces, though you do get to see people deflecting bullets and punching henchmen through walls. However, that's not what you should watch this for regardless. You should watch it for the story, because as short as this season is, it's expertly crafted. If you're looking for Luke Cage or Iron Fist, look elsewhere. In my humble opinion, this is better than both of them combined.
  • comment
    • Author: Precious
    I was surprised at how much I enjoyed this "reboot" if you will of The Tick. I can see how if you are not familiar with the source material you might find it a bit campy and cheesy at parts, BUT THAT IS THE POINT. This show hits on the spirit and essence of the Tick pretty well with modern era special effects, costume design, and budgets. The writing is way better than I expected for this type of a romp. I can't wait for Season 2.
  • comment
    • Author: Qwne
    Speaking as a 50-something man-child who has loved this character since the 90s, I gotta say, like many of the reviewers here, that initially I was taken aback and somewhat confused at the direction this version chooses. But after the halfway point, I let go of my preconceptions and just allowed this to play out.

    It grows on you. This version of the Tick is - mostly - exactly as you remember him. And while the costume leaves a lot to be desired, Peter Serafinowicz's Tick (which is just a lovely Adam West impersonation - right down to the use of "chum") - he is as big and clunk headed as he should be. The addition of a more "realistic" storyline for Arthur I think works; and would give the series legs if it is picked up. I would love to see more of this.

    And the casting of Arthur could not be more spot on. The actor plays the serious parts and the comic foil equally well.

    The humor is the same. It has a small touch of sincerity which the original and the 2000s live action didn't need nor would have benefited from. But the one-off joke of superheros in a superhero-jaded world has been done. This sort of recasts that feeling and offers a new take. Is The Tick nothing more than Arthur's psychosis? It would explain a lot. Does it even matter?

    So happy that Edlund is trying again to bring the big guy out of retirement!
  • comment
    • Author: Ironfire
    Its a dark comedy, and not a great one at that. The characters are not so shallow as usual, in fact they are quite fun, considering it's a superhero show(I mostly find super hero characters to be the most shallow types). The story telling however, tries too hard, to be a hybrid of dark comedy and super hero genre. It doesn't move forward and it doesn't explain much(I wonder if the writers thought everyone has watched the original cartoon). The main character's initial pivotal decision making takes 6 episodes! juts for the sake of adding up the number of episodes, which is incredibly torturous. Acting from Peter Serafinovicz who plays the Tick and Jakie Haley's who plays the Terror is superb, and production values are nice. If the writers didn't take themselves so seriously and the story had moved forward more fluidly, this could have been a superb show. Still, enjoyable to watch.
  • comment
    • Author: Zieryn
    The Tick is supposed to be funny, that's not too much to ask when rebooting something hilarious is it? This is pitched so badly, not knowing what it wants to be and what tone it is going for that it misses every mark. It of course can't be a super hero show that takes itself seriously. I'm guessing the dark tone was supposed to contrast with the ridiculous characters and script in a funny way? It just goes too far and starts to feel like it's trying to be dramatic. Peter Serafinowicz is a pale strange shadow of the perfectly cast Patrick Warburton from the original.

    I guess when rebooting you should do something different to separate yourself from the original but it seems to me what they kept from the original does not fit with the tonal changes.

    This didn't make me laugh, it made me pretty bored and very sad.
  • comment
    • Author: Thofyn
    The first attempt at a live action The Tick was underwhelming because it skewed more towards sitcom for lack of a budget for superhero hijinks. Amazon's The Tick is disappointing in the opposite direction. This show takes itself way too seriously. It feels like yet another standard superhero show(Can you believe we're now at a point where we've got so many to choose from?)that just happens to have the Tick in it. So far this show is just playing superhero tropes straight rather than comically sending them up. Where has its absurdist satire gone?

