Search

» » Kääbik: Viie väe lahing (2014)

Kääbik: Viie väe lahing (2014) watch online HD

Kääbik: Viie väe lahing (2014) watch online HD
  • Original title:The Hobbit: The Battle of the Five Armies
  • Category:Movie / Adventure / Fantasy
  • Released:2014
  • Director:Peter Jackson
  • Actors:Ian McKellen,Martin Freeman,Richard Armitage
  • Writer:Fran Walsh,Philippa Boyens
  • Budget:$250,000,000
  • Duration:2h 24min
  • Video type:Movie

Watch online HD Download HD

Short summary

Bilbo and company are forced to engage in a war against an array of combatants and keep the Lonely Mountain from falling into the hands of a rising darkness.
After the Dragon leaves the Lonely Mountain, the people of Lake-town see a threat coming. Orcs, dwarves, elves and people prepare for war. Bilbo sees Thorin going mad and tries to help. Meanwhile, Gandalf is rescued from the Necromancer's prison and his rescuers realize who the Necromancer is.

Trailers "Kääbik: Viie väe lahing (2014)"

When the movie was promoted with a panel at San Diego Comic Con, several fans camped outside the hall the day before the panel, in order to get seats. In the middle of the night, the fans were woken up by cast members Lee Pace and Andy Serkis, who greeted the waiting fans and delivered autographs and photos for hours. In the end, Pace passed out from exhaustion, and shared a mattress with a fan.

This is the last movie featuring legendary screen actor Sir Christopher Lee (Saruman the White) to be completed and released before his passing on June 7, 2015 at age ninety-three. Lee was one of a handful of cast members to star in both The Lord of the Rings and The Hobbit trilogies.

The elk on which Lee Pace (Thranduil) rides is played by a horse named Moose.

In the movie, Gandalf calls Legolas "Greenleaf". The name Legolas already means "green leaf" in the Sindarin language. (Though he is sometimes referred to as Legolas Greenleaf in the books.)

Several cast members kept props from this movie when shooting wrapped. Martin Freeman kept his sword and prosthetic ears, while Richard Armitage kept the original Orcrist-sword, and Lee Pace kept his elven-sword, which he keeps in his umbrella stand.

In the book, everything is seen from Bilbo's perspective. The first part of the Battle of the Five Armies is witnessed by him in one chapter; the second part happens off-screen because Bilbo is rendered unconscious, but is retrospectively described to him in the next chapter. In this movie, the entire battle takes up nearly half of the running time due to several perspectives being followed.

During the confrontation between Galadriel, Saruman, Elrond, Radagast, and Gandalf in Dol Guldur, Galadriel fights Sauron using Earendil's Light. In The Lord of the Rings trilogy, she gives it to Frodo in Lothlorien.

Lee Pace's parents visited him on-set, and subsequently Peter Jackson offered them to be extras in the movie. They were given roles as Lake Town villagers, and filmed a scene with Ian McKellen. However, according to Pace, they were cut out of the movie, because his father was "hamming it up" during his scene.

This is the only movie in The Hobbit trilogy, as well as The Lord of the Rings trilogy, where Legolas blinks normally. In all the other movies, he only blinks when he is surprised or injured.

Sir Ian Holm and Sir Christopher Lee filmed their scenes at London's Pinewood Studios, because health concerns left them uncomfortable with flying to New Zealand.

In the theatrical version, Bombur does not get to say a single word, but he does get to blow a horn. [He does, however, have one line in the Extended Edition (hands Bifur the axe that had been dislodged from his head) "Here you go cousin."]

Billy Boyd, who played Pippin in The Lord of the Rings trilogy, co-wrote and performed the song "The Last Goodbye" for the end credits of this movie.

Despite appearing in all three movies of the trilogy, Cate Blanchett was on-set for only eight days of the entire production.

Despite playing his father in the trilogy, Lee Pace (Thranduil) is two years younger than Orlando Bloom (Legolas).

This movie has the shortest running time of any Middle-earth movie directed by Peter Jackson, running at two hours and twenty-four minutes (two hours and forty-four minutes in the Extended Edition).

James Nesbitt, who plays the Dwarf Bofur in all three movies, has two daughters who played Bard's daughters in the second and third movies.

Sir Ian McKellen and Cate Blanchett are the only actor and actress to appear in all six of the Middle-earth movies.

Legolas is not in the book, however, the book stated that all of the Woodland Elves were present during a battle, and him being an immortal Elf, he is almost certainly likely to have been near his father when the events took place.

In the scene at Erebor, when all of the Dwarves are fully clad in armor, Gloin (Gimli's father) wears the same helmet worn by Gimli in The Lord of the Rings trilogy.

Thranduil refers to Gandalf as Mithrandir, a Sindarin word that means "grey wanderer". Gandalf in Old Norse means "wand elf".

Of the talking animals in the book (wolves, eagles, spiders, thrush, raven), only Smaug and the Spiders are given a voice in the movie.

Peter Jackson is the "carrot man" in the town of Bree in Der Herr der Ringe: Die Gefährten (2001), and in Der Hobbit: Smaugs Einöde (2013). His two pugs are the dogs in the Lake Town scene.

Smaug the Dragon made a guest appearance, and was interviewed by Stephen Colbert on The Colbert Report (2005) on December 11, 2014, to promote this movie. Benedict Cumberbatch, who voiced the dragon in the trilogy, also provided the voice of Smaug for the interview.

Only movie in the franchise to acknowledge Legolas' quiver running out of arrows. Legolas' empty quiver can be seen at the Battle for Helm's Deep, in Der Herr der Ringe: Die zwei Türme (2002).

Despite playing the title character, and being the only actor to appear on all three posters for each installment, Martin Freeman only gets second billing in all three movies.

Bilbo finds a handkerchief back at his Bag End home. In Der Hobbit: Eine unerwartete Reise (2012), he had forgotten his handkerchief as he hurried out of his home to catch up with the Dwarves, at the beginning of the adventure.

Near the end of the movie, when Bilbo gets home to see his things being auctioned off, he takes away spoons from Lobelia Sackville-Baggins. This is a reference to the first hobbit movie, Der Hobbit: Eine unerwartete Reise (2012), when Frodo asks Bilbo why he is hiding some of his things. Bilbo tells him it is because once, he'd caught Lobelia trying to take his spoons. In the book, the spoons were never recovered.

The song in the first trailer is called "The Edge of Night", originally sung by Peregrin Took in Der Herr der Ringe: Die Rückkehr des Königs (2003).

When Thranduil tells Legolas of Strider, the first few notes of Der Herr der Ringe: Die Gefährten (2001) theme is heard.

Balin the elder Dwarf, who is in all three of The Hobbit movies, is mentioned in Der Herr der Ringe: Die Gefährten (2001). The Fellowship discovers his tomb in the Mines Of Moria, and Gandalf reads from it: ("Here lies Balin, Son of Fundin, Lord of Moria")

The story of Thranduil's heirloom, the white gem necklace of Lasgalen showed by Thorin, being stolen by the Dwarves, is not in the book. Thranduil does get the recovered emerald necklace of Girion from Bilbo, after the battle, as thanks for his aid.

In the beginning of Der Herr der Ringe: Die Gefährten (2001), Gandalf tells Frodo that he was barely involved. While it is true that Gandalf is hardly involved with the main plot of the trilogy, Sir Ian McKellen still holds top billing in all three movies.

When the Hobbit film franchise was in early development under then-director Guillermo del Toro, it was originally going to adapt the book as a single movie, to be followed by a "bridge movie" set between it and The Lord of the Rings. Then the project was altered to be a two-movie arc, with the first movie subtitled as Der Hobbit: Eine unerwartete Reise (2012) and the second movie subtitled "There and Back Again". When the decision was made in July 2012 to extend the franchise to three movies, this second subtitle was still kept for the final movie, while the second movie became Der Hobbit: Smaugs Einöde (2013). However, in April 2014, Peter Jackson announced that the third movie's subtitle had been changed to "The Battle of the Five Armies". The primary reasons for the change, were that the title battle is the central focus of the movie, but also, as Jackson stated on his Facebook page, "'There and Back Again' felt like the right name for the second of a two film telling of the quest to reclaim Erebor, when Bilbo's arrival there, and departure, were both contained within the second film. But with three movies, it suddenly felt misplaced. After all, Bilbo has already arrived 'there' in the Desolation of Smaug."

Peter Jackson confirmed that principal photography on the movies had finished after two hundred sixty-six days, the same amount of days as The Lord of the Rings trilogy. Jackson has described this accomplishment as having done a once in a lifetime experience twice, in a production video.

For the scenes where Galadriel picks up Gandalf, a dummy of Sir Ian McKellen was used. This dummy was called Michael Gambon (it was even included with that name on call sheets (as seen in the appendices documentary)) because Gambon and McKellen sometimes get mistaken for one another.

The three songs from The Hobbit trilogy ("Song Of The Lonely Mountain", "I See Fire" and "The Last Goodbye") have been performed by men: Neil Finn, Ed Sheeran, and Billy Boyd, respectively. In the opposite way, the three songs from The Lord of the Rings' trilogy ("May It Be", "Gollum's Song" and "Into the West") have been performed by women: Enya, Emiliana Torrini, and Annie Lennox.

In the book, Thorin doesn't get his sword Orcrist back until after he dies, and it's buried with him. In the movie, Legolas gives it back to Thorin by throwing it at an Orc, who is about to strike the Dwarf. Thorin then uses Orcrist to kill Azog.

During the end credits, the picture of Bilbo Baggins is a slightly edited version of a picture taken of Martin Freeman holding a LEGO Minifigure of Bilbo.

Peter Jackson met Evangeline Lilly after he finished filming The Lord of the Rings trilogy, and liked her so much that he promised to include her in J.R.R. Tolkien's other stories, should they be made into film. When they started filming The Hobbit, Lilly received a phone call from Jackson, that he created the character of Tauriel for her.

Though the movie revolves around the thirteen Dwarves, there is less screentime devoted to Thorin's company in the theatrical version, compared to the previous movies. However, Peter Jackson claims the Extended Version added thirty minutes of film, thus making it the longest addition in the franchise.

Peter Jackson claimed that the nonverbal scene of Gandalf sitting next to Bilbo and fumbling with his pipe was Sir Ian McKellen's last day during production. Jackson became overwhelmed with sentiment that he was filming McKellen's swan song as Gandalf, and made the decision to disregard the scripted dialogue for the scene.

