Search

» » Halloween 5: The Revenge of Michael Myers (1989)

Short summary

One year after the events of Halloween 4: The Return of Michael Myers (1988), the Shape returns to Haddonfield once again in an attempt to kill his now-mute niece.
It's one year later after the events of Halloween 4. Michael survives the shootings and on October 31st he returns with a vengeance. Lurking and stalking, Jamie, Rachel, and Rachel's friends, Michael forms a plan to lure Jamie out of the children's hospital where events lead up to the confrontation at the Myers house. Halloween 5 is a dark, thrill ride that will scare the heck out of you!

Trailers "Halloween 5: The Revenge of Michael Myers (1989)"

(at around 32 mins) The bus that the Man in Black gets off of stops outside the exact same store where Jamie and Rachel went to get a Halloween costume in Halloween 4: The Return of Michael Myers (1988).

The house that Michael returns to when recreating the hair brushing scene is not the same house design as the Myers' house in the first Halloween movie.

Don Shanks revealed in an interview that many of the scenes involving the man in black had him playing the character, because of speculation that he was a blood relative of Michael Myers. He also admitted that even the writers had not yet decided the man in black's identity.

As part of the opening, an alternate scene was shot but never used. The scene shows a man who finds Michael Myers' body at the beginning and removes his mask, staring at it weirdly. The filming of it can be seen in the documentary, Inside 'Halloween 5' (2000).

The poster depicts Jamie Lloyd in her clown costume from Halloween 4: The Return of Michael Myers (1988), despite the fact she wears a princess costume for this film.

Lowest grossing film in the entire series.

This film had one of lowest international theatrical distributions of the series, being seen only in Argentina, Colombia, France, Germany and Turkey. Elsewhere, it was released straight to video, with large campaigns in Norway, the UK and Spain.

Despite the subtitle "The Revenge of Michael Myers" which appears on all movie covers and posters, it does not appear in the actual film. It only says "Halloween 5" in the opening credits.

KNB Effects had designed grotesque facial makeup for Michael Myers' unmasking towards the end of the film. The producers told them to do so as an option, either showing Michael's badly scarred face or keep it in the dark. They went for the latter.

The Jamie Lloyd character has a striking parallel to the Tommy Jarvis character from the Friday the 13th series. Both characters appeared in the fourth, fifth and sixth films of their respective series. They were both about the same age in their first appearance. They both become institutionalized and develop homicidal tendencies themselves after the killer. In this film, Jamie starts out as a mute. In the fifth Friday the 13th, Tommy rarely speaks. At the end of that film, Tommy is seen holding a knife and essentially becomes Jason. At the end of the previous Halloween, Jamie is seen holding a pair of scissors and she essentially becomes Michael.

The scene where Michael Myers drives a car while wearing a different kind of mask was initially scripted to have him wear a Ronald Reagan mask. However, the idea of a Reagan mask was soon rejected in order to keep the film devoid of any political subtexts.

In an odd coincidence, the fifth film of all three of the major slasher series (Michael, Freddy and Jason) has a different title in the film than the one shown on its cover. In this one, "The Revenge of Michael Myers" is missing. In Friday the 13th Part V: A New Beginning, the "Part V" is missing. And in A Nightmare on Elm Street 5: The Dream Child, the number "5" is missing.

When filming a scene, Donald Pleasence accidentally hit Don Shanks in the nose, breaking it. As a result, they had to cut out the nose of the mask and add on a paper thin nose cut off of another H5 mask. The edges of the nose appliance can be seen clearly in a lot of the film.

Second film in the series to begin by changing the ending of the previous film, after Хэллоуин 2 (1981).

The laundry chute scene was filmed with 30 different sections of the laundry chute. Some were full props, others were positioned horizontally to run the camera through on a dolly, and others were various sections that had cut-out portions for filming. Although the scene was very complex, it was all shot in one night.

(at around 7 mins) This is the first Halloween film to have Michael Myers with black hair. His original hair color is blonde. You can see Michael in this film without the mask twice, first when he wakes up in the cabin and again in the attic when he's in front of Jamie (at around 1h 27 mins). Tom Morga is one of two actors to have played Myers who had a different hair color. The other is Brad Loree in Хэллоуин: Воскрешение (2002).

On the DVD audio commentary, director Dominique Othenin-Girard stated actress Tamara Glynn (Sammie) became increasingly tense and 'unfeminine' as they got closer to filming the love scene between her and Matthew Walker (Spitz) in the barn. Glynn even asked co-star Danielle Harris to be on set during the filming of that scene to help ease her tension.

The car chase sequence was shot in a single night.

The last film in the series to feature a pumpkin in the opening credits until Хэллоуин (2018).

When Jamie starts sensing Michael near Billy, Dr. Loomis is walking in the hallway. The sign tattooed on Michael's wrist and the man in black can be seen on the wall behind Dr. Loomis.

The Man In Black shots were re-shot in the UK for unknown reasons with an unknown British extra. The extra was uncredited.

After filming for two weeks, Donald Pleasence gave his much bigger trailer to Danielle Harris once he left set. Harris's mother had been complaining about the small size of her daughter's trailer and Pleasence decided that she should have his.

In the script, Rachel had Tina's role, and Tina had Rachel's, with a vast change in character for Rachel. Also the script had a scene in the Myers' house that had The Shape fall through the floor into a cage in the basement, and the end had Michael escaping with Sheriff Meeker finding an empty cell, and other drafts had Meeker dying.

This was the only Halloween movie never released in Italy.

(at around 17 mins) The script added two "bumbling" cops, Deputies Nick and Tom, with their own "clown theme" in the background to homage a scene in Wes Craven's The Last House on the Left (1972).

This is the first time Michael Myers is shown driving since the original Хэллоуин (1978). While it's obvious he drives a tow truck in Halloween 4 (right after Loomis confronts him the the garage/diner), you never actually see him behind the wheel.

The old hermit from the opening scene was originally scripted as a younger man named "Dr. Death" who had a fascination with the occult. His shack was supposed to be filled with ancient runes and tablets, and he attempted to bring Michael back to life after finding him. This scene was filmed, and can be seen in Inside 'Halloween 5' (2000).

