Search

» » The Swimmer (1968)

Short summary

Neddy Merrill has been away for most of the Summer. He reappears at a friend's pool. As they talk, someone notices that there are pools spanning the entire valley. He decided to jog from pool to pool to swim across the whole valley. As he stops in each pool his interactions tell his life story.

Prior to making the film, star Burt Lancaster, despite being quite athletic, had a fear of water and took lessons from Olympian and UCLA water polo coach, Bob Horn. Lancaster trained at the pool at his own house and one at UCLA.

Burt Lancaster always insisted that this was both his best and his favorite film of his career.

Star Burt Lancaster worked out continuously throughout the production of the film to maintain a high level of fitness. Lancaster did numerous push-ups and sit-ups every morning before each shoot to stay lean and solid. He gained twenty pounds of muscle by doing weights, running, karate and aerobics.

Although the critical response at the time was mixed, critics were unanimous in their praise of Burt Lancaster's physique, especially considering he was 52 at the time of filming.

Burt Lancaster said of this film in an interview with 'Take 22': "...the whole film was a disaster, Columbia was down on it. I personally paid $10,000 out of my own pocket for the last day of shooting. I was furious with Sam Spiegel because he was over at Cannes playing gin with Anatole Litvak whilst he was doing Die Nacht der Generale (1967). Sam had promised me, personally promised me to be there every single weekend to go over the film, because we had certain basic problems - the casting and so forth. He never showed up one time. I could have killed him, I was so angry with him. And finally Columbia pulled the plug on us. But we needed another day of shooting - so I paid for it".

Burt Lancaster called the film "Death of a Salesman in swimming trunks".

The opening paragraph of John Cheever's source "The Swimmer" short story reads: "It was one of those midsummer Sundays when everyone sits around saying, 'I drank too much last night.' You might have heard it whispered by the parishioners leaving church, heard it from the lips of the priest himself, struggling with his cassock in the vestiarium, heard it from the golf links and the tennis courts, heard it from the wildlife preserve where the leader of the Audubon group was suffering from a terrible hangover. 'I drank too much,' said Donald Westerhazy. 'We all drank too much,' said Lucinda Merrill. 'It must have been the wine,' said Helen Westerhazy. 'I drank too much of that claret'."

After the first rough cut was screened, Sydney Pollack replaced director Frank Perry with the latter still remaining the credited director for contractual reasons. Allegedly, Perry did not finish directing this film because of creative differences and was fired by producer Sam Spiegel.

Robert Horn, the swimming teacher who helped Burt Lancaster to prepare for his role, was twenty years younger than Lancaster, who confessed that he would have given anything to have a son like Horn.

William Holden was the first choice for the lead role of the swimmer Ned Merrill for both producer Sam Spiegel and director Frank Perry but Holden turned it down as did Glenn Ford, Paul Newman and George C. Scott before Burt Lancaster, who was eager to play the role, was ultimately cast.

According to assistant director Michael Hertzberg on the Frank Perry director - star Burt Lancaster relationship: "My take is that, in this case, there was nothing wrong with the director, and there was nothing wrong with the actor, but they were just wrong for each other".

Some movie posters for the film featured a long preamble that read: "The famed John Cheever short story appeared in the New Yorker and people talked. Now there will be talk again. When you sense this man's vibrations and share his colossal hang-up . . . will you see someone you know, or love? When you feel the body-blow power of his broken dreams, will it reach you deep inside, where it hurts? When you talk about "The Swimmer" will you talk about yourself?".

Debut theatrical movie credit as an actress for writer-comedienne Joan Rivers.

The main location of Westport, Connecticut was the hometown of director-producer Frank Perry.

The film was made and released about four years after its source short story of the same name by John Cheever had been first published in 1964 in 'The New Yorker' magazine on 18th July and then later in the same year in the short story compendium "The Brigadier and the Golf Widow".

Debut film score composed by music composer Marvin Hamlisch.

Joan Rivers' short scene took seven days to shoot.

Producer-director Frank Perry and screenwriter Eleanor Perry were married at the time that the film was made and released.

Producer Sam Spiegel recruited composer Marvin Hamlisch to compose the film's score after seeing him play the piano at a party.

A documentary about the making of the movie, The Story of the Swimmer (2014) directed by 'Chris Innis' is available on the latest Grindhouse Releasing Blu-ray/DVD combo release of the film, and runs for about 149 minutes, longer than the movie itself.

The source short story by John Cheever that has a length of just a dozen pages was written from a manuscript of notes that totaled 150 pages.

Lyricist Charles Burr wrote lyrics to the main theme, titling the song "Send For Me In Summer". No vocal version was ever recorded and the lyrics were never made public, although the instrumental theme has also become known by that title.

Debut theatrical movie for actress Janet Landgard.

The picture in its initial first theatrical distribution was a commercial failure at the international box-office.

The picture was predominantly filmed on location in the American state of Connecticut in the USA.

Producer Sam Spiegel removed his name from the film's credits.

Burt Lancaster paid for the US $10,000 cost for the one extra day's shooting for the last day of filming.

Linda Evans auditioned for the lead female role.

The John Cheever source short story was originally conceived as being a full length novel.

Principal production took place during the summer of 1966, but the film was not released until 1968.

Shirley (Janice Rule) is reading the January 1967 edition of Films and Filming magazine. Production on this picture began in June of 1966, so this would indicate these are the last scenes that were shot.

Siouxsie and the Banshees' 1978 debut album "The Scream" was inspired by this film.

The film's source 1964 short story by John Cheever published is only twelve pages long.

Some movie posters ran with a tall big blurb set in a gigantic font height that read: "When you talk about 'The Swimmer' will you talk about yourself?".

Although Sam Spiegel took his name off the film, the logo of his company, Horizon Pictures, remains in the credits.

The car Ned gets a ride in is a Rolls Royce Phantom III. Only 727 were made from 1936 to 1939, all with custom coach-works by various builders. As of 2018, even average-condition examples can sell well into six figures dollar-wise.

There are a total of ten pools used for this film - nine residential and one public.

According to an article in the July 16, 1966 edition of the New York Times, Burt Lancaster's wardrobe for the film only consisted of 17 identical pairs of blue nylon swimming trunks.

Janet Landgard and Janice Rule receive 'Introducing' credits'

Joan Rivers portrayed a character, Joan, who had the same first name as her own.

Opening credits: The names and incidents portrayed and the names used herein are fictitious, and any similarity to the name, character or history of any person is entirely coincidental and unintentional.

John Cheever: Uncredited, the author of the source short story "The Swimmer" as a man at the pool party.

Kim Hunter: As Betty Graham.

Joan Rivers: As Joan.

Diana Muldaur: As Cynthia.

Cornelia Otis Skinner: As Mrs. Hammar.

David Garfield: As a ticket seller at a public pool billed as John Garfield Jr.

The scene where Ned Merrill (Burt Lancaster) visits his ex-mistress Shirley Abbott (Janice Rule) was directed by Sydney Pollack.

Barbara Loden's (Shirley Abbott) scene with Burt Lancaster was omitted from the film and was entirely re-shot with Janice Rule playing the part.

Joan Rivers says of her brief appearance in this movie in her autobiography "Still Talking" (1991): "He [Burt Lancaster] redirected every line . . . [director] Frank [Perry] wanted a happy girl who then got hurt. Lancaster was going to be Mr. Wonderful who came up against a mean bitch, and was right not to go off with her. Trying to please both men, I was going back and forth between line readings, and nothing made sense".

User reviews


  • comment
    • Author: Karg
    In the opening scene of the movie a man is seen scampering towards a swimming pool on a beautiful summers day, he dives into the pool, swims a couple of lengths only then to be greeted with a drink at the side of the pool. It is clear from the outset that although he knows the people, he has not seen them for a while. Don and Helen are surprised but genuinely pleased to see their guest and before long they are joined by another couple the Forsbergs who he also knows from his past, they too are overjoyed at this unscheduled reunion.

    We are introduced to Ned Merrill a fit looking middle-aged man who comes across as friendly, likable, perhaps boastful but certainly easygoing. However, he becomes distracted when told of a neighbor the Grahams who have just installed a brand new swimming pool. To the perplexed group Ned announces that he plans to swim home via his neighbours pools. "This is the day Ned Merril swims across the county", he promptly swims a length leaps out of the pool and then jogs away.

