Search

» » King Ralph (1991)

Short summary

As the only relative to take over the Royal throne, a down on his luck American slob must learn the ways of the English.
When an accident obliterates the British royal family and most of its branches, a desperate geneological search discovers the next king: Ralph, a sleazy American lounge singer. Can Ralph measure up to the job, even with the help of loyal aristocrat Willingham?

Trailers "King Ralph (1991)"

According to an interview with John Goodman in the article "'No Leading Man, King Ralph Insists" published in the February 12, 1991 edition of the Los Angeles Times, Goodman denied his new leading man status in this movie, and said he was still just a character actor. Goodman said: "Don't call me a leading man. This is just another part, with a lot more lines. The only difference for me this time, was that I didn't have time to fool around when I wasn't working. When you're the leading man, your meter's running all the time, and you're always working. There's no goof-off time. But that still doesn't make me a leading man. I'm still just a character actor. Nobody's ready to call me Mel Gibson, Jr., and I don't think anybody's ready to pay good money to see me get the girl in the movie. I know I wouldn't go see something like that."

John Goodman does his own singing.

During the film, King Ralph and Miranda go to a Burger King, where Ralph fails to get a Whopper. One of John Goodman's first acting jobs was in a commercial for Burger King, where he happily consumes a Whopper.

The script was originally written with Bill Murray in mind.

Although Finland is not in reality a monarchy, it almost became one after independence was declared in 1917. Even a prospective King was chosen, but later, the idea fell out of favor, and a republic was created instead. Since the film clearly happens in a slightly different alternate history, the appearance of the Finnish Royal family should not be considered a goof, but a rather erudite touch from the filmmakers.

The film was released eleven years after its source novel, "Headlong" by Emlyn Williams, had been published.

First top-billed starring role of John Goodman. On movie posters, the part was also Goodman's first sole name-above-the-title billing.

John Goodman was the only American actor in the movie's lead cast. The rest were British actors.

John Goodman began work on the film shortly after the television sitcom Roseanne (1988) had just finished production on the second season.

The line of dialogue which described King Ralph as being Ralph the Chicken-hearted was a spoof of medieval British monarch Richard the Lionheart.

In the beginning of the movie, in the scene where Ralph (John Goodman) is in the dressing room getting fired, he says, "What? 'Cause I wouldn't sing 'The Impossible Dream'?" This is a reference to Peter O'Toole (Sir Cedric Willingham). In Man of La Mancha (1972), Peter O'Toole sang the song "The Impossible Dream".

King Ralph cracking nuts with the Seal of England is a reference to Mark Twain's The Prince And The Pauper, in which Tom Canty (the pauper) uses the Seal to crack nuts that he snuck into his room.

When Princess Anna of Finland (Joely Richardson) is first seen, due to her look and clothes, she resembles Princess Diana.

In the novel "Headlong" by Emlyn Williams, the Ralph Jones (John Goodman) character was known as Jack Green, becoming King John II, instead of King Ralph. The character of private secretary Sir Cedric Charles Willingham (Peter O'Toole) was known as William "Willie" Millingham in the book, while the character of cabinet secretary Lord Percival Graves (John Hurt) was called, in the novel, Sir Godwin Rodd, and nicknamed "Sir God".

The picture was not selected to be the Royal Performance Film in 1991. The honored movie selected for that year when this movie debuted was ironically another American comedy, Hot Shots! - Die Mutter aller Filme (1991).

Clarke Fountain at Allmovie states that the type of heir that Ralph Jones (John Goodman) is in this film, is a "collateral heir". Fountain writes that "Sometimes a family title, among the nobility of England, goes to the "collateral" heirs, people not in the direct line of decent, like cousins, great-nephews and the like. On rare occasions, these people are not even aware that they are about to be elevated to the House of Lords, and they have been living more-or-less ordinary lives. In this comedy, the family which lacks direct heirs is the Royal Family of England, as all of the likely heirs have died one after the other in swift succession."

The movie was filmed during April, May, June, and July 1990.

Peter O'Toole previously played British Monarch Henry II in Becket (1964) and Der Löwe im Winter (1968).

The name of the African country was "Zambezi". It is fictitious, though ironically, Zambezia - In jedem steckt ein kleiner Held (2012) had a similarly titled name, which refers to that film's fictitious African bird city. Moreover, there is an African place called "Zambezi", but it is not a country. Wikipedia states, "The Zambezi (also spelled Zambeze and Zambesi) is the fourth-longest river in Africa, and the largest flowing into the Indian Ocean from Africa. The 2,574-kilometer-long river (1,599 miles) has its source in Zambia, and flows through eastern Angola, along the eastern border of Namibia and the northern border of Botswana, then along the border between Zambia and Zimbabwe to Mozambique, where it crosses that country to empty into the Indian Ocean."