At the epilogue of the movie, the aging Bilbo is sitting down looking at the One Ring. When Gandalf knocks his door, he stands up to open it, keeping the ring inside the right pocket of his vest. This establishes a straight connection with the beginning of Der Herr der Ringe: Die Gefährten (2001), when Bilbo, talking with Gandalf in the kitchen, introduces his hand in the same pocket, in order to touch the One Ring.

On Orlando Bloom's last day of filming, after he had completed his scenes, Peter Jackson recorded a video of Bloom "covering" the viral "They're Taking The Hobbits To Isengard" song on his phone.

The movie ends with a close-up of Erebor's map, which is on Bilbo's table. It's the same map, at which Gandalf looks, when he visits the aging Bilbo at the beginning of Der Herr der Ringe: Die Gefährten (2001).

There were multiple scenes that appeared in the teaser trailer and the first official trailer that were not in the movie.

When Tauriel and Legolas arrive in Gundabad, and she questions him about what is beyond the fortress, he answers: "An ancient enemy". This enemy is the Witch-King of Angmar, leader of the Nazgul. Angmar was the kingdom that existed beyond Gundabad. The word means "house of iron".

Bofur's hat never leaves his head throughout the movie.

Like the final installment of The Lord of the Rings trilogy, the end credit sequence is made of drawings and the actor's names are put beside their drawn faces.

Reports of studio interference were confirmed by Peter Jackson, Graham McTavish, and Evangeline Lilly, with McTavish confirming the theatrical cut for this movie isn't what Jackson intended, and that the extended cuts of all three movies are closer to Jackson's original vision. Amongst other things, the studio demanded more emphasis on the love story.

This is the only Middle-earth movie to have any profanity at all, unsurprisingly spoken by Billy Connolly's character, Dain Ironfoot. Dain yells for all the non-Dwarf soldiers outside the gate of Erebor to "SOD OFF!!!", a common British insult.

The only movie in the Middle-earth saga to not earn an Academy Award nomination for its visual effects.

Azog's primary goals throughout the trilogy are to kill Thorin and end the bloodline of Durin. If Daín II Ironfoot and Thorin's sister, Dís, were technically not Durin's bloodline, then Azog would've succeeded.

Stephen Fry (Master of Lake Town) left behind a large supply of alcohol when his scenes wrapped. These were given away as gag prizes when filming wrapped.

In the novel, Bilbo spots the Eagles before he is knocked out. In the movie, he is knocked out, and the first thing he does, upon waking, is spot the Eagles.

Orlando Bloom and Hugo Weaving were in five out of the six Middle-earth movies. Bloom was not in Der Hobbit: Eine unerwartete Reise (2012), and Weaving did not appear in Der Hobbit: Smaugs Einöde (2013).

Peter Jackson had previously stated this will be his last movie he would do with J.R.R. Tolkien's Middle-earth properties, but recently said he would consider returning to it, due to his emotional attachment.

The song in the end credits is "The Last Goodbye", composed and performed by Billy Boyd, who played Pippin in The Lord of the Rings trilogy. Boyd wrote and composed the song for the movie.

Bard asks a woman in Dale if she has seen his children. She replies by saying they are on the market in Stone Street. Stone Street is the name of the studio in Wellington, New Zealand where large portions of the movie were shot.

The Misty Mountain Trolls, the Dol Guldur Trolls, and the Ogres don't appear in the book.

This movie is the shortest movie in Peter Jackson's Middle-earth film franchise. Der Hobbit: Eine unerwartete Reise (2012) is one hundred sixty-nine minutes, Der Hobbit: Smaugs Einöde (2013) is one hundred sixty-one minutes, Der Herr der Ringe: Die Gefährten (2001) is one hundred seventy-eight minutes, The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers (2002) is one hundred seventy-nine minutes, Der Herr der Ringe: Die Rückkehr des Königs (2003) is two hundred one minutes, and this movie is one hundred forty-four minutes. (This list does not include the Extended Editions.)

At the end of the movie, when Gandalf knocks on Bilbo's door, the dialogue between Bilbo and Gandalf "No thank you! We don't want any more visitors, well-wishers or distant relations!" seem to be the audio recordings taken straight from Der Herr der Ringe: Die Gefährten (2001).

The five armies in the movie, are the Dwarves, the Elves, the men of Lake Town, the Orc army from Dol Guldur led by Azog, and the Orc army from Gundabad led by Bolg. In the book, the Five Armies are the Elves, the Men of Lake Town, the Dwarves, the Eagles, and the Orcs.

This is the first Middle-earth movie in the franchise, in which the Extended Edition received an R rating by the MPAA. It is also the first Extended Edition, with the second least amount of new footage (twenty minutes), the movie with the least amount of new footage is The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey (2012) (thirteen minutes).

The mithril chain mail given by Thorin to Bilbo just before the battle of the five armies, is the same that old Bilbo (Ian Holm) gives to Frodo (Elijah Wood) in Der Herr der Ringe: Die Gefährten (2001).

Cast member Sir Christopher Lee and Cinematographer Andrew Lesnie died the year following this movie's release. Lesnie died in April of 2015, Lee in June.

Daniel Radcliffe and Tobey Maguire were considered for the role of Bilbo, before Martin Freeman was cast.

The only movie in Peter Jackson's Middle-earth series to not, even temporarily, hold a spot on the IMDb Top 250.

When Galadriel is in Dol Guldur, she wears Nenya, her ring of power, on the right hand. Nenya, also named the White Ring, the Ring of Adamant, and the Ring of Water, is a word in Sindarin that means "water".

Despite being one of the main antagonists in the second movie, and featured in the cliffhanger, Smaug barely appears in the final trailer, nor does he appear much at all in the final movie, save the first eleven minutes, and a fleeting shot later on.

DIRECTOR CAMEO (Peter Jackson): A painting of Bungo Baggins, which was put back over the fireplace, with Belladonna's painting by their son, Bilbo, after he cancelled the auction for his house.

Sir Christopher Lee reappears as Saruman, and it is his final time in the role. This movie takes place sixty years prior to The Lord of the Rings trilogy. The role of Saruman the White is similar to Sir Christopher Lee's role in the Star Wars prequels. Count Dooku, a former Jedi Knight, who turned to the Dark Side, and became apprentice to the evil Sith Lord Darth Sidious.

At the beginning of the end credits, all of the characters from the three movies are presented with Alan Lee's illustrations, in the same style as the credits of Der Herr der Ringe: Die Rückkehr des Königs (2003). When the main credits begin, there can be seen a chronological review of The Hobbit trilogy with the landscapes, creatures, and several scenes from the three movies.

There are three Sherlock Holmes in this movie: Benedict Cumberbatch played Holmes in Sherlock (2010), Sir Christopher Lee was Holmes in three movies (he also played Mycroft Holmes and Sir Henry Baskerville), and Sir Ian McKellen played the retired detective in Mr. Holmes (2015). Martin Freeman, of course, is Watson in Sherlock (2010), and Stephen Fry was Mycroft in Guy Ritchie's Sherlock Holmes movies.

The codpieces of Azog, Bolg, and the armored Trolls are skulls.

During Bard's speech to the people of Lake Town, after they reach dry land, the fourth wall of cinema is broken by a Siberian Husky, as it looks directly at the camera during a widescreen shot, though it is highly unlikely the Husky's gaze was intentional.

The runestone that Kili gives Tauriel, is the same one he showed to her in Der Hobbit: Smaugs Einöde (2013), a gift from his mother with the word "inikhde", which means "Return to me", in Khuzdul, the Dwarvish language.

As of 2018, Orlando Bloom is the only major Elf actor not to appear in a Marvel movie: -Hugo Weaving (Elrond) had starred as the Red Skull in Captain America: The First Avenger (2011). -Liv Tyler (Arwen) played Betty Ross in Der unglaubliche Hulk (2008). -Lee Pace (Thranduil) played Ronan in Guardians of the Galaxy (2014). -Evangeline Lilly (Tauriel) starred in Ant-Man (2015) and Ant-Man and the Wasp (2018). Cate Blanchett (Galadriel) in Thor: Tag der Entscheidung (2017)

During their visit to Gundabad, Legolas tells Tauriel that his mother died in a battle against Gundabad's Orcs a long time ago. J.R.R. Tolkien never mentioned Legolas' mother in the books.

Bilbo uses the One Ring to make himself invisible a total of six times throughout the trilogy: -1st - to escape Gollum in the Goblins' caves. -2nd - to escape the spiders. -3rd - to help Thorin and the rest of the Company to escape from Thranduil's cells. -4th - to hide from Smaug's sight after his awakening. -5th - to avoid being eaten by Smaug, running from Smaug's fire breath. -6th - to travel from Dale to Ravenhill, to tell Thorin about Azog's trap.

According to a fan, someone asked Peter Jackson at the premiere if he was going to see it. He said "I will, but not yet. I'm not sure what the studio has done with it."

Through Peter Jackson's The Hobbit and The Lord of the Rings trilogies, the release dates were always set in the month of December, perfect timing for award season.

After the battle, a Lake Town citizen blows into a horn in Dale. The fanfare that is heard is a part of the track titled "Sons of Durin" in the movie's soundtrack.

During the battle of the five armies, Legolas clings onto a giant bat to fly across the rocky terrain. In Peter Jackson's King Kong (2005), a similar giant bat was also hitched for a ride.

This movie marks the third time Sting, Bilbo's silver sword, is featured in the theatrical poster alongside the title character, following Der Hobbit: Eine unerwartete Reise (2012) and Der Hobbit: Smaugs Einöde (2013), thus making its appearance more than key characters of the trilogy, Gandalf The Grey and Thorin Oakenshield, who were only seen in the poster of the second installment. It is also seen used by Frodo on the poster for Der Herr der Ringe: Die Rückkehr des Königs (2003), meaning it has appeared on four posters in the whole franchise.

Only entry in the franchise, to feature two female characters among the promotional materials for the movie. However, Éowyn and Arwen appear together on the main posters and DVD cover for Der Herr der Ringe: Die zwei Türme (2002).

Orlando Bloom and Luke Evans appeared in Die drei Musketiere (2011) and Der Hobbit: Smaugs Einöde (2013).

Throughout the duration of filming three movies, Martin Freeman frequently joked around by giving one or two middle fingers towards cameras when behind the scenes footage was being shot.