    Peter Serafinowicz puts in a good performance the titular blue titan, but he has the legacies of Townsend Coleman & Patrick Warburton against him. Some of his delivery seemed too fast & sarcastic. He still gets the best dialogue, but the episode was so gritty that Tick's ramblings felt tacked on rather than the zenith of its kooky spirit. The scene where bullets bounce off him was cute & a welcome action upgrade from the last adaptation, but it still wasn't enough. Whereas the previous live action Tick costume missed the built-in mask, this one is missing his distinctive lantern jaw. A jaw prosthesis really should've been part of the costume to give Serafinowicz the most heroic visage possible. For a comic book character with so few details, why can they never get his face perfect?

    Arthur is more of the central character, & he is a depressing PTSD mess after watching his dad die during a super-battle. Now he's investigating a sinister conspiracy by the killer too. Arthur doesn't need a tragic origin! (The Tick comics weren't quite as upbeat as the cartoon, but Oedipus getting non-fatally stabbed was its darkest moment.) It was more novel when Arthur just decided to wear a costume without a personal tragedy motivating him. He doesn't even choose the moth suit; the Tick foists it upon him.

    How did the Tick know were Arthur lives? One theory is that the Tick is a figment of Arthur's imagination made into an independent corporeal being like Abbey from Misfits. This would be like Dr. John Watson imagining Sherlock Holmes into existence. This is suggested by a blue nightlight talking to Arthur in the Tick's voice, although it could just be a dream instead of a childhood flashback. Creator Ben Edlund has directly called the Tick a parasite, so maybe this version has the power to psychically leech onto Arthur's mind instead? Or perhaps there is no explanation because it's a continuity error? The mystery of the Tick is going to be a big piece of Edlund's proposed multi-year master-plan, but I'm not convinced we needed a massive reinterpretation of the Tick to begin with since a complicated backstory doesn't subvert genre expectations. I'm fond of "The Luny Bin" where it reveals that instead of being a guy in a costume with an origin story, the Tick is simply the Tick. I'd be delighted if that was what these possible red herrings were leading up to, but I imagine everybody else would feel cheated.

    If anything, the first episode was too tonally consistent. Director Wally Pfister, cinematographer to Christopher Nolan's pretentious Batman movies, grounded everything so that even Edlund's jokes fell inert. The Terror's ship looking like a flying Titans' Tower isn't inherently hysterical, especially when its appearance is surrounded by multiple traumatic homicides. The Terror remains a mean old coot (Jackie Earle Haley is always fantastic), but merely blinding Flag Force Five & shooting them in their faces felt so pedestrian. They missed a golden opportunity for giving them a ludicrous death that you could only get from a superhero comedy. Shooting your enemies in the face may be effective, but it's not whimsical escapism. It comes off like cynically laughing at comic books rather than laughing with them. The only genuinely funny part in the entire episode was when The Terror stole Arthur's ice cream because I am a terrible person.

    This new version of The Tick definitely does things differently than the prior adaptations, but in doing so it feels homogenized. It has better production values than the Tick's last TV outing but with even less of its unique charm. Just because Ben Edlund can make a dour version of The Tick doesn't mean it's worth paying to watch it as an ongoing series.
  • comment
    • Author: blodrayne
    Why does everything have to be so dark/serious now? I used to like the old Tick show but this is so boring and just dumb. It's like they tried to do the dark knight thing but with comedy and it just totally misses the mark. The writing also just isn't that funny. I never thought I'd want to send Adam Sandler in to do punch-ups but they need him or somebody. I probably laughed once, sad misfire. Of the three amazon pilots I've watched, I liked this one the least and I hated "I Love Dick" so that's surprising. Jean-Claude Van Johnson without a doubt is the show that deserves a series of the three, it has smart/clever comedy as opposed to dark/no comedy. If The Tick wins, I will be extremely disappointed. Cannot blame the Tick on the actors though, they did a fine job. At the end of the day it comes down to the writing, just plain boring. Snore fest. Too bad.
  • comment
    • Author: Priotian
    Seems Today nobody has any Original Ideas, and therefore must make Remakes, based on some kind of Hollywood Template including too many cliché jokes (already been done before so many times no longer funny but pathetic).