One of two 1991 movies starring John Goodman. The other picture was Barton Fink (1991).

This was Dallas Adams' final film before his death on August 29, 1991, at the age of forty-four.

The first of three queenly movie roles for Judy Parfitt. She also played Queen Marie in Auf immer und ewig (1998) and Queen Mary in W. E. - Die Romanze des Jahrhunderts (2011). She also played Queen Lillian White in the television series The Charmings (1987).

The film is loosely based on the 1980 novel "Headlong" by Emlyn Williams. Both Williams and Sir John Hurt (Lord Percival Graves) played the Roman Emperor Caligula in adaptations of Robert Graves' 1934 novel "I, Claudius": Williams in the unfinished film I, Claudius (1937), and Hurt in Ich, Claudius, Kaiser & Gott (1976).

The name of the rock band seen at the end of the movie was "Ralph and the Dukettes".

The film takes place from March to July 1990.

Many of the main cast had first names starting with the letter "J". These were John Goodman, Sir John Hurt, Julian Glover, Joely Richardson, James Villiers, Judy Parfitt, and Jack Smethurst.

Peter O'Toole and James Villiers, who were friends since they met as students at the Royal Academy of Dramatic Arts in London in the early 1950s, have previously appeared together in The Ruling Class (1972).

The dogs, with which King Ralph is attempting to play fetch, are a reference to Queen Elizabeth II. She prefers the Pembroke Welsh Corgi breed, and has owned more than thirty during her reign.

Star Billing: John Goodman (first), Peter O'Toole (second), and Sir John Hurt (third).

The name of the Las Vegas ape was "Mitzi the Psychic Chimp".

Julian Glover (King Gustav of Finland) once played the James Bond villain Kristatos in James Bond 007 - In tödlicher Mission (1981). The name of the Bond villain in James Bond 007 - Stirb an einem anderen Tag (2002) was called Gustav Graves. There is also a character called Graves (played by Sir John Hurt) in King Ralph (1991). James Villiers, who played Prime Minister Jeffrey Hale in this movie, also appeared in James Bond 007 - In tödlicher Mission (1981).

According to "Variety", on this picture "Lensing was done on UK locations, and at London's Pinewood Studios."

The amount of the payoff to Miranda Green (Camille Coduri) was fifteen thousand British pounds.

Despite prominent billing in the opening credits, Judy Parfitt (Queen Katherine of Finland) has only one line.

When Lord Graves knocks on Miranda's door a picture of U2 can be seen on the back of the door showing Bono and The Edge.

The Treason Act of 1702, by which Ralph has Lord Percival Graves arrested, is an actual Act of Parliment, enacted in the last year of William the Third's reign. It made it a capital offense to attempt to prevent the successor to the crown from properly taking the throne. Eventually, in 1998, the punishment was changed from death to life imprisonment.

The real royal family name, Windsor, was changed to the fictional name Windham for the movie. Un-synched lip movements in a few parts (most notably the abdication scene) seem to suggest the change was made after the film was shot.

The title that Ralph Jones (John Goodman) was knighted with at the end of the film, was the "Third Duke of Warren".

Ralph Jones' (John Goodman's) full name after he received his title, was "Ralph Hampton Gainesworth Jones".

When private secretary Sir Cedric Charles Willingham (Peter O'Toole) is crowned King Cedric I at the end of the film, though fictitious, it became the third time in motion pictures that O'Toole had played an English Monarch. O'Toole portrayed King Henry II in Becket (1964) and Der Löwe im Winter (1968).

In the picture's source novel "Headlong" by Emlyn Williams, the character equivalent of private secretary Sir Cedric Charles Willingham (Peter O'Toole), William "Willie" Millingham, is crowned King William V at the end of the book, which was first published in 1980 about two years before Prince William was born in 1982. Assuming William one day becomes King of England, and that he is likely to take the title of William V, this will be the same "William V" monarch title that William Millingham is called in this film's source novel.

King Ralph's (John Goodman's) title was Ralph I or Ralph the 1st. His baby son was affectionately billed in the credits as Ralph II.

Early in the film, the entire British Royal Family is wiped out due to an electrocution accident. In the movie's source novel "Headlong" by Emlyn Williams, they are not electrocuted, their cause of death is different. In the film's source book instead, Wikipedia states, "in May 1935, the entire British Royal Family is killed in a freak accident after the explosion of a large dirigible (similar to the Hindenburg disaster)".

As Miranda is about to leave after their first date, she extends her hand first to King Ralph for a hand shake. There is a "no touch" rule for Royalty. The only time a hand shake is appropriate, is if the Royal person first extends their hand.

John Goodman has played the King of England (in this movie) and the President of the United States (on The West Wing (1999)). In both instances, the character was unexpectedly elevated to the high position, and in both instances, the assumption of the high office was temporary.