Lowest received Middle-earth movie on Rotten Tomatoes, at a sixty percent, as of January 2015.

In addition to the aforementioned Elf actors and actresses, several other cast members of Tolkien movies have been involved in Marvel films as well. Sir Ian McKellen appeared in X-Men (2000), while Dominic Monaghan appeared in X-Men Origins: Wolverine (2009), along with Danny Huston, whose father, John Huston, has played Gandalf. Sir Christopher Lee appeared in the original Captain America television series. Benedict Cumberbatch appeared in Doctor Strange (2016). John Rhys-Davies was the first actor to play Wilson Fisk, a.k.a. The Kingpin, in The Trial of the Incredible Hulk (1989). Marton Csokas appeared in The Amazing Spider-Man 2: Rise of Electro (2014), and Richard Armitage appeared as Heinz Kruger in Captain America: The First Avenger (2011). Martin Freeman appeared as Everett K. Ross in The First Avenger: Civil War (2016).

This movie's post-production officially concluded November 15, 2014. On November 17 , 2014, one month before the release in theaters, Peter Jackson showed the cinematic version of the movie to an exclusive projection at the "Weta Studios" in Wellington, New Zealand, only for the "Hobbit Contest international members" who had visited New Zealand, and the locations where the two trilogies were filmed (The Lord of the Rings and The Hobbit), after having won "The Hobbit: The Fellowship Contest". An international contest for all Tolkien's fans around the world, organized by Peter Jackson with the collaboration of: Air New Zealand, Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, New Line Cinema, Warner Brothers, and WingNut Films. The contest officially started the first week in September 2014, and was concluded in the first weeks in October 2014.

The golden ground where Thorin hallucinates, is the same place where he had tried to kill Smaug in Der Hobbit: Smaugs Einöde (2013) by smothering him in hot melted gold.

Sir Christopher Lee's final live-action role.

The final movie of the cinematic Middle-earth franchise, that began with The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring (2001).

Martin Freeman co-stars with Benedict Cumberbatch in Sherlock (2010).

This is the sixth movie taking place in Middle-earth to be directed by Peter Jackson. It is also set third in terms of franchise chronology.

This is the last movie in The Hobbit trilogy, and also the final movie in the Middle-earth film franchise.

The extended cut is Peter Jackson's first R rated movie since The Frighteners (1996).

In Fast & Furious 6 (2013), Luke Evans' character (Owen Shaw) blames another character's flaws on loyalty, claiming that he is "loyal to a fault". Here, Bard is present when Bilbo Baggins claims that the Dwarves are "loyal to a fault".

As well as on Der Hobbit: Eine unerwartete Reise (2012), Hugo Weaving (Elrond) and Benedict Cumberbatch (Smaug/Necromancer (voice)) also worked together on Patrick Melrose (2018) as David Melrose and Patrick Melrose respectively.

The film was originally gonna be called "The Hobbit: There and Back Again" which is a reference to Bilbo's book title in the Lord of the Rings trilogy

In Bard's speech to the people of Lake Town, he says "the winter is upon us". This quote is similar to the trademark and tagline of the television series Game of Thrones: Das Lied von Eis und Feuer (2011). The Lord of the Rings trilogy actor, Sean Bean, had a major role in the series' first season.

In the beginning of The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring (2001), Gandalf tells Frodo that he was barely involved. While true, Sir Ian McKellen still holds top billing for in all three movies Gandalf is hardly involved in.

Both actors who portrayed Bilbo, each appeared in movies involving interstellar travel. Sir Ian Holm played Ash in Alien (1979), while Martin Freeman played Arthur Dent in The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy (2005).

Dominic Monaghan: "Merry" from the Lord of the Rings trilogy, can be briefly seen during the auction scene.

Fran Walsh: A painting of Belladonna Took hanging over the fireplace at Bag End.

Katie Jackson: As a scared girl aboard a boat in Lake Town, who tries to escape from the town.

Ruby Ashbourne Serkis: As a scared girl aboard a boat in Lake Town, who tries to escape from the town.

Liu Yuan: A young Hobbit at the auction of Bag End.

Fraser Hesketh: A Lake Town refugee throughout the movie. His wife and children had also made cameo appearances.

Luc Campbell: A young Hobbit at the auction of Bag End.

Ollie Matthews: A young Hobbit at the auction of Bag End.

Billy Jackson: A Lake Town refugee who stabs an Orc during the battle.

Riley Brophy: A Lake Town refugee at the arrival of the Elves of Mirkwood.

Bruno Du Bois: A resident in Lake Town moving a wheelbarrow before Smaug's attack. Du Bois' scenes were not included in the theatrical version or the Extended Edition, but were shown in the appendices.

Jamie Haugh: A somber villager, who appeared after the destruction of Lake Town, and after the battle, mourning the dead. Haugh during the scenes with the villagers angry with Alfrid had appeared in every single shot taken for the scene.

Corrin Ellingford: A guard in Lake Town standing by the Master's house before Smaug's attack.

Kate Mulligan: A woman strolling in Lake Town before Smaug's attack.

Terry Notary: A somber villager who survived the destruction of Lake Town.

Rachel Gilkison: A woman in strolling in Lake Town before Smaug's attack.

Shane Rangi: A Lake Town refugee and a Gundabad Orc.

Eric Saindon: A guard in Lake Town standing by the Master's house before Smaug's attack.

Hayden J. Weal: A somber villager who survived the destruction of Lake Town.

Towards the end of the movie, Thranduil instructs his son Legolas to go find the Ranger Strider (Aragorn in The Lord of the Rings). Aragorn would have been roughly twenty-seven-years-old at this time, according to the timeline of the Middle-earth movies. However, there's a slight discrepancy between the timelines of the movies and the novels. In truth, The Hobbit occurs in the Third Age in 2941-2942. Aragorn was born in the Third Age in 2931, making him between ten and eleven years old at the end of the Battle of the Five Armies, and unlikely to be a Ranger. But in Der Hobbit: Eine unerwartete Reise (2012), the old Bilbo begins describing events that occurred sixty years prior to Der Herr der Ringe: Die Gefährten (2001), which begins in the Third Age in 3018, when Aragorn is eighty-seven years old.

In the novel, Fili and Kili died to protect Thorin Oakenshield. In the movie, they die for different reasons: Fili is murdered in battle by Azog, and Kili is killed trying to save Tauriel, while Thorin is actually trying to protect them.

During the confrontation in Dol Guldur between Galadriel, Saruman, Elrond, Radagast, and Gandalf against Sauron, the latter is helped by the Nazgûl. It's the first time that they reveal their true appearance, embodied in their trademark armor.

In the novel, the Master of Lake Town is given a fair share of the Erebor treasure at the end, but consumed by greed, he makes a getaway with whatever gold he can carry. He later dies of starvation in a wasteland. Since the Master gets killed early in the movie, Alfrid was given a similar fate in the extended edition where his greed ultimately kills him.

In the book, Bolg is killed by Beorn during the Battle Of The Five Armies. In the movie, he is killed by Legolas, outside of the main battle. Bolg's father Azog is killed by Thorin in the movie, also away from the battlefield; in the book, Azog has already been killed 143 years earlier, by Thorin's cousin Dain during the Battle outside the Gates of Moria. Der Hobbit: Eine unerwartete Reise (2012) briefly showed this battle, but the movie adaptation kept Azog alive to be the returning villain throughout the Hobbit trilogy.

In the theatrical release, Alfrid escapes with some of the gold that the Master of Lake Town was trying to steal. However, in the Extended Edition, Alfrid is killed when he falls onto a catapult as it is fired, and he becomes stuck in the throat of a troll.

As Fíli dies before Kíli in the movie, Kíli becomes crown Prince of Erebor for a little while, until his own death later on.

When Dain questions where is Thorin during the battle of the five armies, at the right of the screen can be seen a giant white Orc. This is the same Orc that later tries to kill Legolas in Ravenhill, looking to destroy the tower, upon which Legolas stands.

When the Dwarves come close to Thorin's corpse, all kneel except Dwalin and Gloin.

As seen in the behind the scenes footage of the Extended Edition, the last shot filmed, is that of Kíli watching his just killed brother Fíli fall down on Ravenhill, which was shot by the Second Unit. The first main unit just finished filming Thorin fighting Azog on the ice plate beforehand.

User reviews


  • comment
    • Author: Daizil
    A couple of years ago, when I heard Peter Jackson would direct two more Middle-earth movies, I started crying out of excitement. Those two movies soon got changed into three and I was angry because I was convinced the story was too short for three three-hours-long movies. Despite the book being approximately 300 pages long, Peter Jackson & co. proved me wrong and managed to not include big parts of the books in these movies, even though there's more than 8,5 hours of total screen time. "Disappointed" is an understatement.

    I don't think this movie was supposed to make me laugh at the serious scenes and sigh at the 'comic relief' scenes -basically everything Alfrid was in- but sadly it did. At least the 'funny' scenes in the Lord of the Rings trilogy were subtle and less in number; BOTFA was supposed to be "serious and dark" and those silly, ridiculous scenes pretty much ruined that.

    I have nothing negative to say about the acting though. The amazing cast of this trilogy did the best they could with the awful script they were given, and I'm thankful for that. It's not their fault that their character development was rushed because the movie was full of pointless Legolas Vs. Gravity scenes, dull Tauriel scenes who fell in love with Kili after having a conversation with him once or twice - same goes for Kili who fell in love with her and even gave her the token his mother, Dís, gave him.

    The worst part of this movie isn't even that it's full of badly done CGI or the big lack of proper character development. It's the fact that Tauriel, a badly written, impossible character made up by Peter Jackson & co., had more screen time than characters who were in the actual book written by J.R.R. Tolkien. Beorn basically got fifteen seconds, if not less, screen time in the last installment of this trilogy. Most of the dwarfs from the Company barely got a line, and a LOT of things are left unexplained.

    SPOILERS AFTER THIS LINE

    For instance, what happened with Thranduil and the white gems? Did he ever get them back?

    What happened to the gold? As a fan of the books I already know the answer, but the movie didn't really care to explain this important part of the story. Come on, the entire battle was about the gold. At least take a minute to explain how it got divided.

    Where did those goats suddenly come from?

    Why were the dwarfs wearing helmets when they were still inside the mountain, but had no helmets on when they actually went to war?

