Search

» » The Jazz Singer (1980)

Short summary

The son of a Jewish Cantor must defy the traditions of his religious father in order to pursue his dream of being a popular singer.
Neil Diamond stars in this motion picture as Yussel Rabinovitch, a young Jewish cantor who strives to make a career outside the synagogue in popular music as Jess Robin. Against the wishes of his rigid father and his loving wife, Yussel travels from New York City to Los Angeles to play his music. Swept up by the excitement, he meets a spunky manager who believes in his talent and shares his dream. He grows apart from his family, and becomes confused about what he should ultimately do with his life.

Trailers "The Jazz Singer (1980)"

After the movie was finished, Sir Laurence Olivier went to New York City for a short time, and had dinner in a restaurant with friends. During the dinner, he recalled to his friends something he said about the movie while Sidney J. Furie was still directing: "This piss is shit." Olivier later said a reporter must have been at the table next to his, because the next day the New York Daily News reported what he said (though with both vulgar words changed to cleaner derogatory words). This news soon spread completely across the country, and with threats of lawsuits in the air, Olivier quickly made a statement to the press claiming that in the end, the movie had been made well, and that he totally supported it. Olivier also wrote a handwritten ten-page letter to Director Richard Fleischer, not only apologizing for the restaurant incident, but also indirectly giving an explanation as to why he was making so many movies strictly for the money.

Though this movie was one of the Top 30 highest grossing movies in North America in 1980 (earning twenty-seven million dollars), Sir Lew Grade, who invested in the movie, stated that the box-office results were "disappointing", and that his company failed to recoup their advertising and distribution costs. The soundtrack album made more money than the movie.

Neil Diamond composed and sang ten new songs for this movie, which were then recorded live on film for the movie.

The movie produced three chart-topper hit songs for Neil Diamond, "America", "Hello Again", and "Love on the Rocks".

The scene where Jess (Neil Diamond) performs "You Baby Baby" in the Cinderella Club with an afro and black make-up on, was actually done as a minor tribute to Al Jolson, who did Jazzi laulja (1927) in blackface.

Sound Mixer Tom Overton said of this movie's sound recording and four 24-track music recording machines: "People are too sophisticated today to sit through a movie filmed to playback music. They want to hear what they see, and that's the way we're doing it. Neil Diamond's songs and score sound just great. We're a hell of a way from those dear old Vitaphone days to which we all owe so much."

In Terry Coleman's biography of Sir Laurence Olivier, he states Olivier received one million dollars to star in this movie. After signing on, Olivier regretted the decision, although by April 1980, three months into filming, he was receiving extra pay for each day of shooting, in addition to two thousand five hundred dollars a week for expenses. During this time, Olivier also directed a play on the east coast, and filmed additional scenes for his mini-series Brideshead Revisited (1981).

Richard Fleischer replaced Sidney J. Furie as director. During the several weeks Furie directed the movie, he was constantly re-writing the screenplay, and Catlin Adams, during that time, had no idea if her character was married to Jess (Neil Diamond) or not. Other scenes were ad-libbed on the spot without any idea where they would be placed. Furie refused to speak to any representatives from the production company (EMI) expressing concern about what was happening. Eventually, EMI threatened to close down the production if Furie did not sent them a completed screenplay within a week. Upon receiving the screenplay, EMI not only judged it to be bad (among other things, it eliminated the key "Kol Nidre" sequence), but that it would double the budget, as well as the time originally scheduled for shooting. Subsequently, Furie was fired, having already shot forty-eight hours of often unusable footage, and Richard Fleischer was contacted to salvage the project.

Though called "The Jazz Singer", ironically, this movie "doesn't feature any jazz", as reported by "Movie '81 Magazine" from Australia. Similarly, trade paper "Variety" stated that the movie's "title has nothing to do with music on display here."

Near the end of the shoot, Neil Diamond was having trouble with the scene where he storms into the recording booth in a rage and has a heated argument with Molly (Lucie Arnaz). During a break, Director Richard Fleischer looked into the glass of the recording stage and saw Diamond going berserk, smashing everything in sight. Fleischer quickly shouted action, Diamond burst into the recording booth in an absolute fury, and pulled off the scene. After shouting cut, Fleischer asked him just what happened. Diamond explained that he felt so bad he was not able to pull off the scene, he asked his band to play something that would make him angry, which was a Barry Manilow number.

Neil Diamond once said of Sir Laurence Olivier, that he was an inspiration to have around, and a revelation to watch as he worked.