User reviews


  • comment
    • Author: Nuadabandis
    I wasn't sure whether King Ralph would be my style, seeing how much the critics panned it. But when I watched it, I was surprised at how much I liked it. It is not perfect, but one of the worst films ever? No, far from it. It is enjoyable, despite the sometimes weak script, uneven direction and one or two parts that felt rather slow and contrived. What redeems it though is the cast. John Goodman amiably bumbles his way through his role and gives some charm into a character that could have been bland and uninteresting, and Peter O'Toole and John Hurt seem to be having a whale of a time as the adviser and scheming courtier. Also, the film does actually look nice, the cinematography is good and the scenery is lovely. The soundtrack and score were enjoyable as well. Overall, it has its problems, but it isn't a bad film by all means. 7/10 Bethany Cox
  • comment
    • Author: Niwield
    This seems to get a panning from film reviewers here, but it actually is a good comedy. The story line is mildly stupid and a replay of the old fish-out-of-water formula, but the British were able to add a fantastic flavour to the film and the comedy is kept in check and doesn't become too outlandishly stupid.

    Thumbs up in my view, but it's a little bit date these days. Superb supporting cast and a friendly film: nothing crude and from recollection, no bad language.

    Goes to show that it can still be done if you really apply your mind to it!
  • comment
    • Author: Nikohn
    I confess that "King Ralph" is one of my favorite movies. Yes, the basic plot concept of the film has been done in MANY stories, both written and filmed, but the superb acting coupled with the not-so-subtle jabs at British Royalty push the plot right over the top. Never mind that John Goodman is brilliant (as usual), but the well-done and loosely-serious role of Peter O'Toole adds a much needed anchor to Mr. Goodman's highly-anticipated antics. The filming locations of the film as well provide a truly beautiful backdrop to the production, steeped strongly in tradition and British heritage. Two thumbs up for this light-hearted comedy that dares to poke at some of the more serious issues of royal responsibility and pressure.

    Highly recommended for fun entertainment, I give "King Ralph" a 9 out of 10.
  • comment
    • Author: Ffrlel
    I think that people are generally harsh towards the nature of this film. It is not meant to be entirely accurate and yes, perhaps I am slightly biased having starred in the film myself (Jason Richards (I) on IMDb). You will see that I played the role of Ralph II, the little guy who played that tiny piano/ keyboard at the end of the film! Having looked at the film again recently, I regard it as one of those classic comedies not to be mocked. I had great fun when acting in the film and I had just as much fun watching it! John Goodman really is the greatest of guys (although the size of him really scared me when I met him!) I suggest to everyone who mocks this film, that this is one of the reasons he became so great in the movie world. If it wasn't for King Ralph, he would have never got to the Flintstones or any of the other films which have come to make him so renowned.
  • comment
    • Author: Akelevar
    "King Ralph" was surprisingly entertaining and very funny, actually. However outrageous, implausible, ridiculous the plot, that doesn't matter. It was deliciously over the top to see Peter O'Toole and John Goodman, the most unlikely team ever, provide the spectacle of a cultural clash, to say the least. The movie cheerfully mocks both American and British culture and stereotypes, but it does it rather playfully, without being offensive to anybody. The joke is either on the hamburger and baseball loving Americans, or the stiff conservatory high-class Brits. People who describe this movie as "low-brow" comedy obviously have no idea what that means. This is good quality humor, no crude and tasteless jokes here. The actors are all top-rate and the acting is first class.

    Who could have played the majestic, royal British type better than Peter O'Toole? Nobody! He's perfect, graceful and dignified as the King's adviser. John Goodman, on the other hand, is perfect as the average joe who doesn't know or care much about protocol, good manners or politics. John Hurt is another excellent choice to play the part of an evil, unscrupulous aristocrat hung up on power. Hurt obviously enjoyed doing this part and he's very funny. The movie tends to drag when Goodman's girlfriend shows up, but Princess Anna enters the stage to compensate. There are also some unnecessary exaggerations, but I didn't mind. The script is good, the jokes are over the top and performances are great all around. Hilarious stuff!
  • comment
    • Author: Mozel
    Though this film got trashed in a lot of circles, I rather like it if for no other reasons than it gives Americans some notion of the function of the monarchy in Great Britain.

    Sometimes having the head of state and the head of government does have its bad points. Watergate for instance might have not been the gut wrenching experience if in America we were a parliamentary democracy with a royal head of state. Richard Nixon would have been put up for a "no confidence" vote and out he would have been without all the drama.

    Drama on the other side of the Atlantic is saved for the Royals. This film might give an American some idea of what the abdication crisis was all about. John Goodman as the American born King has his own Mrs. Simpson.