    What happened to the people of Lake-Town? Why didn't the movie explain that Bard became King of Dale? If I had not read the book, I'd get really annoyed after watching this movie and not knowing what had happened to them.

    What was the point of those ridiculously large worms and why did no one else /ever/ mention them before? And why were they gone after ten seconds? Did they ever get killed?

    Why mention Legolas' mother and never explain anything about her at all?

    Besides all these unanswered questions, there are certain things which bothered me more than all of those questions combined. 1. The Durins (Thorin, Kili, Fili) didn't get a funeral. In my opinion it's ridiculous to cut something like that out because they were basically the main characters. Which brings me to my second point. 2. I think Peter Jackson forgot that this story is called The Hobbit because Bilbo is supposed to be the main character, not Thorin. 3. Kili basically sacrificed himself for Tauriel which is unforgivable. In the actual story, Fili and Kili died defending Thorin in battle. Now the poor boy is dead because he had a crush on a badly written elf which also completely degrades the importance of Legolas and Gimli's friendship.

    Let's not forget about the scene wherein Legolas grabs a flying bat, or when Bard uses his son Bain to shoot an arrow, which should make him fall but somehow it doesn't, or when Dain and Thorin decide to hug in the middle of a battle, or when Azog somehow manages to float and dramatically opens his eyes.

    I absolutely loved the Lord of the Rings trilogy. They are my favorite movies of all time and the reason I became a fan of Tolkien's works in the first place. It's sad that Peter Jackson desperately tried to link the Hobbit movies to the LOTR trilogy, because it's partly the reason why the Hobbit movies are so awful. If the unnecessary Dol Guldur scenes and the Tauriel storyline were skipped, every good part from the book which is now cut out would have easily fit in. I'm still giving this movie a 4 out of 10 though, because I absolutely love the cast and I think they did a brilliant job, especially Richard Armitage and Martin Freeman. Also, the very last scene was exactly like I imagined it would be, with Ian Holm's Bilbo and Gandalf knocking on the door. Loved that part. And "The Last Goodbye" by Billy Boyd was a beautiful way to end this movie and trilogy and made me tear up.

    You might enjoy this movie if you really liked the first two -I didn't-, if you're into bad CGI or movies that look like video games or if you don't really care about Tolkien's Middle-earth and are content with a movie that doesn't do Tolkien and his characters justice at all. Otherwise you're probably someone like me and you'll leave the theater disappointed and grieving over the characters you love so much.
  • comment
    • Author: VAZGINO
    I should begin by saying that I am a big fan of Tolkiens work, and have read LOTR and The Hobbit (and his other books) many times. I did enjoy the first trilogy, and thought that the changes Jackson did to the story were sometimes understandable, sometimes acceptable. However, I have no idea what happened with this movie and the whole second trilogy.

    I am terribly disappointed, and I have no idea whether the changes were necessary simply to milk as much money as possible out of the whole project (spreading out the story to get 3 long movies, even if that meant adding many new things), or whether Jackson actually thinks he knows better than Tolkien... knows better how to explain things, how to connect the Hobbit to LOTR, or how to make a compelling story.

    And yes, an adaption doesn't HAVE to be close to the book. However, if you mess with the story, if you include things that contradict the whole story, and if you essentially kill off the charm and warmth and concept of the book the movie is based on, things get dangerous.

    The Hobbit was a book written for children, and while there are scenes in the trilogy that will definitely be fun for children (the dwarfs offering a lot of those kinda scenes), the violence and amount of killing and cut off heads make me wonder how suitable the movie really is.

    However, watching this movie, and having seen the previous ones, these questions came up in my mind:

    • Is it really FORBIDDEN to make a movie that Doesn't have a love-story involved? Isn't the Hobbit legendary enough, hasn't the book proved often enough it is a great story without a love-story included? Why did Jackson have to create Tauriel, the female ninja-elf and her love-story with a DWARF? Why did this have to be added? Would the film would have so much more terrible (hard to imagine) without a cliché and badly-written love-story that was added by Jackson and Walsh? - I sincerely think that, if the elvish race is capable of doing the things Tauriel and Legolas do in battle, not only could the small group of elven warriors Jackson added to the battle of Helms Deep in Two Towers have totally defeated the orcish army in less than 2 minutes... the history of Middle-Earth would be very difficult if they all could fight even remotely as well. Also, the fighting skills of Legolas in this movie are totally inconsistent to what he was able to do later on in LOTR. Considering that elves live incredibly long, the amount of time that passed between the Hobbit and Lotr is no explanation of why Legolas is a walking "ninja-god" in the Hobbit and much less superman-like in LOTR. - The incredible length of the scenes... it sincerely feels like the movie team was paid by the minutes of film they produced - The worms... I reckon they are based on a small comment by Bilbo, mentioning "were-worms" (a comment that has often riddled Tolkien-fans). Is this an attempt to somehow win over the fans of Tolkien-lore that feel insulted by Tauriel, the changes to the story, the goats, rabbits and deer-mounts, the fact that the WONDERFUL scene of Beorn appearing at the battle in the book and turning the tide, bringing relief and a change to the battle was kinda removed because the ninja-elves prove that Middle-Earth is located in the Matrix? - I really would feel bad for JRR Tolkien if he was able to watch these movies. He felt so much love for the world and characters he created, and put so much time, effort and feelings into his work. All this now was steamrolled over by the production team of this movie. After the rather respectful handling of LOTR, Jackson changed so much about the Hobbit that it feels totally disrespectful to the lifetime of work Tolkien put into his stories.


    What went wrong? Did Jackson think that, in order to attract and convince all those that haven't read the books, he would need to turn a wonderful book, written for children with a lot of warmth and charm, into a medieval Transformers (regarding amount of CGI, length of fights, lack of realism, character depth and taste)?

    Did he really think this was in any way a respectful adaption of the work of a man who invested DECADES into writing, refining and perfecting his stories? Who, instead of focusing on just hours of battle, managed to create a world full of lore, charm, and wonderful characters?

    I have no idea what went wrong behind the scenes. Have no idea whether the movie studio said "Jackson, forget about what people love about the Hobbit. Turn it into three overlong movies for more profit, get us as many battles and skirmishes as you possibly can milk out of this, and just to make sure, add a love-story (we don't care how you do it), add a popular character from the previous trilogy so people will dig that. Oh yeah, the book was written for children, so make sure there is a song or two, bird poo on the nutty wizard who escaped from Hogwarts (Radagast), a dwarf with a pickax stuck in his skull, and funny bits that children love. But don't forget we want adults to watch it too, so please, add tons of action and cut-off heads, too... gotta hit all those demographics".

    I know a lot of Tolkien-fans apparently love this movie and the trilogy. One review even said "...from a true fan". Please don't think this is the case in general. I have grown up reading Tolkiens work, and I am simply stunned by how bad, how tasteless and disrespectful this trilogy is.
  • comment
    • Author: Dagdarad
    I was as irritated as most people when I heard that Peter Jackson would split The Hobbit into three movies because it was obviously a decision based on nothing more than getting as much money as possible, but even I never imagined that he would stoop to making a movie like Battle of the Five Armies (a.k.a. Battle of the 25 Armies plus a couple of random giant mountain goats and a pig thrown in for good measure).

    The CGI was as bad as something you would see in a B movie—even worse than the previous two Hobbit films. But even more noticeably, the script took a dive to rock bottom. Within the first half hour, such utterly laughable clichés as "You make me feel alive," were spoken in a cheesy love scene that seemed like something straight out of Saturday Night Live, except that the audience was apparently supposed to take it seriously.

    Shortly before the battle started, there were a few much-needed moments of comic relief, and I thought the film might possibly turn around. But all my illusions were soon shattered during the ten-minute scene where Thorin walks on top of the ice that Azog is floating under with his eyes open, following the orc and apparently waiting for him to break through it, when—surprise!—he does, and (spoiler for those who have not yet watched the ten-minute scene that made this obvious) kills Thorin. Alas. It might have been sad if I hadn't been waiting around for ten minutes knowing that he would get killed.

    Things were looking grim for the dwarfs when who should appear? Our heroes the eagles, of course, who have managed to bail out the protagonists in every single movie of the trilogy.

    Although I couldn't stop laughing during the scene where three dwarfs find completely random giant mountain goats with no riders in the middle of the battle and proceed to ride them up a mountain, the worst part of the movie was easily the ending. As if the movie isn't long enough, the audience is not only forced to watch Bilbo go all the way BACK to the Shire, they have to re-watch footage from Fellowship of the Ring! I knew it was a bad sign that Peter Jackson actually made a movie shorter than three hours (although it felt like six)—apparently, he had so little material for this movie that he had to re-use material from his original trilogy.

    When Tauriel discusses love with the abominably clichéd line "Why does it hurt so much?" I think she described the feelings of most of the audience enduring the latest Hobbit movie.
  • comment
    • Author: Olma
    Peter Jackson, with this new trilogy, which adapts a somewhat long children's fairy tale into a three-part action epic, each movie being three hours long and delving into completely irrelevant stories that are only hinted at in Tolkien's body of work, has really destroyed his reputation as the Tolkien translator. He will always live in the shadow of The Lord of the Rings, which is a sumptuous, beautiful, heartrending, thrilling masterpiece.

    I don't know what happened. But Jackson sacrificed tone, realism, characterization, and story when he adapted The Hobbit. It is unrecognizable as work by the same director.

    There are so many problems with this trilogy and this movie that is nigh impossible to list them. Nearly every scene is a real travesty, and the whole operation is an affront to the source material and fans of LOTR. The movies make hyper-violent beheadings and mass slaughter into orgies of staged action sequences and dumb gags. The orcs, which are now entirely computer-generated, are no longer compelling or realistic, and they are seemingly significantly more fearsome than in LOTR... It takes what the audience understands about Middle Earth and makes it BIGGER, in a completely childish overextension of the original story, to make things even more epic! Were-worms and enormous bats - these don't exist in the larger and more climactic battle in LOTR, but sure, they existed back then, right? Sure! Jackson also turns characters into absolutely ridiculous flat caricatures. Thranduil, the bourgeois blue-blood riding an elk, Dain, Thorin's cousin, who rests his enormous high- pitched Scottish girth on a wild boar, the she- elf who falls in love with a dwarf... It's stomach churning how Peter Jackson has combined a love for extreme violence and an eye for juvenile gags and unbelievable characters, and in a beloved, classic setting.