    At the Grahams he is also welcomed with enthusiasm particularly from Mrs. Graham, and at this stage we also learn that Ned Merrill is a popular ladies man as he easily flirts with all the womenfolk he meets. However, at the third house the mother of an old friend confronts him as he leaves the pool, she is hostile to him and instructs him never to come around again. This is in sharp contrast to the previous people he encountered and the viewer is left as confused as Ned seems to be.

    At the fourth pool things return to normal, Ned meets a young woman who used to baby-sit his children when they were younger. To the astonishment of her sister and brother she thinks his idea of swimming to his home via neighbours pools is fascinating and offers to join him. They both make their way through the tranquil countryside joking and talking about the old days with out a care in the world. The girl Julie a happy go lucky 20 year old who seems at ease with Ned and informs him that when she was younger she had a crush on him.

    After another friendly encounter at another home full of party-goers who are also pleased to see him, it now becomes clear that Ned was fired from a high flying executive position. Despite trying to put forward a positive persona and ducking awkward questions from the guests he swiftly leaves with Julie.

    By this time Ned has become fixated by Julie and decides to sit down for a while after spraining his ankle while jumping a fence. He is overcome by her beauty and tells her of his true feelings. Julie is shocked and grossed out at this man trying to take advantage of her and decides to bolt and runs back the way she came leaving a stunned and pitiful looking Ned alone by himself. Gone is the beaming complexion and the confident posture for it to be replaced by an edgy and confused look as well as a hunched demeanor. The fit middle-aged man, charming and energetic at the beginning starts to look weak and pathetic as he limps a lonely walk to his next pool.

    From this point on things get worse for Ned Merrill and it seems the nearer he gets to his home the greater the hostility from folks. They all know him but do not want to associate with him. The viewer also begins to feel uncomfortable about Ned,however, this is tempered only by the dislike for the people he meets on his way. At best they are pompous, loud, arrogant, shallow and at worse self-centered, smug and cruel.

    The ending of the swimmer is quite shocking, Ned's American dream is in reality a nightmare, and you are left with an empty feeling. Now you know where he has been all along and why his neighbours have not seen him for a while. It is obvious from the first two houses that he is hiding something and this is confounded by some of the confused expressions on the faces of Ned's old friends; they know something that the viewer doesn't. You are not sure if Ned Merrill is just simply embarrassed and is trying to put on brave face by acting as if things are normal, or else has suffered some form of mental breakdown due to his life imploding on him. At first you believe the former but as the film progresses you begin to see signs of his delusion, confusion and irritability, that quickly points to the latter.

    For example, having trouble with his memory and his unwillingness or inability to comprehend the reality of his misfortunes. It would also explain his misreading of Julie's desire to be with him; it was not come on but rather the need to be with a mature fatherly figure. Was he was imagining that he was younger and in the early stages of courtship with his wife? Was his obsession with the past and his wish to swim the county a desire to rekindle happiness from his adolescence? The swimmer is an engrossing film however it is also disturbing because it exposes the shallowness of suburban life with its trappings of materialism and social status in a provocative way.

    In addition it also raises the spectacle of how callous and contemptuous people can be when you have lost your social gravitates as a consequence of family or employment upheaval. In the swimmer many were all too eager to use the opportunity to mock Ned Merrill now that he had fallen from grace, the men because their wives had desired him and the women because he had rejected them. Others just simply on the basis of past envy, jealousy and resentment toward his family and status.
  • comment
    • Author: Balladolbine
    "The Swimmer" is a one of a kind movie, adapted from a John Cheever short story.

    The Film opens with the sound of footsteps moving through the woods accompanied by a low eerie music. Occasionally animals and scenes of nature both in daylight and at night come into the cameras focus. The camera moves along looking at trees, a lake and the wildlife clearly representing what someone is seeing as they walk along. Eventually, a man clad only in a pair of black swimming trunks emerges from the woods, skips up to the edge of a suburban swimming pool and dives in. Having swum a couple of lengths he is greeted at one end by the owner of the house holding out a drink and welcoming him to come and join his guests. The Swimmer is Ned Merrill (Burt Lancaster) and it soon becomes apparent that everyone at the house knows him and is happy to see him. He is charming and charismatic with the male guests and flirtatious with the females who obviously find him attractive. The other guests have not seen him for quite some time and when Ned is asked where he has been he evasively states "here and there." When further questioned if he has had a good summer he replies "sure, just great." The guests then begin to look puzzled when he gives answers to further questions that just don't seem to make any sense. They exchange confused looks and clearly know something that we don't. Ned, whilst looking out over the Connecticut valley begins to get an idea that he could swim in stages back to his house by using briefly the pools of several of his neighbours. he boldly announces that today he plans to "swim across the county !"

    As Ned visits each house and swims in each pool something more is revealed about his life and how he has behaved towards others in the past. Some people are pleased to see him, others are contemptuous of him and a few downright hate the sight of him.

    What becomes clear (SPOILER AHEAD) is that Ned has been away for a long time and re emerges into the life he once knew believing that it is about two years earlier than the present. He appears to have been a high flying Manhattan advertising executive who had the house, the car, the wife and the money but lost it all by living a life of pure selfishness. We are told that he married into the upper middle class and seems to have been given most of the success he enjoyed. At the various different pools he is revealed as a cheating husband, a bad father, a crook and a "fair weather friend". The result of his behaviour was that his wife either kicked him out or he was fired from his job or both.

    It is possible that Ned's fall from grace brought about a nervous breakdown which has led to his memory loss and distorted view of reality. He may have even been hospitalised for the period that he is absent from the neighbourhood, but the absence is never explained. It is also unclear what became of his wife and daughters. They might simply have left him, but there are hints that they may actually be dead.

    The final scene where Ned eventually arrives "home" and his disillusionment is brought crashing back to reality is a great piece of symbolic storytelling.

    Most of "The Swimmer" was shot in 1966 and finally released in 1968. Maybe back then audiences weren't ready to question the themes that are raised. Central to the story is the falseness of the American dream and how if you're not "somebody" you're not only a nobody, but you're also not even welcome. The film "American Beauty" made in 1998 takes the same swipe at society and is a great film in its own right, but "The Swimmer" made thirty years earlier, is so much more effective at exposing the corrupt underbelly of the professional suburban existence.

    Burt Lancaster played many memorable roles and was certainly in much more enjoyable movies, but I think he does his finest acting in "The Swimmer." He is perfect as the arrogant yet vulnerable and bemused Ned who cant work out whats going on. The movie does appear dated today and the musical score is very sixties, but any serious film fan should definitely see this at least once. It really is unforgettable.
  • comment
    • Author: Akinozuru
    Frank Perry's screen adaptation of the achingly sad John Cheever short story gets the tone of Cheever's story just right, even if the movie itself doesn't have quite the same impact.

    There have been countless strong and powerful films made around the theme of suburban loneliness, and this movie belongs to that genre. There's something so poignant about the idea that someone can exist in a world that's manufactured for the sole purpose of providing its inhabitants with luxury, pleasure and convenience, and still be miserable. You'd think people would have gotten the point by now, and figured out that privilege, wealth and materialism have virtually nothing to do with ultimate happiness, but if our own consumerist culture is any indication, they haven't.

    What helps "The Swimmer" to stand out from other similarly-themed films is the way the story is told. It's only through the reactions of others that we begin to sense what's wrong with Burt Lancaster's character. To us, he looks the picture of middle-aged robustness and health. Lancaster became a much better actor as he aged, and he gives a wonderful performance here, as his bravado and macho virility (the strutting and preening of a man on top of the world) slowly dissolves into a lost insecurity, until the film's final devastating moments leave him as forlorn as a baby.

    What a sad, sad movie.