Don Shanks was originally set to wear the same mask that George P. Wilbur had worn in Halloween 4: The Return of Michael Myers (1988) in order to retain consistency between the movies. The mask did not fit Shanks, so a new one was made.

Donald Pleasence had disagreements with Akkad and Othenin-Girard citing that Jamie should have been portrayed as "all evil" after stabbing her stepmother, Akkad disagreed thinking that fans wanted to see more of The Shape. In an interview, Danielle Harris explained what she thought of the idea: "The way Halloween 4 ended I thought I was going to be the Killer, I thought it would have been fun to come back as the Killer or Michael's sidekick. Scary, but fun".

In terms of his appearance, the Man In Black's wardrobe of a long, black coat and black cowboy boots, is a nod to country music singer Johnny Cash, who often wore long, black coats and black cowboy boots, thus earning him his famous nickname "The Man In Black".

Director Dominique Othenin-Girard's name is incorrectly spelled "Dominique Otherin-Girard" in the opening credits.

Tina was originally scripted to wear a devil costume to the Halloween party but this was changed so that Samantha wore this instead as Dominique Othenin-Girard did not want the heroine dressed like a devil.

Although set on 31st of October filming took place in the summer as evident by the leaves still being present on the trees.

On the audio commentary for the DVD, it is stated that Greg Nicotero and Wendy Foxworth were seeing each other during filming.

Jeffrey Landman kept his pirate costume.

Mike (Tinas boyfriend) is the only person to share the exact same name as the iconic serial killer Michael Myers.

A scanned PDF copy of the shooting script exists on line. The title page reveals the moniker: Halloween 5: And Things Go Bump in the Night". The film never carried that title in any market.

The first Halloween film to go directly to VHS in Australia. It also took almost two years from its initial US release to be released in that country.

Tina's boyfriend Mike's car which is subsequently stolen by and used later by Michael (Don Shank's) is a 1967 Chevrolet Camaro.

When Michael kills Spitz by stabbing him through the back with the pitchfork when he's on top of Samantha is similar to Friday the 13th Part II (1981), when Jason uses a spear to kill Jeff and Sandra, except Michael doesn't use enough force to kill Samantha with the pitchfork also, so instead he kills her with a scythe.

George P. Wilbur, who had portrayed The Shape in the previous film, did not express interest in returning to play the role (although he did work as a stunt player on the film). Don Shanks was cast to play the speech-less, white-masked murderer. Shanks had already played a similar character in the first two Silent Night, Deadly Night films.

Unable to find a small Victorian house like the Myers House in Halloween (1978), the filmmakers chose a bigger, more mansion-like house because they needed a house that could provide wide rooms, hallways, an attic, a basement, and a laundry chute.

Danielle Harris and Don Shanks became good friends over the course of filming, reportedly spending a lot of time together while off set.

Don Shanks was also injured when he was filming the scene where the shape crashes Mike's Camaro into the tree, Dominique Othenin-Girard forgot to yell "Cut!" And fire was beginning to emerge from the car (Shanks puts this down to Othenin-Girard being sidetracked by seeing stunts take place during his first major directing job) finally stunt coordinator Don Pike told Othenin-Girard to yell "Cut!".

Don Shanks is the only person of Native American ancestry to portray Michael.

This is the first Halloween movie to contain no full frontal nudity in it.

The handgun that Dr. Loomis uses, is a M1911A1.

The film's first screenplay, which was written by Shem Bitterman, featured Jamie Lloyd and Michael Myers as dual antagonists, with a now-teenage Jamie going on a killing spree of her own, Myers attempting to kill her because she was unwittingly interfering with his own spree, and Rachel being caught in the middle. Executive producer Moustapha Akkad disliked the screenplay, feeling it felt more like a parody of the Halloween series than an actual entry in it, and also because he had already promised Danielle Harris that she would be allowed to return as Jamie, and did not think that the 12-year-old Harris would be credible as a serial killer. As a result, the screenplay was rewritten essentially from scratch by Michael Jacobs and director Dominique Othenin-Girard, though Bitterman remained credited for contractual reasons.

Don Shanks was 6'1", the fourth-shortest Michael Myers in "Halloween" history. Then below him at 6' is Tony Moran who played the unmasked Michael Myers in the first Halloween. The second-shortest at 5'10" is Nick Castle from the original Halloween. Dick Warlock in "Halloween II" was the first-shortest at 5'8-1/2", camera angles were used to make Shanks appear more taller and imposing.

Michael is shot ten times by Deputy Charlie with a, Smith and Wesson Model 64.

As well as all previous movies (but Halloween III: Season of the Witch (1982) where he doesn't appear), Michael Myers never runs.

The Vincent Drug store featured in in this film and the previous one can be found on Google Street view....

Karen Alston (Darlene Carruthers) reprised her role in the beginning of the film showing the anonymous person in the mask stabbing her as she falls into the bathtub of water. Her voice-over was recorded by Wendy Kaplan (Tina).

Troy Evans starred opposite Don Shanks who played Michael Myers in this film. Don Shanks and Troy were both of Jim Carrey's co-stars. Don Shanks was a stunt performer in Dumb and Dumber(1994) and Troy was Roger Podactor in Ace Ventura: Pet Detective(1994).

Matthew Walker (Spitz) starred in another slasher movie two years later in Childs Play 3 (1991) as Major Ellis however unlike this movie he doesn't die in Childs Play 3.

As well as all previous movies (but Halloween III: Season of the Witch (1982) where he doesn't appears), Michael Myers never talks.

Moustapha Akkad has said that one of his biggest regrets about the film was killing off the character of Rachel Carruthers. In retrospect, he would've kept her alive, but she was killed in an attempt to show that no one, not even Rachel, was safe from Michael.

In the infamous laundry chute scene, Jamie was originally stabbed in the leg but the shot was cut from the film by the MPAA because it was deemed "too disturbing" (as Jamie exits the chute, a bloody wound is visible on her leg). Danielle Harris still owns the prosthetic leg.