    This movie, once again, extends Legolas past human bounds, past elven bounds, past the bounds of Newtonian physics, as he sprints, newly cyan eyes shining, on falling bricks and hangs from bats. We get to watch dwarfs behead seiging armies of orcs, who are impotent to the blows of the tiny Olympians. Again, oh no!, Middle Earth is doomed, the age of men is over, (cue slow-motion shots of Gandalf looking stricken, Thorin killing orcs with Sparta kicks)... The feel, the script, the look is all taken from LOTR and rehashed with this cast of cardboard characters, in a badly rendered world of excess and fancy.

    I expected mature film-making for thoughtful audiences expecting real characters living in a real world with a compelling story, but obviously that was too much to expect.

    If one of the important themes of The Hobbit is the rejection of greed, as we can see personified by Thorin, then is it hypocritical that Hollywood has churned out three abominably shallow and violent films out of The Hobbit for the public's consumption? I think so. I hate what these films represent, and what they could have done.
  • comment
    • Author: elektron
    What a difference an Extended Edition makes. For the first part we got some jolly embellishment. For The Desolation of Smaug we got bags more depth and character. For The Battle of the Five Armies, it may - I hope - be transformative. Because right now this feels like An Unfinished Journey.

    It's as if, after all the complaints about splitting a pamphlet of a novel into three parts, Peter Jackson is playing a joke on us: This is what you get when you ask for Middle-earth-lite. Characters we've come to love or loathe arc into nothing; others (e.g. Beorn and Radagast) are given literally seconds of screen time; and for the first time in this prequel trilogy, a whole chapter (The Return Journey) is pretty much elided entirely.

    I'd like to be clear on my admiration for what Peter Jackson has done with The Hobbit so far. For all The Lord of the Rings' mythic grandeur and complex world-building, there's a warm geniality and brisk impetus to these lovingly crafted films. And those qualities are married to a thematic depth missing from its bedtime story source. Home and borders are themes that have run through this trilogy, from Bilbo's (Martin Freeman) heartfelt declaration of solidarity at the end of An Unexpected Journey, to Kili's (Aidan Turner) fevered speech to Tauriel (Evangeline Lilly) as she heals his wounds in Desolation, when they realise reconciliation is possible. Heck, I even like the addition of Tauriel - though her unsatisfying conclusion is perhaps typical of a final chapter that too often fails to tie up its loose ends.

    The movie kicks off from precisely where the second ended, with the dread dragon Smaug (Benedict Cumberbatch) descending upon Laketown. The citizens flee but nothing can stop the cataclysm - until a certain someone finds an ingenious way to pierce the beast. Then there's nemesis #2: Sauron (also Cumberbatch). We get to see some familiar faces face-off with this faceless monstrosity.

    The story then enters its most intriguing phase: a kind of psychodrama involving Thorin (Richard Armitage) and his sickening relationship with gold and power. It's the one time we really glimpse that signature Jackson oddness, in a wonderful hallucinatory sequence where Thorin imagines he's sinking in a lake of gold.

    The narrative follows the book fairly closely. This was, after all, the stage of the story where Professor Tolkien finally foregrounded politics and ethics and the machinations of characters ahead of adventure. The film is at its most successful in the quieter moments, as Thranduil (a subtle Lee Pace) ponders the duty of the elves; as Bard (a brooding Luke Evans) comes to the gate of the mountain to plead for peace; and as Thorin struggles with his "dragon-sickness" (i.e. greed), while Bilbo wrestles with the dilemma of what to do with a certain stolen gemstone.

    Thorin was presented at first as this trilogy's Aragorn. But over time we've learned of the dangerous pride that ruined his grandfather. Thorin's hubris and arrogance is in stark contrast to Bilbo's very relatable and achievable traits of decency and humility. The gulf between them is intriguing and wisely plundered for drama. Armitage and Bilbo provide the best performances of the film - mostly internal; mostly in the eyes - and their farewell is one of the more moving moments in a trilogy that has largely prioritised humour over pathos.

    The battle itself is undoubtedly impressive - great roaring hordes punctuated with spectacular giants - but in a sense it compounds the problem of the relatively truncated runtime. What was already the shortest Middle-earth film is rendered artificially even shorter by the fact that there's 45 minutes of virtually wordless fighting. By now we should all be braced for Super Legolas and his physics-defying fighting style. That reaches new heights here; as he sprints up a crumbling bridge like he's on the wrong escalator, it's like some sort of visual satire on the weightlessness of CGI.

    With its last bastion and swarming armies, the titular battle resembles The Return of the King's Pelennor finale - yet that movie took breath between its showdowns. Galadriel vs. Sauron; Legolas vs. Bolg; Thorin vs. Azog... it's like we're watching someone finish off a video game but we're powerless to stop them skipping the tension- or character-building cutscenes. Moreover, the dubious editing decisions create some strange and jolting juxtapositions and tonal lurches, and negate the sense of time passing or of great distances being crossed.

    The result is a film that really earns its status of "theatrical cut", insofar as it resembles many a boisterous blockbuster. This is fairly damning criticism for a Middle-earth movie, usually so luxurious and layered in its sense of a unique world. There's plenty of meat here - but where are the bones that hold it all together? 11 months away, perhaps.
  • comment
    • Author: invincible
    As a fan of the books first and the movies second I have willingly celebrated the achievement of Peter Jackson and his team for bringing this wonderful world to the screens.

    Sadly on this occasion I cant feel quite so enthusiastic. Without a shadow of a doubt this is the worst blockbuster movie I have ever seen.

    The excitement of waking up to the day having finally arrived to have one last cinema experience in Middle-Earth was soon turning into cinema nightmares.

    A direction less mess from start to finish that only got worse as this movie went on, from the opening sequences of Smaug having his revenge on Lake-Town and Bard using his son as a make shift aim for his bow this simply descended into a ridiculous aimless shambles.

    Our beloved Mr Bilbo Baggin's reduced to a secondary character of no weight or meaning was soon a small quibble compared to the elf- centric nonsense which ensued. Riding bats was bad enough before the ultimate insult of Legolas using a sword as a sort of remote control to crash a troll type enemy into a tower which becomes the setting for quite simply the worst piece of cinema ever used.

    I could go on for ever, this films redeeming feature is that it ended. Christopher Tolkien was quoted saying that these movies had reduced the beauty and aesthetic of his fathers work to nothing and it had been absorbed into the absurdity of our time, and I believed he was wrong as he was talking about Lord of the Rings but his words are fitting for this monstrosity of overblown Hollywood Esq movie making.

    I am certain that action fans think this is a fitting end to this adventure but as a fan of the books and the previous films I for one am offended by what was put in front of me. The beauty, emotion and heart of this wonderful story of a Hobbit that had an adventure was taken and ripped to pieces by terrible movie making.

    A sad end for all the wrong reasons.
  • comment
    • Author: Cha
    Well, I have to say that I'm glad that's over. The final movie was well worth the price of admission, which in my case was a free ticket to a preview screening.

    I found this movie to be a stretch and as the final movie in a trilogy that was getting less interesting the further you went into the series, I left feeling extremely disappointed, and glad I didn't pay for the premium experience (3D, Imax, etc).

    There was a little too much CG this time around, and it wasn't even all that great. Case in point two close scenes with a rider approaching and leaving were clearly CG...they couldn't even afford to use a real horse and rider? Come on...

    The battle scenes went on way too long and in parts were even more ridiculous than the "riding the broken wooden bridges all the way down to the bottom of the cavern..." scene in the earlier edition of this series, and since the battle scenes were pretty much all that carried this movie, well...

    Yes, this movie does have to be seen and it should be viewed on a big screen. However, in the opinion of this reviewer, waiting until it appears in a second run theatre will provide better value for money.

    It's a movie that wraps up a series, but when compared to Peter Jackson's original LOTR work it pales and is as pale as an orc who has been working in the basement of Orthanc. At night. With the lights out.
  • comment
    • Author: Giamah
    In Jackson's defense: the project was ambitious to begin with. Turn 310 pages of children's literature into an epic Hollywood trilogy. Many debates go on about which movie was the best: the fairy tale, the one in-between, or the die hard-alike final. The sad truth is, that to a pure fan, they are, one by one, in their own unique ways, an abomination.

    What can one expect, from a battle that starts in the third-to-last chapter in the book, but that goes on for 144 minutes in the film adaption? Granted, some of the battle scenes were innovative. In fact, the beginning, the cooperation between the elves and dwarfs, who had been ridiculing each other like Tom and Jerry at first, was most entertaining. For a few minutes, at most. But not for two hours.

    Of course, the writers realized this. Therefore, these bombastic large- scale battles were altered with individual scenes. And this is where all touch with Tolkien faded. Not only were the action scenes needlessly absurd, (I think of Legolas jumping from one falling stone to another, of Azog opening his eyes in an o-so-melodramatic fashion we've seen way too many times, and of Brad's ridiculous carriage scene) but the individual stories weren't nearly as grasping as they should have been.

    And this can be forgiven for Thranduil and his son, in an unsuccessful ending scene, that was empty of any convincing emotions, in an attempt to make a bridge to the Lord of The Rings series. This can even be forgiven for Thorin, the classic anti-hero who goes mad after barely a few days of being around his treasure, but realizes his true destiny just in time, only to die an honorable death, in order to obtain forgiveness for his 20-minute-earlier sins. But this can't be forgiven for the Hobbit. Bilbo Baggins is a supernumerary in his own movie. And that is inexcusable.

    All fans of Tolkien will probably watch this. The feeling I'm left with, is gratefulness for the untouchable Lord of the Rings series. They can never be taken away. "The Hobbit" falls short right there where the Lord of the Rings is most powerful: loyalty to Tolkien. The trilogy did not fail because it grasped for Hollywood-greatness, it failed because Tolkien would watch it and say "What a fine movie! Where'd you get the idea?"
  • comment
    • Author: Wilalmaine
    I first experienced The Hobbit at the age of 4, when my mother read it to me, and I have been a Tolkien fan ever since. And I have been generally disappointed with Peter Jackson's take on The Hobbit since the beginning. Jackson abused the mythos, struck out trying to turn a lighthearted children's book into a trio of Serious Epics, and created bloated, endless action scenes that did nothing to legitimately advance the plot (before this film, the barrel-battle and the golden dragon-dip were the most egregious). I honestly could not think of a single scene which was not addressed more effectively in the cheap 1970s cartoon. And I found it painfully obvious that Jackson was trying to cheat his way to success by hitting all of the same notes as he did in the Lord of the Rings films, whether or not they made sense in this context (the character Tauriel exists solely to be Arwen; the character Alfrid exists solely to be Wormtongue).