    Instead of being a Hilarious Parody of Superheroes and Supervillans like the Original with lots of ADULT Humor, the screenwriters had to add in Nonsense Social Commentaries that then turned Comedy into Tragedy and Drama and SPOILED THE ENTIRE CONCEPT OF THE TICK AS A PARODY, ENTERTAINING, AND FUNNY.

    What makes this not believable is the Remake has Arthur getting a "Supersuit", in the Original Arthur's costume is spandex, that smells after a while and he goes to a Laundry Mat to inexpensively clean his costume. While The Tick is bulletproof, and seems to be wearing his Superhero Suit all the time as if somehow part of him.

    In the Original Arthur already can fly.....somewhat. There are also implications by Episode 2, that The Tick escaped from a Super Secret Military Project. This Remake is dragging things out to make more Episodes, of some of the same plot material covered in just one Episode of the Original.

    The order that I watched this was the Remake First, then the Original 2001 The Tick Episodes, so this is more of a valid Review than most that watched the Original then this Remake. GO WATCH THE ORIGINAL 2001 THE TICK BEFORE MAKING ANY COMMENTS (you cannot compare a beef steak and a hotdog until you (not somebody else) have had both).

    Original All About Arthur, a "normal" person wearing "a Bunny Suit" (moth costume) wanting to become a Superhero.

    Remake All About the Supersuit.

    Instead of a Remake, Producers, the screenwriters, should have decided to continue from where the Original 2001 The Tick Ended (without adding their Social Commentaries (as Social Engineering)).

    From being a Boy Scout a longtime ago, put petroleum jelly on Remake of The Tick. The Tick will then fall off after a while. Pulling the tick off yourself means that the head might break off and cause an infection.
  • comment
    • Author: Tiainar
    I feel like DC comics made this version of The Tick. Amazon strayed too far from the origin material for fans. The humor is mostly gone from this COMEDIC setting.

    Arthur - Instead of a chubby accountant who dreams of being a superhero this Arthur is portrayed as a borderline mental patient who spends his days and nights obsessing over the death of his father and trying to prove that the super-villain known as the Terror is alive... The Terror, for the small amount of time we see him, is actually well portrayed. The Tick is well he's bad. The costume is crappy looking, no where near the right look, and the character seems far less dense than he should be. One of the endearing things about the Tick was his childlike innocence and constant confusion. His lines aren't bad but there is something out of place about his speech patterns. He looks and sounds less like a hero and more like a guy who talks to streetlamps while wearing tinfoil on his head. Then there is Arthur's suit. Gone is the white spandex and wings that barely let him fly, the new version is a high tech, bullet-proof gizmo suit.

    I cringed when I saw that Ben Edlund's name appeared under the writing credits.
  • comment
    • Author: Freaky Hook
    Bad acting, bad writing, bad supporting cast (Whoopi Goldberg - are you kidding me?) If you want to make the Tick as originally written, which is why people take the time to write original characters into existence in the first place - then you have to think Deadpool with the dark humor and Tick attitude of clueless arrogance. This mess Amazon put out is garbage. I hope they can get a refund... I don't really have anything else to say But IMDb wants their ten pounds of flesh This series doesn't merit ten lines What about Bob is better than this But even lost in translation is better than this because of bill is that enough lines you nazi?
  • comment
    • Author: Kirinaya
    This version of the Tick is abysmal. It's not sure if it wants to be a dark superhero show or a parody of a dark superhero show. The unbearable directing never lets any of the tired jokes land, and the actor they got to play the Tick, while good in other things, couldn't understand the character less. This isn't a good Tick adaptation, and it's not a good anything else either. As a dark superhero show it's flat and unoriginal. As a comedy it's poorly paced and too mean spirited. Arthur is ridiculously unlike-able, and the rest of the cast of characters is either off putting or beyond bland. I am incredibly disappointed. I don't think Tick fans will like this, I don't think non Tick fans will like it, I would be amazed if anyone liked it. I'm sure SOMEone will, but I can't think of who. The thing that kills me is it COULD have been good. I see a skeleton that has a lot of potential, and moments that could be memorable, but something always screws it up in a major way. I'd say it was the director, but the acting and writing were awful too. It's almost like nobody who worked on it really cared. The effects were OK for a low budget Amazon original. That's really the only nice thing I have to say. I wish with all my heart that this had been better.
  • comment
    • Author: Sinredeemer
    Never had heard of The Tick. Kept seeing the silly big blue guy as I scrolled through Prime. Passed it over for about 5 months. Decided to try it and loved it so much called my husband down to watch it again. Then we called our son down and watched AGAIN. He knew this character. It's done so well, the blend of realism and the comic book world. Have recommended it to many others. So love the alternative to Hollywood drivel. Go Amazon. Enjoy Bosch as well though of course the books are best.
  • comment
    • Author: catterpillar
    Having been a huge fan of the animated series and the tragically short-lived live-action one, I was excited to see that Ben Edlund was returning to The Tick well for another drink. Alas, this series shows little of what made the previous two series so enthralling.