    Grade: A-
  • comment
    • Author: Eigeni
    Ned Merrill, a Park Avenue (New York) executive, who marries into money (his wife Lucinda), produces two daughters (Ellen and Aggie) and lives a self-centered, self-serving, philandering life in a wealthy suburban community in Connecticut, has been absent from his social circle for a while. The entire story takes place on the day that he reappears. The length of his absence and where he was and what he was doing during the absence remains a mystery in this story. All that is certain is that Ned has had some sort of psychological break (amnesia or repression) and has lost the last two years of his memory. He thinks that it is two years earlier than it actually is. Generally, whatever was going on in his life two years ago is what he thinks is going on in this life on this day. Complicating this basic problem is an unstable perception of time, in which Ned's mind regresses in time during the course of this day, this regression revealing itself in Ned's comments concerning his daughters, Ned describing his daughters as being younger and younger as the day wears on until he is partially shocked back to reality (at the eighth pool, that of the Biswangers) into thinking that it is only two years earlier than it actually is. Between this partial shock back to reality and the end of the story, Ned is forced to remember what he has chosen to forget. On this day, Ned Merrill decides to `swim across the county,' that is, to `swim home' on `the Lucinda River,' a trek comprised of ten swimming pools that lead to his house: (1) the pool of Don and Helen Westerhazy, (2) the pool of Howard and Betty Graham, (3) the pool of Mrs. Hammar (this pool is not mentioned when Ned initially maps out the Lucinda River), (4) the pool of Mr. and Mrs. Lear, (5) the pool of Roger and Enid Bunker, (6) the pool of Mr. and Mrs. Halloran, (7) the pool of Mr. and Mrs. Gilmartin, (8) the pool of Henry and Grace Biswanger, (9) the pool of Shirley Abbott and (10) the public swimming pool. The evidence of what Ned has chosen to forget (as well as some things that he never knew), like pieces of puzzle, is revealed in what is said by the people with whom Ned interacts on this day, whereas what Ned chooses to remember is revealed in what he himself says. A good movie, I think. The viewer has to pay attention to the details in order to put the puzzle together. Burt Lancaster was 53 to 55 years of age during the filming of this movie. Most guys stop looking that healthy 20 years earlier.
  • comment
    • Author: Bajinn
    I still have dreams where I'm at summer camp; 10 years old and running through the woods. The sun barely breaks through the thick forest canopy. There is no way for me to recapture that feeling in my adult life. No backpacking trip in a national park or well-planned vacation to an unspoiled beach can provide it. This is the problem of privilege: What seems to be a gift is really a loan. We spend the rest of our lives paying back this debt. This movie is fantastic. Burt Lancaster is the man. If you are a film fan and an American and you have not yet seen this film, then be careful! Save this one for a rainy day because you won't find many more like it. It's about living in the past, in a dream of what the present should be. It's about a privileged, womanizing, self-obsessed middle aged man who comes up with a plan to swim home that is clear only to him. "Why would you want to do that?", people keep asking him. Watch this movie alone and then don't talk to anyone about it. Keep it secret. Let it fuel you.
  • comment
    • Author: Buge
    EVERYONE has films that for some strange reason, seemingly completely out of sync with one's age and place and station in life at the time, resonate and then some, impacting that person for years to come.

    For me, the two that stand out in that regard are 1968's "The Swimmer" and 1973's "Save the Tiger," both dark character studies dealing with morality, amorality and the twists and turns of complex lives not always so well lived by their middle-aged characters.

    Why I identified with these characters at such an early age myself I have no idea, only that their serpentine screen dilemmas provided a kind of moral road map in the real world, at least for me, and did their jobs as cinematic storytellers in staying with me all these years, still.

    "The Swimmer," taken from a short story by John Cheever, stars Burt Lancaster as Neddy, an upper-class Connecticut man whom we find lounging poolside with friends in an affluent suburb.

    It occurs to him that he can "swim home" by visiting pools of friends and acquaintances, a route that he sees as a kind of "river."

    As the man swims, we begin to understand more and more about his life, or think we do, and he evolves through conversations, confrontations and offhand comments, until he winds up ingloriously at a public pool and, finally, standing shivering in the pouring rain before the gates of his mansion in one of filmdom's most surprising endings.

    Many fascinating characters people the film, played by many a recognizable face, including Joan Rivers (yes, that Joan Rivers), John Garfield Jr. (son of the great noir star), Janice Rule, Marge Champion (dancer-choreographer Gower Champion's better half), Kim Hunter and Janet Landgard.

    The film was directed by Frank Perry (with some scenes overseen by Robert Redford's frequent collaborator, Sydney Pollack, who is uncredited), with a screenplay by Perry's wife, Eleanor.

    "Save the Tiger" stars Jack Lemmon as Harry Stoner, a clothing manufacturer who is undergoing the loss of youthful idealism as he weighs whether or not to pay an arsonist to torch his factory so he can survive financially through the insurance settlement. His friend and business partner is played by an extraordinarily effective Jack Gilford, a rubber-faced actor with the saddest eyes you'll ever see best known to a generation as the Cracker Jack man.

    Like Lancaster's Neddy in "The Swimmer," Lemmon's Stoner in "Tiger" is undergoing more than an evolution, but a breakdown, not only emotionally, but spiritually as well. Each story is a type of first-person morality play as seen through the eyes of these central characters.

    Lemmon won the best actor Oscar for his performance (beating out, among others, Redford, for his turn in "The Sting"), and the film was voted best drama by the Writers Guild of America.

    Both films seem to have evaporated into the mists of time, little remembered or considered by generations that came after.

    But they've stayed with me, I like to think because they were both beautifully rendered and had something worthwhile to say, expressing it uniquely and well.

    If you're in the mood for thought-provoking character studies that will stay with you long after viewing, and for all the right reasons, I recommend giving them a look.
  • comment
    • Author: Cells
    I saw this movie in 1968 when it came out, and have never been able to forget it. I never found anyone who had ever heard of it--a shame. It's my favorite Burt Lancaster performance: I can't imagine anyone else doing the role justice.

    When Neddy is ready to leave the garden cocktail party he has been invited to, he looks out across the valley and sees the row of pools, all belonging to his neighbors. He's obviously a poet, and sees the chain of pools as a river (Metaphor). He decides to swim back home. Little does he, or we, know at this point what going home means! He goes from house to house, he greets his friends and jumps into their pools. We become a little worried as things seem to get a little out of hand--a little more so at each house. It's not long before we realize that this "river" is (Meta-Metaphor!) a trip through time, through his life--and that he has made one fine mess of it. The ending is amazing, and almost unbearable.
  • comment
    • Author: Zan
    "The Swimmer" was a critical and financial disappointment back in 1968 when it was released because it was a subject matter that was never covered before in the movies, as far as I know. The film was so ahead of it's time that the viewers back then couldn't quite understand just what it was trying to tell them.

    The movie starts off with Ned Merrill, Burt Lancaster, coming out of the woods in rural Connecticut wearing nothing more then bathing trunks to his neighbors Donald and Helen Westerhazy, Tony Bickley and Diana Vander Vils, home. After impulsively taking a dive into the Westerhazy's swimming pool Ned gets the idea of going home by swimming in all of his neighbors pools, that ring the neighborhood, until he reaches his home on the other side of the woods.

    The Westerhazy's seem happy and at the same time surprised to see Ned who seems, by their conversation with him, to have been away for some time. From what we can gather from the talk between Ned and the Westerhazy's Ned's, or Naddy as they call him, a very successful person in both his work and his marriage to his lovely wife Lucinda with whom he has two beautiful daughters; in short Ned is a success in everything that he ever did.

    We first begin to notice that there's something wrong with what Ned's talking about himself and his wife and daughters when his neighbors seem startled and taken back a bit by Ned's boasting, that's the only word I can come up with in regards to the way Ned is talking about himself. The Westerhazy's want to say something but settle not to and seem to play along with Ned's story telling. It's like you would do with a youngster who's making up things in order not to hurt his or her feelings.

    As Ned starts to swim from swimming pool to swimming pool every one of his neighbors who's pool he swims through begin to put a piece of the puzzle of Ned's life into place. Even the swimming pools that Ned swims through begin to take a different look like the insight that the audience gets about Ned's past.

    Going from swimming pools in private homes and mansions to the public pool at the local recreation center where Ned has to borrow .50 cents, which came as a great shock and embarrassment to him and his ego, to swim in. We also begin to see during his swimming adventures in the movie Ned slowly being worn down. Vigorous and athletic looking in the beginning of the film, for a 50 or so year-old, Ned turns into a broken down and pathetic looking old man toward the end.

    Even though the movie doesn't come right out and say it the audience comes to see just what Ned is really all about through the people that he meets, who reveal bit's and piece's of his past, in his quest to swim home through their swimming pools; And at the same time so does Ned by the time he makes it home.

    Ned's the type of person that everyone watching the movie can either relate to or identify with as someone that everyone's come across in their life. Ned's a person who lives in a dream world that he built around himself and doesn't want to see reality until it hits him right between the eyes. You have to see the movie a number of times to realize what it's trying to tell you about Ned: What he's all about? Where does he come from? What's the story with his wife and daughters? What did he have to do with those neighbors that he comes in contact with in the movie and most of all what state of mind is Ned in?