Neil Diamond once said of this movie while doing publicity for it: "It was a unique experience to come up with songs that would comment on the film's storyline, yet not intrude on it. People constantly ask me why, with all my success, I find moviemaking so special. I believe that film is perhaps the greatest form of mass communication, as well as an art form, fulfilling all the elements of people's fantasies, Besides, it's a natural progression for most in the music business. Bing Crosby did it, (Frank) Sinatra and Elvis (Presley) did it, John Denver, Helen Reddy, Bette Midler, (Barbra) Streisand and Kris Kristofferson have all done it. It's tricky, and you have to be lucky, but the success rate is high. By making a movie, we allow our music to reach countless millions around the world. It's a challenge combining all our performing elements. Without that challenge, we grow stale."

The big concert finale at Hollywood's Pantages Theater utilized eleven cameras, a forty-one piece orchestra string section, employed one hundred and fifty crew, and featured two thousand four hundred audience members.

To date (November 2018), this is the only acting role for Neil Diamond (not counting the times he played himself in movies).

The scenes of Jess (Neil Diamond) in Laredo, Texas were shot on D Street in Victorville, California. The scenes of Jess driving (and breaking down) in his Mustang were shot on U.S. Highway 395 outside Victorville.

This was not the first theatrical movie to have music by Neil Diamond, as Jonathan Livingston Seagull (1973) had had a background score composed by Diamond, for which it won a Best Original Score - Motion Picture Golden Globe award in 1974.

Lucie Arnaz was cast without a screentest.

The budget for the movie's sound recording amounted to almost one and a half million dollars.

Director Richard Fleischer re-shot a great deal of Sir Laurence Olivier's scenes because he felt Olivier had overacted. When Olivier asked Fleischer why they were doing these scenes again, Fleischer explained the truth in a diplomatic manner: that he did not like how the scenes had been staged originally.

This movie was shot during January, February, March, and April of 1980 and then debuted later in the year in December.

A scene was shot, but not used, of Jess visiting his father's bedside. A photo of it implies that his father is sick in the photo, though it is not clear whether this scene was meant to take place before or after Jess left for Los Angeles, so it may also have been a general scene. The shot of this can be found on the soundtrack LP's inner sleeve montage of photos from the movie.

Although Sir Laurence Olivier thought that this movie was most likely going to be a commercial hit (his original reason for signing onto the project), he advised a friend of his who stated he was looking forward to the movie against seeing it.

Producer Jerry Leider saw Neil Diamond perform at a concert at the Greek Theater in Los Angeles via the television special Neil Diamond: Love at the Greek (1977). It was then that Leider wanted to make a movie with Diamond.

Director Richard Fleischer told Sir Laurence Olivier that he did not like his Jewish accent, although that Olivier told him he used the same accent he played with in The Boys from Brazil (1978).

According to the DVD sleeve notes, Producer Jerry Leider "knew he would have to keep the powerful emotions from the original Jazzi laulja (1927), and at the same time provided audiences with a contemporary story. Many changes were made to the script (the original story)."

Sir Laurence Olivier stated that he would be told to be on set at 8:30 in the morning although his scenes would not be shot until 4:30 or later in the afternoon.

Lucie Arnaz replaced Deborah Raffin as Molly Bell around the time Richard Fleischer came on as the director.

The dancer character, known as Mary Dale in Jazzi laulja (1927), and which has appeared in various earlier versions of the story, was cut of this movie. An alternate female character, Molly Bell, replaced her role, that being of the Jazz Singer's wife.

After Richard Fleischer saved the movie as a director, Producer Jerry Leider told him that this was the greatest rescue since Entebbe.

This movie is listed among The 100 Worst Movies Ever Made in Golden Raspberry Award founder John Wilson's book "The Official Razzie® Movie Guide".

This movie was released fifty-five years after its source stage play of the same name by Samson Raphaelson was first performed in 1925.

The original Broadway stage production of "The Jazz Singer" opened at the Fulton Theater on September 14, 1925 and ran for three hundred three performances. The play starred George Jessel.

Publicity for this movie stated that Neil Diamond had released twenty seven gold, and fourteen platinum albums.

Neil Diamond, like Al Jolson in Jazzi laulja (1927), is seen in "blackface" in this movie, but not to the same extent. Considered offensive and racist by modern contemporary standards today (as of June 2013), the existence of "blackface" in one scene in this movie, where Diamond also wears an afro wig, the "blackface" was considered an "homage" by the production to the original's famous "Mammy" sequence. The 1927 movie was made during an era when the "Black-and-white Minstrels" were, at that time, an act at the height of popularity.

First of two early 1980s movies about singing and Judaism. The second was Barbra Streisand's Yentl (1983).

Neil Diamond "won" the first Razzie Award as Worst Actor for this movie, and never accepted a dramatic role in any other movie.

