Search

» » Wer schluckt schon gerne blaue Bohnen? (1976)

Wer schluckt schon gerne blaue Bohnen? (1976) watch online HD

Wer schluckt schon gerne blaue Bohnen? (1976) watch online HD
  • Original title:The Duchess and the Dirtwater Fox
  • Category:Movie / Comedy / Western
  • Released:1976
  • Director:Melvin Frank
  • Actors:George Segal,Goldie Hawn,Conrad Janis
  • Writer:Melvin Frank,Barry Sandler
  • Budget:$4,590,000
  • Duration:1h 43min
  • Video type:Movie

Watch online HD Download HD

Short summary

It's 1882 on the Barbary Coast. Charlie Malloy aka the Dirtwater Fox, makes his living cheating at cards. His latest venture however is stealing $40,000 from a bunch of outlaws. Bluebird, a saloon performer and prostitute, wants an easy life. When a Mormon, Josiah Widdicombe, comes to town, Bluebird has the idea that being the seventh wife of a Mormon would be a good life - she only has to work once every seven days. She steals Malloy's bag with the money, unaware of the amount inside. She only wants enough to buy a dress to masquerade as a duchess for Widdicombe. The ruse works. On Bluebird's way to Salt Lake City, Malloy catches up with her. Although Bluebird still has every intention of becoming a Mormon wife, the two decide to partner on the scheme of Mormon riches. All the while, the outlaws are on their tail after their $40,000.

Matte paintings were used to create the period look of San Francisco and Salt Lake City.

The nick-names of the lead female character played by Goldie Hawn) were "Bluebird" and "The Duchess of Swansbury". Hawn's character's real name is "Amanda Quaid" in the end credits, yet this name is never spoken at all during the film.

The film's title logo formed a fox's tail out of the bottom right serif of the letter 'x' in the word 'fox', the final word in the film's "The Duchess and the Dirtwater Fox" title.

Second of three movies actor George Segal made with director Melvin Frank. The first was Mann, bist du Klasse! (1973) whilst the third one was Ein irres Paar (1979). This movie was the only one that didn't co-star Glenda Jackson.

Publicity for this picture stated that it was the singing and dancing debut of actress Goldie Hawn.

The film has been described as being "a burlesque amalgam of McCabe & Mrs. Miller (1971)".

The name of the outlaw posse was "The Bloodworth Gang".

Director Melvin Frank had planned to re-team again his Mann, bist du Klasse! (1973) co-stars George Segal and Glenda Jackson for this picture.

Reportedly, the part of Amanda Quaid / Duchess Swansbury was originally intended for Glenda Jackson, but she turned it down. Melvin Frank then changed the character "an American girl who pretends to be English in certain places."

The nick-name of Charlie Malloy (George Segal) was "The Dirtwater Fox".

Most of the Bloodworth Gang members are not given names during and through the picture and their character names not known until the closing credits.

Then Colorado First Lady Dottie Lamm appeared in the picture. The movie was filmed in the American state of Colorado. The 3rd November 1975 edition of show-business publication 'Box', Lamm appeared in the picture as an extra/background artist. Lamm appeared in the picture to learn about the motion picture industry by talking with cast and crew. Lamm intended to utilize her experience on the production in order to attract more movie-making to the state of Colorado. It was reported that Lamm would donate her wages from working on the movie to the Coalition for the Equal Rights Amendment.

It was estimated that the production of this picture in the American state of Colorado, USA would spend an estimate US $1.485 million according to the 3rd November 1975 edition of show-business publication 'Box'. It was estimated that about 30% of this money would go on salaries and 70% would be spent on businesses.

This movie was first announced in the 20th June 1975 edition of show-business trade paper 'The Hollywood Reporter'. It was reported that Melvin Frank had been hired by the 20th Century Fox film studio to co-write, produce, and direct this picture.

The principal photography production period on this picture ran for about two months.

The year that this motion picture is set is 1882.

The film's closing credits state: " "Special thanks to the Central City Opera House Association for permitting us to use the opera house in this picture; and special thanks to the people of Central City, Colorado, for their courtesy and cooperation in the filming of this picture."

The film's title, "The Duchess and the Dirtwater Fox", featured a word, "Fox", which was also part of the 20th Century Fox name of the picture's production studio.

The names of the actors and their characters (in parentheses) who were members of "The Bloodworth Gang" were: Bob Hoy (Ingersoll), Walter Scott (Graves), Jerry Gatlin (Stein), and Bennie E. Dobbins (Murphy), and gang leader Roy Jenson (Bloodworth).