    You somehow begin to realize that there's something wrong with Ned almost as soon as you see him but you just can't put your finger on it. "The Swimmer" makes you think, as soon as the credits start to roll down the screen, where you know that something isn't quite right with the picture and the person in it but it takes some ninety five minutes to see it for what it is. The movie does it by putting together all the swimming pools that Ned swims through like some kind of cleansing of Ned's soul that conditions him for the hard reality that's about to strike him at the conclusion of the film.
  • comment
    • Author: Zodama
    Judging by the comments here, apparently I'm not the only one who was incredibly moved by this masterpiece--a masterpiece of storytelling on Cheever's part, that is, and a more than passable film portrayal of what one might call "the perfect short story." If HBO had existed in the 1960s, and Rod Serling had written for it, this is what "Twilight Zone" might have looked like: a tangled, twisted terrain of the human psyche that leads to the deepest of our fears--and the most profound of our hopes. The stakes for Ned Merrill, as we come to discover, are about as high as they can be for any character not caught in a literal life and death struggle. But he might as well be, judging by the size and fearsomeness of the phantoms that haunt his way. For this reason I think I'd say that other than *Glengarry Glen Ross,* this is the most terrifying film ever made.

    In contrast to many others, however, I don't think Ned is delusional: I think he's spent so long believing his own publicity, as it were, that he hasn't fully accepted what has happened to him. (And of course, "what has happened to him" is almost entirely of his own making, which makes his predicament all the more painful because it seems to offer no hope of redemption.) And he's clearly one of those hail-fellow-well-met types who, when he promises he's going to do something for someone--as he continually does in the movie, right up to the point where he promises to pay his bill to a local proprietor--he truly means it, at least in the moment.

    Additionally, "The Swimmer" seems like far too profound a work to tie it to themes as dreary and shopworn as the emptiness of suburban life or the dark side of the American dream. Granted, a great deal of powerful literature, dating back at least to Nathanael West's *Day of the Locust*, has been written around the second of these ideas, but "The Swimmer" seems to speak to something much deeper, a haunted place in the human soul. In the ads for the movie--which, in sharp contrast to the brilliant development of the story itself, attempted to lay out all the details in a way at once pedantic and almost pandering (as previews in those days tended to be), a voice-over asks if the viewer might see Ned in him- or herself.

    *The Swimmer* is an epic, but an unusual one. Not because of the small scale and the deceptively trivial-seeming stakes involved it the epic journey--that's an idea Joyce introduced years earlier in *Ulysses*--but because of that journey's destination. Ned isn't going toward a new land, but back--back to nothing short of Eden. And if it's an epic, then he's a hero of sorts, and not entirely an antihero either. After all, even with all the things you learn about him along the way, it's hard not to root for Ned Merrill.
  • comment
    • Author: Mojind
    This movie is not for everyone, but everyone I know who's seen it admits that it's one-of-a-kind. Burt Lancaster is flat-out powerful in the lead, as the man who decides one day to swim his way through his neighbors' pools to his home. As he makes his way pool by pool we learn more and more about Burt's real character. A kaleidoscopic study of how we see ourselves, versus how others see us. One of my favorites, please give this movie a shot.
  • comment
    • Author: Phobism
    This hugely impressive and somewhat obscure film is a troubling psychological drama about a man called Ned Merrill (Burt Lancaster) who appears in his neighbourhood after an absence and decides to 'swim home' to his family house on the other side of the county via all of his neighbours swimming pools. The beauty of The Swimmer is the way in which it is so cleverly structured. At the outset, Merrill seems like a popular and successful businessman and family man but quickly cracks begin to show in his persona. The way in which this is communicated to the audience is via the reactions of the people Merrill meets on his journey. We increasingly discover as he travels from pool to pool that he is not only far from universally liked and respected but that he is also a mentally unstable man who appears to be living in some self-constructed fantasy world. The story-telling approach allows the audience to piece together the narrative from various fragmented bits of indirect information and other very direct hostile reactions. Each neighbour that Merrill encounters acts as a mirror which reflects a dark truth and a different protective layer is peeled back so that we increasingly see who and what Ned Merrill actually is. Among other things, via these encounters we discover that he is a poor friend, is an unfaithful husband and has trouble differentiating between fantasy and reality. As he gets closer to his home, the events he experiences get more and more brutal in their savage self-revelation. At the beginning of his journey he is a picture of health amongst his affluent suburbanite friends, while at the end he is a broken man who pathetically has to scrounge his way into a public pool. The gorgeous weather and beautiful greenery of the fabulous properties that Merrill travels through act as a direct comparison to the very dark nature of the actual story. This is a day in the life of a damaged man, a man who is clearly not a good person, a middle-aged man who in one very uncomfortable scene appears to make a pass on a teenage girl on the basis that she had a crush on him as a little girl. The Swimmer is certainly not a breezy tale despite the attractive setting.

    Burt Lancaster is extraordinary in the central role. Repeat viewings of the film only emphasise the brilliance of his performance. It's a very complex role and Lancaster is the dark soul of this compelling tragedy. He is very ably supported too by a very nice pool of actors in the other roles. But it ultimately is Lancaster's vehicle. What makes the film so good though is the combination of this top-class acting, with a great script and intelligent narrative construction; add to that the beautiful suburban Connecticut scenery and you have a superlative drama. The Swimmer is an excellent film that doesn't necessarily give it's audience all the answers but it has enough respect for you as a viewer to allow you to construct it's puzzle yourself, it of course comes highly recommended.
  • comment
    • Author: Nilador
    A man beyond middle-age living in tony, upscale Connecticut environs decides to swim home from one neighbors' swimming pool to another, drinking cocktails all along the way, engaging in friendly, empty banter and confronting all the demons of his life -- most of his own making. This is a late '60s experiment (and, thankfully, they were more experimental in the main in the '60s than today) that takes an exceptional short story by the uniquely American master teller of modern tales, John Cheever, and expands it into a character piece for the wonderful Burt Lancaster. Here he's playing an ordinary business executive stuck in an early '60s, three martini lunch time warp, a Viet Nam era/Hippie-Nation prevailed-upon Upper West side would-be master of the universe. A man who is strangely out of place and out of time and will suffer a fate, maybe cruel, maybe just, but one that he is entirely complicit in despite any protest. This is engagingly dark stuff told under the glare of a late summer bright sunny sky. The film's flaws are bound to its era of production -- auto-camera zooms and sunlight flares and delirious music montages -- but they mean little compared to the hyper-sophisticated smarts of its dialogue and the performances, obviously from Lancaster, but also the unique variety of women he encounters from his past before arriving at his horrible present. "It's a beautiful day! Look at that sky, look at that blue water!"
  • comment
    • Author: Thetalen
    I liked that Burt Lancaster called The Swimmer, about a man who decides to "swim to home" across the relatively quiet upper-middle class suburbia by taking a swim in each of his neighbors swimming pools (and one rec center), "Death of a Salesman in swim trunks." I can still see the connections with the disillusionment of, and a critique by others, of the American (white) middle-class male in the promise of having it "all", but having the connection to Willy Loman and the story of falling so completely from grace and promise (and failing himself repeatedly) marks this as something special in American cinema at the time. And Burt Lancaster, in his 50's by the time he made this, is fit for the part (in more ways than one) and really gets into how this man is so happy to be doing this "adventure" as he calls it, like he's some sort of explorer.

    But what is he exploring? Actual places, or people's hearts and minds? A lot of this can be (or should be, or both) read as an allegory, or some kind of surrealistic dive (no pun intended) into the well-off. These people have such lavish homes and places, none of them have to worry about being without (though a little boy may be taught to value his money early on with a lemonade stand), and of course their pools and/or tennis courts. So with a story like this, adapted from a short piece of prose by John Cheever, the plot isn't really of significance. Although, to that point, it is fascinating for me in watching this how it feels like he *must* swim at each of the places he stops at, even if it's only for several seconds. And at one point when he discovers one pool that's been drained of water - the lemonade entrepreneur can't swim - he mock-swims it. Not great, but close enough.

    So with this extremely basic through-line we get what is more closely related to European cinema of the period: it's a mood piece, all about expressing how this man goes across the spectrum. He is jubilant, happy, accomplished, serious, focused-determined, downtrodden, sad, angry, kind of crazy, bewildered (watch out for those cars in that heavily edited walking-across-a-highway sequence!) and melancholy. The conflicts of the movie come from whether or not those he comes across will be good to him or not; it seems like, for the most part, everyone at least has some familiarity with him and at most they've even had relationships - in one woman's case, Shirley (a fantastic ten minutes for Janice Role), a former lover... on the side, as it were.