    In fact how he got to the throne is quite the tale. On some grand occasion the extended royal family got together for what looks like a team picture like they take in spring training of the various baseball rosters. Someone left a loose electrical cable dangling on the metal bleachers and the whole lot of them were electrocuted.

    Genealogists poured through the Windham family tree and found some member had renounced it all and gone to America. The heir of that forgotten branch is John Goodman, Ralph Jones who does a lounge act in Las Vegas and not in classier joints in Las Vegas.

    Of course the free and easy and thoroughly American Goodman doesn't take readily to his new found job. He can't quite comprehend that he has to serve as well as be served. And he has the same problem the Duke of Windsor had when he was briefly Edward VIII. With a lot more excuse since Windsor was brought up in the tradition.

    Peter O'Toole as the lord who tries to give him some on the job training and John Hurt who has his own reasons for wanting Goodman to flop both give stand out performances. Best scene the palace ball for Goodman's prospective bride when Goodman does his lounge act.

    It's a funny film and in its own way educational. The Duke of Windsor should have seen it. His duty would have been clear.
  • comment
    • Author: LeXXXuS
    It's not stupid, it's charming. A bit old-fashioned and corny, yes, but entertaining and amusing and well worth the time! I just saw this for the second time on cable TV and liked it just as much as the first time!

    Goodman performs bravely and exquisitely as the good-hearted buffoon who overcomes the stuffiness and snobbishness of a group of bluebloods too good for their own bodily functions.
  • comment
    • Author: Nayatol
    When the entire British royal family is wiped out in an "awful" accident, the American bar entertainer Ralph Jones (excellent: John Goodman, he makes up for most of the boring parts of the plot) becomes the new King of England. After a few adjustment problems with his new job (clothing, manners etc.) he falls in love with a young woman he meets at a local strip club. Problems emerge when his secretary tries to marry him to the Finnish princess to seal a business deal for a few English companies. All in all, a good movie with some great lines but also some boring parts.
  • comment
    • Author: Global Progression
    Although I own the DVD, whenever King Ralph show up on television I watch it all the way through. This is a clever satire sending up both the pretentiousness of the British monarchy and the crassness of American society. Peter O'Toole and John Goodman....both gifted actors give this film real depth in their nuanced performances. William Hurt's over the top performance as the villainous pretender to the throne is pitch perfect, and the supporting cast, including the aides to the King, the visiting Roals from Finland, the African King and Ralph's love interest are solid, leaving this movie without a weak performance. There is something in this for everyone; romance, betrayal, friendship, and a fast moving plot with just the right kinds of twists and turns that keep the pace of this relatively short movie moving right along.
  • comment
    • Author: Anasius
    I don't know what the harsh critics of this movie were expecting. It's a predictable movie with a familiar theme, as others have mentioned, but I don't know what folks found so disappointing. If you can handle the first 5-10 minutes of silliness, you will enjoy the rest of the movie. If you're looking for a groundbreaking cinematic masterpiece...well, first of all, you might want to stay away from John Goodman movies. ;-)

    This movie is good family fun, has some funny lines and nice character interaction, and the conflict/romance plot, while completely predictable like the rest of the movie, does the job it's supposed to do. The bad guy gets stuffed, the good guy gets the girl, the hero is redeemed, etc. Those aren't spoilers, since anyone who watches movies enough to be reading this site can see it all coming by the second commercial break. Still, I wasn't disappointed by that, since unlike others, I didn't think a movie called "King Ralph" was going to reach new peaks of comedic genius.

    I gave it a 6/10. Worth watching for some chuckles and classic theme vibes. I also don't think the British greats were wasted in it...I think it made for decent corny fun, and having O'Toole et al be part of it was a big part of that.

    They could have picked a better tune than "Good Golly Miss Molly" for King Ralph's big performance though. :-)
  • comment
    • Author: Mr.Champions
    John Goodman stars as the title monarch in this royal comedy.

    Ralph is a Las Vegas lounge singer badly in the need for some

    moolah when a group of British councilmen approach him one night

    and bear him the news that Ralph is the new king of England

    after the whole royal family has been wiped out in a freak

    accident! Reluctantly, Ralph takes the job. At first, he seems

    like a fish out of water, the fact being that he is an American

    first of all, and that he is also a total slob! Being king might

    not be so good after all.

    This movie is funny because Goodman does a nice job being a

    lovable slob trying his best to be the royal figurehead of the

    Britain. Peter O'Toole is also good as Willingham, the

    aristocrat whose job is to look after the newly appoi
  • comment
    • Author: Hatе&love
    So I don't consider this a classic, as some other reviewers have labeled it. You really have to stretch the imagination to accept the premise that the first 30 people or so in line for the crown are suddenly killed and England, one of the largest and most powerful economies of the world, has to ask some D list lounge singer to be their new king. But I get it; this is a just-for-laughs fish out of water story, not a serious what-if film.