The amount of money that Charlie 'Dirtwater Fox' Malloy ('George Segal') robbed from the bank was US $40,000.

This comedy western was made and first released within about two years of Mel Brooks' classic comedy western Der wilde wilde Westen (1974).

About one hundred and fifty people were hired as extras and background artists for filming in Central City in Colorado, USA.

About two weeks were spent shooting in Fremont County in the American state of Colorado, USA.

Goldie Hawn's music hall song and dance number was filmed at the historic heritage Central City Opera House located at Eureka Street, Central City in the American state of Colorado, USA.

The movie's star-team of George Segal and Goldie Hawn was able to provide letter "G" alliteration from the first names of both its name-above-the-title two stars.

'Blackjack the Wonder Horse' received an 'introducing' credit in some movie posters. The blurb read: "Introducing BLACKJACK - The WONDER HORSE".

The film's opening title cards read: "San Francisco Barbary Coast 1882" and "while in the town of Boulder Creek 200 miles south...".

Rut Hawn: Uncredited, the father of actress Goldie Hawn as a fiddle player in the orchestra.

Dottie Lamm: Uncredited, the Colorado First Lady as an extra / background artist.

Ron Lyle: Uncredited, the heavyweight boxer as a bar-room bouncer.

User reviews


  • comment
    • Author: Burisi
    This movie is a treat from start to finish. Fantastic writing is the main reason why, and terrific character actors at every turn. Not quite as bawdy, but reminiscent of Blazing Saddles in its depiction of the Wild West - I mean, one of the funniest characters is BlackJack, George Segal's loyal steed.

    Highly recommended for laughing out loud - a real gem - can't wait for the DVD.

    Don't be afraid to show it to the kid's either, just a bit of language to manage, but otherwise, funny for almost all ages. Wish Segal and Hawn had done more work together - a great team!

    Enjoy!!
  • comment
    • Author: Makaitist
    Although the music may be a little dated now, I believe any fun-minded viewer will find this offering to be a thoroughly enjoyable romp.

    George Segal and Goldie Hawn are at their best and deliver one delightful comic situation after another, much like, and in my opinion, better than, Mel Gibson and Jodie Foster in the also enjoyable but more recent "Maverick." I wouldn't be surprised if Mel and Jodie, not to mention the "Maverick" producers, wisely drew on this film for inspiration as the chemistry is interchangeable between the two movies.

    One of many moments not to be forgotten is in the excellent turn of Conrad Janis as the blissfully unaware mark or the sidesplitting pig-Latin (pig-German?) argument Hawn and Segal develop in his presence.

    I would very much like to see this film again and so will you.
  • comment
    • Author: Ger
    This western comedy gets off to a smashing start: Goldie Hawn, dressed like a lascivious German barmaid, singing in a San Francisco saloon full of rowdies. It's a Marlene Dietrich bit that out-Dietrich's Madeline Kahn from "Blazing Saddles". Thin plot has a card-sharp in the Old West trying to keep vicious sidewinders from stealing his stolen loot; a dancehall girl gets there first. This is one of those comedies from the 1970s best described as 'bawdy', with some memorable moments: Hawn, pretending to be the Duchess of Swansbury, singing for a drooling Mormon; she and George Segal talking gibberish-French in a stagecoach; the couple floating down a river to the vocals of Bobby Vinton, and later getting tied to stakes in the sweltering desert. Sloppy, yet ingratiating film gets by solely on charisma and energy. It didn't find a sizable audience in theaters, though I would suspect Hawn-buffs will enjoy it on DVD. Raffish Segal also charming, and working effortlessly with his co-star. ***1/2 from ****
  • comment
    • Author: Shazel
    if you are a sucker for western romantic comedies...then none will please you more than this one. goldie hawn and george segal make a hilarious couple, fighting and sparing all the way to the love that awaits. good movie to watch with someone you love--pleases both the gals and the fellas.
  • comment
    • Author: Pipet
    A half-decade after "Laugh-In" and a half-decade before "Private Benjamin," Goldie Hawn reveals that she not only has beautiful thighs (which the director takes very opportunity to remind us) but that she can act. Hawn herself takes every opportunity to develop a well-rounded character given a script that doesn't invite it - she exhibits a wide range of responses that the director doesn't really ask of any other actor.

    Otherwise, the film is a confused mess. Beautiful location photography, and not much else. The story-line is a real jumble. If I cared about the characters I might have invested more in following it, but there's no reason to care about these lowlives, they have no direction and no motivation beyond greed.