This movie was "plagued by shooting problems" according to a 1981 edition of "Movie News" (Australia).

Debut theatrical movie produced by Jerry Leider.

Ernie Hudson: As a heckler.

User reviews


  • comment
    • Author: Awene
    I try to go into a movie uncolored with opinions, and thankfully hadn't heard any negative reviews on this one prior to seeing it for the first time in 1980. That allowed me to view it with an open mind.

    The score is superb. It's what makes the movie what it is. The songs fit the mood in every scene, and are all well-placed. The acting, while not the best I've ever seen, isn't nearly as bad as made out to be by critics. Let's face it. Neil Diamond is not an actor. He is a singer, a performer. In this movie he does that very well. And yet, he manages to pull off his character, Yussel Rabinovich, without a hitch. His scenes with Sir Lawrence Olivier are touching and believable. They are indeed a good match as father and son cantors. But for Yussel, his heritage isn't enough. His music roots drive him, and that's what he sets out to discover. Against the will of his father, and over the protest of his wife Rivka, he leaves his home in New York for L.A. and seeks his destiny.

    Lucie Arnaz turns in a good performance as Molly Bell, a "retired" music promoter who sees potential in Yussel and takes him under her wing. What follows is a tug-of-war, a battle of values---old and new---as Neil's character, now Jess Robin, climbs the charts professionally, yet never really forgets where he came from.

    Watching Neil perform in this movie is like seeing one of his concerts. He's all-show, and not a bit shy. When he picks up a guitar, you know you're in for a treat, and he does music as only he can. It's a great story, well-told and, on the whole, well-acted. Neil gives emotions where called for. But in this movie, the music's the star. That's where Neil really delivers.
  • comment
    • Author: Milleynti
    Okay... all these submissions below? Ignore them. Here's the real scoop.

    The biggest problem most folks have with this film is that they're comparing the two male leads' acting ability. BIG MISTAKE.

    One is Neil Diamond-- one of the greatest singers of all time. The other is Sir Laurence Olivier-- one of the greatest ACTORS of all time. Think of it this way: if Sir Larry accompanied Neil in a recording of "Cherry, Cherry"-- people would rave about Neil's performance, but then spend an hour going on about how much Olivier sucks.

    The fact is this: neither of them suck. Everything is great! Neil Diamond is a fine actor. (Not an AMAZING actor, mind you... but a fine actor.) He'd even beaten out Dustin Hoffman for the role of Lenny Bruce in "Lenny", but turned it down... leaving the door open for Hoffman.

    I made the mistake of reading all of the below jeers and whines about Neil Diamond's "terrible acting performance" in this movie. I then watched it over at my girlfriend's house with very low expectations. But I was very impressed, and greatly enjoyed the film. Granted, there are some times when Neil's performance isn't exactly as dramatic as it should be... (i.e., when his father shrieks "I HAVE NO SON!!", Neil doesn't exactly seem to be heartbroken.) But then, there are times when he manifests a great deal of emotional power... especially in the scenes where he gets angry.

    Okay, so I'm a huge Neil Diamond fan, yes. I love his music, and I think it's cool that he's had a lead in a major motion picture. BUT-- from an acting perspective, he has my respect. From one actor to another. (YES, I consider him an "actor" too... and so does the IMDb.)

    I only have two complaints: one is that this is the only movie he's been in until Saving Silverman-- where he had just a cameo. That sucks. I want to see Neil in more movies.

    The other complaint is what everyone else doesn't like: "The Jazz Singer". AL JOLSON sung Jazz. NEIL DIAMOND sings Pop. Soooooo... couldn't it have been called "The Pop Singer", and had an addition in the credits that read, "Based on 'The Jazz Singer' by Al Jolson" or something?

    Anyway... the music is great, (even "Love on the Rocks"-- and I'm not a big ballad fan... as they depress me. But I can't dislike a Neil song.) the movie is a great story, and the acting is FINE. Watch it. If you're a fan of Neil's, or even just a fan of 20+ year old movies that have good stories.... check out "The Jazz Singer".



    --and by the way.... neil diamond rules. thank you.
  • comment
    • Author: Dakora
    Between his duties and responsibilities, and his dreams and love. For those who want to pick the movie apart, without looking inside the story it tells, skip this comment.

    Given the choice between one's responsibility to family, parents, religion, tradition, and duty, or choosing love, dreams, goals, and the pursuit of happiness through following our heart, which choice would we make?