    John Goodman, whose career was built on playing the middle-aged working class every man, does a decent job here portraying a beer drinking, football loving regular Joe who just can't stop creating uncomfortable moments around stuffy British people.

    The gags are a bit of a mixed bag. When they develop in a way that's organic to the character and moment, they work pretty well. But for every good setup there is the overly forced one, such as when Goodman's character accidentally launches a greasy bird off his plate at a state dinner while trying to cut into it. The ensuing chaos sees every glass along a long, long table fall over like dominoes for nearly 30 seconds. The scene feels so desperate to hit the laugh; you can practically see the little charges going off to keep the glasses falling in comedic fashion past the horrified diners. The problem is, comedy is really hard. Even a whiff of desperation for laughs like that scene has turns funny into sad really quick.

    The other part of this movie that's hard to swallow is the romance subplot. Hollywood knows that one of their major target demographics, middle aged guys, will identify with Goodman and so they supply the dream girl for the viewers alter-ego. In this case the movie asks us to believe that an insanely gorgeous 26 year old is just dying to fall in love with her dream guy: an obese man nearly old enough to be her father. When the leading man is Tom Cruise or Brad Pitt, yah OK I can believe that. But Goodman? I don't know, I just think an actress more age appropriate would have been easier to believe. The two here just don't seem like they go together.

    My enjoyment of the film may have been effected by the fact that I don't care much for the concept of a monarchy, and I find arguments that keeping families in an artificial state of wealth and privilege is a good thing because they "serve the people" facile and ignorant. Note that the fantasy is always that you get to suddenly become royalty, never that you get to suddenly be a subject who gets sent to prison for not bowing properly or mouthing off. Monarchies are an outdated and brutish form of government best left in the history books, imho.

    All in all, I managed to watch the whole movie, even if I wasn't enthralled the whole way thru. Passable entertainment.
  • comment
    • Author: Kajishakar
    OK first off you have to suspend belief big time, after all the whole royal family wiped out having their photo taken, and being replaced by an American lounge singer who is less than sophisticated is a bit far fetched. So I can understand why lots of people don't rate this film, but I think there is more to it.

    John Goodman does a great job as Ralph and the supporting cast are just as engaging from an excellent Peter O'Tool and charming Camille Corduri, currently to be seen in Doctor Who. So the acting isn't bad. There are some laughs along the way and the story though predictable is good enough. So what's wrong with it.

    It could be that it's just a bit simple, but that's what makes it fun, nothing much to think about just sit back and enjoy. It has a heart and it doesn't try and be anything it isn't so let's not give it too hard a time.
  • comment
    • Author: Bralore
    I'm not even going to attempt to be unbiased about King Ralph. I first saw the movie at a young age and watched it many times growing up. The movie isn't high art or genre defining. It is a simple story about a lovable slacker who discovers he is much more and embarks on a fish-out- of-water journey. And as that King Ralph is a decent movie.

    When a freak accident wipes out the entire British Royal Family, American lounge singer Ralph Jones is uncovered as the next heir to the throne. Despite being your atypical slacker, he shows a certain charm and his unconventional methods (along with much help from his private secretary and assistant) begin to win people over. He even begins to secretly see Miranda, a former stripper that he meets soon after arriving in England. But soon the corrupt Lord Graves begins a plot to disgrace Ralph and position himself as next in line for the throne. Miranda is pulled into the plot but falls for Ralph and backs out. Graves already has what he needs and disgraces Ralph at a royal ball. After Miranda admits her part in the plot, Ralph is able to trace it back to Graves and repair some of the damage done. He admits to Parliament and the people that he is not fit to be king and abdicates the throne to his secretary, who was secretly part of the royal line as well. Soon Ralph makes up with Miranda and the movie ends with them married as Ralph becomes a Duke and gets to live his dream of being a musician.

    The cast is solid all around. John Goodman is impossible to hate as the big buffoon struggling to adapt to an entirely new world. Camille Coduri is likable despite her character's part in the plot against Ralph and has good chemistry with Goodman. Peter O'Toole and Richard Griffiths provide solid backup as his secretary and assistant, respectively, and John Hurt appears to have a blast in his small role as the evil Lord Graves.