    At one point George Segal squeezes Hawn's breasts publicly and exclaims 'honk honk!" First, this is anachronistic (it references automobile horns not yet in use in the movie's culture), second, it is degrading, and third - most importantly - it is not funny. It needs a "topper," some remark that would give it comedic relevance. Director Frank's attempt at a topper is for Segal to repeat the line twice. I am not amused.

    A botched job, only interesting for Hawn fans.
  • comment
    • Author: Gavirgas
    This is a rather naughty little film, with a lot of Goldie Hawn on view at times. It is however done with such a lovely sense of fun and mischief that my kids and I watched it many times with great enjoyment.

    Goldie sings some fun songs - including one about fruit, naughty fruit - and goes adventuring across the Old West in the company - at times - of the handsome and talented George Segal. [My favourite GS film, this one!] There are some sidesplitting scenes - for both audience and Goldie's clothes - and there is a very well-trained horse.

    Best of all is the running gag! - How many times did you....? - Including this time? Once!

    I use it all the time!!!
  • comment
    • Author: Tehn
    I first saw this film when I was about 10 & thought it was a great film. Saw that it had been recently released on DVD & decided to take a trip down memory lane to see if Goldie was as hot in the movie as I remembered......she was. The film starts off pretty funny & moves along at a good pace. Some good gags, some good dialogue & a bit of slapstick. But what I think lets the film down is the finale. It just peters out & is a bit of a damp squib.

    George Segal & Goldie Hawn work well together & I'm surprised they didn't do anything else together. All in all an enjoyable little film...if only for Goldie Hawns dance routines.
  • comment
    • Author: Rrd
    I liked this movie. It is a bit dated and it does lose the thread a bit at times, but generally is funny and spontaneous. I really wondered if some of the humor was unplanned. For example, when the Fox turns the corner on his horse and falls off. It really looks like this wasn't in the original script but it happened anyway. I particularly liked the song Don't touch my plums and especially when Goldie sings it to the Mormon family. Goldie Hawn is at her finest and suits the role she is playing. Watch it when you want to smile or need cheering up and don't want to think too deeply! We watched this by accident on TV last night and I managed to stay awake all the way through (ask my husband, that's amazing!)
  • comment
    • Author: Ndyardin
    1976 was probably a crucial year in gauging the status of the Western as a feasible Hollywood film genre: apart from well-regarded titles like THE OUTLAW JOSEY WALES and THE RETURN OF A MAN CALLED HORSE, you had to contend with some notorious flops, of both the art-house – Robert Altman's BUFFALO BILL AND THE INDIANS OR, SITTING BULL'S HISTORY LESSON and Arthur Penn's THE MISSOURII BREAKS – and the spoof – THE DUCHESS AND THE DIRTWATER FOX and THE GREAT SCOUT AND CATHOUSE THURSDAY (which I've yet to catch up with) – variety. The star rating I gave to the film in question is an indication that it wasn't, in fact, as disastrous as contemporary (and even more recent, in view of its release on DVD) reviews would have you believe and I'd say it's even worthy of earning a place in my collection…which should, of course, imply that it has rewatchability value.

    Goldie Hawn, George Segal and his amiably clumsy horse Blackjack are practically the whole show here and this is clearly one of those movies which rely heavily on the charisma (or lack thereof) of its leads for its success or otherwise. The screenplay does have some good lines – including an amusingly protracted stagecoach conversation (supposedly in French) between the two stars which actually incorporates slangy English, French, Italian, Spanish and some Latin, too – but the plot is rather too thin to sustain the film's length. Hawn is a saloon entertainer/hooker with ideas above her station: she gets to wear tarty outfits, sing a bawdy song in an English accent and board the aforementioned stagecoach to become "The Duchess" of the title, an English governess to a host of kids borne by a wealthy Mormon; on the other hand, Segal is a luckless womanizing cardsharp who keeps getting caught cheating and finding himself at the wrong end of the noose; he eventually manages to abscond with $40,000 in stolen loot to the eternal chagrin of a ramshackle band of outlaws. The bag containing the money changes owners more often than these characters take a bath and, along the way, Hawn and Segal finally make love aboard a canoe approaching some deadly rapids, take refuge in a Jewish wedding ceremony and are bound together and left to roast under the baking desert sun. The change in mood towards the end – where Segal is repeatedly shot in the final confrontation with the gang – is far from smoothly handled but the open-ended conclusion nevertheless manages to end the film on a lighter note.
  • comment
    • Author: Brol
    Supposedly a Western, romantic-comedy, this film fails on most levels. Oh, it's not that it's that bad. It's not terrible. It's even mildly amusing in spots. But it had a great deal of promise, and didn't fulfill any of it. George Segal was trying to come off as the lovable rogue, but succeeded only in the rogue part. His character was crooked and churlish. Goldie Hawn did what she did (and still does) best: peg the needle on the cute-o-meter. Her character was pretty non-admirable as well, a prostitute and a con artist. At least the photography of the Colorado countryside was nice, and the direction was unobtrusive. I remember liking this film in the distant past, but a recent viewing made me wonder why. Check it out to see Goldie look cute, but don't expect anything more.
  • comment
    • Author: VariesWent
    "The Duchess and the Dirtwater Fox" is a fairly good film. It's a cross between classic Hollywood and the then more contemporary comedy stylings that were coming into vogue in the late 60s and 70s. That is to say the humor is blue, and less suggestive than it is explicit, yet at the same time very smart. And perhaps because of this the film's tone is probably a little misunderstood.

