Search

» » Madalik (2016)

Short summary

A mere 200 yards from shore, surfer Nancy is attacked by a great white shark, with her short journey to safety becoming the ultimate contest of wills.
In the taut thriller The Shallows, when Nancy (Blake Lively) is surfing on a secluded beach, she finds herself on the feeding ground of a great white shark. Though she is stranded only 200 yards from shore, survival proves to be the ultimate test of wills, requiring all of Nancy's ingenuity, resourcefulness, and fortitude.

Trailers "Madalik (2016)"

The movie was shot in part off the Gold Coast of Australia. Other filming commenced in a giant swimming pool.

Blake Lively was pregnant with her second child during filming.

The crab that Nancy crushes while on her rock is CGI, although the crushed crab she attempts to eat is real. Blake Lively's reactions of disgust are genuine as Director Jaume Collet-Serra states "we're not allowed to harm any animal, so there were no live crabs, but we did send our art department out in the mornings to go find crabs that had died naturally on the beaches, so there's a couple of those in there."

Steven Seagull's name in real life is Sully. He lives (to this day) in a seagull sanctuary in Australia. Two extra seagulls were used to portray Steven Seagull. According to producer Matti Leshem, she added "They were all good but not nearly as good as him. Peggy was the vocal one, the very squawky bird. Gaviota (which means seagull in Spanish), I think he's almost 30 [as Steven is estimated to be about 15 or 20 years old]. The most challenging thing about Sully as an actor is that seagulls are remarkably clean. They self clean a lot, so the blood on Sully, obviously fake blood, he kept wanting to clean it off, so we had to deal with that."

Jaume Collet-Serra teamed up with the art department for the design of the shark. "I came to the conclusion that the shark had to be female", says the director. "Females are slightly bigger and have great scars from mating. Visually they're scarier, as they are more protective." Creating the shark generally took thousands of hours of research, so the film crew watched every Shark Week episode to get the idea of creating the shark he further added "she's a female shark, we know exactly how much she weighs. Every scar that she has has a story behind it. It's really an incredible job of artistry and research".

Blake Lively was partly inspired by her husband Ryan Reynolds work in the similarly minimalist film Buried - Lebend begraben (2010), stating "that was one of the reasons why I wanted to take on this movie so much, because I know how tough that was for him and how rewarding it was."

Blake Lively only had a stunt double for the surfing scenes as she couldn't surf professionally, "All I did was paddle" she recalled, her surfing stunt double was professional Australian Surfer 19 year old Isabella Nichols, she taught Blake how to paddle correctly, how to wax a board and put a leg rope on and fins in to make it look authentic.

Blake Lively revealed in an interview that she is terrified of sharks in real life and that she never saw Der weiße Hai (1975).

The movie was originally going to be filmed on the Gulf Coast of Texas near Galveston but the filmmakers were denied a film permit for safety reasons.

The screenplay for this film was featured in the 2014 Blacklist, a list of the "most liked" unmade scripts of the year.

Director Jaume Collet-Serra viewed the movie as one about survival and decided not to place an emphasis on gore and noted "This isn't a creature movie."

Much of the film was shot in a tank with bluescreens for effects, still Director Jaume Collet-Serra wanted to avoid the "more stylized look" of similar films using the set-up and estimated that 10% of the film was shot on location in order to "trick" the audience into believing the setting was real. He explains "every scene has one shot that is real and the other 99% is not-but the one real shot tricks you".

For the seagull character of Steven Seagull, the usage of both CGI and a puppet was considered based on the belief that it would be inordinately hard to train such a bird to act. This "horrified" both producers, Matti Leshem and Lynn Harris, who wanted to use an actual seagull while scouting for location in Australia. Blake Lively was able to feed a group of seagulls, at which point it was realized that using such a bird would be possible.

The dead whale was a mix of CGI and a styrofoam prop.

The initial script featured Blake Lively talking to the seagull much more and likewise scenes featuring such an interaction were shot; however, in the end Director Jaume Collet-Serra decided on a less-is-more approach, noting to Yahoo that "...we didn't want her to be like Snow White talking to animals; when you see her predicament you get it, you don't need her to explain everything to a Seagull!"

The movie was originally titled "In the Deep."

For Blake Lively surfing some digital effects were used to take on the waves,the production company utilize face replacement techniques orchestrared by Lola VFX (Famous for its face replacement work on The Social Network (2010) and The Return of the First Avenger (2014) Anderson stated " they have their own proprietary methodology for doing the face work, but they realized pretty quickly that surfing shots are full of their own challenges, they scanned Blake and got performances of her with their rigs and setups then had to transfer that to a 3D version of Blake's face that is tracked, reanimated and replaces the stunt doubles face"

Blake Lively revealed in an interview during principal photography "The most difficult part about it was having to wear a vest to make the location look more tropical but really it was freezing, but I wasn't complaining because the waves were pumping!"

The sheer size of the shark made a great difference to the animators, Scott E. Anderson told the animators to "think of the shark as a big diesel truck with lots of power and torque, versus a high-revving German engineered car." Anderson continues, "it's big and sleek with a graceful, powerful way of swimming, we use that mass when she's attacking the buoy or hitting anything else- she's got a huge heavy size to her".

