Search

» » Crimes of the Century

Short summary

Never-before-seen footage and exclusive interviews offer a vitural scene-of-the-crime vantage point for history's most major news events.

User reviews


  • comment
    • Author: Kulwes
    I need to second GrowTesk's appraisal of the editing skills displayed in this series. I find the writing and subject material very interesting and logically planned, but whoever was in charge of the decisions to end all talking head sound bites with a stylized, sound modulated black and white close-up for dramatic emphasis needs to be drummed out of the business. Whoever hired them needs to be slapped and fired. The snapshot sound effects for every still was overused and passé. The overbearing and intrusive 'background' music was discordant and obstructive. This type of hackneyed, lazy, immature treatment of the topics practically ruined the experience for me. It actually made me angry after a short while, and I had to stop watching.
  • comment
    • Author: Jusari
    I haven't logged into this site in a long time, but I felt I just had to after attempting to watch this.

    The stories, the content and the witness testimonies are more than plenty to carry this show, however it is so bogged down by the SpikeTV, ADD type editing, I couldn't even make it through the first episode.

    I lasted about twenty minutes before the image of some editor using the "sweet" new filters, audio tuning, and jumpy, rave like transitions crept into my head and annoyed me beyond comprehension.

    Please, spare yourself. You can look up all of these stories on wikipedia and save yourself from a seizure or an aneurysm.
  • comment
    • Author: Ballalune
    This series contains several interesting stories. Unfortunately, the producers thought that style was more important than the substance, so they apparently let some clueless film students with schizophrenia and severe cases of ADD do all the editing and sound. Their attempts at being artistic and trendy absolutely ruined the finished product, rendering the show unwatchable. Shame on CNN for allowing this, and let's hope none of those creepy film students that are responsible for the editing and sound ever graduate. If this green-lit production is a sign of things to come, well, all I can say is that would be more disturbing than any of the subjects of the series....and this includes the Uni-bomber and the DC Sniper.
  • comment
    • Author: Whiteseeker
    Let me just start with what another reviewer wrote: "the producers thought that style was more important than the substance, so they apparently let some clueless film students with schizophrenia and severe cases of ADD do all the editing and sound." Well, that may be a slight exaggeration, but only slight. The voices distort for no reason, and there are some bizarre close-ups on faces and blurred moments that ought to be clear.

    One can also question who handpicked these stories. Certainly "Oklahoma City" is worth an episode, but then the episode on "Waco" appears after it. Why? It would make more sense to talk of Waco first to put Oklahoma City in context. And then somehow the Kennedy assassination did not make the cut, but Amanda Knox (who will be forgotten in five years) did? Sure, Kennedy is too big for one episode, but Amanda Knox a "crime of the century"?
  • Series cast summary:
    Erik Thompson Erik Thompson - Himself - Narrator 8 episodes, 2013
    All rights reserved © 2017-2024 hd.thomson-multimedia.com