    Even though the film was shot widescreen there's a definite TV budget feel about it. There's more coverage than can be expected from a made for TV film, but the shots themselves are typically those used in non-theatrical productions, giving the film a kind of uneven feel.

    For what the film is the humor is pretty sophisticated, which I think has some of the other commentators (specifically those who gave negative reviews) a bit confused. For a comedy that opens with a dance hall scene laden with sexual innuendo one might not expect the gags to be as sophisticated as they are. A viewer might get the impression that the humor will be blue, but not just blue, but explicitly blue. But that's not the case here. The humor, though suggestive and occasionally profane, is actually pretty smart, and on that score is actually quite funny. Now, if you can accept all that, and like your humor with lots of wit, then this film should entertain. In short the humor is smarter than one would expect. You have to approach watching this film with kind of mindset to really enjoy it :-)

    If I had one gripe with the film it'd be the ending. As climatic as it was it felt a little flat and open ended. It's also a bit implausible, even for a comedy, but a film like this really needs a happy ending... of sorts. On that score the ending should've been a little more plausible, but it is what it is.

    If you like your films smart, then try not to be too swayed by the negative comments, and give the film a chance by renting it once. It's not a film that has a lot of big sight-gags, but there's enough here that should entertain.

    Enjoy :-)
  • comment
    • Author: Dori
    Goldie Hawn teams up with George Segal in this comedy western about a card shark and a dance hall girl who end up on the trail together, chasing a valise with $40,000 hidden in the bottom of it. The trouble is that the guys that Segal stole it from while they were in the process of stealing it want it back and are hot on their trail.

    When this movie first came out, I was only about 12 years old, so, for obvious reasons, my parents never let me see this show when it first came out. But I feel like I can get on the phone, call my mother and thank her for not letting me waste my time in watching this. I'm a fan of Hawn, but not that big of a fan.

    There's no chemistry between the stars. In fact, I think Segal had more chemistry with the horse in this film. Maybe BLACKJACK should have gotten top billing over Hawn, because all she ended up being was fluff and a bit of eye candy (very little bit, that is).