    The movie tells a story of strength through failure, of living versus wasting away in a life spent pleasing others, and of giving our heart and our dreams sway over the path we take in life.
  • comment
    • Author: Modigas
    The Jazz Singer with Neil Diamond is one of my favorite movies. How can anyone say he can't act? Every time I suggest to my husband that we watch it, he usually doesn't want to because he reckons it is one of the saddest movies of all time. I keep saying "They are only acting and it does work out in the end after all" but I still have trouble getting him to watch it and I usually have to agree to watch 'Going my Way" first!!!! Neil Diamond in concert is fabulous. Neil Diamond acting is nearly as good. I also can't understand why Lucy Arnez didn't make it as an actress, having famous parents must be a disadvantage in some cases.
  • comment
    • Author: watchman
    Dreadful piece of tripe was a career low point for all involved. Although I heard she is good on stage, a medium whose best performers often can not transition to pictures, Lucie Arnaz just did not possess the magnetism to be a film star. She's bland and uninteresting but even with that she still gives the best performance in the movie! Neil Diamond is a fine singer but as this movie proved his gifts did not reach to acting competency. The great Laurence Olivier sinks right along with the rest by giving a ham-hock of a performance, perhaps his worst ever. Badly directed and antiquated even when shot originally in the twenties this is a total miss.
  • comment
    • Author: Xanzay
    Wonderful version of a cantor's son in conflict over his orthodox Jewish beliefs and his desire to be a singing star.

    The only major flaw that I had with this film is that by the orthodox Jewish people, there is no accommodation made whatsoever in the field of intermarriage. If it occurs, the person intermarrying is regarded as dead as depicted in the film.

    Caitlin Adams, who portrayed Jesse's wife Rivka, is true to life since she chose to break with her husband due to her orthodox beliefs. Others might argue that their marriage was headed towards a downward spiral anyway.

    Laurence Olivier is absolutely mesmerizing as Diamond's father. His authentic Jewish accent and tearing his clothes are memorable.

    Diamond's voice is superb and is acting is on par for the role. "Love on the Rocks," as well as "Acapulco," and "Coming to America" are wonderfully staged.

    In the world of today, we need understanding and accommodation and that's exactly what we get in this fine film.
  • comment
    • Author: Gavinranara
    I love Neil Diamond. I had always heard of this film, but never knew what it was about, what type of reviews it got... anything. So I Netflixed it this weekend, and I loved it. There were even times where I got choked up in parts.

    So I came on here, saw the negative overall reviews, and was SHOCKED when I learned Neil won the Razzie Award for Worst Actor for this. I thought he did a very fine job. The story unfolded very nicely, the love story was genuine... I would say this film was even better than the "music" genre film Dreamgirls.

    Sure it had it's glitches here and there, but for the most part I was very pleased.
  • comment
    • Author: GoodBuyMyFriends
    ...and not much of a movie either. Pointless remake of the 1927 "talkie"--the plot was old then; the plot was still old in the 1950s Danny Thomas remake; it was laughable in 1980. If Neil Diamond really wanted to do a movie, why not do a concert film?

    Diamond plays a Jewish man who wants to sing rock music--his father (Laurence Olivier!!!!! Why Larry?) wants him to perform only traditional Jewish songs. Also he falls in love with a non-Jewish woman (Lucie Arnaz giving the only good performance) which he knows his dad would never approve. Yawn--what a lousy script.

    The acting is beyond belief--Diamond is a great singer but he's no actor--he was very bad; Olivier is a howl as his father--he hams it up mercilessly and just gives an unbelievable (I don't mean that in a good way) jaw-dropping performance. Olivier was one of the most respected actors around--why did he do this? Didn't he read the script? It's obvious he's hating every moment--I guess he was really hard up for the money. Arnaz is actually very good despite everything--she also has the film's second best line (after Olivier's "no son" line). She tells Diamond seriously, "You're too talented to waste everything on singing". Sheesh!

    What saves this movie from total disaster is the singing--Diamond was (and is) a good singer and some of the songs are great. When he's singing the movie is OK--when he's not it's a laugh a minute. ALMOST bad/good.
  • comment
    • Author: uspeh
    I like to see remakes, because in many cases you experience two films at once: the film you are watching of course, and the one you recall. Usually that prior one is pretty good. In this case, it IS pretty good, and historically important too.

    It was the first popular talkie, and not all talkie either. It was pretty amazing in depicting New York Jewry in a way gathered from the reality of the era, and on that score alone is fascinating. It was perhaps overly melodramatic, but suitably severe. And its "message" though simple wasn't quite dumb: that "jazz" music can be sacred work if delivered so. Along the way, we got (still!) entertaining songs.

    Now this. I do not know what prompted the remake. It seems that they simply had Neil Diamond and saw a fit. He is Jewish. He has a fantastic portfolio of songs, some of which seem written for the project, and he is at least a credible actor. So they tromped through the old script, modernizing as they went. They shifted the focus to the music and the self- discovery of the musician. The rift with the father is recast as upset over sex rather than jazz, something I think is a big mistake.