(at around 1h 29 mins) In the scene where Michael is ambushed by Dr. Loomis and beaten with a 2x4, Don Shanks was really hit with the plank. He later admitted in an interview that one of the blows broke his nose.

Rachel was originally supposed to be stabbed in the throat with scissors but the actress, Ellie Cornell, felt it was too gruesome an end for her character, so it was changed.

The film had been fighting an X rating with the violence, blood, and gore. Some scenes were trimmed down to keep it rated R, including a shot of Mike quivering on the ground after Michael stabs him in the head with a hand rake, a shot of glass embedded in Officer Eddy's face after Michael punches through the windshield, and Billy's leg being hit by the Camaro, the scythe that kills Samantha was originally supposed to go through her forehead.

In an article that appeared in the October 1989 issue of Fangoria magazine, director Dominique Othenin-Girard claimed that the film's ending was not scripted. Donald Pleasence stated in the same article that the film would contain the death of his character Dr. Sam Loomis.

Despite receiving third billing, Ellie Cornell is only in the film for the first 20 minutes.

Max (Rachel's dog) is the fourth dog to die in the series.

When Rachel's death scene was altered by the actress' request, it was changed in order to reflect the flashback where Jamie stabbed her foster mother in Halloween 4: The Return of Michael Myers (1988) in a similar fashion.

Body Count: 15 (not including the opossum & dog).

2nd Halloween movie where Michael Myers murders on October 30th.

User reviews


  • comment
    • Author: Ferne
    No surprises that Michael Myers didn't actually die at the end of "Halloween IV: The Return of Michael Myers" in a blaze of gun fire, causing him to tumble down a cave and throwing in some dynamite to hopefully finish him off. Well that didn't work, as he barely escapes and finding himself floating down a river to be rescued by some old hermit who looks after him for a year to bring him back to health. Now it's close to Halloween again, Michael awakes to pay him back for his troubles. Myers gets back to his brutal business and heads back to Haddonfield with the intention of killing his niece Jamie. After the horrific ordeal of stabbing her step-mother, she's now at a children's hospital and left with the inability to speak but somehow shares a telepathic link with her uncle to know when he would kill. Dr. Loomis sees this in Jamie and tries everything to get her to use it so he can finally destroy Michael Myers.

    "Halloween 5: The Revenge of Michael Myers" was one of the sequels that I wasn't to fond of when first watched it, but after continuous repeat viewings its slightly growing on me, nonetheless still it's not without its problems in what is an unsatisfying exercise. While a little more grittier being very misogynistic and graphic (which the previous sequel wasn't) with its deaths, it's run-of-the-mill formula fell on the dull, lumpy side with it being less punctuated with grinding suspense and moody atmosphere (as some of it takes place in full daylight) concentrating on visceral unpleasantness and plastered jump scares. This low-budget production feels like a rushed job, and the misguided, wishy washy script just doesn't cut it even with a decent concept for its basis and a few unsettling surprises that caught me off guard. However there are some odd out of character moments involving Michael (toying with his victims, driving after them in what I guess beats slowly walking after them and showing a glimpse of emotion is just to name a few), useless comic routine police officers with ridiculous sound effects backing them up and a cloudy inclusion of a man dressed in black that seems to be following Michael around. The performances are simply mediocre, however the like of Danielle Harris radiates again and Ellie Cornell proves how much of a bold talent she is with a terrifically wholesome turn. Donald Pleasance looks ragged, but he passionately camps it up (with some morbid streaks) to show the obsessive strangle hold Myers has over Loomis' personally and mentally. As now he would do anything to get his man, even risking the life of Jamie to do so. Outside these three, there's not much else. I didn't find the teens here as agreeably likable. Dominique Othenin-Girard's direction is competent, but generically flat with little visual styling (which was an imprint of "Return") and few intensity filled pockets of shocks, which you only wished it could hold it throughout. Still Michael is used unnervingly as a foreshadow within the background of many shots and it always seems to work as he could be lurking anywhere. Also the creative novelty of the film's opening credits is a nice touch.

    It's more of the same, but an watchable pedestrian slasher blanketed with shocks.
  • comment
    • Author: Minha
    This film was incredibly bad on many levels. By the middle of it, honestly I was bored and at times forgot that this was a horror film. This is a movie that should have never been made, and is one of the worst of the series. This film is really for "Halloween" completest only, and is for the most part unwatchable. The storyline that ended "Halloween 4" isn't revisited (with no explanation), and goes in a really strange and awful direction that is continued in the EVEN WORSE film that follows. The whole "man in black" concept is ridiculous and silly, and actually isn't even explained until the next film. The acting is very bad, and Donald Pleasance seems like he is really slowing down and ill throughout the film. I actually felt sorry for him watching this. Do yourself a favor, and don't even waste your time renting this.
  • comment
    • Author: Thetalune
    When the original Halloween was made it was scary because of its gritty realism and believable characters. Part 2 was also an edge-of-seater. But by the time you reach this, Part 5, the tension has gone from the series and Michael Myers has descended from a believable shadow-stalking figure into an unkillable Jason 'Friday the 13th' Voorhees clone.

    For what its worth, the plot of this film involves Myers coming after Jamie, who is now in a childrens' psychiatric hospital after attacking her stepmother. The concept of Jamie having a psychic bond with her deranged uncle is interesting, but it's all completely ruined by the constant unfunny attempts at humour, the tedious padding and the lack of likeable would-be victims. Instead of genuine characters all we have here are Porky-style sex-mad teenagers with nothing approaching an IQ between them. There's even a scene set in a barn similar to the one in some of the Friday the 13th films. And Rachel from Part 4 seems to have been reduced to a stereotype blonde airhead whose only purpose in the film is to run around half-naked before being slaughtered. And why does Myers' mask look nothing like the one he wore in the previous films?