Blake Lively's hair stylist, Rod Ortega, had to get into the tank to do Blake's hair, Blake recalls: "He basically spent 30 days in the tank with me-like in the water the entire time he was doing my hair from the water he was like a fish."

The film crew had to ride bikes to the set every morning. Producer Mattie Leshem added "We weren't allowed to have too many vehicles on the island, so essentially everyone had to ride their bikes to set every morning. But because we needed all the daylight to shoot in, we were riding in the dark. And in order to get close to the set, we had to get off our bikes and walk to the beach, because there is a Muttonbird population and it's an endangered species and 20,000 of them were nesting exactly at the time we were shooting the movie. And they're incredibly fast in the wind but when they're on the ground, they're like drunken ducks so if you're riding a bike you could easily run them over. We were warned under no circumstance could we hurt a single Muttonbird and [we didn't]."

The digital shark was mostly done by a Swedish company that is a digital shark specialist called Important Looking Pirates (ILP). Ever since their groundbreaking sharks and water simulations on Joachim Rønning and Espen Sandbergs Kon-Tiki (2012).

Blake Lively said in an interview during principal photography about doing her own stunts that "there wasn't a single scene that wasn't stunt-heavy, doing the underwater sequences I'm in 4.5 foot waves" she shares describing her toughest days on set "whether I was in the tank or when I was in the ocean I was about 300 yards away from Shore they would drop me off on this rock that was three feet by three feet, you're in the wild, you are in the land of big, incredible, majestic wild creature and if you're wearing a wetsuit you're dressed as a seal".

Blake Lively came up with the name "Steven Seagull." Producer Matti Leshem noted "she really made her own relationship with Sully. There's a moment in the film where she's fixing his broken wing and the bird really bit her. I would say that relationship was complex in the sense that there was a lot of love there and they really bonded, but there were moments that you could see Sully really lashing out. Obviously she was trying to help him, but I think the complexity and deep emotional bond that they have between them is what makes this movie great."

The movie was filmed in 47 days, with principal photography from October 28th to December 13th 2015.

This movie marked Blake Lively's second star (not co-starring) billing. Für immer Adaline (2015) was her first.

Blake Lively's orange bikini was a gift from fashion designer Tory Burch.

Due to unexpected box-office success, whether a follow up sequel was possible, film director Jaume Collet-Sera said in an interview he doesn't believe in sequels, he can only do original work. Which is an ironic statement considering he started his directorial career with a remake (House of Wax) and a sequel (Goal II: Living the Dream).

Louis Leterrier was originally set to direct but exited the film, due to creative differences and the reduction of previously told budget.

For all the obvious reasons, the film's great white shark was created digitally. Great whites generally do not survive well in captivity, Slashfilm has noted that the use of CGI was unusual for the director, as he typically uses practical effects as opposed to digital ones required by the shoot.

The shark had multiple personalities, although one digital shark became the main adversary to Blake Lively the filmmakers deliberately crafted a few different shark "stages" VFX supervisor Anderson explained it began with "The early naturalistic shark, representing the fact that Nancy just wandered into a sharks feeding situation before becoming a more directed shark during the buoy sequence and leading into the more directed and stylized action of the flare sequence, culminating with Nancy in the water and finale with the shark, through it all footage of real sharks were used to give use that sense of balance from the simplicity of a fin through the water s-curve of a shark swim, the gills reactions, the motion of the 'lips' and an overall sense of mass. This was all driven by reality, but controlled by animators following Jaumes desires for each scene".

14 visual effects Studios were involved including important looking Pirates, Digital Sandbox (DSBX), Scanline, MPC, Lola VFX, Spin, Aaron Kupferman studios, Mammal Studios.

The VFX crew also provided a slightly different look two underwater views versus the shark above the water VFX Anderson stated " the underwater look of the shark had a particularly aesthetic that was really driven by Jaume and his scene by scene mood of the film, we started with very realistic looks and actions culled from a large amount of shark reference footage, that drove both the look development and character development at ILP, what was this actual difference? Underwater we did tend to keep the shark a bit more shiny than it is in stock footage it just made our hero shark more of a star than the flat look of unlit footage. We were also balancing the look between visibility and naturalistic blending of the shark into the environment. Most animal, sharks included are designed to blend into the environment our job is to use visibility selectivity to meet the needs and direct the audience and eye when we want our need to".

Nancy's nickname for the seagull is Steven Seagull, which is, of course, a pun on actor Steven Seagal.

Blake Lively wears a Baby-G BG169R-8 model gshock. However, that model doesn't feature a tide graph in real life.

Director Jaume Collet-Sera said that script was re-tailored to fit Blake Lively, as the original character was a younger one, about three to four years younger.

In the beginning of the movie, the two surfers ask Nancy (Blake Lively) if she is from California and she says she is from Texas. In real life, Blake Lively is from California.

Carlos (Óscar Jaenada) drives a 1997 Jeep Wrangler [TJ].

Blake Lively was born the same year a month after the shark movie, Jaws: the Revenge (1987) came out during the summer.