    And the script and production values (other than the songs) is horrible, Laurence Olivier embarrasses himself and us all every thing he speaks with some sort of faux stage accent. he is truly dreadful. Everyone is, save one, but he is the worst. The only good actor is on screen only a few times: he is the booker, played by Sully Boyar, and every time he shows up to speak, the sun shines. Doesn't kill the mold though.

    Ted's Evaluation -- 1 of 3: You can find something better to do with this part of your life.
  • comment
    • Author: Gio
    My wife loves this film.She thinks an Oedipus Complex is a Greek Shopping Centre.(NB this is satire - I have nothing against wives,greeks or shopping centres).You don't have to be Jewish to hate this movie but I am a little concerned that "The Jazz Singer" is so inextricably bound up in that faith that to give it a bad crit might be considered somehow anti-semitic.In fact you could transpose the plot into a Muslim musical or a Jehovah's Witness musical without too much effort,so I hope I am not going to offend too many faiths by saying that I found it very,very bad. So bad that it was not even so bad it was good,if you follow me. I have no feelings one way or the other (well,not the other,actually) about Neil Diamond who is obviously very popular.Popular singers make movies - who's to blame them?Blame their agents if you like.They don't often make good movies.Some kind person ought to have told Mr Diamond that if you don't learn from the mistakes of history you are doomed to repeat them.They didn't and he did. Laurence Olivier was cast as Mr Diamond's father.Presumably he was unavoidably detained elsewhere and the producers scoured the Old Folks Homes of west L.A. until they found some geezer who looked a bit like him and offered him 3 hots and a cot for the duration.I hope he didn't give up his day job. The other possibility,that Olivier actually turned up,does not bear thinking about. It wouldn't be fair for me to comment on the songs,but a lot of people like them apparently. The original "Jazz Singer" was pretty dire,but at least it was innovatory."Sonny Boy",originally written as a joke for Al Jolson,is ommitted from this remake.Pity,it would have added a bit of class.
  • comment
    • Author: post_name
    You know how some people read "Playboy" for the articles? This is one movie you'll only want to watch for the music. Especially if you're a Neil Diamond fan.

    "The Jazz Singer" is supposed to be an update of the Al Jolson chestnut (replete with Diamond appearing in black-face at one point!!) but the only connection between these two films is that a cantor's son wants to break into show business. Other than that, they're about as similar as Chardonnay and Kool-Aid.

    Diamond is a singer. Period. He can't act, he can't even look at people when he talks to them and he certainly doesn't have the charisma to carry a film. Olivier was a good actor... a looooong time ago. Here, he's just well-aged ham with an accent.

    Like I said, the best part of this movie is the soundtrack. Heck, I have the CD and I love it. What Diamond fan doesn't know and/or love "America", "Hello Again", "Love on the Rocks" and even "On the Robert E. Lee"? I even liked where Diamond auditions for a spot as a country bar singer and breaks into "You are My Sunshine". It's not on CD, though. Bummer.

    To sum up - all the dramatic highlights are really low-lights; the so-called actors involved with this should all turn in their SAG cards; and it's small wonder Fleischer has been regulated to directing films like "Honey, I Blew Up the Kid" and "Amityville 3: The Demon" after this disaster.

    But at least it's a disaster you can dance to.

    Three stars. For the music. Ignore all the rest of that "Jazz".
  • comment
    • Author: MilsoN
    "The Jazz Singer" was a bomb dropped on the movie world at Christmas in 1980. It's a needless remake to an original movie that has already been remade and wasn't that great in the first place. Had it not been the first movie with sound I don't think many people would remember it.

    The storyline has been updated so the cantor's son is now off to the music field, particularly rock. Now I ask you if you could get an actor to star in your big Christmas movie which is a remake of a famous film, would Neil Diamond head the list? Or perhaps every actor with a brain read the script and turned it down. Let's face it folks - Diamond is a terrible actor. Yes he has a great voice and the songs are the only worthy thing in it. You know things are going to go all wrong from the first scene when Diamond dons black face. Was this an ode to the Al Jolson scene from the original or a stupid, misplaced piece of humor? Either way the scene goes terribly wrong and you end up feeling uncomfortable watching it.

    The great Laurence Olivier reached a career low as the role of Diamond's distressed father. As he did in "Marathon Man" and "Dracula" and "The Boys From Brazil" Olivier over emphasizes a bad accent and spends most of his time yelling. When he cries "I Hef No Son" the result is unintended laughter. It's a bad performance by a great actor. Surprisingly it is Lucie Arnaz (Desi and Lucy's daughter) who gives the one good performance as Diamond's tough but tortured love interest.