    One good point in this film is Donald Pleasence, who is at his best as an overwhelming Dr Loomis who dominates his every scene and makes the film worth viewing. There is also an enigmatic Man in the Black Fedora-type figure who leads the film into the far superior Part 6.
  • comment
    • Author: Kea
    Halloween 5, yeah, this was a disappointment, most fans don't really dig this sequel which is understandable. It is kind of stupid or just plain stupid; this is the story that most horror movie sequels try to rip off, the telepathic powers that get really annoying. It seems like every horror movie sequel has to have it, Friday the 13th and Nightmare on Elm Street had it, why not include the Halloween franchise as well? Unfortunately I didn't get into it, I think because it was extremely unoriginal and not to mention that the story didn't really continue from the 4th sequel. The ending of Halloween 4 had Jamie turning evil, I guess they just totally dropped that idea which could have been great to see, instead we got a silly and typical horror story that was badly acted, edited, and directed.

    Michael Myers makes his way into a small shack by the river owned by a local hermit. Once there, Michael collapses and remains in a comatose state for a full year. On October 30th Michael awakens, kills the hermit, and returns to terrorize Haddonfield, where his young niece, Jamie Lloyd continues to live after nearly being killed by Michael the year before. Jamie has been mute since attacking her foster mother at the end of film 4, but exhibits signs of a telepathic link with her evil uncle. Dr. Sam Loomis realizes that this link exists, and plans to use it to put an end to Michael's reign of terror. Michael begins stalking Rachel and her friend Tina. After both are killed Jamie agrees to put herself in danger to help Loomis stop Michael for good. With Jamie's help, Loomis lures Michael back to the old Myers house. Michael makes many attempts at killing Jamie, finally getting the chance to in the attic. Jamie tries appealing to Michael's humanity by calling him "Uncle". Myers pauses, prompting Jamie to ask to see his face. He takes off his mask, and a lone tear runs down his face. Jamie reaches up to wipe it away, and Michael is thrown into a rage. The killer pursues Jamie, who runs into Loomis. The doctor seems to turn on the girl as he shouts for Michael to come and take her. It turns out that he has used the girl as bait, thus leading Michael to walk beneath a heavy chain net. But you have to see what happens next by watching the movie.

    While granted that this movie isn't the worst movie in the world, I do enjoy the Halloween sequels, I think this was a fall in the story line for the Halloween series. It really could have had a lot of potential, but since they dropped a few ideas that were presented in the previous Halloween sequel. Not to mention this is one of the rare times that I wasn't scared by Michael, he's loosing his touch… no, I can't say that, please I can't say that… it's the writing! It's the blasted writing! So if you wanna see the sequels, yeah, do watch it just to see the story continue, but if you are just looking for a scary movie in general, you can skip Halloween 5.

    5/10
  • comment
    • Author: Sharpbringer
    Halloween 5 takes place one year after its immediate predecessor. We're told in the opening moments that Michael Myers (somehow) survived the onslaught of gunfire that was unleashed upon him by Illinois state troopers at the conclusion of Halloween 4 by crawling out of a sewer drain, floating down a river, and taking shelter in a homeless man's secluded makeshift shanty. Inexplicably, Michael co-exists with this individual for—again—an entire year without incident. Without warning, Michael decides to "off" his caretaker without warning so as to pursue his original plan of finally putting an end to the Myers family name with the murder of his niece, Jamie.

    I have a few questions about this.

    First, why was it necessary that the movie take place on year later? Wouldn't it have been more feasible (a relative term given the circumstances to be sure) to have Michael lay unconscious for several days before coming to and continuing his reign of terror? Logistically, having him exist in some sort of comatose state for a full calendar year without food, water, or any kind of nutrition seems like an unnecessary stretch; on the flip side, if he were conscious during that time, why would he wait so long to dispatch of this poor sap who would naturally serve as little more than "creative kill fodder" for the imposing slasher? Any way you slice it (pun intended) it just doesn't make any sense.

    Given the ridiculousness of how movies of this type play out, I'll concede that such a complaint could be viewed as a moot point. I only dwell on it here because it serves as the perfect example of just the sort of moronic plot developments that plague the fifth outing of the now dwindling franchise.

    Jamie, having been placed in a juvenile sanitarium for the attempted murder of her foster mother, now has some kind of magical ESP connection with her mask-wearing uncle. It's explained that Michael is actually the one who forced Jamie to brutally stab her mother with a pair of scissors at the conclusion of the fourth film. In fact, any time Michael is about to do what he does best, she wigs out, and the omniscient (and omnipotent) Dr. Loomis swoops in to decipher her writhing and what it means about Michael's next move. Thrown into the mix is some sort of mystic cowboy, clad in all black, who dons the same Druid-ish tattoo as Michael. The guy roams around Haddonfield, keeping tabs on the now grown up boy wonder, never doing anything of particular note (well, that's not entirely true—he does implement a breakout of Michael from the county jail after the perennial sociopath is finally subdued, but this is confusing, odd, and does nothing to advance the story within the framework of the movie). All of this, I suppose, is designed to serve as a lead-in to the sixth film.

    If you're scratching your head, rolling your eyes, or doing both at the same time, you're not alone. As things progressed, I found myself increasingly frustrated at the missed opportunities of Halloween 5, as the aftermath of the fourth film's conclusion suggested an interesting new direction for the series that is never made tangible. Instead we're forced to endure a stale entry that's full of logical inconsistencies.

    All of that said, this entry is still superior to Halloween 3, and methinks that's worth at least an extra half star.
  • comment
    • Author: Lanionge
    Ho boy, where to begin? At this point in the series, Dr. Loomis has become abusive, the characters are all hateful, Michael's slipping, and the scripts are making even less sense.

    We begin right where we left off from Halloween 4, a la Halloween I and II: Michael escapes from the mine shaft, crawls to safety, and gets nursed back to health by some random bum with a parrot. One year later and with a lot more energy, his immediate action once he's able to move is to off the bum and head back to town, hoping to hunt down his niece who now has a psychic connection with him. A troop of teenagers are introduced, and the movie promises carnage. Sort of.

    This movie is bad. By bad I mean incompetent on pretty much every level. In horror movies, part of the delight and part of the terror is the fact that the teenagers die, but one character at least we hope will live. Not so in this one. Every single character is a hateful, stereotypical 80s idea of idiocy, and Michael's carnage can't come soon enough. This storytelling is backed up by probably some of the worst editing and directing I've ever seen, as characters move sporadically through jump cuts to... well, they don't really do much of anything, except ignore the warnings of a traumatized little child with a psychic connection to a serial killer. That role is given over to Donald Pleasence's Dr. Loomis, who somehow still has a practice and still is listened to, despite the fact that at this point he breaks about every rule of clinical ethics and the fact that he's an obnoxious jerk.