The shark meets its doom after being impaled on a rebar at the bottom of the sea floor. Live-action tank footage of actress Blake Lively was combined with the final CG shark and sea-floor crashing effects.

Blake Lively slammed her face into the buoy, which caused her a running bloody nose while shooting the climactic ending. The blow to the face and bloody nose both made it into the final cut of the film, which can be seen during the ending climax.

In creating the shark, director Jaume Collet-Serra wanted to create a worthy adversary that would keep the audience on the edge of their seats. "I wanted the shark to be a presence for half the movie," Collet-Serra said. "I wanted to reveal it slowly, then have it to be a force of nature; my reasoning was that if Nancy doesn't get a good look at the shark, then the audience shouldn't get a good look at it either".

Blake Lively shot the jellyfish scene, in which her character is surrounded by hundreds of jellyfish, in pitch black water, director Jaume Collet-Serra noted "she was in a tank that was completely blacked out, the cinematographer and I had these lights that were underwater just underwater bulbs and they're essentially where the CGI jellyfish are, she was willing to get into a pitch dark tank and get underwater, she also had an uncanny ability to hold her breath, I think she was holding her breath beyond a minute she's like a superwoman".

The shark has only 4 minutes of screen time.

In animating the shark, Anderson's greatest challenge was to create a believable character. "The shark is very consistent in its character", he says. "Nancy wanders into its area accidentally and interrupts the shark's world, and after the shark has wounded her, the shark just thinks of Nancy as food. It's nothing personal - the shark is just being a shark. Towards the end when Nancy is fighting for her own survival, the shark fights back; both of them are just doing what they need to do."

At the end when they are in "Galveston", the Gulf of Mexico's water is shown to be a clear blue. The water off of Galveston's beaches are usually muddy brown but can be clear blue during the summer.

Nancy finds her strength and courage and makes her stand for survival on the buoy which is number "42". 42 is considered, in pop culture, to be the answer to the meaning of life. As in the famous Douglas Adams book Hitchhikers Guide To The Galaxy where 42 is the answer to the ultimate question.

The name of the beach is never revealed. It may have been Isla de tiburón (shark's island).

Nancy uses a Webley & Scott No. 2 Mk. V Signal Pistol against the shark at the end.

Body count: 3.

User reviews


  • comment
    • Author: Jelar
    I wanted to like this movie, but it's just so stupid I can't.

    I love the beautiful bay and the long shots showing how pretty it is. But problem 1: where are the waves? There aren't any! It's clear that the actual surfing shots were filmed elsewhere. Come on... you don't surf on a beach with no waves. Sigh.

    Other problems: 2. A shark that size bites you, and all you have is a tiny nick in your leg? 3. There's a juicy fat whale carcass right there, but the shark is only interested in bony human beings? 4. That whale carcass appeared out of nowhere? She's been surfing there all day, and suddenly turns her head and it's magically 60 feet away? 5. Why would you try to eat a crab after just a few hours? Just nonsensical. 6. The CGI dolphins were quite bad. But not as bad as the fake wound on her leg. I've seen 1980 horror movies with better blood... and they had a $500 budget. 7. The water is clearly shallow, as you can see in the aerial shots. Yet at the end when she sinks to the bottom, it's suddenly 60+ feet deep?! 8. Holding on to that chain would've ruptured her eardrums in seconds because she wasn't equalizing. 9. That shark is dumb enough to swim full force into the bottom of the ocean? 10. Why is there a buoy there, of all places? 11. Am I supposed to believe a beach this nice is right next to Tijuana, within walking distance of drunks, yet there's nobody there, no garbage, nothing? 12. Something tells me you wouldn't have a 4G connection on that beach to stream video on your phone.

    Sigh. It's a shot, and it's a miss! Wasted opportunity. Watch a re-run of Jaws instead.
  • comment
    • Author: Clever
    The Shallows knows exactly what it is, and that's the best praise I can give it. It's barely 90 minutes long, has a small cast, and only one location. Its only purpose is to give you a thrill-ride during that time; an adrenaline rush based on an ubiquitous fear among humans: being stranded in the ocean with a shark. However as the title suggests, this doesn't take place in the middle of the ocean. This woman is stranded only a couple hundred yards from the shore, close enough to potentially shout for help. What The Shallows does so well is establish this sense of isolation and hopelessness for our main character, and her situation of being so close yet so far from safety.

    Blake Lively is great in this role. It's mostly a reactionary role - not much dialogue aside from some early establishing conversations to develop her character. For the majority of the film Lively is terrified and fighting for survival against a deadly shark. This thing is huge, like the Jaws' shark's father huge. And it's interesting to see how she follows its patterns and observes its behavior, allowing her to act accordingly without being trapped. There are some far-fetched scenes, sure, but Jaws had them as well and it's hailed as a classic. Now I'm not saying The Shallows is as good a movie as Jaws, because it certainly isn't. But again, the movie knows what it is, and as a short shark thriller appealing solely to our primal fear, it gets the job done and then some.