    If it has any closer relation than Death of a Salesman, which may have been what was most comparable at the time for Lancaster, it's Mad Men: I could have see Don in a sort of dream episode like this, where everything from masculinity to ethical codes to psychology and how men treat women and objects and possessions comes into question. And Lancaster is the one here going through these emotions, to plumb the depths to get at what this man may be all about, to excellent effect. There are moments it feels like he could become, well, affected in his delivery but it doesn't happen; he's a passionate person and comes off as such in whatever he's talking about (and it may even come close to being uneasy, like a walk and talk with a much younger woman, an ex "babysitter"). If Lancaster doesn't work than neither does the movie, in large part. I'm glad he gets to deliver here and it's certainly one of his three or four major pieces of acting in a career full of wonderful roles.

    If I don't quite love the movie as much as some out there - a flop on release initially it's gained a following over time (youtube Gilbert Gottfried and TCM, of all people, to see a good talk about the film) - it may be because certain little things make it awkwardly dated. When Ned is walking through the woods to go from place to place it's shot and edited to be fairly dream-like and hallucinatory, which may be fine thematically, but in how it looks today it's stuck in that 60's way of messing with lenses and filters and shots far off with actors speaking ADR that doesn't totally work for me. And there's a short scene at one of the houses where a young Joan Rivers pops up and it feels misdirected (and according to her she was).

    These small misgivings aside, it is a film that is lucky to get its audience over the years. It's at times strange and borderline, darkly, comical, and then by the last half hour as things get grimmer and more oppressive (and that last several minutes when he does get 'home'), it has the feeling of some fable that's gone into the realm of tragedy. We may not understand fully what Ned's gone home to, but there's some intuition that failure is at the heart of it. And maybe the river will flow for someone else some other time...
  • comment
    • Author: AfinaS
    One of the most astonishing films ever made and possibly Lancaster's best work. Based on the short story of the same name, other reviewers have pointed out, correctly, that it received a lukewarm reception at time of release. Indeed it did. Nonetheless, looking at the work with fresh eyes today, it shows almost a prescience of the coming fall of the American Dream. (For a musical version of essentially the same story, listen to Wainwright's 'Going to a Town.') The story begins with the simple tale of a seemingly successful man in Southern California who, just for the sheer joy of it, decides to go home (from where he finds himself) by pool-hopping, a choice as strange then, as it would be now. (Moreso now, with, possibly electric security fences and video cameras). Well-known, handsome, charming, he meets people along the way, even though (in the script) he keeps insisting that he thought most of the homes would be 'empty this time of year.' It is a testament to the writer and director that the work can be interpreted in many ways -- as a drama, as a fantasy, as an allegory, or even (my favorite) as a suburban horror film. By the end of the film both the character played by Lancaster and, arguably, the audience as well, are emotional wrecks. Because nothing is what it appears to be; and you really can't go home again. The film was not only an allegory about America (yes, way ahead of its time) but also about Lancaster's career, for he was just reaching the crossover point where he was no longer A-List, and he could no longer play the roles which had made him iconic. So the irony is double-dipped. One scene in particular - where he meets a young woman on his pool-hop, and while chatting realizes he used to baby-sit for her - is especially uncomfortable, because, without explanation, he asks her to stop what she is doing and come along with him. The meaning is clear in context, and, at the time, it was impossible for a member of the audience not to feel agony while watching. In fact, the entire film is at its best when it makes you uncomfortable. A true horror story, but one definitely not for children.
  • comment
    • Author: Ytli
    --- Spoilers ---

    I love this movie so much it's hard for me to write any kind of in-depth analysis about it.... and the fact that other reviewers did it perfectly well doesn't encourage either.

    One of the great strengths of this eerie film is that we'll never be revealed what happened to Ned Merrill and to his family, so that many viewers can figure out their version of the personal background story for Ned. Well, I'd like to try to figure out my own, just for fun.

    1- Basic facts, given very early in the picture: Ned's been away for quite a long time, as it seems, something like two years. He appears to have been a big corporate executive in Manhattan, rich enough to live in some big mansion located in a wealthy neighborhood. He has a wife, Lucinda, and two daughters. Strangely enough, he only shows up dressed in swimming trunks, bare foot, without any car or vehicle of any kind. Even if he carries himself well, and seems in very good shape, he has a tendency not to answer questions about himself, his life, his family, or in the vaguest way. (Writing skills from John Cheever and the screenwriter: by giving these specific informations early, they're setting up the odd tone of the film.)

    2- Derived facts or light extrapolations: Ned has problems to remain focused (even in the middle of a conversation), he seems "elsewhere", delusional. We're pretty sure he's subject to hallucinations, and we also get the point quickly he cannot see reality as it is. When confronted to hostile people, he looks astounded, totally surprised, as if woken up in an abrupt way. He then loses all his arrogant self-confidence, and at times runs away, literally. (The good filmmaking quality gives the audience the ability to often view things from three points of views: Ned's, his counterparts' - male or female, aged or young, friendly or hostile - and our external point of view.)

    3- Interpretations and extrapolations: everybody seems to recognize Ned easily, from residents to employees, and even teenagers have recollections about him (fourth pool). Needless to say that Ned was some sort of a big man on campus, which could explain why few people will take a chance to push him out directly, only three actually. A kind of "The higher they rise, the harder they fall" situation is plausible, of course, but beside the obvious fact that Ned got bankrupted, other disturbing elements about him are revealed: his educational skills seem poor (he isn't paying much attention to the little boy's safety by the empty pool), he was a definitive womanizer and acting unfaithfully to his wife, while other people seemed aware of it (first pool), he is accused directly to be a crook (recreational center pool) and less than concerned by others' health (the encounter with the mother on third pool). We're also proposed to believe he was a kind of cynical jerk, unable to appreciate the simple pleasures of life, which he apparently can now (the race with the horse). And last but not least, he's portrayed as an actor of segregation (the surrealistic conversation with the African-American Rolls Royce driver) and a miser fellow, as well (sixth pool). (Rather than explaining things with long pieces of dialog, the counterparts' reactions to Ned's behavior and words build a precious indicator of Ned's past life and times.)

    4- Questions: why do some people seem so uneasy when Ned's around? In a scene where he clumsily tries to seduce a woman who never met him before, the lady's husband takes her aside and as he whispers something to her hear, her face gets distraught instantly. Some other people won't hesitate to bully him (eighth pool), humiliate him, pity him or even insult him (the whole recreational center pool sequence). Why this violence? Do Ned's past acts make him deserve this? If he's been just kicked out of his mansion by his wife, why is the house in such a poor condition? Is it more than two years he's been away? Why ain't there any pool in his own backyard?

    So, my assumption? A few years before the movie begins, Ned Merrill was a big shot of an executive, messing around with others, doing only what he wants (the tennis court instead of a swimming pool, the girls must've been pleased), selfish, ignorant, and unfaithful. For some reason, he got bankrupted and his wife, tired of his lies and unwilling to go on with a new life at a smaller scale, decided to leave him, taking her daughters with her. Enraged by this, Ned hit his wife, almost killed her, and therefore got committed to a mental institution, where he received heavy therapy, perhaps shock treatment. Released from the institution, he comes back to his old neighborhood, wandering around, brainwashed (maybe for days, that would explain his sun tan), with all remembrances of the drama wiped. As he decides to pay a visit to his friends at the first pool, his mind starts to trigger his memory…
  • comment
    • Author: EXIBUZYW
    1968 was a pretty damn good year for movies, with movies that are now classics ranging from ROSEMARY'S BABY to 2001 to THE LION IN WINTER and a score or so of others. In a way it is sad that the list of the great films of 1968 usually does not include Frank Perry's THE SWIMMER, a brilliant, challenging film that is difficult to describe and nearly impossible to forget.

    Briefly, the story deals with Ned Merrill, an upper-middle class suburbanite, who appears at the beginning of the film clad only in a bathing suit. Soon it is established that he is on his way home, and that he can "swim home" by swimming across the pools of each of his neighbors on the way.

    Lancaster, at fifty-five here, is still a marvelous figure of a man, and both his physicality and his sexuality are put to good use here, to say nothing of his considerable abilities as an actor. This may well be Lancaster's best performance; it is certainly in the top ten.

    Anyway, "Neddy" shows up on the back patio of some friends and begins his journey, encountering various friends, business associates, a babysitter who had an adolescent crush on him, and a woman with whom he had an affair (Neddy is a married man) along the way.