    That last point is far and away my greatest complaint about the final effort. I almost didn't believe what I was seeing: the ridiculous, eternal Battle of Five Armies wasn't just reminiscent of Helm's Deep and Minas Tirith, it WAS those battles, shot for shot. Jackson literally plopped the same choreography from his good trilogy into this film and called it done. It's bad film-making, it's lazy, and it's just an inexcusable, cynical cash-grab. For instance:

    -In the lead-up to Helm's Deep, a scared, desperate people streamed (left to right) over barren countryside into the fortress. In BOFA, a scared, desperate people streamed (left to right) over barren countryside into the ruins of Dale.

    -Characters hidden on a rocky outcropping witness the gates of a great enemy fortress open. A massive army streams out, while its general urges them onward from above. Is that Frodo and Sam at Minas Morgul or Legolas and Tauriel at Gundabad?

    -We had a sweeping shot of ranks of spear-bearing Uruk Hai before the walls, who part to allow a mounted leader to advance menacingly through their ranks. Now we have a sweeping shot of spear-baring ELVES before the walls, who part to allow a mounted elf-king to advance menacingly through their ranks. In both cases, we have shots up at the outnumbered defenders peering down from their hastily rebuilt fortress. In both cases, a prematurely fired arrow opens the hostilities.

    -A berserker carrying a bomb ran urgently towards the culvert, leaping headfirst to bring down the wall. Now we have a troll with a ram on his head, who runs urgently and leaps headfirst to bring down a wall. The Uruk Hai/orcs following stream together through the narrow hole, then fan out.

    -Gandalf rides (right to left) up the steep, winding streets of both Minas Tirith and Dale to warn and rally the citizens.

    -Characters say "Send forth the legions", "Kill them all," "The Age of the Orc has begun". In both trilogies.

    -Before, Legolas slid on a shield (left to right) down a staircase to save Gimli, using the shield to impale an Uruk. Now, Bard rides a wagon (left to right) down a hill to save his children, using the cart to bowl over a troll.

    -When All is Lost at Helm's Deep, a heroic younger character confronts the aging king, urging him to fight rather than hiding. The king agrees, and the small band charges out in one final desperate effort while a dwarf blows an impractically large horn. The burly character shouts "To the King!" The attacking Uruks are taken aback by the blinding sun and bowled aside. When All is Lost at Erebor, a heroic younger character confronts the aging king, urging him to fight rather than hiding. The king agrees, and the small band charges out in one final desperate effort while a dwarf blows an impractically large horn. The burly character shouts "To the King!" The attacking trolls are taken aback by... well, nothing, apparently... and bowled aside. Yeah, this one is EXACTLY the same, without even an effort to hide it.

    -In ROTK, Legolas makes his way to the head of a Mumak and brings it down by piercing its brain from above, causing it to crash into another Mumak, resulting in an earth-shaking collapse. In BOFA, Legolas makes his way to the head of a troll (which seems to have morning-stars for feet) and brings it down by piercing its brain from above, causing it to crash into a town, resulting in an earth-shaking collapse.

    -In a one-on-one showdown outside Minas Tirith, Eowyn faces the Witch-King, who is armed with a sword and an improbable mace. In a one-on-one showdown above Dale, Thorin faces Azog, who is armed with a sword-arm and an improbable mace.

    I could cite more examples, but I'm bumping up against the word limit.

    The acting in The Hobbit is generally solid -- Martin Freeman in particular is excellent. But Peter Jackson either ran out of ideas or didn't bother trying. This film is a bloated, self-plagiarizing mess, and the only worthwhile moments are those pulled unaltered from the book.
  • comment
    • Author: Tejora
    If you haven't read The Hobbit and/or if you like the first two movies: I envy you of sorts...

    If someone had told me some years ago that I would consider walking out from a Tolkien movie opening night, I would have slapped them with a cod. Or a salmon. The Hobbit trilogy is crap.

    It's little more than a long list of invented battles and love stories to attract a widest possible audience, as well as loads of idiotic storyline to make the story slide into the Lord of the Rings movies as smooth as an Elven ass.

    I understand that some adaption is required from book to screen, but when dealing with a book more or less only surpassed by the Bible and the IKEA catalogue, one should tread carefully.

    Do yourself a favor. Read the book. Let your mind be the big screen.
  • comment
    • Author: Golden freddi
    * This Review contains a few spoilers*

    The Battle of Five Armies... The last part of a poor trilogy, it made me exited and gave me hope, because maybe it could be like the Return of The king... but no.

    This movie was an embarrassment for Peter Jackson, the man who just got himself a star on the street of Hollywood. This man turns out to be just like all the other Hollywood directors, a money wolf. This trilogy was made for nothing more than money, why 3 parts, why?! And half of the book isn't even concluded in the movies.

    A 260 page book spread in 9 hours in movie could be something awesome, but it didn't. it became horrible. Something that annoyed me : Added characters, no character development, no emotional moments, to many ''you got to be kidding me'' moments, no Dwarfs, Elve or men die in the battle. Where is there brutality of the LOTR? Where in the most epic battles of movie history everything took place : grief, death, epicness, sadness, moments of smiling while having a hard time trying not to let go of some tears, and above all, the fact that you don't know how many of the good people will survive. Well in TBOFA nobody died, expect orcs (CGI monsters).

    And than some other things that made no sense, and are left out. What happens with the Arkenstone, who becomes king under the mountain, where does Tauriel go, what happens to the dwarve, what happens to the lake people, and what about the gems of the Elves?! Isn't that what this movie was all about?? How hard was it to include 15 minutes more and tell this. And why did Peter Jackson change the story about the death of Fili and Kili? Where was the love of brother ship? that's what I liked about the book, it was about love for your brothers, not about the love of a stupid made up elve girl. Oh and above all, Middle- Earth looked life an awful ugly world, while it's supposed to be an amazing wonderful world. Peter Jackson messed up big time

    I think this is enough for you guys to get why this movie was horrible compared to what it could've became, a story rank worthy to the LOTR movies.

    2/10, 1 star because it was Middle-Earth, and 1 star because Bilbo played an amazing role (oh yeah speaking of Bilbo, he looked like a side character, isn't he the main character?)
  • comment
    • Author: Fearlessrunner
    Before seeing _The Battle of the Five Armies_ today, I told people, "The first two films lacked fidelity to the book, but this one should be better." I figured Jackson wouldn't have to add lots of extraneous invented action scenes because the final third of the book contained plenty of action.

    Boy, was I wrong.

    Unnecessary invented characters from the previous films continued to take up screen time in this one, and many new ones were added. Tolkien wouldn't recognize a bunch of grand-scale evildoers or various "good guys" whose relationships were supposed to tug at our hearts, though they turned my stomach instead.

    The additions included plenty of trite dialogue. When one invented character, in a scene made from whole cloth, was shown weeping over a loved one and asking "Why does it hurt so much?", I just about tossed my Junior Mints.

    Meanwhile, a character largely responsible for turning the tide in the book's Battle of Five Armies (note the lack of a "the" before "Five") was shown in the film, without explanation, for about three seconds. Blink and you might miss it.

    When one baddie was apparently killed, I thought, "If he suddenly jumps up and starts fighting again, I'm leaving." Too bad I didn't follow through on my threat after that excruciatingly predictable plot twist.

    Did I mention that Dain, confronting the elf warriors, came across as some nightmare parody of John Cleese performing "The Lord of the Fawlty Towers"?

    I could go on, but "travesty" is about the kindest word I can use for this mass of claptrap. I now fear that Jackson will film _The Silmarillion_, turning it into yet another tawdry, over-the-top CGI fest.
  • comment
    • Author: Fohuginn
    I despise Desolation of Smaug, so I can assure you I went in with minuscule expectations. Even those were shattered. I have disregarded the book in this review, because the book was ruined back in Desolation of Smaug. I watched this as a movie, ignoring everything I knew about how it was meant to go.

    Picking up exactly where Desolation left off, Smaug comes to his fiery end within ten minutes of the film's beginning, which only serves to highlight the terrible decision to split the film into three and to make the cuts where they did. We then spend roughly forty minutes waiting for the infamous 45 minute battle scene to begin, and then plead for it to end. Unlike the gripping, tense and endlessly entertaining battle sequences in LOTR, these CGI-heavy storms contained no sense of danger or drama. The laws of physics are suspended to the point where most people in the audience were laughing, and the hideous and unexplained fan service gives the impression that the film was directed by a 11 year old boy with some magic markers.

    Once again the screenwriters run out of Tolkein to fill 2 and a half hours, so invent their own, and the result is cringe-worthy dialogue about love. At the film's conclusion, barely any character is given any resolution save for Legolas (who doesn't appear in the book at all) and to a degree Bilbo himself.

    Martin Freeman performs well as Bilbo, nailing nearly every scene he is in. However, nearly every big name actor in the film collects around 2 minutes of screen time (everyone from Blanchett to Connelly) and most of them feel as if they are going through the motions. Blanchett in particular is given a particularly cringe-worthy part and I hope she was paid well. An unrecognisable and CGI-heavy Billy Connelly gives probably the least inspired performance in the film as Dain, whose role is so heavily reduced that it probably doesn't matter. Ryan Gage's Alfrid is so painfully unnecessary and uninspired that he brings down the movie in every scene he appears.

    Each of the film's deaths is anti-climactic and changed for the worse. The Lord of the Rings trilogy features some of the best cinematic deaths ever - Boromir, Theoden, The Witch-King, the Cave Troll, the Balrog/Gandalf. None of these fare even close.

    Most unforgivingly, the film pathetically pretends to be Lord of the Rings. We first see hints of it when Saruman, Galadriel and Elrond storm into Dol Goldur and Galadriel reprises her role as Green Witch from Fellowship, but it becomes far more blatant later on. BOFA blatantly steals the LOTR Oscar-winning score, it recreates key scenes from Two Towers but replaces the terrifying Uruk-hai with generic CGI white orcs, it sends Legolas off to find Aragorn (which makes no sense) and the final scene is literally taken word for word from the Fellowship of the Ring.