    Now, it has its faults. The electronic music during the surfing scenes was immediately off-putting, and there are some slo-mo shots that definitely did not deserve to be in slo-mo. But the directing as a whole is well done - gorgeous sweeping shots of the open ocean, the slow build up before the initial attack, showing the shark only when it's most effective. The writing is clever and practical, relatable to the point that you feel for this character's predicament, and the acting as I said is top notch. The Shallows doesn't break any new ground, but it does exactly what it sets out to do - give the audience yet another reason to avoid the beach.
  • comment
    • Author: Roru
    People often underestimate or under-appreciate the ability to produce a genuinely good B-movie. There's Renny Harlin on one end of the spectrum, making crap like The Legend of Hercules, 12 Rounds, and The Covenant. But then you have someone like Jaume Collet-Serra, who knows a thing or two about framing a scene, getting good performances from his actors, and above all, making an entertaining movie.

    The Shallows could have been an otherwise conventional and forgettable thriller without Collet-Serra's strong and stylish direction. For example, the scene when Blake Lively's character first gets attacked by the shark is beautifully composed - in one unbroken take, no less - and legitimately nightmarish, with the red blood slowly overtaking the blue screen. It also doesn't hurt that Lively successfully carries the entire film on her shoulders, giving what is arguably the best performance in her career to date. There's a quiet fierceness and admirability to her character that makes it easy to root for her survival.

    Overall, there's a lot to like about The Shallows. It's gorgeously shot, suspenseful, emotionally gratifying, and entirely successful on what it sets out to be - a solid B-movie, and it takes skill to pull that off. Sure, it doesn't match the heights of either Gravity or The Martian, but then again, its budget is a mere fraction of what those films cost.
  • comment
    • Author: Gann
    This movie started out well. A very attractive woman surfing on a beautiful, secluded beach. There was some great cinematography and shots of the area. Blake Lively even seems to be a decent actress.

    Then the shark stuff starts, and from the very beginning, we have to forget about everything we know about sharks and play pretend. First of all, she really ticks off the shark somehow by disturbing its "feeding grounds." She approaches a dead whale that the shark was feeding on and seems to have offended the shark somehow. So the shark ignores the thousands of pounds of floating, dead meat in the water for the rest of the movie, and pursues the 100 pound surfer girl exclusively.

    The surfer seeks refuge on the carcass of the whale, then the shark drags a dead whale many times its size further out into the ocean, and seems hell bent on knocking her off. In her escape from the floating whale to a small rock outcropping, she's bitten by the shark, and has some serious wounds from both the bite and coral. The shark is circling her, she's bleeding heavily, and there's no one around who can help.

    At this point, I'm still willing to forgive the whole shark ignoring the dead whale to pursue a person who isn't even in the water any more. It still felt suspenseful. I wanted her to find a way out and survive. The movie still had my interest and I still cared what happened to her.

    Then things got real, real stupid. The shark continued to circle, and killed a drunk on the beach who was trying to reach her. Then it killed two other surfers that she'd met the day before. It tried jumping up on the coral to reach her, and pretty much completely stopped acting like a shark. She managed to escape to a buoy as the tide came in, and the shark proceeded to rip the giant, steel buoy to pieces. She shoots the shark with a flare gun then lights whale oil in the water on fire with it, also lighting the shark on fire. I had already written off the movie at this point, but kept watching as I was already close to the end.

    She then ties herself to the anchor that was holding the buoy in place, and as the shark breaks the chains away she is pulled hundreds of feet under water in the matter of a couple of seconds, and the shark chases her at full speed with reckless abandon to kill her. It ends up impaling itself on the jagged spikes which were apparently part of the anchor.

    And yea, that was it. A stranded, wounded surfer with nothing kills an over 20 foot long shark by making it chase her into spikes. Dumb.

    You know what would have been good? A wounded surfer on a small rock outcropping tries to keep her sanity and get help to survive a shark attack. Leave out the dead whale because that kind of made the rest of the movie not make sense. Don't make a wounded, half dead surfer kill a 20+ foot shark, that's not the victory that the movie needed. It would have been sufficient to have her survive. You don't have to schlock it up with the typical Hollywood type ending.

    Sharks are scary enough, you don't have to make it cartoonish shark with a vendetta against a surfer. Every time the shark did something stupid that a shark would never do, it became less suspenseful. I don't know why they went down that road, but they turned a movie that started out pretty suspenseful into a SciFi Channel made for TV special with a dumb ending.
  • comment
    • Author: Akisame
    I wanted to like this movie. I really did, but its just bad.

    Basically we have a hot blond chick that gets stranded on a rock with a shark trying to get her.

    Now here's the biggest flaw in the movie. There is a 2 ton whale that is barely eaten in the same location as this girl. So why is the shark interested in a 90lb woman over a 2 ton whale? Oh not only is this shark after this woman, this shark attempts to climb rocks, go through jellyfish, tries to climb its way through a buoy drone and basically stalk this girl for like two days when it has a nice huge whale right there? That made no sense at all.

    The next issue is the woman is apparently a superhero since she can suffer massive blood lost, jellyfish stings, dehydration, concussions and yet still swim like an Olympic swimmer by out swimming a great white shark.

    C'mon.
  • comment
    • Author: Memuro
    I can suspend disbelief with the best of them, a shark becomes vengeful towards a human, no problem, an exhausted woman can ride a turbo charged chain to extreme depth, fine, mobile phone coverage on an isolated beach in Mexico, sure, they have great infrastructure.