    Breaks every rule... that's what this movie does. This movie is so unable to bring actual horror, suspense, or gory delights to the fore that it literally just bumbles around hoping for something to photograph until Michael comes around, and then the storyline and directing are so incompetent they can't even make Michael seem cool. The scenes in the barn are pretty much must-see for film students who want to know exactly what NOT to do. And then, as if it's not enough, the movie has the audacity to introduce a new character for the sole purpose of letting Michael out of prison... who he is, what he's there for, what he knows, even if it's a he... there's no explanation. They literally wrote a character into the script because they were too lazy to know how to end this movie. That's like THE single basic screenplay no-no.

    Of course, there's always room for camp, but camp only works when the film goes in outrageous directions and does things creative and fun. This movie isn't even creative enough to come up with crazy, out-there ideas like Halloween 3, it just lazily serves the tropes of its genre without even the craft and skill required to make a successful continuity cut! By the time this movie ends, you will feel frustrated, bored, betrayed, and uninterested. While this movie plays, you will wish for every character to die just so that you no longer have to watch their stupid, mindless antics, and you will regret renting (or buying) the disc. Halloween 5 isn't even worth the plastic it's printed on, and that's bad considering how cheap it is to put things on DVD.

    --PolarisDiB
  • comment
    • Author: Nagor
    More or less a disappointing continuance of the Halloween saga. It has been a year since Michael Myers somehow survived massive gunfire and falling down a mine shaft. Upon healing his wounds he once again returns home to seek out his niece Jamie(Danielle Harris), who now herself is hospitalized and telepathic...knowing when the slasher is about to attack. Donald Pleasence, Ellie Cornell and Beau Starr reprise their previous roles. Also notable are Wendy Kaplan and Tamara Glynn. It is hard to tell if there are more squeals than thrills. My main complaint is they kill off Rachel(Cornell)way too quickly. Miss Harris is left with the most serious acting and does very well. This time it is Don Shanks playing the maniacal white masked menace. The finale is quite brutal, but is it brutal enough?
  • comment
    • Author: Beanisend
    Sure, they wasted their one chance to change the direction of the Halloween series (the right way). The year long coma is BS, yes, indeed. Sure, the psychic connection between Jamie and Michael is a little goofy, ill-explained, beyond the scope of a Halloween movie, and exists for no real reason, and yes, other people wearing a mask similar to Michael and pretending to be Michael is getting old (not to mention predictable.) The mask doesn't resemble any of the previous masks really, the Myers house had an inexplicable make-over . . . I could keep these complaints rolling for some time (don't even get me started on the man in black), but despite all my reasons to not like this film . . . I prefer it over #4.

    I found Halloween 5 to be strangely fun, which horror tends to be when you stop caring for the cast. While I like Danielle Harris and Donald Pleasance in the leads, most of the supporting characters I didn't really like at all, so when Myers starts the party rolling I'm rooting for team Thorn. And this time around, Miky proves he has a dark sense of humor. I especially like his choice in masks in Halloween 5 . . .

    But is it scary? No, but there are a few genuine intense moments towards the end as Michael inevitably runs out of victims and closes in on the stars. I liked all the chases involving Danielle Harris and confrontations between Donald Pleasence and evil personified . . . even if said confrontations are on the silly side.

    Speaking of Harris, despite her character not being able to talk in the script, she manages to rise far above the material and actually pull it off. Or in other words, while her character was written by a hack and sloppily thrown together, she works wonders with the very little she's given. It makes me really wish she got writing worthy of her performance, but like a professional, she makes the best of it . . . and to think the studio wouldn't let her reprise her role after this? A slap to the face after an insult . . . oy.

    I remember reading on the VHS box of Halloween 5 the exclamation, `Michael finally unmasked!' And couldn't help but chuckle as I recalled him being mask-less at least once in every Myers-inclusive Halloween until this film. Granted, this is the first time he, himself, takes it off. Oh well.

    As for the film's ending, I can't forgive because it lead to the atrocity known as Halloween: The Curse of Michael Myers which felt Halloween 5 was extremely flawed but still fun . . . so it set out to make a sequel that was all flaw and no fun . . . or something.
  • comment
    • Author: Yojin
    Halloween 5: The Revenge Of Michaels was a jarring experience, for the most part. The editing in this film seriously was giving me an aneurysm, and that's about the scariest part that happened during the runtime I was watching this movie. The great majority of the film is suffussed with uninspiring cheeseball moments and slapstick (yes, I said slapstick; the film attempts to add comedy into the mix) that is barely endurable. I will however admit that the last 20 minutes of this film were near fantastic. They nearly made up for the abundance of idiocy that was witnessed before, and also contained frightening, sinister moments that reminded me of what made the original so damn spectacular. With that being said, I still conclusively think this movie dropped the bomb. Even Michael Myer's didn't want to properly put on his mask for this one as shown in the actual film. (Tuck in the damn mask for heaven's sake!) We haven't quite hit "awful" yet in this franchise, but we've just encountered hitting "bad." (Verdict: C-)
  • comment
    • Author: Kamuro
    This film was a huge creative mess. There is so many things wrong with it that this was the "Last Halloween" film for 6 years.

    The events of this film take place 1 year after "Halloween 4". What was a huge misfire was that "Halloween 4" had a brilliant ending. Sadly that gets pushed to the side for "Halloween 5" and so we end up getting a typical 1980's slasher film.

    Here is some of the problems the film had

    * Killing off Rachel * * The Tina Charterer* * The Comic Relief Cops* * The Stupid Soundtrack * * The Myers House Changed * * The Mask was terrible * * The Dork with the laugh * * The Introduction of the Man in Black * * Having Jamie be a mute for 1/2 the film * * The lack of individuality for any the female roles! * * Not Showing the Deaths of the cops (In the television adds we see Michael starting to attack them) * * The Ending*

    Now believe it or not this film could still be re-edited into a better film. By editing down the "Tina Role" and "Policemen Roles" They could also "Edit out most of the laughs that dork does.