    3 out of 10 stars.
  • comment
    • Author: Narim
    There's a tragic air about this putrid film, and the reason is simple: it STINKS like a Dead Possum! The comedic talents of Goldie Hawn and George Segal are wasted miserably on a poor script with thoroughly unlikeable characters (Goldie plays a mean-spirited, bar room whore -- who's bright idea was THAT??? -- and George is a cranky card shark who seems to really need a bath). What should have been a rollicking hour-and-a-half of wisecracks and bellylaughs is instead an embarrassment. The film's jokes are lousy and the tone is uneven -- it's a mixed up mess as it jumps from trying to be clever, to exciting, to funny, and even to romantic -- and nary a bullseye in the bunch. Every shot is misfired. Nuthin' but rotten eggs. And it all seems "thrown together"... The result is a film that's just a horrible bore. Just when you think it won't get worse, there is a "love scene" (in a boat going down a river) during which the most vomitably maudlin of movie songs kicks in, "Lemon Drops, Lollipops and Sunbeams" (I kid you not about that title. And if the title isn't cloying enough, you should only HEAR how sickly sweet this tune is! Oi Vei!!!)...to add insult to injury, the song reprises itself over the end credits, as if sounding once in the film wasn't punishment enough for a weary audience. When you hear it again, it's like a bad smell that you thought you'd escaped only to find you've run across it again...I can't give this film low enough marks. It takes "mediocrity" to new lows. And that's because this film isn't even the kind of "bad" that's fun to watch (and heckle). It's Just BAD. Painfully BAD. Hawn and Segal have both proven their merit as comic talents many, many times over in various funny films (Hawn in "Foul Play" and Segal in "Where's Poppa?" just to name two). "The Duchess and the Dirtwater Fox" must be a project they would both rather forget... I know I wish I could!
  • comment
    • Author: Skiletus
    Bad acting, bad script, just about bad everything...including Goldie, who I normally like. If you're into seeing Goldie in skimpy clothing or nice Colorado location shots, it might be worth it. Otherwise, stay away.
  • comment
    • Author: DireRaven
    Saw this in the theaters when I was like 10. I snuck in after watching The Bad News Bears I think, and even then I knew this movie stunk. Watching it now coincidentally on the same day I pay my cable bill is like soap in my eye. I've asked this question many times, but What were people thinking back then? I mean how can you even throw a movie like this together? Don't the performers and producers know how bad it is? Maybe this is the kind of stuff you learn only after you die. As viewing films like this brings me ever nearer to death, perhaps I haven't long to wait. One final note, this film's movie poster contains a startling example of sexual subliminal placement. Check it out, if you glance quickly, or stare at it long enough, Goldies elbow is actually photographed for your brain to see a bare b***t. But the movie still stinks.
  • comment
    • Author: Tyler Is Not Here
    The 'comedy' western is a bit like a situation comedy with horses and six shooters thrown in and a bit of action in case the laughs are thin on the ground. and in this movie the laughs (and the thrills) are as thin on the ground as grass in a desert.

    George Segal tries hard in the 'lovable rogue' lead - a sort of bargain basement 'Maverick' but he is undercut by a poor script and the millstone of Goldie Hawn - who does little beyond flash her red undies at the camera at every opportunity as if this might distract the viewer from the meagre contribution she makes to the movie.

    This is the West That Never Was beloved of peddlers of cliche and writers of cheap 1960's and 70's TV series, with the intendedly humourously amoral lead duo pursued about a pretty landscape by the gang that couldn't shoot straight and sundry other less than menacing foes.

    Notable is the lack of 'name' supporting players any of whom might have upstaged Ms Hawn by showing comedic talent, rather than legs.

    Rating: A sonorous 3 out of 10
  • comment
    • Author: Wizer
    When I had a chance to watch this one, I already had a appreciation for Goldie Hawn. When I finished this film, all I could appreciate in it was Goldie.

    The comedy was strained at best, mostly terrible. The cast around Goldie is not much support. This film makes many of her other films look much better. I do not understand what about this script caused it to be made.

    Comedy Westerns had been a vehicle for many Hollywood stars and comedy teams since the 1940's. I understand for this reason why it was made. What I don't understand is why they waste Goldie Hawns Talent with a terrible script. Pee Wee's Playhouse has a better script than this.

    One thing though, Goldie was a much sexier woman when she was young than her daughter is now. The best scenes in this movie are the ones exploiting that charisma. The rest of it is a sleeper, literally.
  • comment
    • Author: Tat
    OK, so the movie stinks. But I too saw this as a young boy when it was new in the theatres and I have to admit the thing I remember was Goldie - truly lovely and sexy, and dressed up in all manner of provocative attire to entice the simple folk in the film. If you're a Goldie fan, and like me believe she's an inspiringly sexy creature, you'll want to at least survey this curio. Goldie in fishnets and skimpy dancehall costumes can't be ALL bad!
  • comment
    • Author: Modred
    A great western and comedy movie. This movie first seems like one of those old boring westerns but when you get into it I mean you get into it!! Goldie Hawn is great in a role she normally wouldn't play. I suggest you rent this movie and try to watch it all the way through.
  • comment
    • Author: Agagamand
    Released in 1976 and directed by Melvin Frank, "The Duchess and the Dirtwater Fox" is a Western/Comedy starring Goldie Hawn (the Duchess) and George Segal (the Dirtwater Fox). The former is actually a saloon entertainer/prostitute who desperately wants to move on to better things and masquerades as a Duchess to do so while the latter is a scammer-gambler desperately trying to steal & retain $40,000. The two reluctantly team-up while being chased by various people, including outlaws, police and a group of Mormons. Then, without warning, romantic sparks start to fly.