    My suggestion to those Neil Diamond fans is to buy the soundtrack and forget the movie. It's silly and stupid and not worth a minute of your time. It was a bomb for a reason.
  • comment
    • Author: Sorryyy
    This is a terrible movie. Neil Diamond can't act... Laurence Olivier was just looking to make a quick buck... The plot is just too predictable and trite... But worst of all, the music doesn't work. How can we believe this Yussuf character has any talent at all (let alone reaches stardom) when the songs are all so... BLEAH? Don't get me wrong. I love a lot of Diamond's '70s classics. But the songs in this movie don't even come close. It would have been a far more interesting movie as a true-life biopic of Diamond's own story (with himself in the starring role if we must), and with songs such as 'I am, I Said' and 'Daydream Believer' on the soundtrack.
  • comment
    • Author: Qwne
    I admit it, I like Neil Diamond. He's a great songwriter (he's probably written a lot of your favourite songs too, you're just not aware of the fact), a great showman, a fine and distinctive singer and he's unfairly maligned by people who should know better. But this film should never have been made.

    The soundtrack is great, of course - you get Love On The Rocks, you get Hello Again, you get America (which is stirring and emotional even for a dyed-in-the-wool Brit who's never even been to the States), you get Hello Again...it's like a greatest hits package. But Neil's acting leaves a lot to be desired. Olivier, clearly going through his "any old crap as long as the money's right" phase, is hilarious for all the wrong reasons as his father. The black-face scenes are just plain wrong - it's funny when Bill Oddie does black-face in The Goodies because his character's a child at heart and it's a surreal show anyway, but the idea of a Jewish rock wannabe blacking up to swindle a club crowd - only to have the ruse tumbled by a genuine black man shouting "that ain't no brother!" or some-such nonsense - should have been spiked at the screenplay's first draft stage. This is Neil Diamond's GIVE MY REGARDS TO BROAD STREET, a vanity project that's an ordeal for non-believers and not much fun for fans either. Buy the CD, yes. Forget the film even exists.
  • comment
    • Author: Rainbearer
    The biggest mistake that Neil Diamond made in doing this film was calling it "The jazz singer",because it is not a remake of the classic Jolson film. That said, let me say that i really enjoyed this film.

    Diamond does and admirable job as the young would be cantor caught between his love of music and his love for his father, and he doesn't seem to be intmidated by the fact that Laurence Olivier plays his father. The film moves fairly well once Yussel decides to follow his dream and pursue a career in music. It probably isn't the best movie ev er made, but it is certainly worth a look. And the music score is wonderful. "America" (coming to America) became an anthem for immigrants at the time the movie was made.

    Definitely worth a look
  • comment
    • Author: Purebinder
    There are some people who think this is one of the worst movies of all time. I am one of these people. 'The Jazz Singer' is truly abysmal on almost every level.

    This journey of despair has Lawrence Olivier hamming it up as a Jewish cantor, (what was he thinking of?) and meister-crooner Neil Diamond, (was he thinking at all?), as father and son at loggerheads because Diamond's character wants to pursue a career in - horror of horrors - Manilow-esque easy listening music!

    Well, what happens next is a schmaltz-fest of cringesome clichés - note how "What happened to the groove?" elicits nothing but sniggers and derision when watched with friends - bad acting, bad accents, a weird bit with our Neil in the wilderness trying to discover himself...but hey, it all comes right for him in the end, and he and his father are conveniently reconciled during one of Neil's concerts. Larry may now like his son's music, but he sure seems to be having some problems clapping in time to it.

    The only thing this movie has going for it is Diamond's music - I'm not a fan, but the man certainly has a talent for singing, if not acting. This still fails to redeem this unwatchable dross however, so you're better off buying the soundtrack album. Maybe you'll buy it on the web to save yourself the embarrassment of asking for it in-store.