    As mentioned earlier, the story is a basic fish-out-of-water tale. Many of the jokes are derived from Ralph's class difference and ignorance of English culture. It is all very basic but is carried by the charm of Goodman. While my score of 8 is biased by years of popping in that old VHS tape, I recommend at least giving it a try. It is definitely worth a viewing.
  • comment
    • Author: Fenius
    Watching a whole royal family blown up, isn't particularly funny, but we must remember this is only a movie. Out of interest, it would be interesting to see the real royal family's view on this movie, as well as how accurately the set up is here. Enter John Goodman, a piano player who plays in seedy second rate clubs, in Vegas. He's scouted out by some of the surviving royalty where on the night of being fired from his gig, he's given a proposition, which is a dream. But really what would it be like, being the new king or any royal figure, having to adhere to customs, and keep up appearances, while also being mobbed in informal wear. No way. And this is basically what they take from Goodman in this. I think they've visually captured this originally good comedy well, and it has been interestingly written. It's quite dishy. One such touch I loved, was the score of punk/fascists with their pink cuts and heavy jewellery, watching through the t.v shop, passing view on their new king. Our King too, falls in love with an English girl, where she too is propositioned, by a corrupt royal party, (John Hurt, in a splendid dastardly performance, who was also up for king). Peter O'Toole as Ralph's royal tutor, is royally solid, no surprise, he was cast in this sort of role. They found the right man for the job in Goodman, as he displays his bumbling and clunky manner with such believability, which he's very un king like, where the writers have poured a lot of funny stuff into this, as well poking fun at the royal traits and figures, themselves. John Goodman's love interest was good too, fresh off the heals of her character in Nuns On The Run. Oh and he was right, about the royal woman (fox, looking a lot like Di), he's 'spose to marry, she really does have the voice of a tuba, which would scare off any guy. Check out Goodman's expressions here. There will be people out there, including real royalty who will take offence to this film, but there's a lot of other more offensive comedies. I found King Ralph very funny, but also very well made in terms of royal setting, costuming, whatever. And really, is there such a desert as Spotted d..k. Hear and see Duke Of Earl song like it's never been played before, by Goodman, and band.
  • comment
    • Author: Arcanefist
    I LOVE this movie! I know that when it came out it was largely ignored...by both the critics and the movie going public...but I found this film to be just simply fun to watch...a wonderful movie to just get caught up into. It has no pre-texts of social or political idealism. It doesn't try to solve the worlds problems with it's message. And it doesn't aim to make us, the viewers, think overly hard about where the movie is leading us. It does, however, present us with totally believable characters who we quickly become emotionally invested in. Sure the opening plot structure is contrived but that is half of the charm of the film's setup. It is a good absurd introduction to the twists of the movie.

    I must confess, being half Cherokee Indian and half English, I was drawn to this movie if for no other reason than I had always heard about that half of my family's history and imagined who they were and how they lived. As an American, I have also fallen prey to my own sometimes myopic world view. King Ralph was an enjoyable way to contemplate the place that a monarchy holds in the hearts of their countrymen.

    I don't believe that there is anything inherently wrong with having a movie that doesn't try to enlighten or enrage us. I have always felt that too often Hollywood tries to insert a message or moral slant to a project just because they believe that to not include one makes the movie seem shallow or silly. I say whats wrong with having just a fun movie? To me King Ralph was just such a movie. Of course it had smatterings of political overtones and touches of social commentary, but I feel that this was used to propel the story rather than to try and impart some deeper philosophical meaning to us.
  • comment
    • Author: Moonshaper
    Back in the early 90's we got many family movies that offered lots of cheesy irritating laughs and child actors, the odd thing was many actually did really well. The original movie would somehow manage to become a reasonable hit (a different time), and those movies, in some cases, actually turned into franchises! Those same franchises then managed to knock out a semi-decent sequel or two before eventually disintegrating into utter trash with numerous straight to DVD sequels being churned out. The films I refer to would be 'Beethoven', 'Problem Child', 'Home Alone' and 'Free Willy'...mainly.

    'King Ralph' was a slightly different animal though, a stand alone family film that was totally stupid in concept but offered a really solid cast and, by the looks of things, some high production values. Amazingly its yet another novel adaptation albeit a loose one, the story simply revolves around the British Royal Family getting wiped out in a freak accident. Its then down to the upper echelons to dig out a new King by rooting through the vast Royal Family tree, trying to discover a long lost distant relation with true royal blood to take the throne. Once they do it of course turns out to be the most unsuitable person imaginable (well for the early 90's anyway), a fat, loud, uncouth, brash American.

    Right so who would be the best fat loud American of the time? why John Goodman of course. The fat, beer-swilling, checkered-shirt wearing slob from the hit TV US show 'Roseanne'. Basically take Goodman's popular character from that show, the stereotypical, overweight, middle aged, lacking of general knowledge, US sports obsessed male Yank, and make him a lounge singer with a knowledge of female club stripping and a penchant for Elvis style shades (not much of a stretch). To counter this you need a stereotypical British gent to guide and teach this gaudy foreigner, enter the stellar Peter O'Toole as the Royal secretary. You can't really get any better than O'Toole for the epitome of a British aristocrat (despite being possibly Irish), and you can't really get anymore of a polar opposite to Goodman. The duo play off each other superbly well considering how daft the film is and the fact its pretty much aimed at children. O'Toole puts in a sterling performance coming across perfectly as someone who would look after royalty, sure we've seen this type of performance from him before but his loyal butler-esque manner is so pleasing to watch and listen to. Indeed his speech to Goodman's character about what it is to be a King of England is quite stirring I must say, as a Brit it did bring a lump to my throat, such a shame these days patriotic talk like that is non-existent and almost frowned upon.