    What I absolutely cannot accept is that high tide does not follow low tide by a little over six hours. It's the same the world over and is invariable. A hot girl in a bikini can persuade me of almost anything, but not that she can change the speed the moon revolves around the earth.

    To add to this marine quibble, the story tells us there's 25 minutes to high tide, but the rock she's sitting on is still two feet above the water. Now if she'd been marooned on a rock in the Bristol Channel, where there's a huge tidal range, it's just possible the rock could have been covered 25 minutes later. Of course it's pretty cold, so no bikini, and there aren't any killer sharks, so no tension.

    The rest of the film is extremely silly. She should have eaten the bird.
  • comment
    • Author: Kekinos
    I wanted to like this but.. This is one of the most ridiculous movies I've seen in a while. Left me baffled in disbelief. The protagonist is apparently Wonder Woman, or something, since she doesn't need any food or drink to survive for days. Neither does she seem to feel much pain or any side effects from gaping wounds, gangrene, and jellyfish stings, nor bleed to death from blood constantly gushing out of her wounds. In fact, after two nights, in this emergency state, she still has the strength and stamina of an Olympic athlete.

    The shark is similarly unrealistic in that it can apparently stalk people, eat an entire person within seconds before immediately moving to the next one, and rather circles a potential human prey rather than eating from a juicy whale cadaver nearby.

    You're better off watching something like "Sharknado" I'm afraid.
  • comment
    • Author: Kabei
    ......to compare it to Jaws in anyway is an absolute insult. CGI shark that you only actually see in total for around 2 minutes of the film is quite lame, I just don't understand how people are so impressed with it. The seagull is actually the star of the show here and I was routing for him more than Nancy ! Some of the sharks behaviour was completely ridiculous........when has a great white ever jumped out of the water onto a pile of rocks for its prey ?! Just a completely unbelievable story that could have been so much better overall. On a positive note the cinematography was good as were 6 mins of the film........the other 80 were very disappointing.........don't rush to the cinema for this one, borrow someone's DVD if they buy it !!!!!!
  • comment
    • Author: Ceck
    Blake Lively diving better than a shark, burning water, surfers that go surf without letting anybody know about spot and timing spoiled this movie but the bird was a solid 2 stars. Gotta love a good animal performance. Oh wait, he was animated? Right...

    On a serious note probably the worst movie I have seen this year. Some beautiful shots with solid acting but the storyboard is just ridiculous and details such as wrong light for different times in the day are frustrating.

    Not worth watching...unless you like watching a bird's wing getting fixed by a med-school dropout. *chirp-chirp*
  • comment
    • Author: Talrajas
    My God, the movie is bad. I'll just point a few things and rest my case:

    The shark in the movie is big and behaves like a human psychopath. The bit on the woman's leg does not match it's teeth. A shark of that size can chew steel cables. It's bite can tear flesh and muscles from the bone and can sever limbs. Yet the woman has only suffered a mere flesh wound.

    After only a few hours, the woman is hungry enough to eat crabs and gross stuff, which make her puke. This is stupid. Hunger makes you so desperate after a few days, not hours.

    Birds have frail articulations and many tiny bones in their wings. The bones are spongy and frail. It's hard to arrange a bird's articulation even for a veterinary surgeon, yet she does it like it's her hobby.
  • comment
    • Author: The Sphinx of Driz
    i think i'm fortunate in that i'm not familiar with Blakey Lively so my view of this film wasn't influenced by her image. i will reiterate what a previous reviewer said and with it, justify my 2 out of 10 rating when he said " god dam she look hot in a bikini." i hate to admit it, but slogged through this whole film thinking it could only be redeemed if she somehow lost her top.

    but frankly, that's all this movie has going for it. look out, spoilers inc.

    everything about this film is terrible. from the beginning opening scene to the final credits (i sat through it -all-) it was if i was watching a college film project made by an ambitious stoner, his entourage of two stoner buddies, his hot girlfriend, a neighborhood kid and a venice pier trained seagull.

    i'm convinced the people who compare this to Jaws in any fashion have never even seen Jaws or are somehow mistakenly thinking of Jaws the Revenge in which case i'll remind you that it's the one with Mario Van Peebles in it. the really terrible one.

    Soul Surfer is a better shark movie. Finding Nemo is a better shark movie. Little Mermaid is a better shark movie.

    this movie is just crap.

    the CG is well overdone and it seems the animation crew shared the same enthusiasm and skill you'd expect from a senior citizen inserting their 3.5" floppy disc, discovering the dial up glory of AOL online and creating their first Myspace page complete with "can't smile without you" MIDI soundtrack.

    temporary suspension of disbelief is required if you want to believe a shark is more interested in a struggling, hot blond than 2 tons of dead whale protein.

    complete disregard for the physics of tides if you want to believe that one minute you're catching rolling 8 foot waves with your bros in the surf and 10 seconds later, are chilling with your homies in glass calm water well past the surf break.

    it doesn't end. the ominous unnamed beach. the seagull. the go pro (and suddenly unattached helmet). the tide. the belief that nature ignores tides.

    and that buoy.

    just please, please don't watch this film.
  • comment
    • Author: Kulafyn
    Pluses:

    Location photography is wonderful. Blake Lively is easy on the eyes and has some good moments acting wise. The Seagull steals the movie -- best character and best character arc by far.