    Sadly what was wrong with this film was only magnified 6 years later in "Halloween 6".
  • comment
    • Author: ARE
    Halloween 5 The Revenge of Michael Myers in my opinion the weakest entry of the original franchise (Not Including Rob Zombie's) it is an enjoyable film and I do have fun with it and it's Third Act is incredible and Michael once again kicks ass with some great kills.

    The main negatives I have with this entry In the franchise is how they just ignore that great shock ending in Halloween 4 and make Jamie a mute who now as weird connection with Michael and can sense whenever he is near by an interesting idea and one that does play out really well but not what I was expecting at all from this entry after that great ending in 4 this movie would of been so much better if Jamie had the evil.inside of her this time like it hinted in the end of 4. Another negative is the fact that they kill one of the greatest characters in the franchise Rachel she was a great final girl in the last entry and they just kill her in this one like she was nothing but a cameo that's so annoying and they replace her with Tina the most annoying character I've seen in a horror Franchise.

    However the third is incredible with the laundry shoot scene being a highlight of this film and the entire franchise and credit to Danielle Harris for doing that scene because it was a real knife that they was stabbing through the laundry shoot so definitely credit to a kid actor at the time doing that stunt.

    Donald Pleasance again playing Sam Loomis is just incredible this is a character I can never get bored of watching always entertaining to watch and he is even crazier in this one I love his determination to stop Michael in all of these movies.

    The look Michael in this one I'm not a fan of something about the mask in this one just looks weird. I do enjoy the Introduction of the man In black and introducing the Thorn storyline not the best story arc in this franchise and can get a little complicated for Michael Myers but it's very interesting and to be honest really what this franchise needed at this time was different and interesting.

    Verdict 7/10 flawed movie and the weakest of the franchise for me but still very enjoyable and watchable
  • comment
    • Author: Unh
    1, 2, and 4 were the best. 5 is also good regardless of the comments. The little girl is perhaps the best of all screen horror children surpassing Poltergeist and Linda blair in the Exorcist.

    Donald Pleasence is one of the great actors of all time adding incredible class to the series. He is in the league of Peter Cushing and Cristopher Lee. A true great in which the series is meaningless without him.

    Halloween 5 spends too much time on teenyboppers with a little too much stuff borrowed from Friday the 13th with silly teen lust combined with slasher stuff. But this film excells when it cuts to the real story of Meyers chasing the girl and the doctor's relentless pursuit. Thank goodness it refrains from too much extreme gore ad special effects which has hurt horror so much in maby other films.

    Meyers here is madder than usual and more hyper. He also commits some murders that make him a truly hated figure to me. Spoiler: At the end I wished there would have been another quick sequel and really wanted to know what would happen especially to the little girl and the doctor. I know that there would not be another Halloween for 8 years so I do not really know. I have not seen 6 yet but I fear 8 years is too long to remain relevant to the little girl's story.

    4 and 5 makes you really want to meet the doctor and the little girl as if they were real people. Perhaps that is the most haunting thing in the series. Now that Pleasance has really died one can only wonder that movies can in some ways can be far more than movies.
  • comment
    • Author: Marilore
    Halloween 4: The Return of Michael Myers was alike Halloween II a great sequel and thoroughly justified the questionable decision to bring Myers back.

    The shock ending to Part 4 also left fans demanding another sequel ASAP. I bet they wished they hadn't bothered.

    Halloween 5 is so obviously rushed and is littered with plot holes and events that make no sense whatsoever.

    Jamie's madness is almost discarded as a plot line, the man in black subplot makes little sense and makes even less in Part 6. Also Ellie Cornell's likable Rachel Carruthers character is killed off almost instantly, and instead the film is carried by a bunch of colourless, obnoxious and unbelievably formulaic characters.

    The result of this is that the viewer begins to root for Myers, willing him to slice and dice these dull protagonists.

    The two cops amused me, but the circus SFX did not. The only thing that lifts this picture barely above standard horror, is the performance of Donald Pleasence, his Loomis character really begins to lose the plot in this one.

    Unquestionably the weakest Michael Myers flick, although Part 6, and Resurrection are only mildly better. This is where the wheels began to fall away in the Halloween saga, even H20 is frustrating, as it discards parts 4-6 as ever happening. Let's hope Part 9 is an improvement and a return to form for the franchise although I wouldn't hold my breath.
  • comment
    • Author: Dusar
    After facing a firing squad and falling down a mine shaft at the end of part four, this next sequel continues with Michael crawling out through a hole just before the police throw in a stick of dynamite, and then he proceeds to escape down a river. He eventually comes to a cabin, or something like that, and once inside it he faints and ultimately goes into another of his famous comas. Thanks to the resident hermit, Michael gets plenty of rest for a whole year...

    Now telepathically linked to her uncle, young Jamie(now mute and unable to make use of her vocal cords)waits anxiously in Haddonfield Children's Hospital, exactly one year later. She knows that her uncle is coming, but cannot express herself with speech. Thankfully Dr. Loomis is still around, and he senses that Jamie knows something but believes that she is protecting Michael. Jamie's sister Rachel(Ellie Cornell)reprises her role for about ten minutes, unfortunately, since Michael eventually kills her in one of the many well-directed scenes in this installment. Replacing her is Tina(Wendy Kaplan), the widely hated bad actress who I actually kinda liked. Aside from being a bit annoying, I still don't think that she was as bad as some of the buffoons from part six...

    Anyways, I used to believe that Halloween 5:The Revenge of Michael Myers was superior to its predecessor. However, having recently watched the two back to back, I realize that I was wrong about that. This sequel still has some redeeming qualities, though. While part four delivered some great scare scenes, director Othenin-Girard capitalizes on this formula and delivers even better scares this time. Examples are the aforementioned death scene with Rachel, the chase scene with Jamie in the hospital's basement, the car-chase scene with Tina, and a very suspenseful scene with Jamie in the Myers's laundry chute. In fact, every scene that takes place in the Myers house is superb.