    Enough already!
  • comment
    • Author: Mikale
    This is an unnecessary updated remake of the venerable Al Jolson musical weepie: still, the end product remains hopelessly clichéd and actually gives the term 'old-fashioned' a bad name! Besides, in view of star Neil Diamond's pop repertoire, the title doesn't make any sense - and, while the new songs in themselves aren't too bad, there's no comparable number to the original's show-stopping and heart-rending "Mammy" (actually, the protagonist's mother here doesn't come into the picture at all!). The rest is glossy but also unintentionally funny: there's Diamond singing in blackface, a punk rendition of a typical Diamond ballad, Laurence Olivier's embarrassing performance (especially the scene where he disowns his son), Diamond's period in the 'wilderness', etc. Not surprisingly, the film - and Olivier - emerged a winner at that year's Razzie Awards: could it be that the great English thespian accepted such an obviously demeaning role solely for the purpose of adding this unenviable tribute to his long list of accolades?
  • comment
    • Author: Braswyn
    I almost throw it away by the window, but later on I thought in pedestrians and also that it is possible to record on it something. The best of this movie is Neil's songs and singing. The plot is completely non credible. Also it contains a great amount of American propaganda. That propaganda in the 80s; today is little bit more sophisticated. The movie is very slow and you can imaging the end after first half and hour. Lawrence Oliver is very good as always but his role is so exaggerated and that he can not do any more with it. A remake made for the glory of Neil Diamond and another waste of time and resources for the American industry. Sometimes very funny when its trying to be dramatic and stupid when is trying to be funny. I recommend if you see it and like it, drink a bottle of wine and watch it another time.
  • comment
    • Author: Llanonte
    Critics are too hard on this film. Yes, for a remake of a classic, this is nothing terrific. Still, the 1980 remake of the Jazz Singer has as many moments as the original did. The opening montage alone is worth renting this movie. A 2 minute music video / opening shows the real streets of New York City and the people that live there. Opening with the statue of liberty, the camera showcases all the different colors, faces and cultures that New York City is made of. Yes Neil Diamond is not a terrific actor....HE'S A SINGER! The amazing talent of Laurence Olivier helps cancel out the bad acting from Neil Diamond. Still, for a singer, Diamond does a good job in this role. For fans of Neil Diamond, this is worth watching for the music alone. Still, I was hoping, out of respect for the original Jazz Singer, have some of the remake made into a silent film. All in all, a nice little movie with good music, even for 1980.
  • comment
    • Author: Pruster
    Yeah, Neil Diamond wasn't really much of an actor here, but Lucie Arnaz was great. Not only fun and charming, but she really showed she could act. Great screen presence-- you just wanted to hang out with her!

    I wish more people had seen her in this.
  • comment
    • Author: Contancia
    This is an updated version of the old Al Jolson film by the same name. In this version, a young potential pop star (Neil Diamond) strikes out on his own, turning his back on his father (Sir Lawrence Olivier), his religion (Judaism) and his supposed profession (Cantor) to seek his fame and fortune. The story is OK, a bit lame, but OK still. There is some fantastic music in this film, with (who else?) Neil Diamond singing "Love on the Rocks" and "America". Diamond is not a great actor, for certain, but he actually held his own. The performance by Olivier was also a little bit weak. Lucy Arnaz also stars in the show and I believe her acting was the best of all. There is one scene in the film in the Temple. A Cantor is singing (quite badly) and all of a sudden, Diamond takes over. The abrupt change actually brought goose bumps to my skin! Other than that, the film is merely pretty entertaining. I won't say this is a great film, but I think it's worth a look if the video store doesn't have the one you REALLY went in there for.
  • comment
    • Author: Wal
    I didn't see the 1927 cinematic version so have no means of comparison. However, I was very disappointed in this movie about a young man named Yussel, who defies his father, a Jewish cantor, and goes off to California to pursue his dreams of becoming a pop singer. I had expected better, given the combination of Lawrence Olivier's acting prowess and Neil Diamond's music, as I am quite a fan of both.

    This is definitely not Olivier's best role or his best performance either as the disapproving, disowning father, though he is a magnificent actor so viewer's expectations are high. True, Neil Diamond isn't a great actor himself by any means, though I found he comes across better than some reviewers seem to indicate. As for Lucie Arnaz, who plays the woman sharing his musical dreams, it's been awhile since I saw the movie and I cannot recall anything whatsoever about her role. I'm sure she was suitably charming and talented but for me, this story is all about the father / son relationship, the importance in the father's eyes of the son's faithfulness to Jewish traditions and using his musical talents within the synagogue.

    The only aspect of this film that failed to disappoint was of course, the music. Neil Diamond is a great musician here as always, with songs such as Hello Again and Love on the Rocks. As for the America finale, it was without question, the best part of the picture...impressive, stirring, and emotional. As others have also noted, it's a film only for dyed in the wool fans of Neil Diamond and Lawrence Olivier. While I am definitely both, other than its rousing finale, The Jazz Singer certainly failed to live up to my expectations.
  • comment
    • Author: Helo
    As the fine old plot of The Jazz Singer was dusted off for the fifth and last time of the last century, it might do well to remember that it wasn't really that great a play to begin with. It was a mediocre piece of writing that Georgie Jessel starred on Broadway with and was made into a film to exhibit that new invention of sound with the singing talents of Al Jolson.