    Minuses:

    1. The Seagull is the best character and has the best character arc in the movie

    2. Overdirected in all the wrong places

    3. Doesn't establish the water as the threat rather than the shark (a la Jaws), so all the tension lets out the moment the shark drops under the waves

    4. CGI overkill. Clever mix of CGI and practical effects is the key, why does this simple equation still elude so many directors??

    5. Blake Lively also has some very bad moments acting wise. Mostly when it comes to moments of peril. Part of this may have to do with the fact that a portion of this movie was shot in a giant pool. If you want to do this right, go Revenant with it and stick her out in the ocean. It would have informed her performance more.

    6. Not shot entirely in a real environment. So many scenes were clearly shot in a tank with the backdrop put in digitally. The scenes that are actually shot on location feel much more visceral. Had the whole movie been that, this likely would have been a different review.

    7. Terrible terrible script!!! This was a Blacklist script? Seriously. Unless someone went through after the fact and tagged on a bunch of unnecessary plot arcs and hack dialogue onto a brilliant script, we may all have to reassess Blacklist's veracity. This is absolute garbage. Had this just been about a surfer chick nursing her grief with a world tour trip to all her late mother's favorite surf spots who then runs afoul of a rogue shark things would be fine. But no, there is this added on backstory of her dropping out of medical school, and a stock father and sister who spout inane expository dialogue. For what? I don't care whether she goes back to medical school or not. Completely unnecessary and offers no stakes. And the last scene of the flick is teeth clenchingly bad. The absolute worst kind of wrap-it-all- up-with-a-bow happy ending nonsense that is the hallmark of terrible movies.

    8. NO STAKES. Nothing builds from one moment to the next. There are just sporadic moments of watered down shark attack mayhem interspersed with indulgent and unnecessary slo-mo shots of Blake Lively looking off into the horizon.

    9. Inconsistent physical state. One scene Lively is close to death with sores on her lips and eyes burning red from dehydration. The next scene she's swimming with Olympian vigor and her complexion is vibrant and crystal clear. Never once did I fear that the elements might kill her before the shark did.

    10. Stalker level overkill of T&A. Can't believe I'm complaining about this but by the 10th time the camera was crammed up Lively's butt or down her cleavage I was over it. Give us one or two shots to show off her body and move on. She's beautiful and deserves the attention, but when bikini shots outnumber shark shots in a shark movie you've gone too far.
  • comment
    • Author: Isha
    The performances weren't terrible and the idea behind the story is a good one. But WAY too much suspension of disbelief required to enjoy this... A giant shark somehow has grudge about Blake Lively to the point where it will ignore the whale carcass just so it can eat her specifically.

    Meh...

    A lot of shots that seem to focus on the fact that Blake has boobs. Don't get me wrong they're nice boobs, but seriously?

    It kind of annoyed me because this film could have been so much more with a bit more work to the story like.
  • comment
    • Author: Uranneavo
    It first I didn't know what to expect from this movie, as it has become so hard to take shark movies seriously, however The Shallows not only surprised me, it is the best shark movie since Jaws and honestly the best creature feature in ages!

    At only 85 minutes, this movie absolutely makes the most of that run-time and its 17 million dollar budget and delivers a tense, gripping, stress inducing movie that will constantly keep you on the edge of your seat. Blake Lively is on her way to stardom, as she carries this entire movie and is able to act without speaking, which is insanely hard to do. You care about her and you want her character to survive. The movie is insanely smart and the Director deserves all the credit in making a movie that honestly should not have worked and made it a classic in this genre.

    The shark is absolutely terrifying and the way Lively is able to not only face off against this shark, but how she is able to make the most over her situation while being under-prepared was not only intelligent, but believable. The story is simple, straight forward, believable and so genuinely crafted, stylishly executed, and not a single scene is wasted. Director Jaume Collet- Serra will have no problem landing a future big budget Hollywood Blockbuster and Blake Lively will soon find herself as a leading lady more often.

    The Shallows is the biggest surprise of the year, with gripping tension, a career performance from Blake Lively, beautiful scenery, an amazing story of will and survival and one big, mean, scary shark, The Shallows is a Summer movie that you don't want to miss! 9 out of 10
  • comment
    • Author: JoJosho
    Oh dear! Started off moderately OK, though you'd have to question the sanity of any girl wearing not-too-much taking a lift from a guy she doesn't know in Mexico.....down a deserted track, to a deserted beach. Then the guys she meets down there don't think to offer to wait for her, even though she has no way to get back! Then the way she eventually deals with the shark is ridiculous beyond belief. How lucky for her the child found the Go-pro, knew how to work it, & realised where it came from, all in time for the good Samaritan to save her.....what a happy ending. Shame it's so pathetically improbable for anyone who has even a modicum of experience of how things work in the real world. A joke!
  • comment
    • Author: Yainai
    That's like saying Ryan Reynolds carried 'Buried.'