    Overall I rate Halloween 5 a 7/10. Some of the editing and voice-overs were absolutely awful so I had to take away a point. Other than that I think that this installment is at least worth a viewing, and the ending will certainly leave you craving more. Too bad we had to wait about six years for another one, and sadly Danielle Harris(who plays Jamie in four and five)does not return. So, to end this, part five is at least better than the next sequel, Halloween 6:The Curse of Michael Myers.
  • comment
    • Author: Madi
    As you may know by now, Halloween 4 ended with Jamie (Michael Myer's niece) slashing her mom because... well she was distressed, possesed or whatever.

    Well, now the kid is in a foster home... looney bin for kids... it's not really important. Anyway, she's mute now for some reason, well not mute, she just doesn't speak. Loomis is there also, screaming at her and then you realise they probably were going to kill off Michael Myers in the last movie and let Jamie take the torch (knife) but they realised that's a horrible idea.

    So Michael is back after some sleepy time with a hobo guy down the river (this all happens in the movie) and is still after Jamie. So bad idea avoided?!

    Not so fast!

    Unfortunately, the replacement idea was as bad, if not worse.

    Which kinda leads us to the end of the movie, mysterious cloaked stranger, mysterious signs, everybody dying except Jamie, Loomis and Myers.
  • comment
    • Author: superstar
    Oh how careless and unsuspecting those Haddonfield residents are: now they see me, now they don't. I cannot describe the sensation that is being burnt alive; shot six times by a pistol; shot several times with various shotguns, pistols and an assault rifle simultaneously and I especially cannot describe what it is like falling through some sodden ground only to have a gravestone cave in on top of me. Maybe I cannot describe it because none of it really happened; after all – the third Halloween film only included me as part of a television trailer thus disconnecting me from the 'real' world entirely: poor shame.

    I can get away with anything, because I'm Michael Myers and I'm invincible. I've been shot and burnt and what have you loads of times but I keep coming back like the giant cockroach that won't die; I am invisible despite being the biggest person in the whole town; I am indestructible despite being a human being; I've been captured but then consequently escaped when I should have been victim of capital punishment long before I even got the chance to. Yes, I'm the thing that wouldn't die in the franchise that wouldn't die and isn't it grand? Rumours were back in the day that I was going to go up against Freddy Kruger in a spin off adventure of its own but that was shelved for fifteen years; Voorhees eventually got the role – Pah! Nobody likes Friday the Thirteenth anyway! Especially the one that had him most recently in space.

    But I am adamant that I can get over it by reliving some of my finest work from yesteryear particularly in the form of "Halloween 5: The Revenge of Mi......" Oh no, wait – this one was just 'Halloween 5' with no subheading, how disappointing. This time, I am convinced that I am invincible as well as invisible with brainless logic forming the basis of this addition to my ever increasingly daft adventures. Evidence comes in the form of: a dog barking at me loudly and yet nobody does or hears anything except for the owner who does or suspects nothing – it's worth saying here that it is Halloween eve in Haddonfield and it's only been a year since I was at large and the owner WAS warned on the phone – silly girl. Another case of idiocy on the resident's part was when the police come round to check; they leave after thinking it was a false alarm involving the dog but I'm smart: I hide in the closet and wait for them to go but when the silly girl opens the door to get something out, she still doesn't see me – unfortunately, she has since changed after finishing her shower.

    I'm Michael Myers and I'm invisible. I can stand amongst the bushes and stick out like a sore thumb but no one sees me. I am able to stand there and watch kids and their cars and partners mingle around a shop front: they are more interested in sex and alcohol than they are in values; when I was their age, I was being treated at a hospital after what I did when I was very young but they don't know anything about that: soon they will, though; soon they will. What I love about these kids is that I kill one of them and take his car – his name is, unbelievably: Michael. From here, I get to live out a fantasy I have never come within a light-year of ever experiencing. I drive to my new partner's house and pick her up; she dances for me showing me her Halloween costume thinking I'm Michael, which of course I am; she says my name in that wonderful voice she has and attempts conversation but I can't reply for two reasons: it would give the game away and I'm stone cold with adrenaline. We drive for a while and she asks to stop by a petrol station but I drive straight past before screeching round and going back – it would seem that a little girl whom I am related to has used her telepathic powers to tell the police where I am: the 'living the dream' is over but it was worth it.

    It would seem that when I do come face to face with my relative, it is in an attic of my Myers house that wasn't actually there in any other of my adventures. It's equally convenient that the authorities and my doctor at the hospital never thought to check the house to see if that's where I was staying during this Halloween. After all, they didn't check the surrounding area after I escaped into the river at the very beginning; especially since I lodged up in a shack owned by an old man – there I lay; for one year with no interference or anything like the old man reporting that he'd found me but how was I to know he'd keep quiet after I'd left? I wasn't, so I had to get rid of him of course. When it does come to the crunch; I delay over completing my goal in this edition as she lies there in my coffin bed – I shed a tear but I don't know why; she escapes and gets the better of me in a laundry chute – how careless of me: this invisible, indestructible killing machine is beaten by an infant. I guess David and Goliath can happen after all. Then again, with my most recent adventure a replay of my first and set in an entirely different universe; I can forget all about this particular episode and re-focus on what I do best: it's what you want and it's what I want.
  • comment
    • Author: Уou ll never walk alone
    this movie is almost the worst piece of crap I've ever seen. after seeing Halloween4, with commercials no less, I thought this film would be awesome. instead I was looking at something that should be killed by Micheal himself.

    well where do I start, this movie has fifty plot holes. why does Jamie see what he see's, why is Micheal killing teens instead of getting to Jamie, what's with that awful mask, and why is Tina even in the film? they could've at least made a mask that looked even remotely like the other masks. this film sucks from the start, he floats down a river and then passes out for a whole year. while somehow growing bigger an stronger with no food or bathroom. and wouldn't the police check the mine to make sure he was dead? they would've found him in the hobo's hut. don't even get me started on he music. ooh the pain. it's terribly bad, if there is even a low enough class of bad to it in. the knife slashing with the piano, give me a break. it seems like the music was made to make the opening credits cool. I know that the mask in H4 was trashed during filming but this mask looks like it was made in a kindergarten class.

    if you were thinking of watching this movie don't. if you think this movie good, then hit yourself real hard cause it sucks. it barely earned that one.