    Based on a story by John Cheever, THE SWIMMER is sort of a reverse version of THE ODYSSEY. In a classic odyssey, the "hero" encounters many challenges and difficulties throughout his journey, and usually ends up enriched or at least a better person at the end: he grows. THE SWIMMER, on the other hand, is the tale of a man who is gradually being diminished with each pool, each conversation, each encounter, until the final scene, which I will not reveal except to say that it is shattering.

    A lot is left unsaid in this film. For one thing, very often the people Neddy encounters either don't seem to understand what he is doing there or meet him with outright hostility, which leaves him completely bewildered. And if memory serves, we are never told where he has been, only where he is headed.

    That's all I can say. This one has to be experienced; it is the sort of film that every viewer will likely have a different take on. And it engages your imagination and makes you think: who is this man and what has happened to him? The movie only partly answers this question, but that is part of its power: the final scene is devastating and leaves the viewer in the dark about a good many things, which normally I would find irritating, but which in this case is exactly the ending that the story calls for.

    But you must draw your own conclusions; see this one. You may not get it. You may even hate it. But I don't think you'll be able to forget it: I know I couldn't.
  • comment
    • Author: Grari
    The Swimmer is one of the most beautiful movies I have ever seen. The story is simple but unusual. A successful executive - Ned Merrill - (in the end we realize that this is not quite so), in a psychological trance, imagine being in a time before the real and decides to "go home", the metaphor that supports the film. His return happens in a planned way, passing by the pools of his friends and acquaintances, forming what he calls "The River Lucinda", in fact his dream of returning to the woman he lost in his uncontrolled life. In this dream he thinks of his two daughters who would be expecting him too. And by the way he traces he finds people who still consider him and people who despise him, the fruit of what he did of his life until then. It is a very strong metaphor and produces a gigantic film. Burt Lancaster, I think, made the best part of his career here. I think this film could only have been performed with him in the lead role. Each one of us is incorporated into the story, living with Ned all his dramas, every moment of his "return home." The sequence in which he fights a race with a horse is the most perfect that is known, is exquisite. And he finds women who were part of his past not well understood, but that gives us the dimension of a superficial life and frivolities. Actress Janice Rule has here, too, one of her biggest moments in the movies. It's beautiful. The unexpected and perfect ending of the film completes this vigorous story of a man who has lost his way in life and can not find himself again. I watched The Swimmer in 1968 when it was released and I've been watching it regularly over the last 50 years. Each time I discover a detail, a situation that I did not perceive well, it is an incredible experience. Great, great, great movie!
  • comment
    • Author: Topmen
    "All animals are under stringent selection pressure to be as stupid as they can get away with." - Robert Boyd

    A cult classic, "The Swimmer" stars Burt Lancaster as Ned Merrill. Realizing that the swimming pools of his neighbours "link" to form a "river" leading to his own home, Merrill decides to "swim" across his affluent Connecticut suburb. The film was based on a 1964 short story by the renowned John Cheever. It was directed by Frank Perry.

    Unmistakably a product of the 1960s, "The Swimmer" initially portrays Merrill as a glorious alpha male. Tall, bronzed and beautiful, Merrill exudes confidence. Those around him are equally lavish, all upper middle-classers in possession of extraordinary wealth. Like Merrill, they're all proto-yuppies, living lives dedicated to paper, profit and pushing product. The world outside their ornate cultural bubbles don't matter. Myopia is good when you're swimming in honey.

    "The Swimmer", though, quickly mirrors the shared delusions of the upper classes to the private delusions of Merrill. Merrill, we learn, is blocking out the last two or three years of his life. Though he's lost his wealth, friends, family, home and business, Merrill parades about as though he's king of the world ("I'm splendid!"). He also aggressively represses the fact that he's a womanising drunk and an insensitive guy who bulldozed many others during his journey up the social ladder. He is a good guy, Merrill believes. He always was and still is.

    "If you make believe hard enough that something is true," Merrill says, "then it is true." The line encapsulates the relativism which sustains Merrill's social class. Merrill and his neighbours create their own truths, their own realities, and are oblivious to life outside their perimeter fences. In this regard, Merrill has not really "gone mad"; he's always been oblivious to reality. His life has always been built on a foundation of lies.

    The spiritual ancestor of David Lynch's "The Straight Story", "The Swimmer" becomes increasingly surreal as it progresses. Timelines blur, characters step out of the past, and the film eventually reveals itself to be a four-way journey; not only Merrill's literal journey from pool to pool, but Merrill's symbolic journeys from the top of the social ladder to the bottom, from boyhood to adulthood and from blissful naivety to painful realisation.

    "The Swimmer" ends with two powerful scenes. In the first, Merrill finds himself lost in a "lowly" public pool which ironically counterpoints the immaculate private pools seen during the film's first half ("Filters out ninety nine point ninety nine point ninety nine percent of all solid matter in the water!"). In this pool, surrounded by hordes of churning bodies, Merrill's now anonymous, a nobody, cast out with the very social dregs he's spent his life patronising. The following scene finds Merrill arriving at his home. His own Dorian Gray portrait, the building's dilapidated and marred with mud and grime.

    "The Swimmer" is slow and dated in many places. For those willing to forgive its "flaws", though, this is an original and very influential picture which captures well a certain zeitgeist. And like the short stories of Raymond Carver, and of course Cheever himself, it is preoccupied with domesticated Americans, all struggling to find substance, value and meaning within the mores and rituals inculcated by post-war America.

    8/10 – See "Everything Must Go", "Goodbye, Columbus", "Ghost World", "Deep End" (1970) and "The Yellow Handkerchief".
  • comment
    • Author: Mojar
    What I love most about under hyped films or films with neutral or even non existent reputations is the beauty of discovering the wonders they can sometimes offer. There is nothing more exhilarating than finding out that something you have barely heard of has merits you can only dream about and 'The Swimmer' is exactly this kind of film. 'The Swimmer' was based on a short story by John Cheever and had a painful gestation, going through a number of directors. According to IMDb Frank Perry is the credited director; I've always thought of it as a Sidney Pollack film and while he may have had a substantial input, I stand corrected. When it was released neither critics nor the public knew what to make of it, and assumed that because of the title, the movie may have been about something sexy. What the movie actually is about, is an examination of the disintegration of the post-war middle class values within American suburbia, when these so-called 'values" can do nothing but lead to mental disturbance, homelessness and despair. These issues were simply not tackled in films very often except in a way that was sensational and unintended to cause any kind of adverse reaction from an audience. 'The Man in the Grey Flannel Suit' (1956) immediately springs to mind as a very conventional examination of anxiety within the context of corporate America. Such themes as these were more the territory of high brow literature, the work of Norman Mailer and John Cheever, as well as Raymond Carver whose work came a little later .

    'The Swimmer' is one of those kinds of films that only works after you've seen it, and then recall it backwards. As Neddy Merrill, Lancaster mysteriously appears in the backyard of a friend to talk. They talk of things the audience has not seen. Neddy's friends seem to humour him, silently disregarding what he is saying. There are juxtaposed flashbacks that serve to undermine Neddy's memory of events that have happened before the film has started. Unbeknownst at first to the audience as they are watching the film, it progressively becomes clearer that Neddy has lost everything: his home, his financial security and family, due to some dubious business dealings that have spiralled out of control and completely destroyed his life, and that of his family. The plot exegesis is not obvious, and one has to pay attention to what the characters are saying to each other in order to obtain clues about what is going on. Not to mention the flashbacks, which advance the plot by presenting the truth behind the delusions that Neddy actually believes. By the end we realise that Neddy, on his personal journey to visit old friends by taking a swim in their backyard pools, has probably lost his mind. The laboured metaphors of left wing writers of the 50s and 60s, who were critical of family life and the conservative lifestyle, are transformed here into classic tragedy in the hands of Cheever and the filmmakers make the most of it.