    When I saw the trailer, I had high expectations - and for the most part, 'The Shallows' delivered. A solid, but overrated performance by Blake Lively, and a nice slow pace. However, the entire film blows up during the final showdown. I kept reading about the whole buoy scene, and thought to myself - well, how bad can it be? Turns out, it's some of the worst collection of scenes in the last five years. It ranks up/down there with the 'Fast & Furious' tunnel scene.

    Horror fans are so desperate for a decent film, it's no wonder they label this as the 'Jaws for this generation.' Yeah. It's not even close to 'Jaws' in ANY generation. 'Jaws' had superior acting to the extent of third man Robert Shaw's performance blowing any performance you'll see in 'The Shallows' out of the water - pun intended. And 'Bruce The Shark' is still one of the most frightening monsters in the genres history - where the CGI loaded nonsense we get in 'The Shallows' is borderline amateur, and reaches the point of hilarity.

    Random Ramblings of a Madman: I'm not going to compare the great 'Jaws' to a film that's not even as good as 'The Reef' or 'Open Water.' I enjoyed both of those films, by the way.
  • comment
    • Author: Hugighma
    I have a couple of issues with this film (occasionally too much CGI, and a weird ending) but for the majority of its brief, 86-minutes-long run, this is a riveting film, exquisitely filmed in the Gold Coast of Australia, about a survivor of a shark attack clinging to life, figuratively and literally, on the side of a rock 200 feet from shore, with the shark still circling the waters.

    Normally watered down PG13-rating gives way to some surprisingly grisly bursts of gore, as she tries to suture her wounds with makeshift surgical tools, and a couple of brutal attack scenes.

    The film makes the most of a small cast, and Blake Lively carries the film almost entirely herself, spending at least two thirds of the film completely isolated. Well, she's not completely alone, she also has Steven "Sully" Seagull, as himself.
  • comment
    • Author: Fawrindhga
    Is it a science fiction film? If only they would screen some of my favorite movies from the sci-fi channel, they're so much better because at least they're versatile; and they probably don't cost a dime to make. Suspense and more suspense, it was only that. A real life shark is bent on killing people like a serial killer! The shark patrols the area like a human antagonist in a horror movie looking to kill anything that enters the water when we would naturally expect it to, which creates one predictable bloody scene and then more and more. I felt like I was definitely obligated to give the main character special attention for her staggering effort to stay alive rather than being entertained by it. In this movie a shark stays in one area (Next to stranded Nancy) for a long time and is motivated to take her down and kills others in a very repetitive chain of events way. The film fallows a mind-numbing 'survival' pattern with rest periods between the gory stuff. In a sci-fi movie called 'Attack of the sabretooth' some genetically engineered cats are bulimic and throw up after they eat so they want to keep hunting the humans to eat more which is flat out ridiculous and funny. In this movie a creature is motivated to keep hunting the lead character in a supernatural way but it's boring supernatural.
  • comment
    • Author: kewdiepie
    Wow. Just wow. Even if you are the king of suspension of disbelief this may prove a challenge. Severed but crawling upper body (zero blood pressure hello?)? A buoy with a flare gun, really? A self-impaling shark, why!? With Blake Lively being seriously outplayed by the fine acting of Steven Seagull, I feel she might want to a) get acting lessons and/or b) get an agent who can cut through the trash scripts. All those shampoo commercial shots of her derriere, cleavage and hair for the first twenty minutes made me think I was watching Fox. This movie makes In the Deep (2016) seem like a profound and meaningful masterpiece.

    This movie is pure garbage. You have been warned.
  • comment
    • Author: Dilkree
    Entertainment wise, it's OK movie. Yet, full of mistakes, goofs and things that's doesn't make sense. Starting from the size of the scar on her thigh to the fact that the shark actually kept coming at her after the first bite leaving a carcass of a whale. Fact: sharks don't like human flesh and blood. Shark going at the buoy... Seriously!!! The buoy fall on its side when one of the chain is cut!!! This doesn't happen. If the current is that strong it would shoot her off to the shore. More mistakes on the goofs section.

    Overall entertaining if you do not know anything about sharks or whales or the sea in general.
  • comment
    • Author: Thomeena
    I only have one thing to say for the opening of this review. Oh my God !!

    Hollywood just doesn't get it. No matter how many millions of bucks they keep spending, they just can't get a shark movie the correct way. They can't even get the shark right.

    There's almost no shark in this movie. We see more of a seagull on a rock than a shark. It's supposed to follow the Jaws recipe but it just doesn't get it right. Not showing the shark kinda worked in Jaws because they couldn't get the shark working and had to film it in a different way.

    I was very worried in the beginning. I saw a lot of smart phone moron type of characters but it went away after a while. I was really worried, I thought the smart phone moron will kill the shark using the smart phone.

    Maybe the production company paid a guy 20 million dollars to tell them you can't kill a shark with a phone.

    I was disappointed with the main character screaming abilities. Very weak screams and not really a true drive for survival. She looked like she kinda enjoyed being stranded on that rock with the bird. Her screams sounded like she had a fish bone stuck in her throat. No volume, no despair. No like.