    This version of The Tick has a lot less Tick in it. This time, the series follows his sidekick Arthur, who has been given mental problems and a traumatic backstory.

    This helps tone down the humor, for those who want a less funny The Tick. The show seems to want to be more of a superhero show with some humor rather than a comedy series with a superhero theme.

    The Tick himself is still funny, spouting off a continuous series of nutty lines like "evil wears every mitten." He's responsible for most of the laughs, but here he is very much a secondary character.

    He's also not very impressive. Patrick Warburton was a perfect Tick, big, macho, and dumb, but Peter Serafinowicz comes across as a rather ordinary oddball in a cheap suit that looks like something from a 1950s sci-fi movie (basically a leotard with a little muscling and antennas added). The effect is wildly unimpressive.

    Now, the bad costumes (there's also a jumpsuit with feathers on it) may be the result of a low budget, and there aren't that many Patrick Warburton's out there, but that still doesn't explain the change of focus from hilarious superhero parody to angsty superhero series with a little comedy.

    This is a pilot for a series I certainly hope won't occur. I suggest Edlund rethink things and make a different pilot with a different cast. I know it's annoying to be expected to do the same thing you did before, but when what you did before was great and your attempt to change things up falls flat, you should consider just doing the same old thing.
  • comment
    • Author: Kulwes
    It's just too serious.

    I feel like the Tick should be funny. REALLY funny. That has been the defining quality of that world. Goofy, strange, sometimes nonsensical and completely over the top absurd. I didn't really get that out of this pilot.

    It just seemed like another cliché superhero origin story with too much melodrama and a tiny bit of humor. Funny that the one thing that makes the Tick different from every other superhero story is what they failed to focus on. Like no one cares about the relationship between Arthur and his sister. We just want a good laugh. That's why you watch THE TICK instead of Daredevil, Jessica Jones, Spiderman, etc. If you try and make it more serious it defeats the point of the story.

    I do think it has potential though, they just need better writing.
  • comment
    • Author: Mogelv
    The Tick has always been an irreverent and silly story about super heroes. Until now. Now it's serious. The episode was an origin story for Arthur and it was serious. The jokes were flat. Essentially an attempt to capitalize off of the Tick name without putting anything in that made the Tick good.
  • Complete series cast summary:
    Peter Serafinowicz Peter Serafinowicz - The Tick 22 episodes, 2017-2019
    Griffin Newman Griffin Newman - Arthur Everest 22 episodes, 2017-2019
    Joshua Schubart Joshua Schubart - Frank 13 episodes, 2017-2019
    Valorie Curry Valorie Curry - Dot Everest 12 episodes, 2017-2018
    Yara Martinez Yara Martinez - Ms. Lint / - 12 episodes, 2017-2018
    Scott Speiser Scott Speiser - Overkill 12 episodes, 2017-2018
    Jackie Earle Haley Jackie Earle Haley - The Terror / - 12 episodes, 2017-2018
    Brendan Hines Brendan Hines - Superian 10 episodes, 2017-2018
    Devin Ratray Devin Ratray - Tinfoil Kevin 10 episodes, 2017-2018
    Kahlil Ashanti Kahlil Ashanti - Goat 10 episodes, 2017-2018
    All rights reserved © 2017-2024 hd.thomson-multimedia.com