Search

» » Holi (1985)

Short summary

In a typical college in a typical Indian city, the hostel boys Madan Sharma (Aamir Khan) and his friend are a rowdy lot. The teaching staff suffer from the common apathy of most teachers in similar colleges. The administration has the usual problems, with ill-paid employees periodically going on strike. On the whole, the college is a very normal place. But on this particular day, when Madan and his friends rise from their slumber, some with the customary hangover, they are not so perturbed to find no water in the taps again, as when they hear that it is not going to be a holiday after all. Instead there will be a lecture in the auditorium by the Chairman of the Board (Dr. Shriram Lagoo), on the day of the festival of fire, Holi, and the boys decide not to attend the classes. The hostel superintendent Professor Singh (Naseeruddin Shah), the only lecturer with some human links with the students, watches with apprehension their growing restlessness. A notice announcing a further ...

Aamir Khan's real debut movie. Many people think that Qayamat Se Qayamat Tak was his debut, but really that film was what made him famous. Holi was not a commercial film, so that is why it went unnoticed.

Ashutosh Gowariker (director of films like Lagaan (2001), Swades (2004), and Jodhaa Akbar (2008)) played a supporting role in this film.

Pink Floyd's song "Is There Anybody Out There" is used in the film. It's in the beginning when one of the students plays it on a guitar.

Amole Gupte, the writer and co-director of the 2007 Hindi blockbuster film Taare Zameen Par (Like Stars on Earth) also acted in this film.

shot mainly on the campus of the Film and Television Institute of India (FTII), Pune and Fergusson College, Pune.

The iconic Fergusson College banyan tree had just fallen and Ketan Mehta, who had studied at Fergusson College, improvised and pictured a song with the main characters on the tree singing about the falling of a symbolic 'system'.

Based on Marathi play Holi by Mahesh Elkunchwar.

Film was made as a workshop with FTI students of Pune.

Aamir Khan is credited as Aamir Hussain.

Holi introduced today popular faces of Hindi cinema like Aamir Khan,Asutosh Gowariker,Raj Zutshi,Neeraj Vohra,Yatin Kareyekar ,Kitu Gidwani and Amol Gupte.

Yatin Karyekar,Raj Zutshi worked with Aamir Khan in his official debut film Qayamat Se Qayamat Tak 1988.

Aamir Khan once said that Asutosh Gowariker has a much bigger role then him in the film and that he often jokes with him that only in Holi he managed to shadow him.

Aamir Khan and Asutosh Gowariker later worked in Asutosh Gowariker directional film Baazi 1995 and Oscar Nominated Lagaan.

Aamir Khan's friendship with Asutosh Gowariker Raj Zutshi , and Amol Gupte started since this film.

User reviews


  • comment
    • Author: Gunos
    This was Aamir Khans first film. Although he is in a supporting cast he is as good as he is today. Holi is a comedy film based on a college campus on the day of holi. The college authorities do not give an holiday on this day and the college guys do all sort of mischevious activities for an holiday. Ketan Mehta co-wrote the screenplay along with Mahesh Elkunchwar. This film has no songs. Only one song is there but without music. In a small role Naseerudin Shah gives a very good performance. no where along the movie will a viewer feel bored. The ending is a good one. Watch out for a cameo by director Ketan Mehta playing holi during the last scene.
  • comment
    • Author: Dddasuk
    Events of this film occur in the span of one day, the day of Holi. One day in which we get to know the lives and thoughts of the characters and the many turns it takes due to the events which were in nobody's control that we fail to remember that it was the same day until we see Holi celebrations on the road. Filmmaker portrays the college life of 1980's India with a personal touch. A place which hadn't changed very considerably since then and retains screaming Graffiti on washroom walls, Che Guevara, guitar, booze, sex and that peculiar aimlessness and itch for meaning that we develop in these days. College for the students as they say is a factory where slaves are manufactured or a jail that imprisons youth or a mental hospital to brainwash people or a place about which they have no clue as to why it exists and what they are doing there. Also the business aspect of education, nepotism, social problems and prevailing air of hopelessness is still strong in Indian colleges. Some things I couldn't digest like students breaking into chorus singing, clapping and whistling, the kind of jokes they make and most importantly the one which pisses off two friends so much that they get ready to slice each other off. Worth mentioning is Nasser's performance as an influential teacher, wish I had one such. The film itself looked aimless for most of the part like its characters but the final moments which had a hopefully energizing arson, an impulsive and rather harsh punishment, a sad poem, a shocking and nauseating suicide, a revealing arrest and a touching final scene, saved it. In the last scene we are silent, in a way cut-off like the characters and in contrast to the festivities outside, the drums, the dance, the happiness and the colors. It is here I believe that we are totally connected to the students, their emptiness, tragedy and silence, even when we cannot clearly see their faces through the small caged police van windows.
  • comment
    • Author: Dagdalas
    The film mainly focuses on the sensitive and frustrating attitude of college youths who often jumps to danger, brainless and over-ridden by emotions and 'josh'.