    Ahh, the ending. The killing of a shark. The worst idea in the history of shark killing. I'm not really a fishing type of guy. But I bet those who go shark fishing, half of them were laughing and the rest of them just wanted to ask for their money back going out of the theater.

    Stiff and unsatisfying ending. A human being more specific a woman, dodges a shark coming straight for her, on the bottom of the sea. Yeah right.

    Last and least, I wasn't aware that there's any living thing that can chew and eat steel. That just doesn't happen. Ever. Yet we have a shark here who chews the crap out of all thing made of solid steel. At one point I thought the shark eats solid steel and will continue on chewing the rocks too.

    I give it a 4 star and not 1 since it did have it's moments here and there. But it wasn't great all around.
  • comment
    • Author: Uylo
    How this movie got 7 out of 10 stars is beyond me,the scenery was nice, but it was worse then open water and about as boring and drawned out that it could possibly get. Basically it contained 4 characters which all die but one person of course we know who didn't die. The ending was even worse when she kills the shark by guiding it to its death when it gets stabbed by the buoy pipes. I had waited a while to see this movie and was really disappointed, at one point the two guys come back and she is screaming shark, shes on the rocks and they ignore her, morons get in the water and soon enough are eaten. So then we are subjected to blake talking to a seagull and timing the swim, evidentally she knows the sharks swimming routine.I have really nothing more to say but have to keep writing because of the limit, let's just say I wasted 1.5 hrs of my life to route for a shark
  • comment
    • Author: Monin
    First of all, this movie was an hour and twenty minutes of a woman screaming on a rock next to a seagull. Second of all, the seagull was the best character and he was the real hero of this movie.

    If you're down to watch 10/10 seagull acting, dramatic zooms on a seagull while squawking, a legitimate argument between a grown-ass woman and a seagull, and the grown woman attempting to eat a raw crab and then vomiting and the seagull walking away like "bitch i'm done with you" then this is the movie for you. (i've given you the highlights)

    This movie is not for sharks at all. The promos for this movie paraded around the idea that this movie was for the sharks and how sharks are so misunderstood. This movie did not a damn for the cause against shark finning or the mass murder of sharks. The movie really didn't do anything to try an negate the usual demonetization of sharks. Honestly saying once in the film "i swam right up on his hunting ground" does not change that the rest of the film was spent treating the animal as a monster.

    The only thing the movie attempted to do in favor of sharks was that it portrayed sharks with the intelligence that they do possess instead of just brainless.
  • comment
    • Author: Xava
    After losing her mother, the medical student Nancy (Blake Lively) dumps the medical school in Galveston and travels to Mexico, hitchhiking to a hidden beach that her mother loved when was young. She brings a backpack and a surf board to surf and she meets two surfers that warn about the low and high tides schedule. They leave the sea, but Nancy decides to stay a little more. When she sees a dead whale floating on the water, she swims close to the animal and is surprised by a white shark. She is bitten on the leg and uses her medical knowledge to survive on a rock. But the high tide is coming and she is under siege of the ferocious shark.

    "The Shallows" is a reasonable dramatic thriller with ups and downs. It is certainly a film difficult to be made in an environment where everything is under movement and it might be difficult to synchronize the vessel, crane, cast and animals in such environment. Blake Lively might convince as a surfer provided she let only the stunts swim since her arms and legs movements are not from a swimmer with the practice to face those tides. The unrealistic cartoonish conclusion is disappointing with the shark crashing on the buoy mooring debris subsea, remembering the Looney Tunes characters The Road Runner playing tricks to Wile E. Coyote. My vote is six.

    Title (Brazil): "Águas Rasas" ("Shallow Waters")
  • comment
    • Author: Irostamore
    If you have no decent expectations when you are going to see a movie to the cinema and if you do not care about your time at all, then you can watch this kind of movie. For me, this is one of the examples I will give to my friends when I will exemplify how to waste your time and not even enjoying. And I will recommend it to those idiots if I want to mock someone ;) But, 99.9%, I am a well intentioned guy, so I place here my warning: it's a waste of time and don't make my mistake by watching it to the end of it. On a scale of epic fails you can probably place this 'masterpiece' between Mega Shark vs. Crocosaurus and Two-Headed Shark Attack, without watching the last of two (or maybe you can try :)))
  • Complete credited cast:
    Blake Lively Blake Lively - Nancy
    Óscar Jaenada Óscar Jaenada - Carlos
    Angelo Josue Lozano Corzo Angelo Josue Lozano Corzo - Surfer
    Joseph Salas Joseph Salas - Surfer (as Jose Manuel Trujillo Salas)
    Brett Cullen Brett Cullen - Dad
    Sedona Legge Sedona Legge - Chloe
    Pablo Calva Pablo Calva - Boy
    Diego Espejel Diego Espejel - Intoxicated Man
    Janelle Bailey Janelle Bailey - Mom
    Ava Dean Ava Dean - Young Nancy
    Chelsea Moody Chelsea Moody - Young Mom
    Sully Seagull Sully Seagull - Sully 'Steven' Seagull (as Sully 'Steven' Seagall)
    All rights reserved © 2017-2024 hd.thomson-multimedia.com