    In Conclusion, please AVOID this film if you have an appreciation for film, Tolkein books, the laws of physics or practical effects. Watch only if you want a demonstration of CGI excess, a Martin Freeman performance (which you can find elsewhere) or are a prisoner whose only escape is by watching this film. Otherwise, please just watch the Lord of the Rings instead.
  • comment
    • Author: Alsath
    How a wonderful book for children became a movie full of noise and void... Poor Bilbo... I felt sad all the time during this last movie, as bad as its predecessor. Unnecessary characters (why Tauriel, why ?!), ridiculous monsters, absurd scenes (Legolas jumping from crumbling stones to crumbling stones), fake sets, loud and empty music, there is nothing to save this movie. Where is the magic of The Lord of the Ring, where the Middle Earth looked so real ? Where is Tolkien's spirit ? Why Peter Jackson could betrayed so much Bilbo ? I sincerely hope that he will do much better in his future projects ; let's forget this trilogy...
  • comment
    • Author: Soustil
    When I went to the theater, I was filled with hope, excitement and joy. I'm the biggest Hobbit fan I know(I adore the movies, the book, and collect all the trinkets and art books I can.), and since the Desolation of Smaug had been a quite good movie, and I had heard Peter Jackson claim this film was going to be even more serious and thriller-y, I naturally assumed it was going to be a dark, thrilling movie that had me on the edge of my seat.

    This was not the case.

    The movie started with an extremely anticlimactic scene that killed suspension of disbelief, and continued on the same track. Smaug, while a masterpiece of animation, was disappointing, as was most of the movie. The film continued, and I was more and more confused- this is not the movie I had expected. It lacked a good plot, was confusing even to me(who has read the book and the production books five times over), and COULD NOT DECIDE WHAT IT WANTED TO BE.

    One second, it was comedy, and while some scenes were amusing enough, some were just cringe-worthy(Peter Jackson's horrendous comic timing making itself known), but these scenes completely ruined the atmosphere of the film, making it dull and bland instead of tense and exciting.

    The only saving grace this piece of badly directed trash had were the scenes with the King of the Dwarfs, Thorin, succumbing to madness, and his relationship dynamic with Bilbo(who had very little screen time for a film about him) These scenes were brilliant, mostly because of the heartfelt and excellent acting of Richard Armitage and Martin Freeman.

    Sadly, even though one feels these scenes should be in center, the movie chooses to focus on dull battle sequences. The scenes that are truly good are hastily skipped over, and we move to classic bad PJ comedy and awful battle scenes. While in Lord of The Rings there were some goofy battle scenes, this movie almost seems like it's trying to make a parody of itself. I did not find many problems with Legolas's gravity defying skills in Desolation of Smaug, but here, it makes you wonder if Middle Earth is actually the moon in regards to the gravity-free atmosphere.

    Other than the terrible battle scenes, we have the focus on a romance plot so bad it almost makes me blush of second-hand embarrassment. It's like the movie is trying to emulate elements from Titanic, but fails miserably. The romance was so forced it might as well be a spoof, and was a complete waste of a female character. I am in favor of female characters being added to the story. In fact, I love it. But here? It is so blatantly clear Tauriel was only added to be Kili's love interest, and it hurts my heart to see female character's butchered in this way.

    (And that's not even mentioning the atrocity that was making Galadriel, who is the strongest person in middle-earth, laying on the floor sobbing and waiting for her strong male wizard companions to help her.)

    The death scenes of some of the characters were underwhelming, except for one, which was emotional enough to make me give this movie my almost-approval, but it is just as many of us feared: This movie gives no screen time or attention to dwarfs who are not Thorin Oakenshield and Kili(we don't even see them fight in this movie. They just stand in the background.)

    So, to sum it up, if you expect a thrilling experience, you're out of luck. The movie was generally poorly paced, poorly directed, with really awful CGI, conflicts that were created, solved and sometimes forgotten in the blink of an eye, and an excess of Legolas.(WHO IS LITERALLY JUST THERE TO LOOK PRETTY AND DO STUNTS.). It is a worth watch if you're a fan, but only for a couple of scenes that the director seemed to have deemed unimportant despite them being the only reason this movie was even worth the name. Tasteless jokes, awful fight scenes, terrible cheesy romance that puts the notebook to shame, and more questions than answers in the end. Peter Jackson truly did not deliver, even though it's clear he tried.

    He simply tried too much.
  • comment
    • Author: Braswyn
    Although I really enjoyed the first and second one, I didn't want to watch the third one because pretty much everyone I knew said it was disappointing. Well I watched it today and was so disappointed in myself for giving too much credit to what other people think over what Peter Jackson presented through the film's two predecessors. The film was really fast paced and didn't have any dragging lagging boring scenes. There was always something going on that had my full attention, not to mention very emotional and memorable ones that were hard to find in films that I've watched over the past 2 years. Everyone comes from different backgrounds so obviously not everyone's going to like or dislike the same movie, but I thought this one really had depth and I regret not seeing it in theaters. Peter Jackson's films only get better and better IMO.
  • comment
    • Author: riki
    So... That was The Hobbit: The Battle of the Five Armies. The final film in Peter Jackson's six-film Middle-Earth saga.

    This may just be Jackson's most ambitious film yet. It has to work as a standalone film, it has to be the final part of a trilogy, and it has to be the bridge between The Hobbit and The Lord of the Rings films. Ambitious?

    Let me state for the record that I'm an enormous fan of the Lord of the Rings films. I consider them to be the best trilogy of all time. However, I didn't really have that same vibe with the Hobbit films. I admit, when I heard they would begin making more Middle-Earth films, I was excited. The thought of returning to Middle-Earth was exhilarating.

    Then, in December 2012, the first Hobbit film has its release. I was disappointed. It may have been because I didn't know what to expect, but it certainly wasn't what I had hoped it would be. There was too much goofy humor, and it was close to putting me to sleep at times.

    Come December 2013, The Desolation of Smaug is released. Looking back, I think that this film was intended to split audiences. This film deviated so much from its source material that, at times, I forgot what I was watching. Suddenly, there was a Dwarf-Elf love story, suddenly Thorin's company of Dwarfs split up, suddenly they're fighting Smaug, and then the film ends.

    Now, here we are in 2014, with the conclusion to the Hobbit films, The Battle of the Five Armies. This film literally starts off where Desolation left off, with Smaug destroying Lake- Town. A breathtaking sequence. Beautiful visuals remind us that Thorin's actions will bring some devastating consequences.

    However, the sequence loses me a bit by cutting away to the Master of Lake-Town and Alfrid, who I guess were meant to be comic relief, but I ended up wishing they'd die. Not because I didn't like their characters, but because I thought they were so annoying and distracting from the overall experience.

    After a very Lord of the Rings-esque recovery scene, we meet Bilbo and Thorin's half company of Dwarfs at Erebor, and you can tell Thorin has changed. He's become sick with the aptly named Dragon Sickness, and Bilbo can tell that something isn't quite right about him. Little do they know that Azog (Who is, like, the evilest thing ever.) is marching towards Erebor, as well as the Elvenking 'Mr. Fabulous' Thranduil, is also moving towards Erebor, resulting in a literal clash of the titans.

    What we end up with is an enormous battle, so large in fact, that it shares title with the film. And now is also when Peter Jackson displays his qualities and faults as a film director. He manages to makes his battles very intimate, despite the chaos that you see on the screen. However, he has shown a particular love for goofy stuff, and after three films, he finally almost got it. There still is goofiness for people who crave that, but for the rest of us it comes off as dumb excuses for cheap laughs.

    But damn, this film has a lot of CGI. And some of it doesn't even look finished! Some sequences looked like video game cutscenes at best, and at points I had to take off my 3D glasses because I had no idea what was happening. Note to self: Never see a 3D film again.

    However, all things must come to an end, and in this film, there are so many cases that are left unsolved, almost to the point where it baffled me. We're introduced to Thorin's cousin, Daín Ironfoot, who I'm pretty sure is a CGI version of Billy Connolly. Suddenly, he's gone, and we're left wondering where he went, and we never see what happens to them again. Same thing happens to Beorn, Tauriel, Bard, and *sigh* Alfrid, just to mention a few.

    That's this film's main problem; It opened too many doors without shutting them. Does that analogy make sense? There's almost no resolution to any of the characters except for Bilbo, masterfully portrayed by Martin Freeman, by the way. For a film series called The Hobbit, he doesn't appear nearly enough. I'm looking at you, Tauriel! Get out of the frame!

    In conclusion, this is a worthy final installment in The Hobbit Trilogy, and a film I consider to be the best of the three.

    Pros: Great acting, well-directed battle sequences, Howard Shore (Need I say more?), good visuals.

    Cons: Lack of resolutions, obnoxious characters, too much CGI, some cheesy moments.

    All in all a fine holiday film. If you enjoyed the previous Hobbits, you'll like this one.
  • comment
    • Author: Vertokini
    I was distinctly underwhelmed by the first two Hobbit movies, I thought they were good but just that "Good" They live in the shadow of the Lord Of The Rings movies and simply paled in comparison and so going into The Battle Of The Five Armies I expected more of the same.

    According to both IMDb and the profit margin this was the most poorly received of the franchise, clearly people did not like the film by comparison. But as usual, I have to be different.

    I consider this to not only be the best of the Hobbit franchise but also hot on the heels in quality as the LOTR trilogy.

    The story culminates beautifully and if you can get past the many changes that were made you'll see the finale of a wondrous tale and a battle on screen that blew me away.

    Once again the fantastic cast, stunning score, mind blowing effects and sheer beauty envelope you into the world of Middle Earth and I was gripped.

    Yes its not flawless, but it is pretty damn close.