    EDIT: after seeing the movie bloodrayne I decided this movie is worth watching if you like being creeped out near halloween. so I now give this film a 4.
  • comment
    • Author: Adoraris
    After reading that this was supposed to be a horror film, I laughed harder than I did during the film itself. The goofy cops with their own Hanna-Barbera-esque theme music, the fact that the women were completely adverse to pants and the little girl's bad Harpo Marx impression throughout the film were too much to stand. Luckily I was watching it with someone and was able to riff on it Mystery Science Theater 3000 style instead of going in the other room and slitting my own wrists out of despair that someone actually wasted precious film on this crap.

    Maybe if they would have given the little girl a blond curly wig, trench coat and an old car horn to honk I could have at least daydreamed myself into a decent Marx Brothers movie.

    ---Shelly
  • comment
    • Author: Jediathain
    I should have listened to what everyone else had said about the movie. It was stupid. I couldn't wait til Tina died because she was so annoying! The only scene that I did like was when Jamie was in the laundry chute and Michael is stabbing through it with his knife. And I really hate to say it, but I think I liked the Curse of Michael Myers better-and I HATED that movie. But at least it kept me awake. This movie was so incredibly boring I had to pinch myself to stay awake. Avoid this movie unless you absolutely must see all the Halloween movies.
  • comment
    • Author: SlingFire
    "Halloween 5: The Revenge of Michael Myers" is a great sequel that really makes the "Halloween" series great.The cast makes this film great too.

    It is a year later from the events of "Halloween 4",Michael survived the police and escaped out of a mine,went into a river.A hermit living in the woods,Michael goes to the hermit's home and stayed there the whole year.

    Jamie Lloyd,Michael Myers's niece is in a children's clinic after she stabbed her foster mother a year ago.Jamie has a telepathic link to Michael.She knows now that he is alive.Michael kills the hermit and is on his way back to Haddonfield.

    Michael is on his rampage and is looking for Jamie.This time,they know now where he will will strike since Jamie is connected to her uncle.Dr. Loomis is trying to get Jamie to tell him where Michael is at,but Jamie is frightened.Jamie is the only one who can help to stop him.

    I give this movie 2 thumbs up and 10 stars.
  • comment
    • Author: Whitebeard
    Halloween 5 is slightly better than Halloween 4 in the fact that we see a bit more of Micheal and we get a few more gory killing scenes like with the scissors.

    The movie uses some more creepy scenes like in the barn house and the Myers house, it may not look the same as the first but it's still creepy.

    The other scene is the car chase where Micheal is driving after Jamie with the theme music playing that always creeps me out.

    The Man in Black was another interesting character but sadly we don't enough of him or learn his story until Halloween 6 when his character is revealed, also that symbol that is on Micheal and the Man In Black is also revealed in part 6.

    A good sequel to the Halloween franchise.
  • comment
    • Author: 6snake6
    If you're only going to see one movie all year, see Halloween 5! What a film! I mean, come on, what could be better than an hour and a half chock full of Mr. D. Pleasance! And how about the scene where Michael drives the police car? What brilliance! But what really makes this movie unforgetable, is the final battle scene between Loomis and Michael. Whoever came up with the idea for Loomis to beat Michael for several minutes with a 2x4 should have won the Nobel Prize. And what genius to have Loomis stabbed and thrown off a balcony just minutes before! I dont know where he gets the energy, but Dr. Loomis is the most powerful character in any movie I've ever seen!

    So hey, I dont want no Al Pacino, I dont want no Marlon Brando, JUST GIVE ME MY DR. LOOMIS AND IM JUST FINE!!!
  • comment
    • Author: Foxanayn
    Obnoxious teens get slashed and stupid cops get wasted by a new Michael Myers in a dumb-looking mask. I lost track of the plot, if there was one, about halfway through the film. All I know is that Michael is running around killing people and his niece can see who the next victim will be. Oh, and Donald Pleasence is still overacting and running around like a goofball. The ending makes no sense, but you won't care because you will just be happy it's over. Complete waste of film and time, except for the little girl (Danielle Harris) who is great.
  • comment
    • Author: Kashicage
    Halloween 5 was one of those films that left one feeling unfulfilled after watching it despite being a fan of the series.

    Halloween 5 seemed to be trying to emulate the original which just cannot be done. It seemed to succeed in being fairly atmospheric but there wasn't much gore in the film. The late Donald Pleasance was back but he didn't seem to have the impact he had in the original and parts 2 and 3. Loomis was still a great character.

    There are two areas which can be commended. Danielle Harris once again did a great job as the niece of Michael Myers and Michael Myers himself was becoming a bit more human which I don't think is a bad thing. Villains can only be inhuman for so long. Also, if you watch the ending you'll get a bit of history on Michael Myers but unfortunately later films did not capitalise on it. That was a shame.

    All in all, Halloween 5 was decent enough and I shall probably rent the DVD.
  • Cast overview, first billed only:
    Donald Pleasence Donald Pleasence - Loomis
    Danielle Harris Danielle Harris - Jamie
    Ellie Cornell Ellie Cornell - Rachel
    Beau Starr Beau Starr - Sheriff Ben Meeker
    Jeffrey Landman Jeffrey Landman - Billy Hill
    Tamara Glynn Tamara Glynn - Samantha Thomas
    Jonathan Chapin Jonathan Chapin - Mikey
    Matthew Walker Matthew Walker - Spitz
    Wendy Foxworth Wendy Foxworth - Tina Williams (as Wendy Kaplan)
    Betty Carvalho Betty Carvalho - Nurse Patsey
    Troy Evans Troy Evans - Deputy Charlie
    Frankie Como Frankie Como - Deputy Nick Ross (as Frank Como)
    David Ursin David Ursin - Deputy Tom Farrah
    Harper Roisman Harper Roisman - Mountain Man
    Karen Alston Karen Alston - Darlene Carruthers
    All rights reserved © 2017-2024 hd.thomson-multimedia.com