    Jolson was America's greatest entertainer and he got to reprise some of the great standards that he made famous, most particularly that climax of getting down on one knee and singing to his Mammy in the audience. That's what the first film version of The Jazz Singer is famous for, nothing else.

    Poor Neil Diamond also got a great showcase for some wonderful songs he introduced and little else. I did enjoy Love on the Rocks, Coming to America and Hello Again, great songs by a great singer. But in making his screen debut he was overshadowed by the 20th century's greatest English speaking actor who played his cantor father.

    Sir Laurence Olivier dusted off that patented middle-Europa accent that had served well on so many occasions. At that point in his career Olivier was doing many things strictly for the paycheck to build a nice estate to leave his kids. That trend started with The Betsy for him. Certainly he had nothing left to prove as an actor.

    Someone else mentioned that Olivier would look ridiculous trying Neil Diamond's art. Actually he did on screen and maybe one day The Beggar's Opera will be available on DVD and VHS or shown on TV so we can all judge.

    I count five versions of The Jazz Singer. Jessel on stage, the Jolson and Diamond versions and another in between with Eduard Franz as the cantor and Danny Thomas as his son. And a fifth done for television by Jerry Lewis which is supposed to make this one look good.

    For Fans of Neil Diamond only and don't expect him singing to Mammy in the climax. The plot has Olivier as a widower.
  • comment
    • Author: Delalbine
    Neil Diamond's first, and only, starring role. This tale, about a Jewish man who tries to make it as a singer despite heavy objections from his stern father (Laurence Olivier), was ripped to pieces by critics upon it's release. I'm a somewhat mini-Neil fan and I enjoy this movie quite a bit.

    Sure, it's not perfect, at all, but, it's got great music by Diamond and a bravura (perhaps somewhat over the top) performance by the terrific Olivier. Neil Diamond isn't bad at all either. You could do a lot worse than sit through this movie. 7 out of 10.
  • comment
    • Author: krot
    I have been trying to find words to describe this movie and remain standing on complete neutral ground for a while, and I think I've finally managed to find them. While I'm not this planet's No. 1 Neil Diamond fan, I have to admit his music does reach a level in me that few others do. The man is a gifted songwriter and singer... You read right. Songwriter and singer. So why waste precious time in knocking him for his first acting stint? For a guy who had never done it before, I was actually impressed by his performance. Now, I am a drama student myself and I can see where Diamond could have done better, but I also think that for a guy that had never tried acting before he could have also been a lot worse. And when you have to act beside a guy like Lawrence Olivier, it's hard to look good even when you're a pro.

    Diamond plays the part of Yussel Rabinowitz, a Jewish son of a temple Cantor who feels compelled to leave his traditionalist home behind and pursue his true calling: Pop Music. On the way he has to try and find a way to get there without losing his father's love and approval, and things only get more complicated when Yussel, a married man, meets Molly Bell, a promoter who has complete faith in his talent and is willing to not just push him all the way but also to be there by his side on his rise to super-stardom.

    In my opinion, it's painfully clear that Neil tried his very best and managed to come through. So he's no Academy Award winning Actor... But just get into the plot of the film. Put yourself in Jesse Rabinowitz shoes and you won't be able to deny that it's a touching story that many can relate to. You'll find that if you just sit back and watch this film from a non-critical point of view, you'll not only enjoy it, but you might learn a thing or two about life yourself!

    And when you're done, do yourself a favour: Put on your jacket, get some money out of your purse or wallet and go out to buy the soundtrack. It's 25 years old and still sounds as god today as it did then!!
  • Cast overview, first billed only:
    Neil Diamond Neil Diamond - Jess Robin / Yussel Rabinovitch
    Laurence Olivier Laurence Olivier - Cantor Rabinovitch
    Lucie Arnaz Lucie Arnaz - Molly Bell
    Catlin Adams Catlin Adams - Rivka Rabinovitch
    Franklyn Ajaye Franklyn Ajaye - Bubba
    Paul Nicholas Paul Nicholas - Keith Lennox
    Sully Boyar Sully Boyar - Eddie Gibbs
    Mike Kellin Mike Kellin - Leo
    James Booth James Booth - Paul Rossini
    Luther Waters Luther Waters - Teddy
    Oren Waters Oren Waters - Mel
    Rod Gist Rod Gist - Timmy
    Walter Janovitz Walter Janovitz - Rabbi Birnbaum (as Walter Janowitz)
    Janet Brandt Janet Brandt - Aunt Tillie
    John Witherspoon John Witherspoon - M.C. Cinderella Club
    All rights reserved © 2017-2024 hd.thomson-multimedia.com