    To add even more British star power to the proceedings we have John Hurt in an even more outrageously, hideously over the top, aristocratic, Conservative cad who will stop at nothing to dirty the new Kings image. Hurt's slimy, arrogant, pompous voice and attitude is just as good as his weaselly yet smartly dressed appearance complete with a dastardly thin pencil tash. I love how he's also completely cold, emotionless and kinda racist, calling Goodman's character 'a song and dance man from the colonies', a real Alan B'Stard. What's more his sidekick is played by Leslie Phillips! all the old chivalrous warhorses here.

    So the brilliant character acting aside, what's also very impressive about this apparent silly kids flick is the fact it all looks fantastic. The outfits, suits and general attire of dignitaries and royals is spruce, debonair and dapper all round, everyone looks tip- top and pristine. The locations are a mix or real stately homes, clever use of small sections of real posh establishments and more obviously stock footage. Interior sequences are the most impressive with some sets looking exquisite, highly detailed and extremely lavish, it really looks like no expense was spared in creating these elegant royal interiors. I guess its all a bit surprising really, you'd never expect such extravagant detail with a silly little comedy like this, you'd think it would be all about the slapstick and raking in as much moolah as possible, different times.

    Being an old movie I did also enjoy the retro blast I got from time to time, anyone of my age will no doubt feel the same way. Its always amusing to see old fashioned British punks in these movies. You the know the types, brightly coloured mohawks, black leather jackets covered in badges, chains and safety pins, lots of makeup etc...Twas also funny to see them all watching old fashioned TV's in the windows of a Rumbelows store, remember that??

    Yeah the whole thing is very predictable as a kind of rags to riches, Prince Charming type of affair, you can guess what's gonna go down in scenes and overall its all very sweet and adorable. It might sound clichéd and dumb but watching the hapless Ralph trying to learn the ways of the super rich, whilst attempting to chat with senior dignitaries and royalty, is perfect light entertainment. That said there is a pleasant and fresh tale to be discovered here, being based on a novel it kinda reminded me of 'Brewster's Millions' actually. Goodman (in an early-ish, pre-superstardom movie role) is amazingly likable as the American lounge lizard with a golden heart who is turned into a rich nobleman...with a golden heart. Supporting cast are all brilliant as said adding real quality and a hint of solid drama to the story, the film is fun for kids with plenty of cutesy charm, but it also has the odd snippet of fun for adults too.

    7/10
  • comment
    • Author: Dranar
    I can't help but chuckle every time I see this film, but I know that just the thought of something like this happening makes about 100 people with calculators sit up and start crunching numbers of the possibility of something like this happening.

    John Goodman plays a down on his luck performer that, as it turns out, goes from distant family to the throne of England to instant family on the throne. The only problem is that he's had no refinement and leaves a lot to be desired in the courtesy department. If one plus one equals two, then this combination equals a comedy that can't be matched...on ANY level.

    I'm not saying this is the best comedy of all time, but what I am saying is that this film, if you rent it, is a nice quiet evening that will not offend many people and leaves the lead actor in a familiar base for him: a place where he's supposed to seem unfamiliar. Everybody remembers him as Dan Connor, but how many of you reading this remember he was the head football coach in Revenge of the Nerds? Goodman was an excellent choice for this part because of his range as an actor and his on-screen chemistry with Camille Coduri was priceless, too, as I felt that they represented the kind of relationship that everybody would like.

    So, hats off (or crowns, if you will) to David S Ward for this film. I just got in here to give this comment and my next stop is to see what else this director has done. 7 out of 10 stars.
  • comment
    • Author: Kriau
    There isn't anything in this movie that is offensive or rude or mean. The stripper never strips, the bad guy doesn't do anything vile, just *bad*. If you prefer modern American violence & crass language & glossy sexuality, you'll hate this movie. You'll think it's dull & stupid. If you're looking for something you can enjoy with your 5 year old daughter & your 95 year old grandmother, this is the movie. Every body gets what they deserve in the end. Yep, golly gee whilickers - it's a feel good movie!
  • comment
    • Author: Shaktit
    I love this movie because it shows a lot about people. I just wonder if I can get it on Video or on DVD. If any of this is possible I would like to have it to watch.

    I also like the characters in the movie. Particularly The King who was played by the man who has the character in Roseanne. From the minute I recognized King Ralph I was not in any doubt about who played him.