    The Good:

    Amazing opening

    Action scenes are brutal

    James Nesbitt

    Evangeline Lilly

    The Bad:

    Still a lot of changes

    Fili's death was poorly done

    Things I Learnt From This Movie:

    I <3 the "Ol twirly whirlies"

    Headbutting and bare fist punching steel helmets seems rational to people in Middle Earth
  • comment
    • Author: Sennnel
    I have read the Hobbit twice. I love the LOTR trilogy of films, they're my favorite films ever. I was initially disappointed with the first Hobbit film because my expectations were set so incredibly high from the first three. Having watched it again recently, I can see that it's a great film. A lot of people are upset with this film because it isn't the book. All I have to say is that books and films are entirely different art forms. If you cut and paste the hobbit onto a movie, you get a very bad film. Anyone can be a critic, not anyone can bring one of the most beloved stories of all-time to life on the big-screen. What Peter Jackson has done, along with all of the very talented people who spent years and years of their lives making these film, is nothing short of brilliant. We should be thanking this man for what he has done, not criticizing every little thing we didn't like about the films. You can't please everyone. Also worth noting...The Hobbit was written for kids and it's pretty silly a lot of the time. The trilogy wasn't written for another 20 YEARS and the whole idea of Middle Earth as we know it today didn't exist. So had Tolkien known he was going to make this little kids book into an epic saga, it's not a stretch to think that he would have made some changes to it. In short, the movies HAD to be different from the books to make them entertaining, cinematically compelling and to keep them true to the spirit of what MIddle Earth and the LOTR trilogy are today. Jackson, and all of the people working on these films are the most passionate fans of Tolkien you could ever meet, heck, they spent the better part of 2 decades making 6 films for us to enjoy. So I am going to say, BRAVO!! Peter Jackson!! Okay, but seriously...I like Tauriel but the whole deal with her and Kili was very awkward. The whole romance is smothered on pretty thick. But I'm not going to let that ruin a fantastic film and a fantastic trilogy for me, and I hope you don't either!! Don't expect the book, don't expect anything and you will have your mind blown. :)
  • comment
    • Author: greatest
    This is one of the worst movies I ever seen. Yes, the former was a cliché phrase, but it goes very well with a movie full of them.

    *** SPOILERS ***

    First of all, who the hell is Tauriel? Where in all the Tolkien mithos is that unnecessary character? And why Tauriel gets more screen time than Bilbo? Damn, Jackson! Second, the extreme overuse of (bad) CGI. Sometimes seems that the orcs are just a mediocre 3D model with a poor AI in a bad video game. Sometimes they seems to have been copied and pasted by the hundreds. Where are the details, Peter? Third: the plot is simply awful. There is a lot of clichés, stupid Matrix-like action scenes and, worst of all, the forced love story between Kili and Tauriel. Again, who the hell is Tauriel? Fourth: Where is Beorn in this movie? One of the main characters in the book gives here fifteen seconds and no more, while "Tauriel" gives hours.

    Fifth: What happened with the treasure, with all the gold? What happened with the people at the lake? Sixth: the goats. Why? The PIG. Can you believe it? A damn PIG in the middle of the battle.

    *** END OF SPOILERS ***

    I can write hours and hours about how awful this movie is. Even when I watch it keeping in mind that this isn't an accurate adaptation. But you have the idea.

    My advice? Don't waste your money. Read the book. Again if necessary.
  • comment
    • Author: Grari
    The Hobbit Trilogy will forever be one of those classic polarizing film trilogies where you either love em' or you hate em'. Were they as good as The Lord of the Rings? Hell NO (and it was unfair for anybody to judge them based on a different trilogy based on better books). Were any of the Hobbit movies unwatchable or boring, though? Definitely not. The first one may have been a little slow in the first 40-50 minutes, but after that it turned into a really good story. The fact that all 3 of them are positive on Rotten Tomatoes proves that they were under-appreciated by many Middle-Earth fans. Some people acted like we should be outside Peter Jackson's house with torches and pitchforks. They weren't THAT bad, and they also weren't Lord of the Rings-award winning-ridiculously awesome either.. They were good, not great. B+ work from Peter & Company.

    The Battle of the Five Armies was set up to be the best in the trilogy, but it did fall slightly short of what it could have been. I only had 3 problems with the film (and all 3 are forgivable because what I saw was still epic and satisfying). 1) One of the 5 armies from the book is completely missing from the battle. The orcs fight alongside a large army of wolves in the book, but they chose to just have 2 armies of orcs fighting alongside a handful of trolls, some bats, and maybe a few wolves. I assume the blu-ray extended version might include a lot more wolves/wolf-riders wreaking havoc. 2) Beorn played a HUGE part in turning the tide of battle in the book, but in the movie we only saw like 10 seconds of him fighting. I was hoping to see AT LEAST a minute of him slaying orcs/wolves left and right. 3) Most of the trolls were as large and fearsome as we would expect, but 3 trolls appear at different times in the film and looked about as stupid/cartoonish as they could be. Maybe those trolls were just supposed to be realistically deformed, but they were still distracting to me.

    Those 3 minor problems aside, I still think it was a really good film. It started out with one of my favorite chapters from the book ("Fire and Water") and we've been looking forward to that ever since Desolation of Smaug ended with the dragon flying straight to Lake Town. Then we got to see the White Council battling Sauron and his ringwraiths. After that there was some good character development, drama, and lots of action. The actors did a very fine job with their roles (especially Richard Armitage and Martin Freeman), and the visual effects were stunning. Overall, I enjoyed this return to Middle- Earth and I thank Peter & Company for what they've done with the entire Middle-Earth Saga.
  • comment
    • Author: Mmsa
    The Lord of the Rings trilogy is my favourite movie of all time. But my passion for middle earth doesn't stop there, I am obsessed with this world and in love with the vastness and complexity of its characters and stories. So, did I like the movie? Yes, a lot. Was the movie actually good? That would be more debatable. Before I go into the thick of this review, I just want to remind that I really like the movie, but if it seems that I am highlighting only the negative points it is because they are so frustrating.

    Everything that is wrong with this and the other two Hobbit movies are basic filmaking decisions that are wrongly taken. This is to say that Peter Jackson's brilliance remains, he gave proof in all of these movies that he knows how to direct his films. There is nobody in the world that knows how to stage a battle like him. He takes us through amazing visual choices and complex staging flawlessly. The fluency of everything is magnificent, thanks to an amazing pace. Despite me thinking about the wrongs of it, I could not help but be flattered by the sheer epicness of this. I was genuinely on the edge of my seat, I felt amazing tension at times, I really loved the experience and was attached to the very end to the characters. Every one of them. The duels were fantastic, it was all riveting. But there were simply decisions that were made early on that took away from it.

    Why are these movies shot digitally! Other than looking very bad it does not make sense. The whole 48fps, 3D, digital shooting was a mistake to being with. These films shot have been shot on film, just like the Lord of the Rings, it would have given them a thousand points more. The whole CGI is just too much. There isn't any of the practicality from the first movies and it shows so bad. Digital masses of everything that have no weight and look way too bad for a 500million$ production. I am convinced that by shooting on film and loosing half of the CGi in favour of practicality would make these three movies ten times better. To this point by removing half of the CGI we could also remove all the extravagant madness that comes from it. There are scenes or monsters in this film that would have never even passed first draft back in the Lord of the Rings, because they are so weird and out of the moment (talking for example about that Legolas moment in this one, those of you who have seen the movie understand me). Other than this you do not waste time on characters we don-t give the F***K about! I am really OK with making three movies out of the Hobbit, you know if it's the last time we visit Middle Earth we might as well throw in everything that Tolkien wrote that could fit in. But lets not waste time on Alfrid or the Governor! You know three two/hour movies could have really made it! Anyways, I don't want to indulge in my frustration too much because it would be a waste of time. Go see the movie if you-re a fan like me, you won-t be disappointed more than you were with the other movies. They are really good, but they could have so easily been f****g great!
  • comment
    • Author: Ricep
    I love the first 5 movies by Peter Jackson and this completely disappointed me...The battle could have been much more epic but the problem lies with all of the extra plot lines Peter Jackson decided to throw in (that weren't in the book). Because of those, the movie was forced to focus on tying up any loose ends dealing with those added characters and plots. So, the movie didn't do justice to just how important of a battle this was in Middle Earth history.

    Also, what happened to the elves half way through the battle? In the book, there are supposed to be over 1000 of them. And they don't retreat in the middle of battle.

    And why did Jackson leave out Beorn?? So Thorin could get all of the glory? Dumb...
  • comment
    • Author: Vudomuro
    The third part of the trilogy (?!) is by far the worst ever movie inspired, if inspire is the word to be used in any relation to this movie, by a Talkien book.

    If Peter did it for money - I understand. I hope he is happy for taking the money from people earning 250 EUR per month in my country, and that is with the story which is about how gold eventually corrupts everything. In a way, he proved the point, didn't he?

    But, if Peter truly believes that THIS was the Hobbit, than something is seriously wrong with his reading and directing skills.

    Hollywood at its worst, 144 minutes of violence based on anti-war children book. Could there be a bigger nonsense than this?!

    Fortunatelly, this gives an opportunity for someone to make a good Hobbit movie soon.
  • comment
    • Author: skriper
    In this film you will see: Animated fights containing dwarfs. Animated fights containing elves. Animating fights containing humans. Animated fights containing orcs. Superlarge animated worms which digs through unnoticeable through the ground. Characters you don't care about dieing. Plot devices everywhere. Eagles saving the day... once more... for no reason. Animated animations doing animated things. Legolas breaking even more laws of physics (seriously, that dude must be a god or something.. He jumps like... 30 meter, onto a giant troll which is about 7 meters tall, sticks a knife in his brain, mindcontrols him to knock down a tower which later on becomes a bridge which he will fight another giant orc which will almost die like 123 times and then at the end die once and for all.... lol jk he survived but noes, now he did die and lol we're happy ohno he survived anyway OK now legolas killed him). A love story which feels awfully forced and pointless (srsly... who cares???). Countless forced references to lord of the rings (also sersly... we get it... the hobbit is a prequel, okay, let it go.).

    And lots more. I can go on forever. This film was awful, i feel cheated in so many ways.
  • Cast overview, first billed only:
    Ian McKellen Ian McKellen - Gandalf
    Martin Freeman Martin Freeman - Bilbo
    Richard Armitage Richard Armitage - Thorin
    Ken Stott Ken Stott - Balin
    Graham McTavish Graham McTavish - Dwalin
    William Kircher William Kircher - Bifur
    James Nesbitt James Nesbitt - Bofur
    Stephen Hunter Stephen Hunter - Bombur
    Dean O'Gorman Dean O'Gorman - Fili
    Aidan Turner Aidan Turner - Kili
    John Callen John Callen - Oin
    Peter Hambleton Peter Hambleton - Gloin
    Jed Brophy Jed Brophy - Nori
    Mark Hadlow Mark Hadlow - Dori
    Adam Brown Adam Brown - Ori
    All rights reserved © 2017-2024 hd.thomson-multimedia.com