    I like the continuous shots used to narrate the story- line and also the sense of mind/attitude that the director has put to the each and every character.The film aesthetically depicts the college atmosphere of mid 80's, which covers every nook and corner of the surroundings. The quality of each shot, it's scripting, the evolution of thread, its portrayal in its very own simplicity and even the silly backgrounds, (which seems to be silly but to be precise, purposefully portrayed by a master-minded persona) all complements each other. However, to some extent i should agree that the film lacks a bit of technical quality and perfection. But to be a film admirer i should say the script and the direction has done its maximum hard-work to over- shadow its drawbacks.

    Nonetheless, the film has delivered a beautiful message to the vigorous youth society who thinks by heart and knowingly does the things at the cost of ignorance. The director has given his midas-touch to even the minute details and has carefully woven the colorful, cinematic plots. "Truly, a holy on an unholy day"...
  • comment
    • Author: Stanober
    The subject matter of the film is novel and not many in Bollywood would have pursued it even back in 1984. However, the film is clumsy, poorly made and comes across as an 'experimental project' rather than a full-length feature film. Technical quality and production values seem non-existent. It appears the director was himself in college (learning his craft?!) while filming the rioting college kids.

    The director has employed hand-held photography before it became truly fashionable in Bollywood. But the impact is jarring motion and when it comes to dialog, total commotion. Horrible, just simply horrible. Where did they record the soundtrack for it? Jeez, either that or the actors were so poorly trained they just couldn't pace their delivery. Its just impossible to make sense of what anyone is saying half the time.

    The time-line of events is rather poorly established. Scene after scene appears to be mid-morning or mid-day, leading one to question if it all took place in 1 day (supposedly, the Holi holiday) or 2-3 days or many days. Also, what on earth is one of the guys doing on the roof with his girlfriend?? How did manage to hoist her up there?! Cannot believe if such a thing could ever happen in a college. The canteen scene has been repeated 3 times at least. To what purpose? Here as in many Hindi films a weak screenplay is the real culprit. Thus, no plot, no punch. And who is the protagonist here? Professor Singh? If so, then his character has not been adequately developed.

    Sparsh (1980 Sai Paranjape) Arth, Saaransh (1982, 1984 Mahesh Bhatt), Ardhsatya, Party (1983, 1984 G Nihalani), Umbartha (1982 Jabbar Patel) were some of the good films made in early/mid-80s -- Holi's comparative universe, but they don't come across as patchy or unduly arty. The use of said devices may have been unintentional but the effect is opposite. Anyhow, it could've been a much better film than this.
  • Cast overview, first billed only:
    Ashutosh Gowariker Ashutosh Gowariker - Ranjeet Prakash
    Aamir Khan Aamir Khan - Madan Sharma (as Aamir Hussain)
    Rahul Ranade Rahul Ranade
    Sanjeev Gandhi Sanjeev Gandhi
    Manoj Pandya Manoj Pandya
    Amole Gupte Amole Gupte - Amol Khanna
    Naseeruddin Shah Naseeruddin Shah - Professor Singh ( Special Appearance)
    Om Puri Om Puri - Principal Pandey
    Shreeram Lagoo Shreeram Lagoo - Chairman of college (as Dr. Shreeram Lagoo)
    Deepti Naval Deepti Naval - Professor Sehgal
    Paresh Rawal Paresh Rawal
    Mohan Gokhale Mohan Gokhale
    Raju Barot Raju Barot
    Deepak Kejriwal Deepak Kejriwal
    Benjamin Gilani Benjamin Gilani
    All rights reserved © 2017-2024 hd.thomson-multimedia.com