    I wish that the danish TV could send this lovely movie again. If they do then I'll watch it.

    I simply love this movie and it makes me laugh. I must admit that I like all the persons in the movie.

    I don't have any doubts that this movie made an impression on me when I saw it. It really was a very fine movie. I just have to mention it.

    I can not praise this movie enough I simply love it with all my heart and soul. The movie was moving my feelings.

    The movie it self was inspiring and amusing. Ther's no doubt that this movie would go into peoples hearts and they would love it very much.

    It shows how the time was in those days as the movie was about. It must have been hard for King Ralph to be a king.

    The customs was very pretty. I just like this movie. And I enjoyed it.
  • comment
    • Author: fetish
    At first glance, this film might seem to be just another fish-out-of-water, slob-vs-the-snobs story, and the high-brow of the movie world might not consider it high-quality, but "King Ralph" works for several reasons. First, it's good, plain fun. Second, and most importantly, it delves to the very reasons why the British Monarchy is still revered and why it remains important to our our cousins across the sea.
  • comment
    • Author: Tygrafym
    This movie is insanely funny. The plot is highly improbable, but if nothing else that makes it funnier. The sets were great, the actors were fine (and peter o'toole as Lord Willingham was excellent). Some of the scenes even manage to show King Ralph being serious as he tries to act like a king.

    spoilers of the end ahead...

    The end with (spoilers!) Ralph abdicating and naming Lord Willingham as his successor (who then makes him a duke) was a particularly funny scene that alludes to one of his earlier errors.
  • comment
    • Author: Zulkishicage
    The bizarre and unthinkable idea of an American King of Britain would certainly make a good comedy however this one tries to hard. The film is based loosely on a novel Headstrong and the the novel was adapted to the idea of an American becoming King and the formula worked making the film interesting but with a basis to build on. The film works well with all the national stereotyping of the characters and the culture shock of the main character to adjust to his new found culture as well as the shock of being from ordinary in to exceptional. The transition of the character and his new circumstances is played out well The faults of the film is that it would of been better as a Drama with Comical elements making it formal without being serious. The plot is too simplistic and as in the novel should of followed more of the complicated Politics of the British Monarchy rather then a predictable dual format. The cast is all good except John Goodman who is to inelegant to pass of as a monarch and a different American lead should of been selected. However an enjoyable afternoon film for all the family that will be fun.
  • comment
    • Author: Kekinos
    A decently little comedy staring John Goodmen who is granted the status of king when every royal member in his family dies. While Goodman is a great actor I couldn't help but picture John Candy in the role. Where Ralph breaks an expensive plays its straight from uncle Buck and his whole personality with the casino scene fits Candy to a T.

    Another aspect of the story I loved was his conflict of interest between Ralph and Miranda. A king isn't allowed to date a stripper and this he must make a choice between her or giving the throne to his evil rival. It was exciting to see how it would all turn out as it wouldn't effect one person, but a whole country. Lets face it I'm a stickler for happy endings so I was glade he ended up with the girl, found a great replacement and kept a title.

    The sets, glamour and costumes all seem legit on such a small budget and adds to the realism. King Ralph isn't a barrow of laughs, but subtle and thought out. Let his royal highness sweep you away.
  • comment
    • Author: Alsantrius
    at first sigh, an amusing lesson about royalty. in fact, a kind of parable with flavor of fairy tale who remands the essence of democracy under the British aspects. a comedy who translate the duties of monarch, it has the chance of perfect cast who gives to cultural differences precise marks. a film about the duties and solutions, about a metamorphose and about the spirit of a nation. seductive and amusing. little gem by Peter O 'Toole and a rich nuanced character by John Goodman. a film for laugh and for reflection. easy and clear, far to be great but not series product, interesting and not too complicated. a movie " ad usum delphini".
  • Cast overview, first billed only:
    John Goodman John Goodman - Ralph
    Peter O'Toole Peter O'Toole - Willingham
    John Hurt John Hurt - Graves
    Camille Coduri Camille Coduri - Miranda
    Richard Griffiths Richard Griffiths - Phipps
    Leslie Phillips Leslie Phillips - Gordon
    James Villiers James Villiers - Hale
    Joely Richardson Joely Richardson - Princess Anna
    Niall O'Brien Niall O'Brien - McGuire
    Julian Glover Julian Glover - King Gustav
    Judy Parfitt Judy Parfitt - Queen Katherine
    Ed Stobart Ed Stobart - Dysentery
    Gedren Heller Gedren Heller - Punk Girl
    Rudolph Walker Rudolph Walker - King Mulambon
    Michael Johnson Michael Johnson - Hamilton
    All rights reserved © 2017-2024 hd.thomson-multimedia.com