    A lot of people have mixed feelings about this flick, but I've always felt it was one of the better comedic Westerns. Goldie was 30 during filming and Segal was 41 and they both shine as the protagonists. Some critics complain that they're "lowlifes" and therefore it's hard to care about them, but it's clear that the "Duchess" is willing to risk it all to escape the life of a prostitute. As for the Fox, yes, he's a greedy gambler, but he has a likable charisma and an unshakable faith in overcoming no matter the odds. Hopefully, he'll repent of his swindling ways. While Goldie looks great, she's too thin in my opinion and would get more beautiful (and curvy) with age, as witnessed in 1987's "Overboard."

    Besides the two stars, highlights include the consistently amusing situations & witty dialogues (especially the great pig-Latin scene in the stagecoach), the awesome Colorado locations, an outstanding stagecoach wreck off a high cliff and Dirtwater's intelligent (and funny) horse, Blackjack, who's one of the better horse-characters in cinema.

    The film runs 103 minutes and was shot entirely in Colorado (the Central City region).

    GRADE: Borderline A- or B+
  • comment
    • Author: MrDog
    Just watched the movie on TV last night (8/21/06). I've seen better, I've seen worse but I did keep watching. I would like to find out the name of the song and where I can get it if possible of the tune that was played while Goldie and George were at the Jewish wedding. If anyone is out there that could help me with the song - that's really what I would like to have. As for purchasing the movie, I probably will not do that. The 10 line minimum is getting to me as I really don't have a whole lot more to say about the movie. I would really have liked to cut to the chase. The movie even on TV had language that wasn't necessary. I am still a fan of older movies. Also there were some funny scenes in the movie. It's nice to see a lot of the character actors as well.
  • comment
    • Author: Delalbine
    Goldie Hawn's recurring go-go dancer character on 'Rowan and Martin's Laugh-In' was quite possibly the reason for her casting as the Blueberry of Billingsgate in this bawdy Seventies flick. Goldie lets it all hang out here if you know what I mean, as long as you don't touch her plums. Her eventual partner in crime for this comedic Western is George Segal, putting the dirt in Dirtwater Fox as an all around con man and enterprising card shark. After helping the notorious Bloodworth gang hold up the town bank of Dirtwater, he helps himself to the loot in question, a forty thousand dollar stash that's at the center of this caper film.

    Blueberry makes the transition to the Duchess of Swansbury after grabbing a handful of Charlie Molloy's (Segal) loot, fitting herself out with a fashionable outfit from a showroom window. For 1882, sixty five dollars seemed like an awful lot of money for a dress suit, but then again it was imported, so who knows? For the record, she filled it out very well.

    The film careens it's way through assorted scenarios involving a lecherous Mormon family head and the Bloodworth's hot on the trail of their stolen money. The picture's funniest segment is probably the stagecoach conversation between Charlie and the Duchess done in a combination of pidgin English, French and German in a non-sensical jumble, which for all it's goofiness is easy enough to understand.

    The unheralded star of the picture of course is Charlie Molloy's horse Black Jack who for some reason didn't earn a cast credit for this picture, unlike his predecessors Trigger and Silver. B Western movie cowboy Allan 'Rocky' Lane also rode a horse in his pictures named Black Jack, and when his on screen career was over, Lane became the voice of TV's talking horse Mr. Ed. However Mr. Ed and Lane's Black Jack never had a lucky number '21' emblazoned on his rump like Charlie's horse did.
  • Cast overview, first billed only:
    George Segal George Segal - Charlie Malloy (Dirtwater Fox')
    Goldie Hawn Goldie Hawn - Amanda Quaid / Duchess Swansbury
    Conrad Janis Conrad Janis - Gladstone (Widdicombe's assistant)
    Thayer David Thayer David - Widdicombe (Mormon patriarch)
    Jennifer Lee Pryor Jennifer Lee Pryor - Trollop (as Jennifer Lee)
    Sid Gould Sid Gould - Rabbi
    Pat Ast Pat Ast - Music Hall Singer
    E.J. André E.J. André - Prospector (as E.J. Andre)
    Richard Farnsworth Richard Farnsworth - Stage Coach Driver (as Dick Farnsworth)
    Clifford Turknett Clifford Turknett - Mr. Weatherly (ticket agent)
    Harlan Knudson Harlan Knudson - Cooper
    Jean Favre Jean Favre - Drunk / Usher
    Bill McLaughlin Bill McLaughlin - Murdock
    Richard Jamison Richard Jamison - Waiter
    Barbara Ulrich Barbara Ulrich - Maisie
    All rights reserved © 2017-2024 hd.thomson-multimedia.com