    The denouement is devastating as anything I've seen and reinforces everything which has come before it. The result of the pursuit of the so- called 'perfect life' that the middle class set up for themselves unfold with unforeseen consequences, that become fate's payback for the acts committed in order to obtain such a deceptively comfortable lifestyle. What Updike is saying is that such a lifestyle is illusory, and destroys everything and everyone around it. I found 'The Swimmer' to be an absorbing experience, intelligent, well executed and unwavering in its commitment to a single idea explicated, and then rounded off with a wallop in case the audience has missed what it's been trying to say. The structure of the film is superior and very unique and it works like clockwork. Since I have not read the short story, I can only observe that the film appears faithful to its source material in that there are no pat solutions offered or bromides provided to make the situation easier to endure for the audience or the main character. In that respect the film is true to its intentions and is a rewarding experience that should not be as overlooked as it as been in the past, and it is indeed a sad situation that 'The Swimmer' is so little known, appreciated or discussed as it is at the moment.
  • comment
    • Author: SoSok
    What can you say about the swimmer that hasn't already been said. On reflection you have to feel sorry for Ned Merrill, certainly you can't have any sympathy for any of the characters he meets on his way! If he has suffered some sort of mental breakdown the question is why? This movie was set in the civilized environment of New England, Connecticut to be precise and it highlights the cozy drinks around the swimming pool and lavish dinner party Scean that is part and parcel of American culture.

    It's perplexing to me that people would put so much expenditure and effort in putting in a pool something that you can only use in New England for about 5-6 months of the year. (Although in the Bizwangers case they added a sliding roof whereby at least they could use the pool all year round!) However the real reason for a pool in New England is to have your friends around, show off your pool and drink and eat to excess. However you can't be satisfied with that, in addition you have to have a pig roast with professional caterers and bar tenders to boot with a band playing in the back ground, thats real living. Material possessions are not just something to show off but are part of what is required to achieve status, without status in the US you have achieved nothing.

    So how did Ned Merrill find himself in this predicament? In a conversation with Julie Ann Hooper he recalls that while on a transatlantic ship down in steerage he saw his wife to be, up in first class, he climbed over the barriers wooed her with his charm and that was the beginning of a whirlwind romance. So Ned Merrill found the inside track to achieve high social status. Next comes the huge wedding no expense spared, the grand house and soon the family. Status is not just 6 figure salary, but the house, the cars, the family, the job, throwing wild parties and being a member of an influential committee that's doing charity work. That's not it, being seen at $10000 plate political fund raisers, being a church deacon and basically rubbing shoulders with the movers and shakers in your suburban community is a requirement. At one scene at the Graham's Betty says to her husband "I wish we couldm travel more!" A bemused looking Howard says" why we have everything we want right here? That just sums up the attitude that the whole world evolves around their neighborhood. It epitomizes the culture of contentment and it's world of self importance.

    Yet Ned Merills found to his cost that when his wife left him, or threw him out he found that everything else became very imbalanced and just like a house of cards once one falls the rest all comes down. Well you can figure out all of the sordid scenarios in sequence, many reviewers have tried but the bottom line is that your life and status can nose-dive into a downward spiral with marriage and work upheaval i.e. friends suddenly don't return calls, invitations to regular events don't turn up but worse you find that you are tapped of favors from colleagues and employment prospects start to very look bleak.

    For people who live in such circles this must be their worst nightmare because you lose one you can lose it all. How do you adjust to such a dramatic change! In Ned Merrills case he became so obsessed in pursuing his American dream and totally absorbed in what he regarded as important that he fell into a state of self-propelling delusion.

    Shallow, selfish people who put so much emphasis on status and material possessions as a sign of success find it hard to cope with such misfortunes . Why didn't Neddy just pack his bags and move to the west coast and start again? He can't, partly because of his pride and the fact that he was handed a lot probably makes it all the more harder. But the answer to the question is that he was conditioned to believe in a certain way and that without all of the above he was nothing, and he can't accept it?

    All in all Ned Merill made things worse for himself, nothing to fall back on, nothing for a rainy day,no safe deposit box full of gold Krugerrands or cash. He threw everything into his lifestyle took himself too seriously and found very little sympathy from former friends, colleagues and acquaintances when the tide turned! Burt Lancaster was proud of this movie and so he should. His performance is very believable, he exuded confidence, happiness and the American spirit. Interestingly at the beginning of the movie he in no way portrayed a middle aged man on skid row which makes the ending even more disturbing when you see the state of him at the end. It could happen to the best of us, Was this what Cheever was trying to portray?
  • comment
    • Author: Jorius
    Ned Merrill, the man in the center of this story, appears out of nowhere and takes a dip in the pool of the Forsburghs, who are his neighbors in suburban Connecticut. They act as though Ned is a long time friend, although one notices a certain reluctance in the part of the hostess to warm up to Ned. Our swimmer, looking to the distant homes nearby, declares he will swim across the area through all his neighbors' pools until he reaches home. This is quite an undertaking because he will have to cover a big area. As Ned Merrill keeps dropping on his neighbors a new image of him is made clear. His good looks and his athletic figure disguise a man that is miserable and has failed as a husband and as a father.

    Ned's encounter with Julie Ann Hopper, the former baby sister he employed to mind his daughters, starts on an upbeat note. Julie Ann confesses on the big crush she had on him. He invites her to come with him swimming until he reaches his own home. Unfortunately, Ned tries too hard to make an impression in the young woman, something that turns her off completely, and the spell he had on her is broken. Julie Ann ends up running away appalled at Ned's sudden interest in her appears to be more sexual than friendly. Her idea of the man she secretly loved is shattered.

    Ned meets all types of people; some are friendly, while others aren't exactly welcoming, like Mrs. Hammar, who tells him how he is not welcome in her house, let alone, in her pool. She resents him deeply for the way she perceived his treatment of his dying son. Ned strikes a good chord with the lonely boy selling lemonade. Not having money on him, Ned has to cut a deal with the child, plus he is instrumental in dispelling the fear of drowning from the boy when they enter the empty pool.

    When he arrives at Shirley Abbot's patio, he gets a cool reception. We realize that both have been lovers, although all Shirley feels now is contempt for the man she loved so much. More of Ned's life is revealed as Shirley throws in his face all she had to put up with him and the hypocrisy of their relationship because he had no intentions in leaving his wife and daughters.

    The last pool where Ned tries to swim proves to be the one where his past comes to play a trick on him. Not having the fifty cents for the entrance fee, he turns to Howie, a tradesman in town, and his friend Jack Finney, to lend him the money. As he exits the pool Howie and his wife, and Jack and his, confront Ned because the way he had used their services and not paid his bills.

    The pathetic arrival of Ned to his dilapidated and run down house, is an affirmation of the image one had in one's mind about what appeared to be a secure and dashing man. Instead of a hero, Ned is more a creature that deserves pity. He had wasted his potential, and the happiness of his family pursuing a life that was instrumental in destroying what might have been a happy marriage. Now, broken in the middle of the pouring rain Ned is reduced to nothing.

    "The Swimmer", a novel by John Cheever, chronicled the life in suburbia, that he knew so well. It took an important director, Frank Perry, to bring the book to the screen. Let's not forget that Mr. Perry had a string of films that are as important today as when they were produced, namely, "David and Lisa", "Diary of a Mad Housewife", "Last Summer", among them. "The Swimmer" was adapted by his wife, Eleanor, this 1968 film doesn't show any signs of aging, perhaps because of the situation presented is real and it keeps repeating itself. Dennis Quaid cinematography captures that ideal setting of rural Connecticut, its country homes and estates. Marvin Hamlish composed the musical score that blends perfectly with appears on the screen. Supposedly Sidney Pollack helped Mr. Perry, although he gets no credit for his efforts.

    The best in the film is the inspired performance of Burt Lancaster. He makes a credible Ned Merrill with his good looks and physique. Mr. Lancaster's performance begins in a high note giving us the impression he is above his neighbors, who appear to resent him for what might be his success in life, although as the story develops, he is seen in another light by the viewer. Several performances are worth mentioning. Janice Rule as the suffering former lover does wonders with her role. Same can be said of Janet Landgard, who appears as Julie Ann. Others in the large cast are Kim Hunter, Marge Champion, Jan Miner, Rose Gregorio, and Cornelia Otis Skinner.

    "The Swimmer" deserves a look thanks to the great work of Frank Perry and the inspired performance of Burt Lancaster.
  • comment
    • Author: jorik
    This is one of the strangest movies I own. Then again, portraits of delusional, mentally-ill people tend to be a little different. This, however, is VERY different and is a success because Burt Lancaster plays the the title role so well.

    While Lancaster's character, "Neddy," is strange, so is the storyline: a man decides to "swim" home, doing laps in neighbors'pools for several miles until he reaches "home." That's the plot.

    However, the real story is uncovering who and what he is really was in the past. It's also an expose of Yuppie suburban snobbery, something that will never go out of style but is 1960s-ish in this film. It's interesting to see a bunch of familiar actors faces pop up as the various neighbors as Lancaster swims from pool to pool.

    To focus on the shallow neighbors - and they are shallow, vain and pretty revolting - is to miss how "Neddy" is worse than them. Slowly but surely, he is exposed as an adulterer, crook, completely selfish, poor father, etc. etc.

    In the end, we see just how delusional he is, too, completely unable or unwilling to see reality, still living in his dreamworld. Apparently, two years before the scenes in here take place, he booted out of his house by his also-unlikable wife and lost everything...his family, job, you name it.

    Much of this film is dream-like, nicely photographed with some pretty nature shots, particularly the first half which features a young actress, Janet Landgard, who was "introduced" in this film but never made it as an actress. She plays Burt's former babysitter and he meets up with her early on and then tries to hit on the pretty 20-year- old, finally scaring her away.

    Landgard has the second-biggest role in the film. The third belongs to Janice Rule, who appears near the end for a long pool-side soap opera scene, the last encounter Burt has until he reaches his destination. Everyone else in the film has a cameo-type part, including Joan Rivers, who is interesting to see.

    Overall, it's an unpleasant, haunting tale of shallow people but it's well-done and sure to evoke a number of discussions and interpretations. It's also interesting to view this movie twice, seeing it a second time when you know exactly Lancaster's situation and mental state. This came from a very short story by John Cheever (10-15 pages, depending on the size of the book) so much of the movie and almost all of the dialog, is made up. This is certainly a film you remember.
  • comment
    • Author: Dishadel
    Burt Lancaster gives a strikingly fine, vibrant and touching performance as Ned Merrill, a washed-up, delusional middle-aged former ladies' man failure who embarks on a bizarre journey of self-discovery by swimming through his affluent Conneticut neighbors' pools while en route back to his house. Among the folks Ned meets during his peculiar pilgrimage are Kim Hunter as the perky, flirtatious wife of an old friend, Janet Landgard as a sweet, but sexy and enticing young woman, Diana Muldaur as a cheery divorcée, Dolph Sweet as a proud, boastful home owner, Joan Rivers as a raucous drunk, and, in an especially bravura turn, Janice Rule as Ned's bitter, snappish ex-mistress. Each individual encounter offers further sad insight into Ned's lonely and dismal misspent life. Deftly directed by Frank Perry, perceptively written by Eleanor Perry (the script is based on a John Cheever short story), gorgeously shot in sparkling color by David L. Quaid, elegantly scored to beautifully lulling melancholic perfection by Marvin Hamlisch, and exceptionally well-acted by a first-rate cast, this wonderfully offbeat and moody allegory about the misery, snobbery, isolation, superficiality and shallow materialism of upper-class American suburbanite existence as well as the inevitability of getting older and the subsequent loss of youth packs a remarkably potent and poignant punch.
  • comment
    • Author: Bladecliff
    "If you make believe hard enough that something is true, then it is true for you", says Ned Merrill (Burt Lancaster), by way of advice to little Kevin Gilmartin in Frank and Eleanor Perry's 1968 masterpiece adaptation of John Cheever's short story "The Swimmer". The multi-layer film is all about Ned's capacity for denial and delusion. He has convinced himself that by successfully swimming home through the succession of estate pools in his wealthy neighborhood, that he will restore his life to what it was before a series of self-inflicted misfortunes ruined him and broke up his family.

    That Ned's regeneration is centered on swimming pools is appropriate, since bathing is an activity our culture associates with purgation and revitalization. But the cultural convention is turned on its head here and the successive soakings instead wash off layers of denial, culminating in a cleansing rain shower which reveals to both Ned and to viewers the full scope of the ugly reality under the veneer of his illusion.

    In the film, Ned's challenge has more layers than in Cheever's original short story. Cheever used the swimming pools primarily as a metaphor, with Ned's life sequentially compressed into his afternoon odyssey. The downhill slide of Ned's life is reflected as he moves through the neighborhood, his reception at the first pools is positive, but at later pools is either neutral or bittersweet, and finally is openly hostile. As he moves along his energy level drops and he gets physically colder, by the end the once virile alpha male can barely stumble to the front door of his house. In the meantime we are reminded several times that Ned is disoriented as to the season of the year, just as he is disoriented as to the season of his life.

    The Perry's insert an additional level to the film, one more centered on Ned's promise to himself that successfully completing his quest will make his wishes come true. By the time Ned articulates to Kevin that believing hard enough in something can make it true, we already know that in his mind fantasy has taken over from reality. And we flash back to how his playful interactions with Julie Ann Hooper (Janet Landgard) were their most passionate when she was recounting her youthful daydreams.

    Then again, what do I know? I'm only a child.
  • comment
    • Author: Inertedub
    When we think of Burt Lancaster, we think of gentlemen, nice guys, honest guys, men we would like to know. But, if you've not seen "The Swimmer," then you've not seen another side of him. There will be a lot of spoilers here. Burt is some sort of business man who loves swimming, but he never got around to getting a pool installed at home. He likes other peoples' pools. In fact, on a whim, he swims his neighbors' pools all the way home one day. (In this way, Burt Lancaster's wardrobe for this picture was his swimming trunks and that's all.) The plot revolves around his interactions with the people/neighbors he comes in contact with in swimming home. We are therefore allowed to see his life from his perspective and their perspective: the married couples, the single ladies.

    Fact 1: He is married with two daughters.

    Fact 2: Through his interactions with the ladies (married or not), we see him flirting and figure out that he has been and may be still unfaithful to his wife.

    Fact 3: We see that his perspective is somewhat delusional, as he sees things as he wants them to be, and not as they are.

    Fact 4: He apparently has had some tough times, as he has been let go, as several people allude to his situation and sympathize for him. Some people make reference to him asking for money in the past.

    Fact 5: He is so self-absorbed, he didn't even know a co-worker had not recovered from an illness, but in fact died. In fact, his blindness to other things and people has in fact made him a virtual island unto himself, so to speak. And, after a while, the viewer feels he basically is an arrogant jerk.

    Fact 6: Most of the people in the beginning are glad to see him as it has been an awful long time since they have seen him. This impulse to swim home allows him to break from his usual routine and therefore come out of his stupor.

    It's very interesting to see that most of the women in this picture feel one way or the other: they either take a liking to him and love to flirt back, or they can't stand him (due to the fact they were probably his wife's friends.) Some of the wives don't even want their husbands to talk to him or lend him fifty cents.

    As you can see, this made an impression on me. I write most of this, as a way of sifting through my thoughts. I had seen this about 5 years ago, so I knew the ending. It is of course easier to understand the second time as we see the little things throughout the picture, that they know better than he does about his wife and that she, and the girls (who were supposedly playing tennis when he left in the morning) won't be home when he gets there.

    The ending is so dramatic, as he is left out in the rain, locked out. In fact, this has a very haunting and tragic feel to it, and while the whole impact of it may not hit home with most viewers and fall flat, the subject matter is still very fascinating, in its portrayal of a supposedly happily married man, suddenly finding himself alone and lonely. Only Lancaster could pull this off, in showing the man as human and not just a complete jerk. (I'd say worse, but I don't know what I can and can not say.) Some female viewers may say this "trash" is just in defense of a sorry excuse of a husband.

    In conclusion, I would like to add that "The Swimmer" has got to be one of Burt Lancaster's most daring and disturbingly realistic movies that he ever made and one you just have to see to believe.
  • Cast overview, first billed only:
    Burt Lancaster Burt Lancaster - Ned Merrill
    Janet Landgard Janet Landgard - Julie Hooper
    Janice Rule Janice Rule - Shirley Abbott
    Tony Bickley Tony Bickley - Donald Westerhazy
    Marge Champion Marge Champion - Peggy Forsburgh
    Nancy Cushman Nancy Cushman - Mrs. Halloran
    Bill Fiore Bill Fiore - Howie Hunsacker
    David Garfield David Garfield - Ticket Seller (as John Garfield Jr.)
    Kim Hunter Kim Hunter - Betty Graham
    Rose Gregorio Rose Gregorio - Sylvia Finney
    Charles Drake Charles Drake - Howard Graham
    Bernie Hamilton Bernie Hamilton - Chauffeur
    House Jameson House Jameson - Mr. Halloran
    Jimmy Joyce Jimmy Joyce - Jack Finney
    Michael Kearney Michael Kearney - Kevin Gilmartin
    All rights reserved © 2017-2024 hd.thomson-multimedia.com